Petition to name serial paedophiles. ...

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#439 Jul 5, 2008
I don't know which of you nasty little children to answer first.

After due consideration, I've decided I'll keep it simple as requested, because I do appreciate how you've all been struggling with any kind of common sense, given that you still can't see how useless, what you've asked for, has been.

GO BACK, READ MY CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS, ONLY THIS TIME, OPEN YOUR MINDS, AND ALL YOUR QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERED.

As for your continued inferences regarding my character, all that does is show anyone who reads this thread, you have absolutely nothing of any value to contribute.

“Ride Hard Die Free”

Since: May 08

bullet-proof tiger

#440 Jul 5, 2008
Awwwwwwwwwwwww dont whimp out wally.
We all know your old posts are full of contradictions and holes.

As for continued inferences regarding your character
I would never cast aspersions Mr Knob gobbler.
Gottaliv

Australia

#441 Jul 5, 2008
"Mr Hobbs said the government had to act urgently, given the current level of public outrage."

Keep the outrage coming folks. It's the only way to get the needed changes.

Especially after Ms Anna Blight's statement of "Nor did she agree there was a need for a change to the law "in light of a media-inspired mob" driving him out of his temporary home."

“Ride Hard Die Free”

Since: May 08

bullet-proof tiger

#442 Jul 5, 2008
Yep, looks like the only safe place for hobs is in a jail or a box.
Rex

Australia

#443 Jul 5, 2008
Your a flat out detractor, i pity you. You cannot see sense or reason. Answers have been given to you which you ridicule.

Your constant rantings are just that, constant.

You really do live in an eggshell don't you?

Society spoke and you considered yourself to be Moses, damning them for their right to free speech.

I will ask the question again but in all honesty i don't expect a reply.

"Will you Wally, house Dennis Ferguson in your own home? or will he pose a danger being there?"

Quite a simple request don't you think?

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#444 Jul 6, 2008
Rex wrote:
Your a flat out detractor, i pity you. You cannot see sense or reason. Answers have been given to you which you ridicule.
Your constant rantings are just that, constant.
You really do live in an eggshell don't you?
Society spoke and you considered yourself to be Moses, damning them for their right to free speech.
I will ask the question again but in all honesty i don't expect a reply.
"Will you Wally, house Dennis Ferguson in your own home? or will he pose a danger being there?"
Quite a simple request don't you think?
Yes Rexy, it is a "SIMPLE" request from a very "SIMPLE" person.

I repeat, "lock them up, throw away the key", and we wont need either your ridiculous petition, which the evidence to date shows, will be completely ineffective, nor will I have to be requested to give the obvious answer to your stupid, irrelevant questions.

We have Authorities, law makers, and enforcers, but we also have Australians whose attitudes to their jobs, regardless of their roles, leaves a lot to be desired, with their priorities being, pissing up, and pissing off.

All the laws under the sun will do no good, unless those we pay to play their role, in seeing they're adhered to, do their jobs diligently.

It only takes one person to slack off and all the good intentions will have been wasted.

You've shown by your own behaviour, not just with me, but with others, how the word paedophile is used by some as a weapon.

Weak and frustrated people, people who lack the intelligence to put forward a constructive comment, constantly use the defamatory word "paedophile" in their attempts to defame a person, regardless of whether it's true or not, simply because they can't argue maturely and responsibly.

So how long before some air head like you, decides to paint it on some ones fence, not because they're a pedo, but out of anger and frustration at not being able to control that person?

Instantly, fear sweeps through the area, and before we know it, an innocent person is at the mercy, of the ignorance, of a threatened mob.

You and others in here make it abundantly clear why the information you seek should never be allowed.

Go back and have a look at the inferences in here, go on you bloody hypocrites, then you'll see from your own behaviour, why it would be totally irresponsible to let pea brains have access to knowledge like this.

