Light-weight people should be allowed to carry more luggage on planes

Posted in the Australia Forum

Proud Misogynist

Carrum Downs, Australia

#1 May 1, 2013
Why can a fat 120kg man take on board 6kgs worth of sh*t, but a 60kg man can't take 8kgs worth of sh*t on a plane for example?

They should weigh our bags PLUS our body/clothes weight - total!

I should be President of Earth.

MEN > women
schmakos

Absecon, NJ

#2 May 1, 2013
They used to do that in the old days, weigh the passenger but theres no chance in hell of that happening now so we continue having to pay the same amount as some fat turd.

Too many fat bastards in everywhere now.
environMentalist

UK

#4 May 1, 2013
Good Aussies wrote:
<quoted text>
What about a fit, muscular 6ft2 man weighing 120kg? Should they be penalised as well?
Should we let little chingwongs carry on more because they are weak and small?
It was a great rule to have, very rational. Up until someone somewhere realized it would give other races an advantage. Can't ever have that now can we.

We whites invented the airplane, and asians should be made to travel with the luggage. Or they can use asian technology like the palanquin which they were using when whites arrived in asia.
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

#5 May 1, 2013
Tickets should be priced per Kg wt of the passenger. Seat width should be adjustable and larger seats to larger and heavier passengers.

Thin light guys save money, heavy fat people get to travel in comfort.

Brilliant idea, so of course a lot of you will find something wrong with it!
chingwongs now

Jakarta, Indonesia

#6 May 1, 2013
Good Aussies wrote:
<quoted text>
What about a fit, muscular 6ft2 man weighing 120kg? Should they be penalised as well?
Should we let little chingwongs carry on more because they are weak and small?
Why penalize the short thin ones, why do they have to pay heavy fat mans fare.

If smarter people get the better jobs, dumb people cant complain and ask for same pay. So why not same criteria elsewhere?

“REFUSE ALL IMITATIONS!!”

Since: Jan 11

Australia

#9 May 1, 2013
Fat plane passengers should be issued with a back-pack containing a balloon. Standing on scales the passenger's balloon should be inflated with Helium until the scales display the weight of the passenger as that of a light person.

Then they can be allowed on the plane.

My R&D department is about to release back-packs and balloons for purchase at airport check-in counters.

I'll be rich!!:D :D :D
Proud Misogynist

Carrum Downs, Australia

#10 May 1, 2013
Good Aussies wrote:
<quoted text>
What about a fit, muscular 6ft2 man weighing 120kg? Should they be penalised as well?
Should we let little chingwongs carry on more because they are weak and small?
Yes. Muscle or fat, weight is weight.
And just what does being "fit" have to do with anything? I'm getting real tired of that word thrown around everywhere. Seems like noone knows the meaning of the word.

MEN > women
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

#12 May 1, 2013
Anorexic women should get 85% off. But three of them be given just one seat.
Proud Misogynist

Carrum Downs, Australia

#13 May 1, 2013
Seriously.. the more you weigh the more you should have to pay. Say a dollar for every kg.
Fat people use-up more fuel, more tyre tread, and make it harder on the engines. Flights might be cheaper (because of the fuel savings) and there would probably be less plane accidents if there weren't any fat people (because the planes would be lighter).

It's about time we started taxing these fat f*cks. Perhaps THEN they'll lower the food-dosage.

I doubt it.

MEN > women
xes

Adelaide, Australia

#14 May 1, 2013
Adelaidean is 213kg so how much for that ticket for him i guess his clothes are bigger so i am gussing his baggage to be in the range of 100kg making his total 313 kg ,So how much for his ticket and extra wide load fat ass ticket?

“REFUSE ALL IMITATIONS!!”

Since: Jan 11

Australia

#15 May 1, 2013
xes wrote:
Adelaidean is 213kg so how much for that ticket for him i guess his clothes are bigger so i am gussing his baggage to be in the range of 100kg making his total 313 kg ,So how much for his ticket and extra wide load fat ass ticket?
Curses! My secret is out!!
Proud Misogynist

Carrum Downs, Australia

#16 May 1, 2013
xes wrote:
Adelaidean is 213kg so how much for that ticket for him i guess his clothes are bigger so i am gussing his baggage to be in the range of 100kg making his total 313 kg ,So how much for his ticket and extra wide load fat ass ticket?
I think you got the "Adelaidean" mixed-up with (the fat) "Ahomana" (bushpig).

I would charge her/it $24,999 for an interstate flight (nearest state/airport only. The plane wouldn't make it overseas with her on board). Any less is just not worth it. I wouldn't want her on my plane. The smell, the fat, the diseases, the sh*t stains... YUCK!

