Light-weight people should be allowed to carry more luggage on planes

Posted in the Australia Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 18 of18
Proud Misogynist

Glen Iris, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
May 1, 2013
 
Why can a fat 120kg man take on board 6kgs worth of sh*t, but a 60kg man can't take 8kgs worth of sh*t on a plane for example?

They should weigh our bags PLUS our body/clothes weight - total!

I should be President of Earth.

MEN > women
schmakos

Absecon, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
May 1, 2013
 
They used to do that in the old days, weigh the passenger but theres no chance in hell of that happening now so we continue having to pay the same amount as some fat turd.

Too many fat bastards in everywhere now.
environMentalist

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 1, 2013
 
Good Aussies wrote:
<quoted text>
What about a fit, muscular 6ft2 man weighing 120kg? Should they be penalised as well?
Should we let little chingwongs carry on more because they are weak and small?
It was a great rule to have, very rational. Up until someone somewhere realized it would give other races an advantage. Can't ever have that now can we.

We whites invented the airplane, and asians should be made to travel with the luggage. Or they can use asian technology like the palanquin which they were using when whites arrived in asia.
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 1, 2013
 
Tickets should be priced per Kg wt of the passenger. Seat width should be adjustable and larger seats to larger and heavier passengers.

Thin light guys save money, heavy fat people get to travel in comfort.

Brilliant idea, so of course a lot of you will find something wrong with it!
chingwongs now

Jakarta, Indonesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
May 1, 2013
 
Good Aussies wrote:
<quoted text>
What about a fit, muscular 6ft2 man weighing 120kg? Should they be penalised as well?
Should we let little chingwongs carry on more because they are weak and small?
Why penalize the short thin ones, why do they have to pay heavy fat mans fare.

If smarter people get the better jobs, dumb people cant complain and ask for same pay. So why not same criteria elsewhere?

“REFUSE ALL IMITATIONS!!”

Since: Jan 11

Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 1, 2013
 
Fat plane passengers should be issued with a back-pack containing a balloon. Standing on scales the passenger's balloon should be inflated with Helium until the scales display the weight of the passenger as that of a light person.

Then they can be allowed on the plane.

My R&D department is about to release back-packs and balloons for purchase at airport check-in counters.

I'll be rich!!:D :D :D
Proud Misogynist

Glen Iris, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 1, 2013
 
Good Aussies wrote:
<quoted text>
What about a fit, muscular 6ft2 man weighing 120kg? Should they be penalised as well?
Should we let little chingwongs carry on more because they are weak and small?
Yes. Muscle or fat, weight is weight.
And just what does being "fit" have to do with anything? I'm getting real tired of that word thrown around everywhere. Seems like noone knows the meaning of the word.

MEN > women
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
May 1, 2013
 
Anorexic women should get 85% off. But three of them be given just one seat.
Proud Misogynist

Glen Iris, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
May 1, 2013
 
Seriously.. the more you weigh the more you should have to pay. Say a dollar for every kg.
Fat people use-up more fuel, more tyre tread, and make it harder on the engines. Flights might be cheaper (because of the fuel savings) and there would probably be less plane accidents if there weren't any fat people (because the planes would be lighter).

It's about time we started taxing these fat f*cks. Perhaps THEN they'll lower the food-dosage.

I doubt it.

MEN > women
xes

Adelaide, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
May 1, 2013
 
Adelaidean is 213kg so how much for that ticket for him i guess his clothes are bigger so i am gussing his baggage to be in the range of 100kg making his total 313 kg ,So how much for his ticket and extra wide load fat ass ticket?

“REFUSE ALL IMITATIONS!!”

Since: Jan 11

Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

xes wrote:
Adelaidean is 213kg so how much for that ticket for him i guess his clothes are bigger so i am gussing his baggage to be in the range of 100kg making his total 313 kg ,So how much for his ticket and extra wide load fat ass ticket?
Curses! My secret is out!!
Proud Misogynist

Glen Iris, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
May 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

xes wrote:
Adelaidean is 213kg so how much for that ticket for him i guess his clothes are bigger so i am gussing his baggage to be in the range of 100kg making his total 313 kg ,So how much for his ticket and extra wide load fat ass ticket?
I think you got the "Adelaidean" mixed-up with (the fat) "Ahomana" (bushpig).

I would charge her/it $24,999 for an interstate flight (nearest state/airport only. The plane wouldn't make it overseas with her on board). Any less is just not worth it. I wouldn't want her on my plane. The smell, the fat, the diseases, the sh*t stains... YUCK!

