Thatcher made 'racist' comment:...

Apr 9, 2013 Full story: Suria 194

Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr says British leader Margaret Thatcher made an "unabashedly racist" comment, recalling what she said to him about Asian immigration after she left office.

Read more
truth

Perth, Australia

#94 Apr 11, 2013
If you see future nothing exist here..do you liked tell others please don't come here..yes o then how
you live your life does meter did someone love you or not..Is that problem?
I don't liked personally that everybody love me..no.
To much love is not good.
soobvious

Milton Keynes, UK

#95 Apr 11, 2013
mat wrote:
<quoted text>
There were many common british on the streets in thatcher rule,
she increased homelessness thatcher was also a classist tory, and all her staunch supporters are fellow classists and tories.She was also responsible for the deaths of hundreds of argentinians.The big question is why do state poltician leaders get away with murder, and then get lauded by there fellow politicains.Thank God for the law of karma, that punishes those elite criminals who are above the law.Thatcher has been reincarnated as a latin american, she will be murdered when she grows up,as divine punishment for the murders of many argentines, like those 300 on an argentinian boat that was torpedoed and all the men on board suffered drowning deaths.
"there were many common british on the streets" really? yet the common British man/woman elected Thatcher three times in total,strange don't you think?

you seem to be confused,sinking an enemy ship in a time of war is not murder its war.you are aware that Argentina staged an armed invasion which started the Falklands war,yes?
sid

Brisbane, Australia

#96 Apr 12, 2013
The image of thatcher is quite evocative, “let them eat fcuking cake”.
rio

Beckenham, UK

#97 Apr 12, 2013
soobvious wrote:
<quoted text>
"there were many common british on the streets" really? yet the common British man/woman elected Thatcher three times in total,strange don't you think?
you seem to be confused,sinking an enemy ship in a time of war is not murder its war.you are aware that Argentina staged an armed invasion which started the Falklands war,yes?
Maggie said it right: " Only in Britain, can a leader be accused of sinking an enemy ship during a war!".

I suppose that Nelson was also a "war criminal"; he dared to win at Trafalgar¬!
F OFF Sri Lankans

Kraków, Poland

#98 Apr 12, 2013
Margaret Thatcher used to often shit in the street when she walked along 'Old Kent Road' and 'Whitechapel'.
Death of a Demon

Bo'ness, UK

#99 Apr 12, 2013
soobvious wrote:
<quoted text>
"there were many common british on the streets" really? yet the common British man/woman elected Thatcher three times in total,strange don't you think?
you seem to be confused,sinking an enemy ship in a time of war is not murder its war.you are aware that Argentina staged an armed invasion which started the Falklands war, yes?
There was 300 mile buffer zone around the Falklands, that both warring parties and International law deemed as International waters therefore no attacks on each other were foreseen to occur.
This was why the Belgrano was not on battle alert whenever she was sneakily and unlawfully attacked as she sat comfortably outside this 300 mile Falklands buffer Zone.
The Argentinians were to respect this law, whenever they did not attack British Warships heading to the Falklands. Naively the Argentinians wrongly believed that Britain would also respect International law and waters, only for them to shamefully and disgracefully NOT whenever they attacked the Belgrano which was to evilly cause the deaths of hundreds of young naval Argentinians.
This foul and sneaky war crime action would be evilly ordered by none other Mrs Thatcher HERSELF!

There always seems to be a hypocritical law that the so-called democratic evil righteous, can easily avoid breaking, because of a falsely perceived, corrupted false moral high ground!

'Legalised Terrorists' comes to mind!
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#100 Apr 12, 2013
Death of a Demon wrote:
<quoted text>There was 300 mile buffer zone around the Falklands, that both warring parties and International law deemed as International waters therefore no attacks on each other were foreseen to occur.
This was why the Belgrano was not on battle alert whenever she was sneakily and unlawfully attacked as she sat comfortably outside this 300 mile Falklands buffer Zone.
The Argentinians were to respect this law, whenever they did not attack British Warships heading to the Falklands. Naively the Argentinians wrongly believed that Britain would also respect International law and waters, only for them to shamefully and disgracefully NOT whenever they attacked the Belgrano which was to evilly cause the deaths of hundreds of young naval Argentinians.
This foul and sneaky war crime action would be evilly ordered by none other Mrs Thatcher HERSELF!
There always seems to be a hypocritical law that the so-called democratic evil righteous, can easily avoid breaking, because of a falsely perceived, corrupted false moral high ground!
'Legalised Terrorists' comes to mind!
We didn't break any laws.

WE declared a buffer zone, then 2 weeks before we sunk the belgrano we told argentina we might attack any of their ships anywhere in the South Atlantic.

We only did attack after intercepting an order for the belgrano to link up with Argentina's carrier for a coordinated attack on the British fleet.

Thatcher was an evil bitch but there's more than enough truth to crucify her. There's no need to make stuff up.
Giggs

Sheffield, UK

#102 Apr 12, 2013
She must have pizzed off a lot of people round the world.

My dad is happy she is dead.