MEN > women
Proud Misogynist

Carrum Downs, Australia

#17 May 1, 2013
apocalypse now wrote:
Tickets should be priced per Kg wt of the passenger. Seat width should be adjustable and larger seats to larger and heavier passengers.
Thin light guys save money, heavy fat people get to travel in comfort.
Brilliant idea, so of course a lot of you will find something wrong with it!
I agree.. except for your width-adjustable seat idea. That would take up too much space, weigh more, be more costly, be weaker...

I was going to write: They should just have normal-sized seats and large-sized seats.. but no. Why should we accommodate these fat f*cks? We should do all that we can to make it harder for fat f*cks to be/stay fat.

MEN > women
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

#18 May 1, 2013
Proud Misogynist wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree.. except for your width-adjustable seat idea. That would take up too much space, weigh more, be more costly, be weaker...
I was going to write: They should just have normal-sized seats and large-sized seats.. but no. Why should we accommodate these fat f*cks? We should do all that we can to make it harder for fat f*cks to be/stay fat.
MEN > women
You mean make them pay for more, but not give them more? Hmmm.

Yeah Lets Stick it to em fatties. Slim down or die! Make em wear corsets on all public transport.
Proud Misogynist

Carrum Downs, Australia

#19 May 1, 2013
apocalypse now wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean make them pay for more, but not give them more? Hmmm.
Yeah Lets Stick it to em fatties. Slim down or die! Make em wear corsets on all public transport.
Yes. Like I previously mentioned.. fat f*cks use up more of the planes fuel, wear out the tyres more, wear out the brakes more, wear out the engines more, wear out the seats more, smell, leave their sweaty, smelly and disgusting "a*s oils" behind on the seats too, make it harder on those sitting next to them... So why shouldn't they pay more?

Say if there were 500 people on a plane and each one weighed 100kgs on average, that = 50,000kgs worth of humans.
If the average weight of those 500 people was 65kgs instead, that = 32,500kgs, which would make the plane 17,500kgs lighter.

MEN > women
Effendi Bohong

Denpasar, Indonesia

#20 May 1, 2013
Come and live in Indonesia for a while if you want to learn all about " hand baggage ". The locals here would lug 44 gallon drums and wool bales up the gangway if they were strong enough to lift 'em !
Good Aussies

France

#21 May 2, 2013
Proud Misogynist wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Like I previously mentioned.. fat f*cks use up more of the planes fuel, wear out the tyres more, wear out the brakes more, wear out the engines more, wear out the seats more, smell, leave their sweaty, smelly and disgusting "a*s oils" behind on the seats too, make it harder on those sitting next to them... So why shouldn't they pay more?
Say if there were 500 people on a plane and each one weighed 100kgs on average, that = 50,000kgs worth of humans.
If the average weight of those 500 people was 65kgs instead, that = 32,500kgs, which would make the plane 17,500kgs lighter.
MEN > women
Weight of a 747-100B = 162,400kg.

Capacity = 550 people.

Fully loaded with people and not including baggage and extras like food etc, weight of the plane with people averaging 100kg = 217400kg

Fully loaded with 65kg people = 198150kg

217400/198150 = 1.09714862

So, if we take an airfare of $500 and 65kg being the base reference, a 100kg person should pay $548.57431.

This figure would be lower when taking into consideration baggage and food and extras, and would change per plane model and seating fulfillment.
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

#23 May 2, 2013
Replace heavy seats by spongy yoga mats.

Train air hostesses to be flexible yoga instructors too, offer free and optional yoga lessons, or let passengers just lie down relax catch up on sleep..

More comfortable for passengers who get to straighten up even sleep properly on long journeys, health to boot, cheaper tickets, save money on expensive seats, save fuel and environment. AND SAVE MONEY ON FUEL due to the less weight to carry for the airline.

Food can be served Japanese style. And instead of seat belts you could have floor belts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Australia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why should Australians fear from Muslims? (Dec '07) 8 min MUQ1 45,523
Whitlam is dead. Hooray! 9 min SnyffMyPhartz 30
WAR India v Australia, who will win? 10 min Tom 6,758
The gloves are coming off.. 20 min The ADELAIDEAN 13
American Women Vs. Australian Women...?!?!? (Aug '13) 26 min JoeBlow 32
How does 14 year old talentless Asian bimbo win... 1 hr Wendall 4
Stephen Hawking Discusses White Genocide 1 hr Ramen 33
Australian police charge teens over 'racist' tr... 2 hr Gollan has free c... 134
Woolworths criticised for 'If you don't love it... 3 hr Becky 103

Australia People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE