Indians are dark Europeans. All Aryans.

[The sIndians Busters]

sid wrote:

<quoted text>
I was unaware that indian homo erectus had been included in the homo sapien race.

No you are not, get back into your cage, dalit POONSINGHJABi wobble head BABOON.

[Blair]

Go and poo on the street again shit bag

[voices of reason]

Its true

Indians are closer to being Whites than Italians and Greeks who are mixed with Arab or something else

Think off Indians as tanned white people, as our body shape and size is exactly as a 'white' person

Im tired of junk science always trying to seperate Indians from their caucasian reality

[Elias]

voices of reason wrote:

Its true
Indians are closer to being Whites than Italians and Greeks who are mixed with Arab or something else

Any Italian reading that would be raising an eyebrow...

[The sIndians Busters]

voices of reason wrote:

Its true
Indians are closer to being Whites than Italians and Greeks who are mixed with Arab or something else
Think off Indians as tanned white people, as our body shape and size is exactly as a 'white' person
Im tired of junk science always trying to seperate Indians from their caucasian reality

Ade take Blair Romania's advice :- Go and poo on the street again shit bag

[Blair]

Elias wrote:

<quoted text>
Any Italian reading that would be raising an eyebrow...

Let the Italian go back to work posing for portraits to put on pizza boxes

[voices of reason]

Blair wrote:

<quoted text>
Let the Italian go back to work posing for portraits to put on pizza boxes

or squashing tomatoes to make some stale pasta sauce

or stomping on grapes to make yuck wine

or watching re-runs of the Godfather

and whatever else italians do, cos I know theyre not hard working !

[Turd Skin]

I just shat out an Indian

[Turd Skin]

Indians ao ugly and stinky that I would not be able to tell an Indian from dog poo unless I hear the currymuncher cockroach scream.

[Another Dave]

ClogWog wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually you are wrong. Just because one nationality shares some common linguistics with another does not mean they share genetic similarities. Or to put in another way, language does not define the actual genes of a given nationality.
The english, scots, and welsh have been kidding themselves for the past century into thinking they are nordic when they are not. DNA studies have long proved otherwise. They have some amount of nordic genes, but roughly as much as all other europeans, but less than other northern europeans.

Changed your story as well as your proxy again Wog. All your previous comments were about Anglos alone, now you attempt to include Welsh & Scots to cover your ignorance. Maybe you should have read the Wellcome Trust article a bit more closely fool, it may have saved you some embarrassment.

"Similarly, about half the DNA of participants from the south-east exhibited a prevalent Anglo-Saxon and Viking influence -- participants in these locations shared DNA with groups from Belgium, Germany and Denmark where these distant ancestors originated.

Wales, by comparison, presented very few interferences from migrant groups. Here, the DNA had similarities with what Donnelly referred to as the Irish compound. Remnants of the Irish and French DNA are considered to be ancient DNA because they are present in all groups in Britain. However in Wales, these markers were substantially more common, suggesting people from Wales may have some of the most ancient DNA in Britain.

The Wellcome Trust team is working with archaeologists and historians to see how the data can be applied to solve ancient mysteries. One has already been touched upon -- up until now archaeologists have been unsure as to whether the Roman population that existed from 40AD until 400AD was replaced by the Anglo Saxon population that arrived, or if it died out.

The Wellcome Trust's results show that people in the south-east share similarities with both the Anglo Saxons from Northern Europe, and with ancient Irish and French DNA, so the answer is that both ancestors are present in our DNA and the Romans were not entirely replaced."

And of course no one was suggesting they claimed more nordic genes than northern Europeans, that is simply a strawman argument you've created to try (unsuccessfully)save some face. But, by all means provide a link to these DNA studies you keep harping on about.

[sid]

voices of reason wrote:

Its true
Indians are closer to being Whites than Italians and Greeks who are mixed with Arab or something else
Think off Indians as tanned white people, as our body shape and size is exactly as a 'white' person
Im tired of junk science always trying to seperate Indians from their caucasian reality

Think of indians as well tanned shaved chimpanzees.

[Elias]

sid wrote:

<quoted text>
Think of indians as well tanned shaved chimpanzees.

Chimps use banana leaves for wiping their backsides...we could learn a thing or two from our cousins...

