Galatians

Reservoir, Australia

#47 Oct 13, 2013
Galatians wrote:
<quoted text>
Be realistic will you? Wait if your family is killed?
Sorry.... wait...what
Galatians

Reservoir, Australia

#48 Oct 13, 2013
Alyy wrote:
JEWS created Racism word in 1920's because they were not welcome in Europe...now we understand why! Jews are cancer!
They started much earlier than this.:)
Good Aussies

Temirtau, Kazakhstan

#49 Oct 13, 2013
Galatians wrote:
<quoted text>
They started much earlier than this.:)
Hey Jew, I responded to your post about me being a neo-nazi, here's my response.

http://www.topix.com/forum/world/australia/T3...
European

Marrickville, Australia

#50 Oct 13, 2013
Micky wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not require an education. I am fully aware of the changes that will occur in Australia if the laws are not changed. I also am not happy with the migration of people for economic reasons being allowed to overtake us and change the way of the Australia as we know it and love it. It is not an issue of foresight, I have seen what has happened to England and Europe with my own eyes. I don't like it and can see the same creeping in here. The most stupid thing that was allowed to happen was the end of the White Australian policy. It should be introduce again, but the politicians dare not as it would offend the global community. I hold no respect for the politicians that allow themselves to be puppets. The issues need to be addressed through the political process not through violence against a group, targeted because of race. There are a few people, and I mean a few that are not a threat, but a majority certainly are.
I fully agree it has to stop diplomatically if it doesn't
Australia will be like Britain.
Think about it, why would Nations with huge populations stop multiplying when they can fill the World?

For them it is beneficial, in the future they can go to those Nations among their own and feel at home while the Whites will be a minority.

Try getting a job from say a Chinese i don't think so.
If you have doubts just look around next time in establishments owned by Chinese and see who they employ.

At least Whites never did that they gave everyone a fair go!
Micky

Adelaide, Australia

#52 Oct 13, 2013
Micky wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not require an education. I am fully aware of the changes that will occur in Australia if the laws are not changed. I also am not happy with the migration of people for economic reasons being allowed to overtake us and change the way of the Australia as we know it and love it. It is not an issue of foresight, I have seen what has happened to England and Europe with my own eyes. I don't like it and can see the same creeping in here. The most stupid thing that was allowed to happen was the end of the White Australian policy. It should be introduce again, but the politicians dare not as it would offend the global community. I hold no respect for the politicians that allow themselves to be puppets. The issues need to be addressed through the political process not through violence against a group, targeted because of race. There are a few people, and I mean a few that are not a threat, but a majority certainly are.
The one rule policy is one offence that is connected to Anti Australian behavior or attitude and you get out of the country forever no return no right of appeal, and if you have been granted citizenship it gets revoked. So this will include all that have been "accepted" as well.
AFG

Hertford, UK

#53 Oct 13, 2013
topbloke wrote:
<quoted text>
well yes it is ours. we claimed it as a british colony in 1788. it was mostly unpopulated. today 20% of australia is owned soley by aboriginals. infact 45% nearly half of the northern terrority is aboriginal owned.
its been like this for a few hundred years.
im not a redneck thats an american term that was born in the slave days of the USA. im saying this because i dont want the once british colony i live in today to be changed by outsiders.
yes i like v8's and meat pies, and nrl and the beach and rock and roll and australia day and anzac day and wearing thongs and wearing what you want. you probably do to. you want be told you cant do something youve always done because it might be offensive to other cultures in your own country.
Bollocks!
Yeah you're NOT rednecks in fact you're WORSE, your ancestors were criminals they were SH IT Europe gladly got rid of!
Nah I hate Rock n roll, pies, Asstralia day and wearing thongs.
AFG

Hertford, UK

#54 Oct 13, 2013
European wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes but how much do you know about European history?
Non whites invaded most of Europe and enslaved white people for centuries way before whites did it to non whites.
A lot.
-
NOOOOOOOOOO it was the Whities who enslaved the non whities first.
Give proof Non whities enslaved whities first.
Micky

Adelaide, Australia

#55 Oct 13, 2013
AFG wrote:
<quoted text>
Bollocks!
Yeah you're NOT rednecks in fact you're WORSE, your ancestors were criminals they were SH IT Europe gladly got rid of!
Nah I hate Rock n roll, pies, Asstralia day and wearing thongs.
It is little retarded sh*ts like you that we don't want in our country. Stay wherever you are.
10 th LIGHT HORSE WA

Perth, Australia

#56 Oct 13, 2013
theres been a lot more racism in the last 20 or so years since all theese horrible people from horrible countries started arriving here prior to that we could say woteva cos no one was here to hear it
European

