Is Your Circumcision Making You Soft?

“Botle bo bokalo ba monna”

Since: Mar 10

Ha o cha o cheche

#41 May 8, 2012
Rapoliete wrote:
<quoted text>
Like wise I circumcised at 24. Initially I had a serious problem of pre-mature ejaculation (5-7 Minutes), leaving my partner very frustrated. After Circumcision I had stiffer rock hard erections, gained both girth size and length, and I could control my ejaculation very well, giving more satisfaction to my partner, who also liked the look of my penus better than when it was still hooded. Yes I could feel that most of the sensitivity was gone, and that is why I could now control my ejaculation better. I suggested cicrumcision to most people who had sex problems, and all of them are now very happy after circumcision. There are pros and cons for each situation, but health wise, hygienically, and performance wise, I would strongly advice Circumcision. But you are still fine when you are not un-cicumcized and you are happy.
You talk like circumcision is a trophy that you must market!
Let me warn you: people who are circumcised die like those who have not! The only good thing about circumcision is cleaneless and smelling better (not good) for lazy people!

“Botle bo bokalo ba monna”

Since: Mar 10

Ha o cha o cheche

#42 May 8, 2012
...otherwise ha ho na sekola bakeng sa lebollo.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#43 May 8, 2012
Chitja wa Botha Bothe wrote:
...otherwise ha ho na sekola bakeng sa lebollo.
True that ntate circumcision is the thing of the past ,ho setse rona mona Africa black community coz we dnt wanna learn ,we dnt want to read...

one of the comments somewhere in American article goes like...."that barbaric ,cruel and dirty practice of Africa and Middle East may as well end there"...i was so shocked and angry to see that these people still really think we stupid thats why they come here and tell you that it reduces the spread of HIV knowing tht HIV is a major problem here they knew we would follow and there we are following...If you have to use protection evry time u hv sex, of which should be the case ,y go on to cut ur healthy part of ur body in this claim>> mxm Lame ppl

“Botle bo bokalo ba monna”

Since: Mar 10

Ha o cha o cheche

#44 May 8, 2012
Doc Alli wrote:
<quoted text>
True that ntate circumcision is the thing of the past ,ho setse rona mona Africa black community coz we dnt wanna learn ,we dnt want to read...
one of the comments somewhere in American article goes like...."that barbaric ,cruel and dirty practice of Africa and Middle East may as well end there"...i was so shocked and angry to see that these people still really think we stupid thats why they come here and tell you that it reduces the spread of HIV knowing tht HIV is a major problem here they knew we would follow and there we are following...If you have to use protection evry time u hv sex, of which should be the case ,y go on to cut ur healthy part of ur body in this claim>> mxm Lame ppl
You are most welcome.

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#45 May 8, 2012
Liteboho wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure there is some one here who said is not circumcised and still lasts up to 45min if i code well and i know many many men that are also happy and lasts long in bed so that can not be used as a reason to cut ur part of the body especially while there is enough evidence that is harmful to do so, holding ur ejaculation is a technique that you need you motor functioning and well balanced coordination dude plz read
Do you not think that others like how a man's tool look after been cut like Rapoliete's? I mean that is what he said besides Duracel, Lol.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#46 May 8, 2012
Sash_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you not think that others like how a man's tool look after been cut like Rapoliete's? I mean that is what he said besides Duracel, Lol.
Sash how it looks? who cares how i want my thing looks? i should be the one who cares not others and if they do then it cant b the main factor to cut my body part.thts lame....we have so many omen who look so dfrnd down there and as men we still hv preferences but that can not go byond them hving to alter their part simply coz som1 das not like how is looks would you?
Rapoliete

Maseru, Lesotho

#47 May 8, 2012
Liteboho wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure there is some one here who said is not circumcised and still lasts up to 45min if i code well and i know many many men that are also happy and lasts long in bed so that can not be used as a reason to cut ur part of the body especially while there is enough evidence that is harmful to do so, holding ur ejaculation is a technique that you need you motor functioning and well balanced coordination dude plz read
Lets hear your own experience, not what others say or have read.
Rapoliete

Maseru, Lesotho

#48 May 8, 2012
Lets also consider what other experts in the field of Health have to say about circumcision based on results of scientific studies.
1. On HIV/AIDS www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/news68/en/index.h...