I think most people will be glad to see the back of her.
soobvious

Milton Keynes, UK

#103 Apr 12, 2013
Death of a Demon wrote:
<quoted text>There was 300 mile buffer zone around the Falklands, that both warring parties and International law deemed as International waters therefore no attacks on each other were foreseen to occur.
This was why the Belgrano was not on battle alert whenever she was sneakily and unlawfully attacked as she sat comfortably outside this 300 mile Falklands buffer Zone.
The Argentinians were to respect this law, whenever they did not attack British Warships heading to the Falklands. Naively the Argentinians wrongly believed that Britain would also respect International law and waters, only for them to shamefully and disgracefully NOT whenever they attacked the Belgrano which was to evilly cause the deaths of hundreds of young naval Argentinians.
This foul and sneaky war crime action would be evilly ordered by none other Mrs Thatcher HERSELF!
There always seems to be a hypocritical law that the so-called democratic evil righteous, can easily avoid breaking, because of a falsely perceived, corrupted false moral high ground!
'Legalised Terrorists' comes to mind!
yes you are so right,imagine deceiving the enemy in time of war! im sure no one in the history of war as committed such a dastardly act!well, before Thatcher that is.

you should research what the captain of the Belgrano said about the sinking,he seems to disagree with you.(or are you claiming to know more about the laws of war than a Argentinian Naval officer?)
me,i am going to take his word over yours.
Tell me why

Beijing, China

#104 Apr 12, 2013
soobvious wrote:
<quoted text>
you seem to be confused,sinking an enemy ship in a time of war is not murder its war.you are aware that Argentina staged an armed invasion which started the Falklands war,yes?
What invasion. Why the heck do you think Falkland Island should belong to Britain- When it is just off the coast of Argentina? Britain was the aggressor just as much as the Spanish and the Portuguese (or french). You just are trying to justify (moralify) your misdeeds, you expansionism and past annexations, couse you won the falkland war.

But Your claims are just as absurd. People are much wiser now, and see things way more clearly than before. Britain should relinquish control of all past annexed lands (and other looted wealth) like Falkland Islands and pay up for past crimes. Make amends while you still can of your own volition (and help the world heal in the process).
soobvious

Milton Keynes, UK

#105 Apr 12, 2013
Tell me why wrote:
<quoted text>
What invasion. Why the heck do you think Falkland Island should belong to Britain- When it is just off the coast of Argentina? Britain was the aggressor just as much as the Spanish and the Portuguese (or french). You just are trying to justify (moralify) your misdeeds, you expansionism and past annexations, couse you won the falkland war.
But Your claims are just as absurd. People are much wiser now, and see things way more clearly than before. Britain should relinquish control of all past annexed lands (and other looted wealth) like Falkland Islands and pay up for past crimes. Make amends while you still can of your own volition (and help the world heal in the process).
i see your location is China, so ill assume your Chinese(could be wrong obviously) but if you are ,one word "TIBET".
Tell me why

Beijing, China

#107 Apr 12, 2013
Death of a Demon wrote:
<quoted text>There was 300 mile buffer zone around the Falklands, that both warring parties and International law deemed as International waters therefore no attacks on each other were foreseen to occur.
This was why the Belgrano was not on battle alert whenever she was sneakily and unlawfully attacked as she sat comfortably outside this 300 mile Falklands buffer Zone.
The Argentinians were to respect this law, whenever they did not attack British Warships heading to the Falklands. Naively the Argentinians wrongly believed that Britain would also respect International law and waters, only for them to shamefully and disgracefully NOT whenever they attacked the Belgrano which was to evilly cause the deaths of hundreds of young naval Argentinians.
This foul and sneaky war crime action would be evilly ordered by none other Mrs Thatcher HERSELF!
There always seems to be a hypocritical law that the so-called democratic evil righteous, can easily avoid breaking, because of a falsely perceived, corrupted false moral high ground!
'Legalised Terrorists' comes to mind!
He who wins the war, carries the loot, the glory n honor, gets to write and rewrite history. AND so he gets to stand on the moral high ground (in very fine clothes).

Until someone else can topple him over.
==========

And Democracy or not, its still one tribe against the other- fighting for land and loot. Democracy is just how they choose the leaders of their tribe internally. Don't make them any more or less of a looter plunder when they go out...
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#108 Apr 12, 2013
Tell me why wrote:
<quoted text>
What invasion. Why the heck do you think Falkland Island should belong to Britain- When it is just off the coast of Argentina? Britain was the aggressor just as much as the Spanish and the Portuguese (or french). You just are trying to justify (moralify) your misdeeds, you expansionism and past annexations, couse you won the falkland war.
But Your claims are just as absurd. People are much wiser now, and see things way more clearly than before. Britain should relinquish control of all past annexed lands (and other looted wealth) like Falkland Islands and pay up for past crimes. Make amends while you still can of your own volition (and help the world heal in the process).
If nations should give up annexed lands then argentina wouldn't exist in the first place.