We have disgusting slime who call themselves ART LOVERS whom you have never mentioned, who deceive innocent children and publicly display their naked innocence, but I'll bet there won't be any angry mobs outside their doors, oh no! because that would make people think they'd be seen as uncultured.

Those creeps are exploiting the innocence and trust of those children, and that makes them abusers.

The fact the children are naked or adorned with adult jewellery, makes the disgusting shit who took those photos, or had anything at all to do with the production of that magazine, paedophiles.

If you want to use that word you cowardly maggot, at least have the courage to aim it at people where it will do some good.

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#445 Jul 6, 2008
Oh and with reference to your mindless comment about free speech, I don't see any evidence of any threat to that in this thread, in fact, some people use too much of it, just because it is free, lol.

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#446 Jul 6, 2008
I believe what you're really saying is, you don't want ME to have free speech, unless of course, I agree with what you have to say.

Lets face it, my constructive arguments about the ramifications of your proposal, is what you want to stop, regardless of the fact everything I said has been born out as a fact, over the past few days in reality.

You're just another control freak, and a hypocrite.

Lots of love, W.E, lol.
Rex

Australia

#447 Jul 6, 2008
After all that useless ranting, you still did not, in anyway, answer my question.

A simple yes or no would suffice.

You are showing your true colours now aren't you.

So? Are you going to answer me or are you going to write another self gratifying response?
Gottaliv

Australia

#448 Jul 6, 2008
W.E.:“and we wont need either your ridiculous petition…”

For starters, it’s NOT Rex’s petition or mine or anyone elses in this forum. It is Derryn Hinch’s petition and so far it’s been signed by over 5000 Australian people and still climbing.

W.E.:“We have Authorities, law makers, and enforcers…”

We sure do, and amongst those authorities and law makers can be found – PAEDOPHILES – whose identity at this point in time, the law protects.

W.E.:“We have disgusting slime who call themselves ART LOVERS whom you have never mentioned…”

The difference between Bill Henson and Dennis Ferguson Wally which you don’t seem to grasp is, Bill Henson was NOT convicted of any crime, Ferguson was. So go an post in the Bill Henson thread if you feel so strongly about him. Both cases were handled by our wonderful justice system which Ms Anna Blight doesn’t see the need to change.

This petition might help get those laws changed.

Sunday 6th - 11.30pm - 5156

NAME THEM AND SHAME THEM PETITION

Link for signing: http://namethemshamethem.com/

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#449 Jul 6, 2008
Gottaliv wrote:
W.E.:“and we wont need either your ridiculous petition…”
For starters, it’s NOT Rex’s petition or mine or anyone elses in this forum. It is Derryn Hinch’s petition and so far it’s been signed by over 5000 Australian people and still climbing.
W.E.:“We have Authorities, law makers, and enforcers…”
We sure do, and amongst those authorities and law makers can be found – PAEDOPHILES – whose identity at this point in time, the law protects.
W.E.:“We have disgusting slime who call themselves ART LOVERS whom you have never mentioned…”
The difference between Bill Henson and Dennis Ferguson Wally which you don’t seem to grasp is, Bill Henson was NOT convicted of any crime, Ferguson was. So go an post in the Bill Henson thread if you feel so strongly about him. Both cases were handled by our wonderful justice system which Ms Anna Blight doesn’t see the need to change.
This petition might help get those laws changed.
Sunday 6th - 11.30pm - 5156
NAME THEM AND SHAME THEM PETITION
Link for signing: http://namethemshamethem.com/
Did you actually read what you've posted.

You state, as if it's of no concern, that Bill Hensen and those who support him, haven't been charged. So does that mean, just like Rexy, you'd allow him to live near your children, in fact, in your home with your children?

Of course you wouldn't, and the reason for that, convicted or not, is that you know he poses a risk to children.

Name them and shame them is a typical hook, put out by Hinch, an admitted paedophile himself, to get ratings for his show, and nothing else.

How gullible you all are, yet in fact, in your comments above, you've actually admitted the petition will go no where, because the legal system is full of paedophiles.