2. On Health and Safety. http://www.circinfo.com/benefits/bmc.html

3. On sexual satisfaction and performance. http://allafrica.com/stories/200907201626.htm...

4. On Religion, just read your Bible. Genesis 17: 10-13

There are multitude of studies done on the subject. The result for a vast majority are in favour of ciscumcision. I would like to repeat. IF YOU ARE HAPPY AS YOU ARE, THERE IS NO NEED FOR YOU TO CONSIDER CIRCUMCISION. If you would like to consider Circumcision, make sure you acquire knowledge before hand.
Rapoliete

Maseru, Lesotho

#49 May 8, 2012
Chitja wa Botha Bothe wrote:
<quoted text>
You talk like circumcision is a trophy that you must market!
Let me warn you: people who are circumcised die like those who have not! The only good thing about circumcision is cleaneless and smelling better (not good) for lazy people!
Oena ha nka kopana le oena, ke batla ho o isa lebollong la thabeng le hona. Just kidding, But in all honesty, I would advice circumcision for most males, from any stand point. All people die, but some die without enjoying life to the fullest though.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#50 May 9, 2012
Rapoliete wrote:
Lets also consider what other experts in the field of Health have to say about circumcision based on results of scientific studies.
1. On HIV/AIDS www.who.int/hiv/mediacentre/news68/en/index.h...
2. On Health and Safety. http://www.circinfo.com/benefits/bmc.html
3. On sexual satisfaction and performance. http://allafrica.com/stories/200907201626.htm...
4. On Religion, just read your Bible. Genesis 17: 10-13
There are multitude of studies done on the subject. The result for a vast majority are in favour of ciscumcision. I would like to repeat. IF YOU ARE HAPPY AS YOU ARE, THERE IS NO NEED FOR YOU TO CONSIDER CIRCUMCISION. If you would like to consider Circumcision, make sure you acquire knowledge before hand.
Pathetic , i have read most probable tens of articles and journals on the topic both supporting and agaisnt the idea and like i said talk to the sexologists then you will understand if your cut dude then your deprived and suppressed of what you could be naturally experiencing. Igrorance is good and its only good in situation like this cause you saying this simply cause your not knowledgeble enough
Rapoliete

Maseru, Lesotho

#51 May 10, 2012
Doc Alli wrote:
<quoted text>
Pathetic , i have read most probable tens of articles and journals on the topic both supporting and agaisnt the idea and like i said talk to the sexologists then you will understand if your cut dude then your deprived and suppressed of what you could be naturally experiencing. Igrorance is good and its only good in situation like this cause you saying this simply cause your not knowledgeble enough
Suit yourself. I have a broad knowledge of sex before and after circumcision. Not just me, almost all my friends too. You are correct on one thing. Ignorance is bliss. By the way I am in the medical and health field.

“Cogito ergo sum”

Since: Nov 10

Klerksdorp

#52 May 10, 2012
Tebza wrote:
<quoted text>
Talking of Randomised controlled Trials here are the facts:
.....Guys lets do the reading plz
Since you are so well read that you assume the reason others disagree with you is because they haven't read lets look at the evidence.
Tebza wrote:
<quoted text> (1) Bertran Auvet French circumcision proponent at Orange Farm RSA, Kenya ,North American Circumcision proponent Robert C.Bailey , and Uganda , North American Circumcision proponent Ronald H.Gray the three had been advocating circumcision since 2003, 1993 and 1998 respectively
All the three studies were terminated earlier than the scheduled time, "Mills and Siegfried point out that early termination of studies for unknown reasons cause the benefits to be exaggerated"
The studies were well into their 3rd quarter and whilst cutting them short can lead to such exaggeration it does not mean that there are no benefits. Statistically the chances of infection would be comparatively relatively the same despite the time factor even though they would increase over time . But then thats the case with all forms of protection against HIV infection over time or any other risky behaviour for that matter.
Tebza wrote:
<quoted text> Three RCTs studies were under the supervision of of the following
Dowsett and Couch in 2007 ,even after publication of RCT still found insufficient evidence to support a program of circumcision as claimed.
And yet the WHO and UNAIDS did, any particular reason we should prefer Dowsett over WHO/UNAIDS? What you conveniently ignore to mention here is that Dowsett et al didn't support the use of circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy but does NOT mean that they disagree with the fact that circumcision does provide some protection (granted they challenge the percentage), there's a difference between the two.
Tebza wrote:
<quoted text> There are many things i can code to you to show that study was not recognised as reasonable per say coz many other studies have been carried out b4 but failed to show that there is any benefit as far as HIV is concerned. so what do you say to the fact that the studies were carried out by people who have history of circumcision promoting???
There's also countless other earlier studies that have shown that circumcision does reduce the risk of infection so be clear on that, as for people who are pro circumcision that has no effect on the results unless you can actually show it.?

