Iran revives tensions over Gulf oil chokepoint Strait of Hormuz as sanctions bite deeper

[Kenhunt]

harvey wrote:

<quoted text>
If you don't know that Israel has been Iran's enemy since the day the Mullahs took over back in '78, you're too dumb to DESERVE an answer. The nuclear development program has just given Israel something to really worry about, and escalate their surreptitious attacks on Iran.
You know nothing.

Again, you failed to provide any substantiation for your claim> I asked: "our non-response to a simple request says it all: "Please provide a credible reference wherein Israel threatened Iran prior to Iran's nuclear efforts."

You could not do it. You failed.

[harvey]

Kenhunt wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, you failed to provide any substantiation for your claim> I asked: "our non-response to a simple request says it all: "Please provide a credible reference wherein Israel threatened Iran prior to Iran's nuclear efforts."
You could not do it. You failed.

Again, I REFUSED to deal with your absurd demand for an answer to a question we all know is bogus. Don't pretend I CAN'T answer, that is dishonest. As was your question.

[harvey]

Kenhunt wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, you failed to provide any substantiation for your claim> I asked: "our non-response to a simple request says it all: "Please provide a credible reference wherein Israel threatened Iran prior to Iran's nuclear efforts."
You could not do it. You failed.

What's dishonest about your posts and demands is that you deliberately misrepresented my initial post concerning which you made your demand. I said this:

"I obviously never said that the U.S. "caused Libya or Syria," dumbass. But those regimes WERE changed, and the U.S helped, in Libya's case (who knows what we might be doing in Syria). It's actually ISRAEL which is more likely to try to change the Iranian regime, come to that. Point is, nukes help avoid that. No one is going to go after a nuclear power and risk an exchange.
'Israel was never a threat to Iran?' You're an idiot."

Now could YOU point out in there where I said that "Israel threatened Iran prior to Iran's nuclear efforts?" I said, as you can see, that the phrase "Israel was never a threat to Iran" was idiotic, and that is a true statement. From the moment Iran broke off relations with Israel in '79 and declared them the 'little Satan'(in contrast with the 'great Satan,' the U.S.), Israel and Iran were enemies, and Israel, massively armed by the U.S. and a nuclear power, was a threat to Iran.

This is why your post was dishonest and your question, stupid.

Here's hoping that you can read and comprehend, this time.

[Kenhunt]

harvey wrote:

<quoted text>
What's dishonest about your posts and demands is that you deliberately misrepresented my initial post concerning which you made your demand. I said this:
"I obviously never said that the U.S. "caused Libya or Syria," dumbass. But those regimes WERE changed, and the U.S helped, in Libya's case (who knows what we might be doing in Syria). It's actually ISRAEL which is more likely to try to change the Iranian regime, come to that. Point is, nukes help avoid that. No one is going to go after a nuclear power and risk an exchange.
'Israel was never a threat to Iran?' You're an idiot."
Now could YOU point out in there where I said that "Israel threatened Iran prior to Iran's nuclear efforts?" I said, as you can see, that the phrase "Israel was never a threat to Iran" was idiotic, and that is a true statement. From the moment Iran broke off relations with Israel in '79 and declared them the 'little Satan'(in contrast with the 'great Satan,' the U.S.), Israel and Iran were enemies, and Israel, massively armed by the U.S. and a nuclear power, was a threat to Iran.
This is why your post was dishonest and your question, stupid.
Here's hoping that you can read and comprehend, this time.

Your "'Israel was never a threat to Iran?" is clearly a rhetorical question. It infers that in fact Israel WAS a threat to Iran. I responded in effect saying, prove it. And you CANNOT. YOU FAILED.

[Kenhunt]

harvey wrote:

<quoted text>
I CAN'T answer.

No, you cannot.

[Harvey the TRAITOR]

Don't like the USA? Leave.

[harvey]

Kluehunt wrote:

<quoted text>
Your "'Israel was never a threat to Iran?" is clearly a rhetorical question. It infers that in fact Israel WAS a threat to Iran. I responded in effect saying, prove it. And you CANNOT. YOU FAILED.

LOL...lame answer. You have just admitted that you twisted a completely different question into an assertion which I never made.

Not to mention the fact that I already EXPLAINED that Israel was a threat to Iran the minute the Mullahs took over.

"Failed?" No, I think that was YOU.:)

[harvey]

Kluehunt wrote:

No, you cannot be as big of a drag queen as I can. NO one can.

And I'm not gonna try, big guy...LOL

[harvey]

the TRAITOR wrote:

I don't like the USA, so I plan to leave and enlist in Israel's army.

Get lost then. No one wants you here!

[KeepGitmoOpen]

Kenhunt wrote:

<quoted text>
No, you cannot.

What do you expect from Harvey the Hypo

[Kenhunt]

harvey wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL...lame answer. You have just admitted that you twisted a completely different question into an assertion which I never made.
Not to mention the fact that I already EXPLAINED that Israel was a threat to Iran the minute the Mullahs took over.
"Failed?" No, I think that was YOU.:)

People are laughing at you, dude. Nothing was twisted except you deny that your question inferred Israel had threatened Iran, which clearly was your intent. We are not the fools you think we are, and you are the fool we think you are...you just proved it again. Israel never threatened Iran before, nor did it when the Mullahs took over. The greatest threat to Iran ARE the Mullahs. YOU FAILED.

[Kenhunt]

Harvery, Here I give you this to help you out. YOU answer your own question:
"'Israel was never a threat to Iran?"

[Knave Dave]

While I wouldn't imply that Obama would ever get into a war to help himself politically, I think that war is likely looking more and more inevitable to Obama as Iran becomes more defiant, not less, in the face of oil sanctions.

"Israel certainly believes it is inevitable, and the gap between Israel and the Obama Administration seems to be narrowing. Soooo… once Obama no longer believes diplomacy is going to work and once the economy has turned solidly against him (as it is currently appearing it may), then Obama no longer has any political reasons to hold off on an Iran war until after the elections. War would steer the topic off of the economy, and will by that point seem inevitable due to Iran's total defiance of sanctions and of the U.N.'s nuclear treaty." ( http://thegreatrecession.info/blog/israel-ira... )

--Knave Dave