Local: China  (change)

 | 

Join the Topix community today: 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment
China

Amid disaster, China races onward

As strange as it sounds, the streets of Chengdu are normal today. This city barely 40 miles from devastated schools and apartments and hospitals is operating virtually as it was before the earthquake struck ...

Read All 6 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6
Ed Green
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
May 16, 2008
 
Very 'communicative'. Varied in terms of viewpoint.
BobL
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
May 17, 2008
 
The writer seems surprised that life continued on outside the earthquake zone. Should China be any different than any other country? Did Chicago shut down when Katrina hit New Orleans? Did New York shut down when the earthquake hit San Francisco? If you aren't personally affected or you're not part of the rescue efforts, your life must go on, in order to work, eat, etc.
gilmore
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 17, 2008
 
Its a true tragedy and the Chinese will no doubt recover well as they have the advantage of capatalistic monetary policies that are dictated by a totalitarian political system. As such, funds can be shifted to rebuilding the areas hit by the earthquake by the politburo without concern for other needs that they may face (i.e., they're not paying billions of dollars rebuilding another society and fighting ragtag militant extremists).
Professer
AOL
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 18, 2008
 
The truth is that China is not the socialist market economy the party describes, nor moving towards capitalism as the western consensus believes. Rather it is frozen in a structure that I describe as Leninist corporatism - and which is unstable, monumentally inefficient, dependent upon the expropriation of peasant savings on a grand scale, colossally unequal and ultimately unsustainable. It is Leninist in that the party still follows Lenin's dictum of being the vanguard, monopoly political driver and controller of the economy and society. And it is corporatist because the framework for all economic activity in China is one of central management and coordination from which no economic actor, however humble, can opt out.
Joined: Apr 27, 2008
Comments: 35
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
May 18, 2008
 
BobL wrote:
The writer seems surprised that life continued on outside the earthquake zone. Should China be any different than any other country? Did Chicago shut down when Katrina hit New Orleans? Did New York shut down when the earthquake hit San Francisco? If you aren't personally affected or you're not part of the rescue efforts, your life must go on, in order to work, eat, etc.
so good feeling to see such reasonable and friendly posts.

I am frustrated to see there is always such people want to mislead the media, hurt the human friendship between different peoples, different nations.
LOL
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 18, 2008
 
Professer wrote:
The truth is that China is not the socialist market economy the party describes, nor moving towards capitalism as the western consensus believes. Rather it is frozen in a structure that I describe as Leninist corporatism - and which is unstable, monumentally inefficient, dependent upon the expropriation of peasant savings on a grand scale, colossally unequal and ultimately unsustainable. It is Leninist in that the party still follows Lenin's dictum of being the vanguard, monopoly political driver and controller of the economy and society. And it is corporatist because the framework for all economic activity in China is one of central management and coordination from which no economic actor, however humble, can opt out.
I don't know that much about economic theory or what you are claiming is true or not, all I can see and hear are the story from everyday life in China. When i left China, there weren't a single western style supermarket in my home tow, now virtually all of the major markets are. Now, majority of the peasants have access to basic necessity (water, electricity, road access, education, hospitals), have you ever lived in a place without those? So exploitation of peasants or not, the living standard have improved in reality and that is more important than any theory might suggest.
Showing posts 1 - 6 of 6
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent China Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Tibet is not part of China... 3 min Avenger 440
Chinese 'may have killed 140 Tibetans' 5 min Avenger 149
Gold (?) Congratulations China Olympics. 10 min Avenger 121
US-China War 15 min Avenger 115
China's economy will collapse without the US 27 min Avenger 62
(HRW) As Paralympics Launch, Disabled Face Disc... 56 min anon 1
Death Toll 8,500 So Far in China Earthquake 1 hr dissident77 359
Related Topix Forums: World News, Asia, Sichuan, China, Chengdu, China