So out with those other things that you say you can quote, but let me advise you against the kind of irrelevant info like the 'history' of circumcision you provided in your post following the one quoted here. Bring relevant and factual information about the trials themselves, perhaps about sampling, methodology, analysis and interpretation, then we can get to the bottom of it good sir.
maca

Maseru, Lesotho

#53 May 10, 2012
hantle le bua kang

Since: Nov 08

any place on this planet

#54 May 10, 2012
Senior Lecturer wrote:
The truth is: If you have circumcised, you become really excellent! Ask any woman...
an honest answer may disappoint you.i would not ask any living woman that question.in fact, i have my own natural scaling which thruthfully determines how my sexual ryding is with a woman

“sethong le sethonyaneng”

Since: Feb 08

Thaba Tshwane

#55 May 11, 2012
I was circumcised at 23/4. they cut the covering skin but left the "foreskin" (mosele: the one on the underside and which connects the covering skin and the head). my own observation is in that way u get the benefits of circumcision and at the same time retain sensitivity. this compared to cutting the foreskin. i know for sure that both b4 and after my sensitivity does come from the under side. I, therefore, believe that had the foreskin been cut, sensitivity would definitely have been affected. I've since lasted longer (not that i was having rounds that lasted below average b4).
Rapoliete

Maseru, Lesotho

#56 May 11, 2012
Bitso-lebe wrote:
I was circumcised at 23/4. they cut the covering skin but left the "foreskin" (mosele: the one on the underside and which connects the covering skin and the head). my own observation is in that way u get the benefits of circumcision and at the same time retain sensitivity. this compared to cutting the foreskin. i know for sure that both b4 and after my sensitivity does come from the under side. I, therefore, believe that had the foreskin been cut, sensitivity would definitely have been affected. I've since lasted longer (not that i was having rounds that lasted below average b4).
I think this will be true for anybody who has experienced sex before and after circumcision. Of course the assumption here is that the operation was performed correctly by people who know what they are doing. For those who experienced problems after circumcision (there will be those who do of course), some would be due to factors unrelated to circumcision, as you will experience one problemor other when you grow up, circumcised or not. Or when you develop certain health problems.
Stayvysant

Europe

#57 May 11, 2012
lento wrote:
<quoted text>
well said:you wont know what you are missing if you never taste it, pleasure!!!maybe this way... if you are a a man enough , and you did your circumcission after you have taste the please of having all your nerves, please come out and tell us the difference!!!!
m 28 yrs old n m 3 yrs old circumcised n circumcision reduces sex pleasure alot 2 a man. S 4 a wife i dnt think der is a difference. Hopes dis clears d confusion!

“Botle bo bokalo ba monna”

Since: Mar 10

Ha o cha o cheche

#58 May 11, 2012
Rapoliete wrote:
<quoted text>
Oena ha nka kopana le oena, ke batla ho o isa lebollong la thabeng le hona. Just kidding, But in all honesty, I would advice circumcision for most males, from any stand point. All people die, but some die without enjoying life to the fullest though.
Ha kea bolotsoa sepetle, mohlankana. Ke tsoa mophatong le metebong, ka ba ka ba musuoe, ha morao! Joale kea phetha: lebollo le loketse batho ba botsoa ho tola kapa ho hlatsoa ditho tsa bona tsa botona!!! Otherwise it's not something you can market as a trophy like most people do.
Rapoliete

Maseru, Lesotho

#59 May 11, 2012
Chitja wa Botha Bothe wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha kea bolotsoa sepetle, mohlankana. Ke tsoa mophatong le metebong, ka ba ka ba musuoe, ha morao! Joale kea phetha: lebollo le loketse batho ba botsoa ho tola kapa ho hlatsoa ditho tsa bona tsa botona!!! Otherwise it's not something you can market as a trophy like most people do.
Litaba tsena kaofela ha o li tsebe ho hang, o ntse o utloa feela ha o bolelloa mafosisa, ebe ose o lumela ebile o sa batlisese. Ha o ne o li tseba o kabe o tseba hoo e leng 'nete, o sa bue taba tsena tse o senolang.

“Botle bo bokalo ba monna”

Since: Mar 10

Ha o cha o cheche

#60 May 11, 2012
Ke lebohela maikutlo a hao, and I think there is no need to continue with you. Thanx, anyway.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

More from around the web