WHo is it you think we should give the falklnds to?
Tell me why

Beijing, China

#110 Apr 12, 2013
soobvious wrote:
<quoted text>
i see your location is China, so ill assume your Chinese(could be wrong obviously) but if you are ,one word "TIBET".
So people of the world are like babies and you can distract them with a jingle toy? We are talking about Thacher and Falkland Islands.

======

What about tibet? Chinese are building roads, hospitals, infrastructure, schools in a most difficult tarrain where previously nothing existed, lifting up the lives of the local population and giving them jobs and access to all of the rest of China. And preventing indoctrination of young tibetans into an ancient regressive regressive culture of no choice?

How does that compare even remotely to the illegal hold of the british empire over FALKLAND ISLANDS even today in this age?
Good Aussies

Malta

#111 Apr 12, 2013
Let's imagine a comparable although hypothetical scenario.

The leader of China visits a Japanese leader. Japan's leaders are compromised by a small international clique of banksters and have begun a program of ethnic cleansing of their own race through mass immigration, integration, tolerance and name calling any Japanese person against their own genocide.

The leader of China mentions to the Japanese leader that if you aren't careful your race will become a minority in your own country and all the immigrants will take over.

Would anyone outside of an insane asylum call the Chinese leader "racist"?
soobvious

Milton Keynes, UK

#112 Apr 12, 2013
Tell me why wrote:
<quoted text>
So people of the world are like babies and you can distract them with a jingle toy? We are talking about Thacher and Falkland Islands.
======
What about tibet? Chinese are building roads, hospitals, infrastructure, schools in a most difficult tarrain where previously nothing existed, lifting up the lives of the local population and giving them jobs and access to all of the rest of China. And preventing indoctrination of young tibetans into an ancient regressive regressive culture of no choice?
How does that compare even remotely to the illegal hold of the british empire over FALKLAND ISLANDS even today in this age?
honestly,that's how you attempt to justify China's occupation of Tibet?

obviously the monks that self-immolate to protest China's occupation must not have received the memo about the roads.

to be honest,the recent vote by the people of the Falklands to remain British exposes your argument as pathetic.

tell me, have the people of Tibet had a chance to vote on their continued occupation by China? oh how silly of me,even Chinese people don't get to vote,do they?
Tell me why

Beijing, China

#113 Apr 12, 2013
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
If nations should give up annexed lands then argentina wouldn't exist in the first place.
WHo is it you think we should give the falklnds to?
Argentina, since it now exists, much closer to Falklands than Britain, simple.

==========

So you stole it from someone and then had the added foresight to kill off the original owners- so there was no one to "give it back to" later!!

Guess what, it does not make any difference whatsoever. The empire is on its way out, THAT is what matters.
Tell me why

Beijing, China

#114 Apr 12, 2013
Good Aussies wrote:
Let's imagine a comparable although hypothetical scenario.
The leader of China visits a Japanese leader. Japan's leaders are compromised by a small international clique of banksters and have begun a program of ethnic cleansing of their own race through mass immigration, integration, tolerance and name calling any Japanese person against their own genocide.
The leader of China mentions to the Japanese leader that if you aren't careful your race will become a minority in your own country and all the immigrants will take over.
Would anyone outside of an insane asylum call the Chinese leader "racist"?
(Tell me why) your post is pertinent to the thread. Oh you were just whining and whinging.
soobvious

Milton Keynes, UK

#115 Apr 12, 2013
Tell me why wrote:
<quoted text>
Argentina, since it now exists, much closer to Falklands than Britain, simple.
==========
So you stole it from someone and then had the added foresight to kill off the original owners- so there was no one to "give it back to" later!!
Guess what, it does not make any difference whatsoever. The empire is on its way out, THAT is what matters.
the empire is on its way out.

are China ending their occupation of Tibet then?

obviously being from a Communist country you are not familiar with self determination,the people of the Falklands have recently voted to stay British.one day when China allows the common people to have a say in how your country is run you may understand.
I can read

Edinburgh, UK

#116 Apr 12, 2013
Tell me why wrote:
<quoted text>
Argentina, since it now exists, much closer to Falklands than Britain, simple.
==========
So you stole it from someone and then had the added foresight to kill off the original owners- so there was no one to "give it back to" later!!
Guess what, it does not make any difference whatsoever. The empire is on its way out, THAT is what matters.
Unlkike china in Tibet, we didn't steal anything or kill anyone to exert soveriegnty over the falklands.

Not like those numerous disputes China has with pretty much every other nation in Asia.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Australia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
An Indian man posted on topic Germany he had...... 7 hr Vikram The Indian 9
Chetan Patel murdered his wife Sejal 8 hr Indians are worth... 3
badi behan ko nangi nahate hue dekha. Aur usne ... (May '12) 11 hr mera nam gulshan ... 1,401
Are Indians schizophrenic? 11 hr Helen 8809 1
Filthy indian bashed by police. Hilarious! 22 hr Indians are worth... 1
mujhe ladko se gand marwana or unka lund chusna... (Jun '13) 23 hr suraj 40
Reasons to reinstate the White Australia Policy Mon Social cohesion 16
More from around the web