you have obviously not even looked at the link i gave.<quoted text> 2% of the population of the US owns 90% of the land. They are called farmers. Does this mean that since the other 98 % do own effectively very little, they should be allowed to grab the land of the others? If only 2% of the population owns 90% of the land, therefore the country is largely empty of population and therefore can be colonized. Let us forget about the 10% land and the 98% of the population... that your zionist argument
The point i was trying to make it that the majority of the land legally belongs to Israel as a nation because it was owned by the Ottoman Empire which signed away its rights to the Mandate for Palestine. The Mandate clearly gives to the Jewish people to build a state on state owned land while protecting civil and religious rights of the local inhabitants.
According to your logic you would be against Palestinian Arabs grabbing the 70-80% of the land which they do not own because they own part of it.
in your comment the 10% can keep their land as it is theirs legally however if the 2% sign away their land to another entity ownership shifts to this new entity. That new entity is Israel.
You also seem to ignore the fact that Jews legally bought large parts of Palestine, Jordan and Syria sold to them by the Local Arabs.
Are you denying the right of the local Arabs to sell their own land??
thank you for telling me my arguement instead of asking me. Very good debaters. i am sure you learn a lot talking to yourself.