Marrickville, Australia

#57 Oct 13, 2013
AFG wrote:
<quoted text>
A lot.
-
NOOOOOOOOOO it was the Whities who enslaved the non whities first.
Give proof Non whities enslaved whities first.
Ancient Egyptians owned slaves, what kind of slaves do you think they were? Most were Jewish.
They're the earliest i know.
Whites having slaves is a recent phenomena it doesn't go back 5000 years like Egyptians.
Galatians

Reservoir, Australia

#58 Oct 13, 2013
European wrote:
<quoted text>
Ancient Egyptians owned slaves, what kind of slaves do you think they were? Most were Jewish.
They're the earliest i know.
Whites having slaves is a recent phenomena it doesn't go back 5000 years like Egyptians.
The ancient egyptians did not use jewish slaves.

http://www.religiouscriticism.com/bible/the-j...
European

Marrickville, Australia

#59 Oct 13, 2013
Galatians wrote:
<quoted text>
The ancient egyptians did not use jewish slaves.
http://www.religiouscriticism.com/bible/the-j...
The Bible has more credence than that web site.
Babylonians had slaves, again it is non whites who first had slaves.
Slavery was last abolished in the Middle East as well.
Muslim Mom

Minto, Australia

#60 Oct 13, 2013
It beneficial in community for making Whites become into slaves as Whites always just drugged or drunk or surfing while pretending at too sore for work otherwise.
Micky

Adelaide, Australia

#63 Oct 13, 2013
European wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible has more credence than that web site.
Babylonians had slaves, again it is non whites who first had slaves.
Slavery was last abolished in the Middle East as well.
From were dose it get this credence from? The interpretation is wide and varied. It has no evidence of validity of scientific proof. It is a hearsay and written by man,a story book. If you believe this then you might like to start worshiping the wizard of OZ or Alice in wonderland.
European

Marrickville, Australia

#64 Oct 13, 2013
Micky wrote:
<quoted text>
From were dose it get this credence from? The interpretation is wide and varied. It has no evidence of validity of scientific proof. It is a hearsay and written by man,a story book. If you believe this then you might like to start worshiping the wizard of OZ or Alice in wonderland.
If what you say is true, then we can say that all history books are
false since the Bible is the most guarded book in all of history never to be changed since the time it was written.

That's where it gets it's credence, it is not just a book like other history books but one where peoples eyes have been up on it since it was written and because of that it is the most guarded book of all time.
So far no one has been able to disprove it and all prophecies have have come true.

It is not to be taken just as a rule book as how Muslims interpret it but it is a history book.
sid

Brisbane, Australia

#65 Oct 13, 2013
European wrote:
<quoted text>
If what you say is true, then we can say that all history books are
false since the Bible is the most guarded book in all of history never to be changed since the time it was written.
That's where it gets it's credence, it is not just a book like other history books but one where peoples eyes have been up on it since it was written and because of that it is the most guarded book of all time.
So far no one has been able to disprove it and all prophecies have have come true.
It is not to be taken just as a rule book as how Muslims interpret it but it is a history book.
I have a 7 year old daughter, how much do you think I could get for her on the white slave market.[Old testament],
My neighbour insists on mowing the grass on sunday, should I stone him to death.[Old Testament].
sid

Brisbane, Australia

#66 Oct 13, 2013
The bible is the book of contradictions and the root of modern racism.
Chapter 25 of the book of Numbers (verses 1-13) tells of when the Israelis began to inter-marry (it uses the term “commit whoredom”) with the Moabites, a neighbouring ethnic group with a different religion. This provoked the rage of God who commanded Moses to “hang them”. One man had married a “Midianitish”. An Israeli, Phinehas killed both of them with a javelin. God praises him for this and declares he “hath turned my wrath away from the children of Israel.” He then rewards him with a “covenant of peace” and the covenant of everlasting priesthood.” Moral of the story, God doesn’t want you to mix with people other you’re own.

Mixed marriages are denounced again. When Nehemiah was governor he found that Jews had inter-married with other ethnic groups. He “cursed them, and smote certain of them” for committing “this great evil”. He concludes with a malicious vague sentence Thus “cleansed I them from all strangers”.(Nehemiah 13:23-30) The exact form of this ethnic cleansing is not described. Yet this is included (without criticism) in the Christian holy book and we are supposed to worship and live our lives according to it.

