Euthanaise the weakest

Posted in the Australia Forum

First Prev
of 6
Next Last

“Fair & Balanced”

Since: Jul 12

wherever there's a mine

#1 Mar 18, 2013
You don't have the right to life
You don't have the right to be treated equal
You don't have the right to be a drain on society for life

mentally retarded creatures should be exterminated at birth. Survival of the fittest means we kill the weakest to ensure we keep becoming stronger.

The average defective human costs us over $110,000/yr. What a waste of money & resources on what is basically a drain.

These things will never live a normal productive life instead are leaches on societies purse. requiring millions over there life time to just join the fringes of society. Face facts we ridicule these creatures and poke fun at them. Waste billion on retard olympics which no able bodied person watches.

99% will never be capable of living by themselves. Killing them as infants saves billions. they have no knowledge of the crappy life ahead.

China has a 1 baby policy to save resources. NWO wants to kill tens of millions to reduce demand on limited resources. So lets start with eliminating these defective animals. Let the strong survive. If you are not going to positively contribute to society then you shall be eliminated.

The Labor socialist economist Keynes even wrote - "I must confess that retarded babies are not beneficial to anyone. They lack utility, even as a commodity. They are a waste of life and of valuable resources. Retarded babies are worthless." So Julia live by one of your socialist ideals & pass laws that defective creatures be eliminated.
stupidisasstupid does

Fairfield, Australia

#2 Mar 18, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
You don't have the right to life
You don't have the right to be treated equal
You don't have the right to be a drain on society for life
mentally retarded creatures should be exterminated at birth. Survival of the fittest means we kill the weakest to ensure we keep becoming stronger.
The average defective human costs us over $110,000/yr. What a waste of money & resources on what is basically a drain.
These things will never live a normal productive life instead are leaches on societies purse. requiring millions over there life time to just join the fringes of society. Face facts we ridicule these creatures and poke fun at them. Waste billion on retard olympics which no able bodied person watches.
99% will never be capable of living by themselves. Killing them as infants saves billions. they have no knowledge of the crappy life ahead.
China has a 1 baby policy to save resources. NWO wants to kill tens of millions to reduce demand on limited resources. So lets start with eliminating these defective animals. Let the strong survive. If you are not going to positively contribute to society then you shall be eliminated.
The Labor socialist economist Keynes even wrote - "I must confess that retarded babies are not beneficial to anyone. They lack utility, even as a commodity. They are a waste of life and of valuable resources. Retarded babies are worthless." So Julia live by one of your socialist ideals & pass laws that defective creatures be eliminated.
What a stupid post!

So that also means,by virtue, that if you become chronically ill, whether it be asthma, diabetes, arthritis,skeletal issues, migraines, visual or hearing problems, have an accident which leaves you somehow disabled etc etc, they all should be euthanised.
After all all those and more cost the taxpayer BILLIONS of dollars a well.
Pray now that you don't get ill, have an accident or age chefboy.

Maybe we should include those who can spell the word correctly that they are advocating: EUTHANISED!

YOU'RE UP CHEF BOY, your defect has been noted!!!

“Fair & Balanced”

Since: Jul 12

wherever there's a mine

#3 Mar 18, 2013
stupidisasstupiddoes wrote:
<quoted text>
What a stupid post!
So that also means,by virtue, that if you become chronically ill, whether it be asthma, diabetes, arthritis,skeletal issues, migraines, visual or hearing problems, have an accident which leaves you somehow disabled etc etc, they all should be euthanised.
After all all those and more cost the taxpayer BILLIONS of dollars a well.
Pray now that you don't get ill, have an accident or age chefboy.
Maybe we should include those who can spell the word correctly that they are advocating: EUTHANISED!
YOU'RE UP CHEF BOY, your defect has been noted!!!
you certainly are a stupid dumb@rse.

read what was written dumbfarck
clearly says defective at birth

hit a bit close to home for you does it?

Many races & countries do it. What use is a creature with cerebral palsy or severe autism? And given the choice you think they'd like to live like a vegetable?
Anglo-Saxon-Celt

Sydney, Australia

#4 Mar 18, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
You don't have the right to life
You don't have the right to be treated equal
You don't have the right to be a drain on society for life
mentally retarded creatures should be exterminated at birth. Survival of the fittest means we kill the weakest to ensure we keep becoming stronger.
The average defective human costs us over $110,000/yr. What a waste of money & resources on what is basically a drain.
These things will never live a normal productive life instead are leaches on societies purse. requiring millions over there life time to just join the fringes of society. Face facts we ridicule these creatures and poke fun at them. Waste billion on retard olympics which no able bodied person watches.
99% will never be capable of living by themselves. Killing them as infants saves billions. they have no knowledge of the crappy life ahead.
China has a 1 baby policy to save resources. NWO wants to kill tens of millions to reduce demand on limited resources. So lets start with eliminating these defective animals. Let the strong survive. If you are not going to positively contribute to society then you shall be eliminated.
The Labor socialist economist Keynes even wrote - "I must confess that retarded babies are not beneficial to anyone. They lack utility, even as a commodity. They are a waste of life and of valuable resources. Retarded babies are worthless." So Julia live by one of your socialist ideals & pass laws that defective creatures be eliminated.
Well in that case chefboy you should be heading to a euthansia clinic ASAP and do us all a favour because your weak moral base is no use to anyone and is a threat to many.
LOL

