Racism And Poverty Go Hand In Hand

Racism And Poverty Go Hand In Hand

Posted in the China Forum

HOW TRUE

Brooklyn, NY

#1 Jun 22, 2012
NEW YORK
The wealth gap between whites on one hand and blacks and Hispanics on the other stretched during the Great Recession to its widest level in a quarter-century, according to a new analysis of Census data. All racial groups saw their net worth shrink during the downturn, but that of whites shriveled much less, with the result that their median net worth is now about 20 times that of blacks and 18 times that of Hispanics.

Related stories

Recovering US job market is leaving black men behind
Ben Bernanke: High unemployment rate to persist, even as economy revives [VIDEO]
The no-jobs economy: Why isn't the US recovery stronger?
Ads by Google
U.S. Census Records
Search the U.S. census collection
1790-1930. Find millions of names.
Ancestry.com/Census
The recession, which included a collapse in home values and high unemployment, took the greatest toll on minority wealth. From 2005 to 2009, median wealth fell by 66 percent among Hispanic households and 53 percent among blacks, compared with 16 percent among whites. The losses left Hispanic and black wealth at their lowest levels in at least 25 years.

“It’s not so much that the wealthy were busy getting richer – it’s that they slipped back less than those at the other end of the ladder,” says Rakesh Kochhar, a demographer and co-author of the analysis released Tuesday by the Pew Research Center.

US job market: Four ways to cut the unemployment rate

In 2009, the median net worth of white households was $113,149, compared with $6,325 for Hispanics and $5,677 for blacks. That gap is about twice as large as the 1 to 10 white-to-minority wealth ratio that prevailed during the two decades before the recession.

The housing crash that began in 2006 reduced home values for most American homeowners, but it hit minority families particularly hard because more of their wealth is tied to their homes.

“For nonwealthy people in the US, the huge preponderance of the wealth they have is in home equity,” says Thomas Shapiro, a law and social policy professor who directs the Institute on Assets and Social Policy at Brandeis University in Waltham, Mass.

Among Hispanics, about two-thirds of their household wealth in 2005 derived from their homes. When the housing bubble burst, their median level of home equity declined by about half – from $99,983 to $49,145 – taking much of their wealth with it. Home equity for blacks – which accounted for about 59 percent of their household net worth in 2005 – fell by 23 percent, from $76,910 then to $59,000 in 2009.
The Prophet

Beijing, China

#2 Jun 22, 2012
This has nothing to do with race.

It has everything to do with families that took home equity loans worth far more than the home was worth. In the late 90s, you could get a 250,000 dollar long on a government build house that was worth 50,000. THAT's what collapsed the housing market.

It is that minority families are far more tied in with socialism and government hand out programs than are white families on average. Minorities tend to live on credit (which represents debt, not real value assets) and government social programs.

Socialism and the credit industry is what is keeping minorities down. Not racism.
RayH

Shenzhen, China

#3 Jun 22, 2012
The Prophet wrote:
This has nothing to do with race.
It has everything to do with families that took home equity loans worth far more than the home was worth. In the late 90s, you could get a 250,000 dollar long on a government build house that was worth 50,000. THAT's what collapsed the housing market.
It is that minority families are far more tied in with socialism and government hand out programs than are white families on average. Minorities tend to live on credit (which represents debt, not real value assets) and government social programs.
Socialism and the credit industry is what is keeping minorities down. Not racism.
The new slavery and feudalism (share cropping).
Ling Ling Qi

Beijing, China

#4 Jun 22, 2012
RayH wrote:
<quoted text>
The new slavery and feudalism (share cropping).
Yeah. In China they call it socialism.

In the United States the call it ...

socialism.
RayH

Guangzhou, China

#5 Jun 22, 2012
Ling Ling Qi wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah. In China they call it socialism.
In the United States the call it ...
socialism.
China's Capitalist. U.S. is Socialist. That's explains the economic trends.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

China Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Film screening highlights Taiwanese struggle fo... 1 hr TW_sugar_daddio 3
Poll Why Are Chinamen So Stupid? (Jun '10) Jun 26 China Sucks 238
Chinese people's eyes Jun 26 Zeta Reticuli 6
how would you destroy china? :d (Jul '12) Jun 26 Baba Vanga 1,704
News Chinese Film Week aims to boost cultural links,... Jun 25 Janusz Bugajski 1
White Male Privilege Jun 24 Kenneth 2
I want to say I hate the Korean,very very much! (Jan '13) Jun 22 A Fellow Korean S... 39
More from around the web