MEN > women
Proud Misogynist

Glen Iris, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
May 1, 2013
 
apocalypse now wrote:
Tickets should be priced per Kg wt of the passenger. Seat width should be adjustable and larger seats to larger and heavier passengers.
Thin light guys save money, heavy fat people get to travel in comfort.
Brilliant idea, so of course a lot of you will find something wrong with it!
I agree.. except for your width-adjustable seat idea. That would take up too much space, weigh more, be more costly, be weaker...

I was going to write: They should just have normal-sized seats and large-sized seats.. but no. Why should we accommodate these fat f*cks? We should do all that we can to make it harder for fat f*cks to be/stay fat.

MEN > women
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
May 1, 2013
 
Proud Misogynist wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree.. except for your width-adjustable seat idea. That would take up too much space, weigh more, be more costly, be weaker...
I was going to write: They should just have normal-sized seats and large-sized seats.. but no. Why should we accommodate these fat f*cks? We should do all that we can to make it harder for fat f*cks to be/stay fat.
MEN > women
You mean make them pay for more, but not give them more? Hmmm.

Yeah Lets Stick it to em fatties. Slim down or die! Make em wear corsets on all public transport.
Proud Misogynist

Glen Iris, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
May 1, 2013
 
apocalypse now wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean make them pay for more, but not give them more? Hmmm.
Yeah Lets Stick it to em fatties. Slim down or die! Make em wear corsets on all public transport.
Yes. Like I previously mentioned.. fat f*cks use up more of the planes fuel, wear out the tyres more, wear out the brakes more, wear out the engines more, wear out the seats more, smell, leave their sweaty, smelly and disgusting "a*s oils" behind on the seats too, make it harder on those sitting next to them... So why shouldn't they pay more?

Say if there were 500 people on a plane and each one weighed 100kgs on average, that = 50,000kgs worth of humans.
If the average weight of those 500 people was 65kgs instead, that = 32,500kgs, which would make the plane 17,500kgs lighter.

MEN > women
Effendi Bohong

Denpasar, Indonesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
May 1, 2013
 
Come and live in Indonesia for a while if you want to learn all about " hand baggage ". The locals here would lug 44 gallon drums and wool bales up the gangway if they were strong enough to lift 'em !
Good Aussies

France

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
May 2, 2013
 
Proud Misogynist wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Like I previously mentioned.. fat f*cks use up more of the planes fuel, wear out the tyres more, wear out the brakes more, wear out the engines more, wear out the seats more, smell, leave their sweaty, smelly and disgusting "a*s oils" behind on the seats too, make it harder on those sitting next to them... So why shouldn't they pay more?
Say if there were 500 people on a plane and each one weighed 100kgs on average, that = 50,000kgs worth of humans.
If the average weight of those 500 people was 65kgs instead, that = 32,500kgs, which would make the plane 17,500kgs lighter.
MEN > women
Weight of a 747-100B = 162,400kg.

Capacity = 550 people.

Fully loaded with people and not including baggage and extras like food etc, weight of the plane with people averaging 100kg = 217400kg

Fully loaded with 65kg people = 198150kg

217400/198150 = 1.09714862

So, if we take an airfare of $500 and 65kg being the base reference, a 100kg person should pay $548.57431.

This figure would be lower when taking into consideration baggage and food and extras, and would change per plane model and seating fulfillment.
apocalypse now

Jakarta, Indonesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
May 2, 2013
 
Replace heavy seats by spongy yoga mats.

Train air hostesses to be flexible yoga instructors too, offer free and optional yoga lessons, or let passengers just lie down relax catch up on sleep..

More comfortable for passengers who get to straighten up even sleep properly on long journeys, health to boot, cheaper tickets, save money on expensive seats, save fuel and environment. AND SAVE MONEY ON FUEL due to the less weight to carry for the airline.

Food can be served Japanese style. And instead of seat belts you could have floor belts.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 18 of18
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

162 Users are viewing the Australia Forum right now

Search the Australia Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Aussies are the new Abos 11 min Abbot rocks 12
Tony Abbott FTA sell out - uNbound migrant work... 11 min yougottabekiddin 39
Why should Australians fear from Muslims? (Dec '07) 26 min fight pig munchers 42,881
Rauf lala has a small ballbag 36 min i love raufs bum 1
The ADELAIDEAN is the best poster by far 39 min Boongs are travellers 53
I have Too many Gf in US 42 min Boongs are travellers 6
White countries are amongst the least multicult... 47 min Boongs are travellers 12
White People Are Obviously Superior 1 hr scoobie 341
War India vs Australia, Who will win? (Oct '10) 2 hr MCCs 12,933
We need to impose a petrol car tax 3 hr Goats milk Australia 406
•••
•••
•••
•••