Once again, you're trying to have your cake and eat it to.

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#450 Jul 6, 2008
Rex wrote:
After all that useless ranting, you still did not, in anyway, answer my question.
A simple yes or no would suffice.
You are showing your true colours now aren't you.
So? Are you going to answer me or are you going to write another self gratifying response?
Yes Rexy, it is a "SIMPLE" request from a very "SIMPLE" person.

"
Here's my answer, it was in my post, but in your childish blind rage, you failed to interpret it. I guess I do expect a bit too much from you, don't I Rexy?

I repeat,

"lock them up, throw away the key", and we wont need either your ridiculous petition, which the evidence to date shows, will be completely ineffective, nor will I have to be requested to give the obvious answer to your stupid, irrelevant questions."

If you haven't the intelligence to read what I've posted in response to your stupid, irrelevant question, and figure out my answer for yourself, then you deserve no answer you fool.

I wonder what "lock them up and throw away the key" actually means to you Rexy?

Surely it can't possibly mean my front door key, surely you have the intelligence to figure that out Rexy boy? maybe not, lol, lol.
Hector

United States

#451 Jul 6, 2008
how can a person become a serial pedophile without widespread serial parental negligence?

maybe the petition should read:

"Watch your own freaking baby or go to prison!"
Rex

Australia

#452 Jul 6, 2008
So, yes? or no? in answer to my question.

Your response was another rant yet again, it did not answer my question.

Here it is again.

"Will you Wally, house Dennis Ferguson in your own home? or will he pose a danger being there?"

Maybe i can help with some answers for you to choose from.

Answer number 1:

"No, i wouldn't have him in my home, Yes, he would pose a danger."

Answer number 2:

"Yes, i would have him in my home, No, he wouldn't pose a danger."

Hope that helps.

“Ride Hard Die Free”

Since: May 08

bullet-proof tiger

#453 Jul 6, 2008
OK Mr Hinch just spoke to Mr Hulls. Hulls has said that it is not his job to step in and change court decisions, to which Mr hinch said "yes but it is your job to change laws" (which it is). Mr Hinch then asked, "So will you look at changing this law"? Hulls whimped it saying that they look at changing existing laws all the time but would not comment on weather they will change this law.
Its the first time in a couple of years since Hulls was on the program (3aw drive) and Hinch says its not over by a long shot.
One thing Mr Hinch said today was, "I have to do something about this because there is no one else who has public voice that that wants to do any thing about it".
We are lucky to have Mr Hinch to be our voice.
Will post transcript of the interview later.

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#454 Jul 6, 2008
Hector wrote:
how can a person become a serial pedophile without widespread serial parental negligence?
maybe the petition should read:
"Watch your own freaking baby or go to prison!"
I commented similarly early in this thread.

Since then, although we both agree it really is up to the parents, I have had off line discussions with many parents, whose circumstances, and ability to survive in this ever increasingly costly world, do require them to have to trust others with their children.

I agree we need to take away "the opportunity" and that will be the end of the paedophiles ability to get near any of our children, but sadly, as I now accept, in so many cases, that's a lot easier said than done in this greed crazed world of today, which requires two incomes, just to afford the basics.

I have always noticed the carry on about paedophiles belies the number of arrests. What I mean by that is, if we take the Media hype about it, where we're led to believe they're behind every tree, but when you consider the few arrests Globally, in comparison, one is left wondering just what the risks really are.

Even this thread has only one of them in it's sights, yet there are constant media claims there are thousands of them out there. What the hell are people supposed to believe when there's so much bullshit surrounding everything these days?

All we ever see or hear about this problem is after an event.

No one will discuss good old Uncle Arthur, or that loving Dad down the street, yet if we're to believe all we read, this is where the largest threat to children exists.

Take a look at these creeps taking photo's of naked children in the name of art.

If one looks at their behaviour, it involved Adults who decided to "strip children naked" (not take a random shot of a baby in the bath) Not for those creeps, their shots involve posing the children, not natural shots of children at play, oh no, those shots were all posed and accessorised, using adult props, in the form of jewellery etc.

