Gay parents deny children birthright

A QUEENSLAND group says laws permitting same-sex couples to have children through surrogacy deny children the right to be raised by both a mother and a father.

[Quest]

So, it's better to deny a child the right to even exist, then to "allow" gay parents to use the same means that many straight couples use to have children?

Has anyone asked the existing children of gay couples if they would rather not exist at all?

[Mojo]

Quest wrote:

So, it's better to deny a child the right to even exist, then to "allow" gay parents to use the same means that many straight couples use to have children?
Has anyone asked the existing children of gay couples if they would rather not exist at all?

Yes!! Spot on! It is better to deny a child the right to exist than to have a child raised by the second most despicable abominations on this planet, with pedophiles taking first place.

[Quest]

Mojo wrote:

<quoted text>Yes!! Spot on! It is better to deny a child the right to exist than to have a child raised by the second most despicable abominations on this planet, with pedophiles taking first place.

Have you actually asked any of the children involved? Have you met a large number of the families involved?

Of course not.

Because you are simply a troll, and, as such, don't have a firm grip on either logic or sanity.

[NoiseGrrrl]

Well, shit. Guess we'd better get our collective asses in gear on some new laws requiring divorced couples and widows/widowers to immediately remarry, and require marriage for all single parents. Why, if they fail to do so, we could take their children away and place them in foster homes or orphanages! Clearly a much better option than the damage they would get from being raised in a home without a mother or father, I mean, after all, NO child has ever had a bad experience in a heterosexual two-parent household!

[Gay And Proud]

I guess these bright lights didn't bother to ask people who've actually been raised by LGBT parents what they thought about the experience. It's not like there are groups like http://www.colage.org/ that make it easy to find them!

Willful ignorance like that, especially when it's the basis for attempts to pass restrictive laws, should be subject to harsh punishment.

[I Miss My 4 Skin]

Some countries have banned circumcision of male babies because it denies them their foreskin.
Yet the queers think it's ok to deny a child it's birthright of having both a mom and a dad.

[MALBARCACA Controller]

Gay And Proud wrote:

I guess these bright lights didn't bother to ask people who've actually been raised by LGBT parents what they thought about the experience. It's not like there are groups like http://www.colage.org/ that make it easy to find them!
Willful ignorance like that, especially when it's the basis for attempts to pass restrictive laws, should be subject to harsh punishment.

Are you related to Gay and Proud in Sydney?

[nhjeff]

A lot more children are "denied" their birthright by heterosexual divorce. let's outlaw that once the woman becomes pregnant.(but for heaven's sake, don't ask the children whether they preferred living with their drunken,abusive father. We're talking about birthrights here, not the weel-being of children.). Oh, what shall we do with all those single women having children these days? Perhaps we could force them to have abortions instead of carrying the child to term, when his birthright would be denied. Or maybe we could re-institute shotgun weddings. But what do we do if the father already has another family? Perhaps we'll have to re-introduce polygamy so that all the bastards can have their birthright. And what about parents who are incarcerated? Maybe we should let all parents go so that their children won't be denied their birthrights?

See where this silly logic leads?

[Gay And Proud]

MALBARCACA Controller wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you related to Gay and Proud in Sydney?

Nope. I've never been to Australia. Some day I might make it down there.

[Quest]

Mojo wrote:

<quoted text>of course I havent met the despicable freaks! I would bash some morals into them if I had!

And you think your hatred, fear, and just plain silliness are moral?

Silly Troll.

[Quest]

I Miss My 4 Skin wrote:

Some countries have banned circumcision of male babies because it denies them their foreskin.
Yet the queers think it's ok to deny a child it's birthright of having both a mom and a dad.

Do you often make utterly irrelevant comparisons while trying to communicate?

[I Miss My 4 Skin]

nhjeff wrote:

A lot more children are "denied" their birthright by heterosexual divorce. let's outlaw that once the woman becomes pregnant.(but for heaven's sake, don't ask the children whether they preferred living with their drunken,abusive father. We're talking about birthrights here, not the weel-being of children.). Oh, what shall we do with all those single women having children these days? Perhaps we could force them to have abortions instead of carrying the child to term, when his birthright would be denied. Or maybe we could re-institute shotgun weddings. But what do we do if the father already has another family? Perhaps we'll have to re-introduce polygamy so that all the bastards can have their birthright. And what about parents who are incarcerated? Maybe we should let all parents go so that their children won't be denied their birthrights?
See where this silly logic leads?

Queer rationalization.

[qwerty26]

So where exactly does one find the definition of "birthright"?

[I Miss My 4 Skin]

Quest wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you often make utterly irrelevant comparisons while trying to communicate?

The irrelevant comparison is when you insist homosexuals are normal.

[I Miss My 4 Skin]

qwerty26 wrote:

So where exactly does one find the definition of "birthright"?

So where exactly can I find my foreskin?

[nhjeff]

qwerty26 wrote:

So where exactly does one find the definition of "birthright"?

It normally refers to inheriting great wealth. Like Ricky Martin's and Elton John's children are likely to,do.

[Frank Stanton]

Mojo wrote:

<quoted text>of course I havent met the despicable freaks! I would bash some morals into them if I had!

pathetic.... one day, you'll meet the right person, and you can do all the alleged hate bashing you want.

http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/1...

[NoiseGrrrl]

I Miss My 4 Skin wrote:

<quoted text>
Queer rationalization.

You are aware of the studies done that have shown that people who harbour violently anti-homosexual attitudes are, in fact, suppressing/compensating for conscious and subconscious homosexuality?

In other words: dude, homophobes are SO GAY. Assuming you're a man, I hope you find the right guy some day, sweetie!

[Anatomical Logic]

I Miss My 4 Skin wrote:

<quoted text>
So where exactly can I find my foreskin?

Check your chick-fila samwitch

[I Miss My 4 Skin]

NoiseGrrrl wrote:

<quoted text>
You are aware of the studies done that have shown that people who harbour violently anti-homosexual attitudes are, in fact, suppressing/compensating for conscious and subconscious homosexuality?
In other words: dude, homophobes are SO GAY. Assuming you're a man, I hope you find the right guy some day, sweetie!

I guess that would explain why I miss my foreskin.