POLITICAL FAILURE is Destroying China Economy!

Posted in the China Forum

CHINA going BACKWARDS

Port Moody, Canada

#1 Oct 7, 2013
China bears have company now

Failure to liberalize will cause China's economy to stall

October 7, 2013 12:08 am

By Gregory Curtis
I've been negative about the prospects for China since at least 2000, when I first began writing about the country. For 12 of those years that was a very lonely position: People thought I was so far off the reservation they didn't even bother to straighten me out. After all, China's GDP had been growing at 10 percent per year for three decades and by 2007 it was growing at nearly 15 percent. What was I smoking?

But, actually, folks, we've seen this movie before. If you want to take an impoverished, almost medieval society and convert it into an industrial powerhouse, the road is well-traveled.

Remember that in 1916 Russia was mainly a collection of serfs dominated by all-powerful czars. Yet, by 1945 -- barely 30 years later -- the Soviet Union was the second most powerful country in the world and a far bigger threat to U.S. hegemony than China would ever become. Other poor societies followed similar paths: Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and so on.

But here's the rub: Moving from an industrial society to a modern, consumer-based, post-industrial society is a whole other enchilada. A fully developed modern economy, like those operating in the United States, Western Europe and Japan, is vastly too complex to be managed by a top-down, centralized system. The Soviet Union learned this to its sorrow, and China is now making the same mistake: By 2013, China's GDP growth had fallen by 50 percent, to just over 7 percent.

Developed societies are so complicated they can work only when capital allocation decisions are made not by government bureaucrats but -- on the fly -- by millions of consumers and the companies responding to them. Imagine a bunch of bureaucrats in Moscow (or Beijing) trying to decide how many silk scarves to manufacture in the latest hot color or how many flavors of toothpaste consumers will want this week.

In short, there are only two paths open to China. The first, and best, is to eliminate the power of the Communist Party, devolving decision-making to a system that is economically and politically pluralistic. This approach would jump-start GDP growth and open a path toward further economic and political development.

...
CHINA going BACKWARDS

Port Moody, Canada

#2 Oct 7, 2013
...
Of course, it also might result in the end of China as we know it. There are some regions of China where the majority ethnic Han are a minority, and others where the Han are not appreciated. There are separatist movements in Tibet and Xinjiang. If the power of the Central Committee and Red Army collapsed, China might unravel a la the former Soviet Union.

But the real problem with a move toward liberalism and pluralism is that it would end the gravy train long ridden by members of the Central Committee, their families and minions. Therefore, China is likely to follow the second path: toward ever greater centralized control by the party.

This path would be a disaster for the Chinese people, for the global economy and even (eventually) for the Communist Party, which would face almost continuous rebellion from an outraged populace.

Most China-watchers blithely conclude that China would follow the first path, toward liberalism. The newly installed Central Committee, headed by Xi Jinping, we've been told, would focus on free-market reforms necessary to keep the economy developing. It would crack down on corruption and expand participation in the political process. It would show much greater tolerance for dissent and free expression.

Unfortunately for these China-watchers, Mr. Xi has just distributed the already infamous Document No. 9 (first reported by The New York Times in August). This document states baldly that the liberal path would endanger Communist Party control of the country. Document No. 9 asserts that China is endangered by "seven subversive currents" abroad in the land.

What are these dreaded currents? They include universal values of human rights, media independence, civic participation, free markets, criticisms of the party, disclosures of party officials'(ill-gotten) assets, open discussion on the Internet and in print, and so on.

In other words, Mr. Xi is engineering a radical shift to the left, back toward total control of the economy and the people from Beijing. Mr. Xi and his cronies have blatantly chosen the path of repression. That path will continue to enrich them and will therefore likely remain in place at least for the 10-year term in office of the current leadership. The Central Committee obviously had in mind the fate of the USSR, and they concluded that the Soviet Union had been undermined in part by Western ideas of pluralism.

Now that Mr. Xi has embarked on this path, there is little doubt that Communist rule will continue indefinitely. But this will come at enormous cost, especially in terms of lost economic opportunity and ever-greater suppression. That's a terrible outcome for the Chinese people and it will be a big wet blanket thrown over the global economy.

It's a lot less lonely these days being a bear on China. Still, I wish I'd been wrong.