In one shot I saw on the news, the child was naked and posed on its back with it arm's over it's head.

No way are those shots innocent or natural in any way. They are heavily adult influenced, which is fine for adult models, but for God's sake, not children.

How bloody pathetic are these undercover paedophiles?

Talk about targeting the most defenceless.

“I Didn't Hit You”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#455 Jul 7, 2008
SUPERIOR AUSSIE wrote:
OK Mr Hinch just spoke to Mr Hulls. Hulls has said that it is not his job to step in and change court decisions, to which Mr hinch said "yes but it is your job to change laws" (which it is). Mr Hinch then asked, "So will you look at changing this law"? Hulls whimped it saying that they look at changing existing laws all the time but would not comment on weather they will change this law.
Its the first time in a couple of years since Hulls was on the program (3aw drive) and Hinch says its not over by a long shot.
One thing Mr Hinch said today was, "I have to do something about this because there is no one else who has public voice that that wants to do any thing about it".
We are lucky to have Mr Hinch to be our voice.
Will post transcript of the interview later.
I also heard Derryn's programme tonight, and he expressed his opinion that they should be locked up and never released, so hopefully, that will be Derryn's next agenda - and petition!! BTW, years ago I worked with a girl whose brother shot and killed an intruder who threatened the whole family (including a baby). During the court case, my workmates mother was approached by producers/reporters of both Jana Wendt, and Derryn Hinch. She declined both. Jana's team said thank you and left; Derryns team chased her down the street on several occasions. I might not always agree with how Hinch conducts himself - as in that case - but I approve of his motives here, and wish him all the best. And I find Derryn easier to listen to than mighty Sir Neil.

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#456 Jul 7, 2008
Rex wrote:
So, yes? or no? in answer to my question.
Your response was another rant yet again, it did not answer my question.
Here it is again.
"Will you Wally, house Dennis Ferguson in your own home? or will he pose a danger being there?"
Maybe i can help with some answers for you to choose from.
Answer number 1:
"No, i wouldn't have him in my home, Yes, he would pose a danger."
Answer number 2:
"Yes, i would have him in my home, No, he wouldn't pose a danger."
Hope that helps.
Do you seriously believe your stupid question deserves its obvious answer?

You really are a fool, go away.
Rex

Australia

#457 Jul 7, 2008
wallabyedward wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you seriously believe your stupid question deserves its obvious answer?
You really are a fool, go away.
Are you a POLITICIAN, they never seem to be able to answer a question either.

People who refuse to answer a simple question usually don't want to admit they are wrong.

Your response still shows your unwillingness to do so.

“A world full of hypocrites”

Since: Jul 07

Location hidden

#458 Jul 7, 2008
Rex wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a POLITICIAN, they never seem to be able to answer a question either.
People who refuse to answer a simple question usually don't want to admit they are wrong.
Your response still shows your unwillingness to do so.
You are being ignored, because you are an infantile fool.

You should know by now, I'm never wrong, lol

I'm PML here.

Who the frigging hell do you think you are you bloody twit, the Federal bloody Police or something?

How bloody deluded are you, you idiot?

This is a public forum where anyone on this planet is able to put their point of view.

You are nobody in here, just another poster.

Now bugger off and stop making a fool of yourself.

Go on go away, go play cops and robbers someplace else.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Australia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Julian Burnside: Border Force operation 'not wh... 1 hr The Anti-Muhammed 3
Poll Which black race is the stupidest? (Dec '14) 9 hr Xavier Gomez 9
Do white women really have sex with dogs? (Dec '12) 11 hr Emma 41
News Convertible apartment increases living space by... 15 hr Sydney Boy 1
Black People 15 hr Xavier Gomez 1
Why I hate Indians 16 hr WTF 4
Who are the most uncivilised countries in the w... (Jul '12) 16 hr IM Civilized 17
More from around the web