i hate han chinese from mainland china

i hate han chinese from mainland china

Posted in the China Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Kuomintang nationalist

Melbourne, Australia

#1 Aug 28, 2014
Han Chinese are parasites locusts lowlife slave minded creatures need a pest control. I hate greedy selfish ignorant stupid useless disgusting despicable hideous inferior Han Chinese. P.S Han Chinese are all inbred rude mean annoying racist insular xenophobes corrupt people also Han Chinese are dumb stupid retards chinks too.
lee

Hawthorn, Australia

#2 Aug 29, 2014
Kuomintang nationalist wrote:
Han Chinese are parasites locusts lowlife slave minded creatures need a pest control. I hate greedy selfish ignorant stupid useless disgusting despicable hideous inferior Han Chinese. P.S Han Chinese are all inbred rude mean annoying racist insular xenophobes corrupt people also Han Chinese are dumb stupid retards chinks too.
I agree with your point but In today's Chinese society,the men are thieves,the women are wh*res,
the old are hooligans,the young are b*stards.
Winnie Wu

Hawthorn, Australia

#3 Aug 29, 2014
China is the worlds number one country for one night stands and extra marital affairs.

Since: Aug 14

Location hidden

#4 Aug 30, 2014
If Any of the posters above are Ethnic Chinese, they should take their own lives to cleanse their moral shame, dishonor, and crime against the Chinese Nation.
New China

Nanjing, China

#5 Aug 31, 2014
lee wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with your point but In today's Chinese society,the men are thieves,the women are wh*res,
the old are hooligans,the young are b*stards.
Don't offend too many, you are moron,
Ditto

Scarborough, Canada

#6 Sep 5, 2014
China is a fraud. There is no China and no Chinese civilization. But there definitely is a lot of CHINESE UNCIVILIZATION.

As a Professor of Chinese History, let me explain. China has no moral claim to Tibet or Xinjiang. They were never part of China except under Mongol barbarians, cousins of the Han rulers of China today. This was just a very greedy and opportunistic land grab when the world was too busy with other conflicts. Period. Case closed.

The Han Chinese, who make up 98% of the Chinese, are actually not Chinese but Barbarians who lived north of China for tens of thousands of years. They were completely barbaric, living by theft, violence, murder, butchery in short complete lawlessness. They had no moral code and were the ancestors of Genghis Khan who committed genocide against all the civilized countries he conquered. China, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Russia, Poland and many others who have ceased to exist as a people. This is NOT an exaggeration but simple historical fact. Among them, butchery and theft are qualities in men their women admire greatly and swoon over.

These Han people had no cities, food cultivation, religion, writing, metal - in short a very very primitive people. For long they were extremely and violently jealous of the civilized people to their south mainly the Chinese and Iranians. Very numerous in number, they gradually infiltrated China about 2000 years ago and finally completely over-ran it about 400 years ago. So the Chinese people have over the past 2000 years gradually ceased to exist as a people and are basically all just Han Barbarians. So the next time you meet a so-called "Chinese" person and wonder why he is so violently jealous of someone who is civilized, intelligent, cultured and beautiful you will understand it is because he is actually just a primitive Han barbarian pretending to be a civilized Chinese who he gradually exterminated a long time ago.
McQuan

UK

#7 Sep 6, 2014
Ditto wrote:
China is a fraud. There is no China and no Chinese civilization. But there definitely is a lot of CHINESE UNCIVILIZATION.
As a Professor of Chinese History, let me explain. China has no moral claim to Tibet or Xinjiang. They were never part of China except under Mongol barbarians, cousins of the Han rulers of China today. This was just a very greedy and opportunistic land grab when the world was too busy with other conflicts. Period. Case closed.
The Han Chinese, who make up 98% of the Chinese, are actually not Chinese but Barbarians who lived north of China for tens of thousands of years. They were completely barbaric, living by theft, violence, murder, butchery in short complete lawlessness. They had no moral code and were the ancestors of Genghis Khan who committed genocide against all the civilized countries he conquered. China, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Russia, Poland and many others who have ceased to exist as a people. This is NOT an exaggeration but simple historical fact. Among them, butchery and theft are qualities in men their women admire greatly and swoon over.
These Han people had no cities, food cultivation, religion, writing, metal - in short a very very primitive people. For long they were extremely and violently jealous of the civilized people to their south mainly the Chinese and Iranians. Very numerous in number, they gradually infiltrated China about 2000 years ago and finally completely over-ran it about 400 years ago. So the Chinese people have over the past 2000 years gradually ceased to exist as a people and are basically all just Han Barbarians. So the next time you meet a so-called "Chinese" person and wonder why he is so violently jealous of someone who is civilized, intelligent, cultured and beautiful you will understand it is because he is actually just a primitive Han barbarian pretending to be a civilized Chinese who he gradually exterminated a long time ago.
Pile of shit from a fake professor.
hate Chinese and Asians