Far from being open to all people, non-Israelis were actually banned from joining the religion.“An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever;”(Deuteronomy 23:3) So even if an extremely distant ancestor was from a neighbouring ethnic group, you could not become a Jew. Only pure Israelis could join.
Micky

Adelaide, Australia

#67 Oct 13, 2013
European wrote:
<quoted text>
If what you say is true, then we can say that all history books are
false since the Bible is the most guarded book in all of history never to be changed since the time it was written.
That's where it gets it's credence, it is not just a book like other history books but one where peoples eyes have been up on it since it was written and because of that it is the most guarded book of all time.
So far no one has been able to disprove it and all prophecies have have come true.
It is not to be taken just as a rule book as how Muslims interpret it but it is a history book.
History books have also depicted half truths,The government of the day have a big say in the curricula at every learning center.The fact that the bible has been translated by "MAN" and mainly scholars of a religious group. Translations have been indirect and reworded. The bibles of today all contain different wording and it has been open to interpretation of the reader or the instructor to put an interpretation as to the meaning of the text. You are right the scrolls are fiercely protected. I don't think that I have read that any person today has even viewed them. Nostradamus also made predictions that have (to a point came true). Dose this make him a God or prophet? If you read different accounts of the same topic, lets take "War" written by a participants on from either side, you will get a different perspective on the same account. It dose not mean that either are true or either are false, it means that we put forward our own interpretation on things we experience.The scrolls that the bible is supposed to be translated from, are hidden from view and access. Is there part two that we don't know about? Or is it that in order to keep the control that it has been so successful in doing in tacked. Remember that the King James version (the most common one)was a re write of the first print. why did it need to be re written.There are many arguments that I could put to you ,i respect that you have a belief and I will not try to change it.but I also have what I consider valid reasons to challenge that it is manipulation for the purpose of control by politics and religion using our fears of the unknown. Like death.
European

Marrickville, Australia

#68 Oct 13, 2013
sid wrote:
<quoted text>
I have a 7 year old daughter, how much do you think I could get for her on the white slave market.[Old testament],
My neighbour insists on mowing the grass on sunday, should I stone him to death.[Old Testament].
Gee are you Muslim?
From your statement this is exactly how Muslims interpret the Bible.

The Old Testament is a history book.
It is what happened in those days.
Does that mean you have to do that if it happened?

And BTW the slave market was always Arab or non white back then.
European

Marrickville, Australia

#69 Oct 13, 2013
Micky wrote:
<quoted text>
History books have also depicted half truths,The government of the day have a big say in the curricula at every learning center.The fact that the bible has been translated by "MAN" and mainly scholars of a religious group. Translations have been indirect and reworded. The bibles of today all contain different wording and it has been open to interpretation of the reader or the instructor to put an interpretation as to the meaning of the text. You are right the scrolls are fiercely protected. I don't think that I have read that any person today has even viewed them. Nostradamus also made predictions that have (to a point came true). Dose this make him a God or prophet? If you read different accounts of the same topic, lets take "War" written by a participants on from either side, you will get a different perspective on the same account. It dose not mean that either are true or either are false, it means that we put forward our own interpretation on things we experience.The scrolls that the bible is supposed to be translated from, are hidden from view and access. Is there part two that we don't know about? Or is it that in order to keep the control that it has been so successful in doing in tacked. Remember that the King James version (the most common one)was a re write of the first print. why did it need to be re written.There are many arguments that I could put to you ,i respect that you have a belief and I will not try to change it.but I also have what I consider valid reasons to challenge that it is manipulation for the purpose of control by politics and religion using our fears of the unknown. Like death.
Well maybe you are right and if you are then we have to put all books in that basket even the Quran.
No book is to be believed since it can be changed and history is only half true since it can be written by different perspectives.

In that case only believe what is in your heart and what is in your heart that will also be your destiny.

Who knows maybe when people die there is no heaven and no God and all that happens is the worms eat you and that is it.

But what if there was a chance, a one in a infinite chance, one smaller than a grain of sand that all is true and there is a Creator
and another better life, a life you could't imagine was possible.

Why not take it?

Life is nothing on Earth compared to what there can be in the heavens.
Just look up in the sky, there are billions of stars, billions of times bigger than our Sun all with planets.
Then there are things too complicated to explain here that have recently been discovered.
We humans are just specks stuck on the Earth and our life span is also just a speck compared to eternity.
How much can a speck know?
How much true knowledge can Man acquire with a limited life span stuck on Earth like a speck?

If there is no life after death, then what is the purpose of all those creations in the universe?

You don't have to believe in religious books as you said because they can and are being used to deceive Mankind to do evil one against the other.

You can throw all that away (books), but why throw away the Words of our Lord?
What if he was right?
That one in a infinite chance that there is a creator and life after death is true.
The Heavens are your inheritance but are you worthy?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Australia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Four things you should know about indians. 2 min stink monkey 16
Ban cage fighting in Australia 3 min Piklu Pandey 81
Poisoning trees 5 min up yours 6
Former Australia Prime Minister Gough Whitlam dies 6 min Neville Thompson 13
why white people are dumb? 7 min The ADELAIDEAN 1
What's wrong with a Multiculturalist Australia? 7 min Piklu Pandey 15
WAR India v Australia, who will win? 8 min varun gowda 6,822
Australian police charge teens over 'racist' tr... 28 min stink monkey 149
Whitlam is dead. Hooray! 4 hr Your Favourite Foo 46
badi behan ko nangi nahate hue dekha. Aur usne ... (May '12) 10 hr KARAN 1,391

Australia People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE