UN rights expert accuses Israel of 'ethnic cleansing' in treatment of Palestinians

Mar 21, 2014 Full story: Bellingham Herald 2,169

He spoke against a backdrop of deadlocked peace talks and accelerating Israeli settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem which Palestinians say is dimming their hope of establishing a viable state on contiguous territory.

Full Story
James

United States

#2089 Aug 28, 2014
Shows how ignorant you are.

Peace is temporary unless hamas demilitarizes or haven't you been listening all this time?

You're the imbecile and everyone knows it. Go back to Ferguson and take your racist bs with you.
Abdurratln wrote:
Interesting, ain't it? Israel finally agreed to a worthwhile ceasefire, one that promises to last for some time, and none of you well-informed imbeciles has seen fit to take notice. Maybe it is because it is clear victory for the people of Gaza. After loosing nearly 2,000 women and children, they are dancing in the streets. And HAMAS is already busy re-arming. Oh! But ain't nuttin big bad israel can do about it. They would have themselves a lot of time and hassle to simply admit the obvious: zionism is wrong and the rights of the Palestinians must be respected.
Just A Number

Dayton, OH

#2090 Aug 28, 2014
Zioni wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the American whose country supports and funds terrorists including Al-Qaida, Fatah, PLO. Whose country invades others at a whim and has massacred 10,000's of civilians.
Not all Americans support the President and his decisions. I however feel the Jewish People have been wronged and hated for basically no reason. The Jewish religion was first and Truthfully way before Islam and Christianity was the Jewish Religion. They descend from Isaac and his peoples inheritance is the land always has been. This conflict has start after the land was sold rightfully and the Palestinians are angry they lost the war and the land so instead of compromising death and stealing seems to be a better option then call the Jewish People horrible and not human because they defend the land that is theirs by birth right and by purchasing it.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#2091 Sep 3, 2014
James wrote:
Shows how ignorant you are.
Peace is temporary unless hamas demilitarizes or haven't you been listening all this time?
You're the imbecile and everyone knows it. Go back to Ferguson and take your racist bs with you.
<quoted text>
Yeah, Mr. Nitwit. AS long as Israel refuses to disarm, peace is temporary. James, How come you such a big ole dumb assss fool?

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#2092 Sep 3, 2014
Just A Number wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all Americans support the President and his decisions. I however feel the Jewish People have been wronged and hated for basically no reason. The Jewish religion was first and Truthfully way before Islam and Christianity was the Jewish Religion. They descend from Isaac and his peoples inheritance is the land always has been. This conflict has start after the land was sold rightfully and the Palestinians are angry they lost the war and the land so instead of compromising death and stealing seems to be a better option then call the Jewish People horrible and not human because they defend the land that is theirs by birth right and by purchasing it.
Judaism was the first? Well, another ignorant POS has spoken. If Judaism was first, what was Moses' religion? And there was Noah before Moses. What was Noah's religion? What was Adam and Eve's religion? It was w3as not Judaism. The biggest idiot on earth can see it was not Judaism.
Mandela

Perth, Australia

#2093 Sep 3, 2014
>
>
>
zionit squeals :
<quoted text>
Says the American whose country supports and funds terrorists including Al-Qaida, Fatah, PLO. Whose country invades others at a whim and has massacred 10,000's of civilians.

>
>
zionit is a terrorist ....make no mistake he is jus like ISIS creatures

Why ave yo not mentioned support for that greastest terrorist nation of all time zionist israel
>
zillions ave been sucked out o the pockets o american taxpayers by the zionist mafia
controlling the USZ administraion..........

Its not americans supporting terror .........Its the zionist mafia who have h-jacked it.......

now futt orff yo nasty peice o dung
>
>
James

La Habra, CA

#2094 Sep 3, 2014
That was spoken by a true terrorist lover living under the safety of freedom. Go IDF!
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, Mr. Nitwit. AS long as Israel refuses to disarm, peace is temporary. James, How come you such a big ole dumb assss fool?

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2095 Sep 4, 2014
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Judaism was the first? Well, another ignorant POS has spoken. If Judaism was first, what was Moses' religion? And there was Noah before Moses. What was Noah's religion? What was Adam and Eve's religion? It was w3as not Judaism. The biggest idiot on earth can see it was not Judaism.
Abraham was the first Jew. Noah, Adam and Eve were prior to Abraham. Moses was post Abraham and thus a Jew.