Melbourne, Australia

#8 Sep 6, 2014
Chinese "Chinks" are all f*cking ugly looking aliens creatures from unknown planet. they are very rude shifty deceitful hateful liars. these lowlife life hideous inferior disgusting despicable Chinese "Chinks" are insular greedy useless bloody damn filthy beasts. WATCH OUT FOR CHINESE AND ASIANS THREAT TO HUMANITY PERIOD!
why so sad be happy

Winnipeg, Canada

#9 Sep 6, 2014
look at how stupid these white English named dummies are if they don't know han Chinese is 95% of the people and 100& of Taiwan and all Chinese peoples.....dumb Americans and dumb white - English named peoples.....
McGold

Montréal, Canada

#10 Sep 6, 2014
Ditto wrote:
China is a fraud. There is no China and no Chinese civilization. But there definitely is a lot of CHINESE UNCIVILIZATION.
As a Professor of Chinese History, let me explain. China has no moral claim to Tibet or Xinjiang. They were never part of China except under Mongol barbarians, cousins of the Han rulers of China today. This was just a very greedy and opportunistic land grab when the world was too busy with other conflicts. Period. Case closed.
The Han Chinese, who make up 98% of the Chinese, are actually not Chinese but Barbarians who lived north of China for tens of thousands of years. They were completely barbaric, living by theft, violence, murder, butchery in short complete lawlessness. They had no moral code and were the ancestors of Genghis Khan who committed genocide against all the civilized countries he conquered. China, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Russia, Poland and many others who have ceased to exist as a people. This is NOT an exaggeration but simple historical fact. Among them, butchery and theft are qualities in men their women admire greatly and swoon over.
These Han people had no cities, food cultivation, religion, writing, metal - in short a very very primitive people. For long they were extremely and violently jealous of the civilized people to their south mainly the Chinese and Iranians. Very numerous in number, they gradually infiltrated China about 2000 years ago and finally completely over-ran it about 400 years ago. So the Chinese people have over the past 2000 years gradually ceased to exist as a people and are basically all just Han Barbarians. So the next time you meet a so-called "Chinese" person and wonder why he is so violently jealous of someone who is civilized, intelligent, cultured and beautiful you will understand it is because he is actually just a primitive Han barbarian pretending to be a civilized Chinese who he gradually exterminated a long time ago.
Interessting piece of thought. For your information, and since you are a professor in Chinese studies, Professor Jin Li has proven that the Chinese and himself have African DNA.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/china/TQR5CN...
Ditto

Toronto, Canada

#11 Sep 6, 2014
McGold wrote:
<quoted text>
Interessting piece of thought. For your information, and since you are a professor in Chinese studies, Professor Jin Li has proven that the Chinese and himself have African DNA.
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/china/TQR5CN...
The ORIGINAL Chinese are of African descent. They are the ones who created the various dynasties of their civilization. The Han however completely overwhelmed, dispossessed and subjugated this original group. They are now in Southern China, many in very remote parts treated worse than second class citizens. The Vietnamese are part of this group. They have virtually no power in the country, which is the standard way Han people treat conquered subjects.

I dont trust the work of a man like Proferssor LI. He started out with the firm belief that the Chinese are a superior people not descended from Africans. This is the view most Chinese, especially in government and university, have of themselves. No literate man can hold these views and command respect. If he did the tests, he will find most Chinese have many genes, and minds too, that are similar to that of Genghis Khan.
McQuan

UK

#12 Sep 7, 2014
Ditto wrote:
<quoted text>
The ORIGINAL Chinese are of African descent. They are the ones who created the various dynasties of their civilization. The Han however completely overwhelmed, dispossessed and subjugated this original group. They are now in Southern China, many in very remote parts treated worse than second class citizens. The Vietnamese are part of this group. They have virtually no power in the country, which is the standard way Han people treat conquered subjects.
I dont trust the work of a man like Proferssor LI. He started out with the firm belief that the Chinese are a superior people not descended from Africans. This is the view most Chinese, especially in government and university, have of themselves. No literate man can hold these views and command respect. If he did the tests, he will find most Chinese have many genes, and minds too, that are similar to that of Genghis Khan.
Vietnamese Bach Viet or baiyue from Africa?
McQuan

UK

#13 Sep 7, 2014
Ditto wrote:
<quoted text>
The ORIGINAL Chinese are of African descent. They are the ones who created the various dynasties of their civilization. The Han however completely overwhelmed, dispossessed and subjugated this original group. They are now in Southern China, many in very remote parts treated worse than second class citizens. The Vietnamese are part of this group. They have virtually no power in the country, which is the standard way Han people treat conquered subjects.
I dont trust the work of a man like Proferssor LI. He started out with the firm belief that the Chinese are a superior people not descended from Africans. This is the view most Chinese, especially in government and university, have of themselves. No literate man can hold these views and command respect. If he did the tests, he will find most Chinese have many genes, and minds too, that are similar to that of Genghis Khan.
So Xiongnu, Ainu, Mongol, ugyhurs, Tibetan, miao etc are all Han Chinese?