[Arjun]

More pics. Are they subcontinental or european?

http://pastmists.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/...
http://pastmist.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/n...
http://pastmist.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/p...
http://pastmist.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/_...
http://pastmist.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/_...
http://pastmist.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/s...
http://pastmist.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/i...

[Rauf lala]

lol pics of the people from my link www.flickr.com/photos/hillswarrier/ ha ha they are himachali,kashmiri and 20%of punjabi i.e 2% of indian population and 53 % of pakistani......98% of indians are ugly negro who have no link with pakistani and north west indians.

[Elias]

Rauf lala wrote:

lol pics of the people from my link www.flickr.com/photos/hillswarrier/ ha ha they are himachali,kashmiri and 20%of punjabi i.e 2% of indian population and 53 % of pakistani......98% of indians are ugly negro who have no link with pakistani and north west indians.

Yes rauf we know...Himachali good...Indian bad...start trying to activate your other two brain cells...

[Arjun]

Rauf lala wrote:

lol pics of the people from my link www.flickr.com/photos/hillswarrier/ ha ha they are himachali,kashmiri and 20%of punjabi i.e 2% of indian population and 53 % of pakistani......98% of indians are ugly negro who have no link with pakistani and north west indians.

You are stupid. I'm north indian, but even i know that south indians are dark because of their climate. It is only the northeast indians who are mongoloid, and some tribals who look australoid. 90% of the population is caucasoid with varying skin colour.

It is harder to find light skinned south indians, but look at these people. While they are not aryan, they are dravidian (mediterranean caucasoids, so they won't look nordic, but still caucasoid). Look:
http://www.american.edu/profiles/staff/cnair....
http://www.hindu.com/mag/2009/05/03/images/20...
http://www.third-millennium-library.com/readi...
http://www.th ird-millennium-http://www30.ho mepage.villanova.edu/phani.nee lakantham/Aish/aish-at-cannes0 7.jpeg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/aikoaw...
http://www.neuroscience.cam.ac.uk/uploadedFil...
http://www.apunkachoice.com/upload/actors/act...

And don't say they are north indians who went to south, because i can tell from their short squarish faces they are pure south indians with light skin colour.

[Arjun]

South indian albinos:
http://static.binscorner.com/m/meet-the-india...
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancien...

Yes, a lot of them are born with albinism disorder of skin, and eye problem, so don't mock them.

[Rauf lala]

Arjun wrote:

<quoted text>
You are stupid. I'm north indian, but even i know that south indians are dark because of their climate. It is only the northeast indians who are mongoloid, and some tribals who look australoid. 90% of the population is caucasoid with varying skin colour.
It is harder to find light skinned south indians, but look at these people. While they are not aryan, they are dravidian (mediterranean caucasoids, so they won't look nordic, but still caucasoid). Look:
http://www.american.edu/profiles/staff/cnair....
http://www.hindu.com/mag/2009/05/03/images/20...
http://www.third-millennium-library.com/readi...
http://www.th ird-millennium-http://www30.ho mepage.villanova.edu/phani.nee lakantham/Aish/aish-at-cannes0 7.jpeg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v295/aikoaw...
http://www.neuroscience.cam.ac.uk/uploadedFil...
http://www.apunkachoice.com/upload/actors/act...
And don't say they are north indians who went to south, because i can tell from their short squarish faces they are pure south indians with light skin colour.

you negro i have met indians personally and none of them look human except Himachali,kashmiri and 20 % of punjabi which makes up 2% of indian population of 1.2 billion ....i have met people from haryana to tamil and bengal to gujrat all look same negri dark ugly skinny midgets except 2%

[Arjun]

Rauf lala wrote:

<quoted text> you negro i have met indians personally and none of them look human except Himachali,kashmiri and 20 % of punjabi which makes up 2% of indian population of 1.2 billion ....i have met people from haryana to tamil and bengal to gujrat all look same negri dark ugly skinny midgets except 2%

u r too thick to get my point. get lost from this forum.
go bleach ur black hair and eyes if ur ashamed of urself

[Rauf lala]

lol i dont need to bleach my hair coz i've similar origin to Adam Sandler from the lost tribes of Israelites.