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/p...
CHINA going BACKWARDS

Surrey, Canada

#3 Oct 8, 2013
"In short, there are only two paths open to China. The first, and best, is to eliminate the power of the Communist Party, devolving decision-making to a system that is economically and politically pluralistic. This approach would jump-start GDP growth and open a path toward further economic and political development."

Can't argue with THAT!
Mad Nazi Mirotard

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

#4 Oct 8, 2013
What POLITICAL FAILURE. Unless Mirotard wanted USA style NAZI to rule China instead of the CCP which was in fact started by peasant, the people of the Jasmine Revolution back then.

Why promote Jasmine Revolution and destroy it after they became successful.

That is why Mirotard is SICK in the mind.
CHINA going BACKWARDS

Surrey, Canada

#5 Oct 8, 2013
I guess a DYING DICTATORSHIP, HATED by ITS OWN PEOPLE, falling to PIECES in FACTIONAL CHAOS and PURGES like the Chinese Communist Party dictatorshit is "political success" to you?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
CHINA going BACKWARDS

Surrey, Canada

#6 Oct 8, 2013
"Unfortunately for these China-watchers, Mr. Xi has just distributed the already infamous Document No. 9 (first reported by The New York Times in August). This document states baldly that the liberal path would endanger Communist Party control of the country. Document No. 9 asserts that China is endangered by "seven subversive currents" abroad in the land.

What are these dreaded currents? They include universal values of human rights, media independence, civic participation, free markets, criticisms of the party, disclosures of party officials'(ill-gotten) assets, open discussion on the Internet and in print, and so on.

In other words, Mr. Xi is engineering a radical shift to the left, back toward total control of the economy and the people from Beijing. Mr. Xi and his cronies have blatantly chosen the path of repression. "

Yep.
FREE CHINA FREE TIBET

Port Moody, Canada

#7 Oct 9, 2013
Mad Nazi Mirotard wrote:
What POLITICAL FAILURE. Unless Mirotard wanted USA style NAZI to rule China instead of the CCP which was in fact started by peasant, the people of the Jasmine Revolution back then.
Why promote Jasmine Revolution and destroy it after they became successful.
That is why Mirotard is SICK in the mind.
I guess a DYING DICTATORSHIP, HATED by ITS OWN PEOPLE, falling to PIECES in FACTIONAL CHAOS and PURGES like the Chinese Communist Party dictatorshit is "political success" to you?

And you must PRETEND that JOSEPH STALIN, and VLADIMIR LENIN, the FATHERS of the Chinese Communist Party were "peasants"? Read some history instead of stupid CCP propaganda for a change! LENIN a "peasant"!!!! HAH!

Or are you HIDING because I have once again exposed you as a liar?

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
New Tibet form in Texas

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

#8 Oct 9, 2013
Stupid Mirotard
FREE CHINA FREE TIBET

Surrey, Canada

#9 Oct 10, 2013
Impotent Red Guard LOSER.

ha ha
It is so Amazing

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

#10 Oct 10, 2013
FREE CHINA FREE TIBET wrote:
Impotent Red Guard LOSER.
ha ha
DALAI LAMA is FREE to set up his new Shangri La in USA but will American folks accepted TIBET USA.

FREE to try!

Red Guards will reappeared but only in USA. In China that is a part of Mao's history.
OCCUPY TIANNANMEN

Port Moody, Canada

#11 Oct 11, 2013
ASHAMED of dictator Xi Jinping's VOW to "return to Maoist Indoctrination" of the Chinese people, huh?

You SHOULD be.

But how long can LIES hide the TRUTH from the Chinese people?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

China Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why does China hate girls? 5 hr epep 7
Chinaskyline pushing 3000ports direct routes,pi... 5 hr chinaskylinerebeca 1
IQ And Race; Chinese Brains Are Bigger (Jan '12) 7 hr epep 84
Nanking Massacre is fake (Apr '08) 12 hr McGold 259
US plans to subjugate Russia, China 14 hr who cares you do lol 7
Umbrella Revolution - Hunger Strike Joshua Wong... 15 hr Huang 4
Why Are Chinamen So Stupid? (Jun '10) 16 hr Great Happy Ape 229
More from around the web