Nice work, professor.
Ghengis Khan

Rotorua, New Zealand

#14 Sep 7, 2014
Ditto wrote:
<quoted text>
The ORIGINAL Chinese are of African descent. They are the ones who created the various dynasties of their civilization. The Han however completely overwhelmed, dispossessed and subjugated this original group. They are now in Southern China, many in very remote parts treated worse than second class citizens. The Vietnamese are part of this group. They have virtually no power in the country, which is the standard way Han people treat conquered subjects.
I dont trust the work of a man like Proferssor LI. He started out with the firm belief that the Chinese are a superior people not descended from Africans. This is the view most Chinese, especially in government and university, have of themselves. No literate man can hold these views and command respect. If he did the tests, he will find most Chinese have many genes, and minds too, that are similar to that of Genghis Khan.
A very Intuitive, thoughtful and informative piece. Keep up the good work
Taiwanese

Sydney, Australia

#15 Sep 7, 2014
Ghengis Khan wrote:
<quoted text>
A very Intuitive, thoughtful and informative piece. Keep up the good work
ni ma de ri ben gui zi Ghengis Khan, little japanese devil from NZ. Still selling radioactive sushi to poison the local kiwis? and spying on NZ for devilish Abe and his team of devil worshippers?

ni ma de ri ben gui zi Ghengis Khan. Sick man of Asia.
McQuan

UK

#16 Sep 7, 2014
Taiwanese? Lee teng hui is original Chinese from Africa? President Ma is a Mongol?
McQuan

London, UK

#17 Sep 7, 2014
Holy shit, professor Ditto said Vietnamese is from Africa....very intuitive, very thoughtful and interesting. A nice little insight for McGold.
McGold

Montréal, Canada

#18 Sep 7, 2014
Ditto wrote:
<quoted text>
The ORIGINAL Chinese are of African descent. They are the ones who created the various dynasties of their civilization. The Han however completely overwhelmed, dispossessed and subjugated this original group. They are now in Southern China, many in very remote parts treated worse than second class citizens. The Vietnamese are part of this group. They have virtually no power in the country, which is the standard way Han people treat conquered subjects.
I dont trust the work of a man like Proferssor LI. He started out with the firm belief that the Chinese are a superior people not descended from Africans. This is the view most Chinese, especially in government and university, have of themselves. No literate man can hold these views and command respect. If he did the tests, he will find most Chinese have many genes, and minds too, that are similar to that of Genghis Khan.
Hmm.. so according to Professor Ditto, the original Chinese are of African descent and they got disposessed and overwhelmed by the Han in their own land. Then who is the Han? Are they Koreans?(Han movies = Korean movies)
McQuan

London, UK

#19 Sep 7, 2014
McGold wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm.. so according to Professor Ditto, the original Chinese are of African descent and they got disposessed and overwhelmed by the Han in their own land. Then who is the Han? Are they Koreans?(Han movies = Korean movies)
Professor Ditto said the original Chinese are Vietnamese....and they are African !!!! Wahahahaha
Ditto

Toronto, Canada

#20 Sep 7, 2014
McQuan wrote:
<quoted text>
So Xiongnu, Ainu, Mongol, ugyhurs, Tibetan, miao etc are all Han Chinese?
Nice work, professor.
You should call yourself McHan, which means "Son of Han". You are very very confused.
The Ainu are not related to the other groups you named above. The Ainu are part of a much larger group who were the original inhabitants of most of Asia, especially the northern part. The barbarian group, who are the Han, Xiong Nu - which means "rider barbarian", Mongol, Korean lived in a very small part in the extreme northeast of Asia.
This barbarian group, ancestors of modern day Han Chinese, expanded over many thousands of years from this very small base in the northeast. They virtually exterminated the entire Ainu group and stole their land. This is a very important development and remains the core of the barbarian Han group's character and behaviour to this day which is this:
ENCROACH ON OTHER PEOPLE'S SPACE PROPERTY POSSESSIONS AND CULTURE. THREATEN INTIMIDATE AND TERRORIZE AND EXTERMINATE THEM IN ORDER TO STEAL WHAT YOU WANT. CONSOLIDATE YOUR NEWLY STOLEN LOOT AND EXPAND FURTHER TO STEAL MORE. CONFRONT INTIMIDATE THREATEN ATTACK BUTCHER TERRORIZE AND GRAB MORE AND MORE WITHOUT LIMIT OR MORAL RESTRAINT. VOILA, YOU HAVE CHINA AND THE CHINESE TODAY WHO HAVE BECOME PURE HAN.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

China Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Tense China-Japan relations overshadow the case... 56 min Yakult 273
News Germany's Merkel signals Japan could do more to... 7 hr Switches 382
News China's Great Wall 'is disappearing' 12 hr PAUL SHYKORA arts 2
Poll China + Pakistan vs. India + Russia, who WINS? (May '13) 13 hr Raj Chanani 881
India outpastes China becomes the fastest growi... 14 hr Raj Chanani 17
how would you destroy china? :d (Jul '12) 14 hr Raj 1,688
India to outpace China to be No.1 economy by 20... (Mar '12) 14 hr Human 131
More from around the web