You qualify as the biggest idiot.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#2096 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Abraham was the first Jew. Noah, Adam and Eve were prior to Abraham. Moses was post Abraham and thus a Jew.
You qualify as the biggest idiot.
The tem Jew comes from a member of the house of Judah, the southern kingdom. Abraham and Moses were not Jewish, they were Hebrew but they practiced what would later become Judaism.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2097 Sep 4, 2014
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>The tem Jew comes from a member of the house of Judah, the southern kingdom. Abraham and Moses were not Jewish, they were Hebrew but they practiced what would later become Judaism.
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
Mandela

Perth, Australia

#2098 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
Bull Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

Hebrew woz a race

Jewish = judaism = religion - but now its been hijacked by zionist banksters

>
>

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2099 Sep 4, 2014
Mandela wrote:
<quoted text>
Bull Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
Hebrew woz a race
Jewish = judaism = religion - but now its been hijacked by zionist banksters
>
>
FYI...

Jewish is an ethnicity... Judaism a religion

You are a racist

Since: Aug 14

Richmond, VA

#2100 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
Where's credible source for that Brain Bubble

Just remember, today's modern day Jews in Israel have absolutely no genetic connection to the Ancient Hebrews who may have briefly occupied Canaan

“New Genome Study Destroys Zionist Claims to Palestine!“http://socioecohist ory.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/n ew-genome-study-destroys-zioni st-claims-to-palestine-koestle rs-khazar-history-vindicated-z ionists-design-myth-of-jewish- genome-to-usurp-palestine/
“ EXCERPT On December 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down.
-
But he went even further. The young Israeli-American geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.
-
How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong? Easy says Dr. Elhaik,“First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.” I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.
-
But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in the academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.
-
They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood.
-
They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.”CONTINUED

The politically motivated Zionist geneticist you cited refuses to show his work and has the unique caveat that his findings would be of a "......non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.”

“Did YU's Harry Ostrer Cook The Genetic Books To Support False Findings Of Ashkenazi Jews Origins?”
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messi...

EXCERPTS "Ostrer replied that the data are not publicly available.

“Criteria for reviewing include novelty and strength of the proposal, non-overlap with current or planned activities, and non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.” That last requirement, Elhaik argues, reveals the bias of Ostrer and his collaborators." CONTINUED
________

That was only ONE of the many times I've debunked your Hasbara nonsense

So, where's your credible source for: "Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage"

What about the millions of Jewish converts over the years.

You're saying that if an Eskimo converts to Judaism that means his ancestors are suddenly Hebrews.

Try again

Since: Aug 14

Richmond, VA

#2101 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
I think that with that Brain Bubble you'd be more careful who call an "Idiot"

Now would be a good time to use your Rule # 13

“Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2102 Sep 4, 2014
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's credible source for that Brain Bubble
Just remember, today's modern day Jews in Israel have absolutely no genetic connection to the Ancient Hebrews who may have briefly occupied Canaan
“New Genome Study Destroys Zionist Claims to Palestine!“http://socioecohist ory.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/n ew-genome-study-destroys-zioni st-claims-to-palestine-koestle rs-khazar-history-vindicated-z ionists-design-myth-of-jewish- genome-to-usurp-palestine/
“ EXCERPT On December 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down.
-
But he went even further. The young Israeli-American geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.
-
How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong? Easy says Dr. Elhaik,“First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.” I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.
-
But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in the academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.
-
They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood.
-
They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.”CONTINUED
The politically motivated Zionist geneticist you cited refuses to show his work and has the unique caveat that his findings would be of a "......non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.”
“Did YU's Harry Ostrer Cook The Genetic Books To Support False Findings Of Ashkenazi Jews Origins?”
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messi...
EXCERPTS "Ostrer replied that the data are not publicly available.
“Criteria for reviewing include novelty and strength of the proposal, non-overlap with current or planned activities, and non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.” That last requirement, Elhaik argues, reveals the bias of Ostrer and his collaborators." CONTINUED
________
That was only ONE of the many times I've debunked your Hasbara nonsense
So, where's your credible source for: "Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage"
What about the millions of Jewish converts over the years.
You're saying that if an Eskimo converts to Judaism that means his ancestors are suddenly Hebrews.
Try again
A post doctoral researcher with little credential is being laughed at by the scientific community

Got any more jokes?

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2103 Sep 4, 2014
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that with that Brain Bubble you'd be more careful who call an "Idiot"
Now would be a good time to use your Rule # 13
“Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.
Got anything of value to add?

DO you get paid by the word?

Since: Aug 14

Richmond, VA

#2104 Sep 4, 2014
Just A Number wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all Americans support the President and his decisions. I however feel the Jewish People have been wronged and hated for basically no reason.
EDITED FOR SPACE
.
Virtually all anti Jewish sentiment stems from the criminal atrocities of Israel's Genocidal Zionists

It is the Zionists that carry out Israel's "final Solution" called Plan Dalet"

“Israel’s “Plan Dalet”: The Green Light for Zionism’s Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine”

http://www.globalresearch.ca/israels-plan-dal...

EXCERPT “On that day in 1948, two months before Israel’s unilateral declaration of independence in defiance of the will of the organized international community as it then was at the UN, Zionism’s in-Palestine political and military leaders met in Tel Aviv to formally adopt PLAN DALET, the blueprint with operational military orders for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.”CONTINUED

It is the Zionist leaders & policy makers who support Israel's Genocidal massacres that incur hostility toward most all Jews:

"Our strategy was always to provoke the Arabs and get an appropriate response so we could attack and smash them".
[Israeli General Moshe Dayan; diaries]
http://www.trionfopublishing.com/news_page_49...

"(The Palestinians) would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed
against the boulders and walls." -- Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) Yitzhak
Shamir in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988

"We will carry out a greater holocaust against the Palestinians," Matan Vilnai, Deputy israeli Defense Minister
http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2010/...

“..... most Palestinians “were born to die—we just have to help them.”CONTINUED
Amiram Levin, former head of the Israeli army’s northern command :

"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as
slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General
Shlomo Lahat as mayor of Tel Aviv, 1983.

"What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on.[…] We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases." Maj. Gen. Gadi Eizenkot

 Re: Palestinian Mothers "They have to die and their houses should be demolished so that they cannot bear any more terrorists.”
Ayelet Shaked Israeli MK
http://www.albawaba.com/editorchoice/ayelet-s...

"We killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own..." —Ari Shavat. Reproduced in the New York Times, May 27th, 1999
________
And, Zionists do not hesitate to kill Jews when it serves their purpose:

“When a shipload of Jewish refugees on the Danube river were refused permission to disembark anywhere, Henry Montor the leader of the United Jewish Appeal explained that they could not be allowed to sail the Holy Land because “Palestine cannot be flooded with old people or with undesirables”.(Feb. 1, 1940).

“On Nov. 25, 1940 the Haganah commanders ordered the blowing up of the ship Patria in Haifa Harbor as a protest against England’s plan to send refugees to Mauritius instead of to Palestine, and thus 272 Jewish refugees perished.”

There are more ethical Jews, today, than ever who oppose Zionist Genocide:

“Jewish activists light children’s dolls on fire at Yad Vashem to protest Gaza attack”
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/07/activists-child...

“American Jews are giving up on Israel”
http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/american-jews-...

Thanks

Since: Aug 14

Richmond, VA

#2105 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
A post doctoral researcher with little credential is being laughed at by the scientific community
Got any more jokes?
Show some sources for your desperate & fraudulent claim

Since: Aug 14

Richmond, VA

#2106 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Got anything of value to add?
DO you get paid by the word?
1. Does debunking your Hasbara Drivel count

2. Honesty is its own reward

I see you decided to choose # 13 from your Hasbara playbook below rather than attempt an honest, On Topic response:

Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.

You of all Hasbarats shouldn't be calling others "Idiot"
James

Santa Ana, CA

#2107 Sep 4, 2014
Right out of the muslimrat playbook.
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Does debunking your Hasbara Drivel count
2. Honesty is its own reward
I see you decided to choose # 13 from your Hasbara playbook below rather than attempt an honest, On Topic response:
Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.
You of all Hasbarats shouldn't be calling others "Idiot"

Since: Aug 14

Chester, VA

#2108 Sep 4, 2014
James wrote:
Right out of the muslimrat playbook.
<quoted text>
Excellent # 5

5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.

That seems to be the only one you can accomplish without the help of a rational adult.

By all means, avoid a fair & open debate at any cost.

Now, dog paddle on back to the shallow end of the think tank & be quiet.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Israel Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Are Jews of Arab origins ? 15 min smith 21
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 27 min L Morales 71,264
Thousands march in Holocaust memorial (Apr '06) 49 min Grau 43
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr TRD 68,912
Hamas chief lauds Turkey as 'source of power' f... 2 hr Jello 1
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 5 hr scirocco 119,692
Liberals are tough on Israel and Christianity: ... 6 hr Faith-Healer 86
More from around the web