Westmead, Australia

#5 Mar 18, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
You don't have the right to life
You don't have the right to be treated equal
You don't have the right to be a drain on society for life
mentally retarded creatures should be exterminated at birth. Survival of the fittest means we kill the weakest to ensure we keep becoming stronger.
The average defective human costs us over $110,000/yr. What a waste of money & resources on what is basically a drain.
These things will never live a normal productive life instead are leaches on societies purse. requiring millions over there life time to just join the fringes of society. Face facts we ridicule these creatures and poke fun at them. Waste billion on retard olympics which no able bodied person watches.
99% will never be capable of living by themselves. Killing them as infants saves billions. they have no knowledge of the crappy life ahead.
China has a 1 baby policy to save resources. NWO wants to kill tens of millions to reduce demand on limited resources. So lets start with eliminating these defective animals. Let the strong survive. If you are not going to positively contribute to society then you shall be eliminated.
The Labor socialist economist Keynes even wrote - "I must confess that retarded babies are not beneficial to anyone. They lack utility, even as a commodity. They are a waste of life and of valuable resources. Retarded babies are worthless." So Julia live by one of your socialist ideals & pass laws that defective creatures be eliminated.
Get rid of the fatties. Stop fat people from breeding.
MalbarCACCA cant read

Saint Petersburg, Russia

#6 Mar 18, 2013
75% of the world population would be gone if the porkies went.

You would have to go too LOL, you're a porky I'll bet. You never leave this site even on Saturday nights you sit alone at home on this site loser loser loser hahahahaaha

“Fair & Balanced”

Since: Jul 12

wherever there's a mine

#7 Mar 18, 2013
Anglo-Saxon-Celt wrote:
<quoted text>
Well in that case chefboy you should be heading to a euthansia clinic ASAP and do us all a favour because your weak moral base is no use to anyone and is a threat to many.
impressive from a farktard that hates muslims yets wants us to vote for one & finds muslim women sexy. so with all your anti semetic BS I bet you toss off to Barbara Streisand - in Yentl you sick ghay carnt. euthanasia is too good for you. you can be shipped back to your camel farcking backwater arab land and have a farcking cry back there.

You fool no-one sand monkey.
chefboy2stupid

Fairfield, Australia

#8 Mar 18, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
<quoted text>
you certainly are a stupid dumb@rse.
read what was written dumbfarck
clearly says defective at birth
hit a bit close to home for you does it?
Many races & countries do it. What use is a creature with cerebral palsy or severe autism? And given the choice you think they'd like to live like a vegetable?
You halfwit Hitler wannabe, there are DEGREES of eg cerebral palsy, where many can hold a job, marry etc. There are DEGREES where intellectually and physically it VARIES a lot.
DUMBARSE...Then what else can be expected by a utopian wannabe who clearly is what he despises.

So if you're unlucky enough to be born disabled you say kill them at birth, but if you are also unlucky enough to become ill or have an accident and become disabled or "a burden on society" that's different.

Seriously, you are just a very naughty boy! Besides, like you're fantasy this should happen is ever going to eventuate.
I thought you'd have bigger fish to fry then thinking how you'd like to dispose of the more vulnerable in society.

Anyway, only a first class coward like yourself would talk about killing a section of society that cannot defend itself.
chefboy2stupid

Fairfield, Australia

#9 Mar 18, 2013
Lol. "Fair and balanced".

Change it to "Fairly UNBALANCED", Chefboy.

Maybe there are some little girls with glasses that you'd like to beat up or maybe somebody who has cerebral palsy and walks with a limp that you'd like to attack (from behind, cowards style, like you)

“Fair & Balanced”

Since: Jul 12

wherever there's a mine

#10 Mar 18, 2013
chefboy2stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyway, only a first class coward like yourself would talk about killing a section of society that cannot defend itself.
What's teh matter. Taboo subjects freak you out?

Seems to be enough farckwits here to defend the disposable. So you're one? That's why your here all day. To useless to do anything else other than be a leach on society. What right do you have to live? Societies best interest if you & other retards are disposed of at birth. If you can't take care of yourself you are worthless. That includes all those career welfare bludgers. Most retards/spastics are too stupid to know society mocks them and wishes they were not seen. As adults (well not you farcktard) we make choices such as DNR is we are going to be left mentally deficient. What choice does a baby have. weak parents unable to make the right choice. burdening society with their/gods failures.

Catholics agree with infanticide. So do socialists (keynesians) & communists & many islamic countries. So the majority of the worlds population favours infanticide.
alex

Australia

#12 Mar 18, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
<quoted text>
you certainly are a stupid dumb@rse.
read what was written dumbfarck
clearly says defective at birth
hit a bit close to home for you does it?
Many races & countries do it. What use is a creature with cerebral palsy or severe autism? And given the choice you think they'd like to live like a vegetable?
defective at birth. before birth they can find deformities, if in first month after 2 of conception they peformed abortion i would agree, but to a new born baby, thats too cruel, but there are a cruel percentage I notice who could do this, notibly chinese who kill babies , it seems,some are more cruel and savage than others are you muslim?

I think people who live in countries that have the death penalty like muslim countries and china develop a coldness and savage primitiveness, especially when the death penalty goe s beyond what is justified- which is only for pre mediated murder- the usa only executes willful murderers

both china and muslim nations have the death penalty for crimes other than murder, though its generally agreed the muslims are the worst of a bad bunch
The Professor

Surrey, Canada

#13 Mar 18, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
You don't have the right to life
You don't have the right to be treated equal
You don't have the right to be a drain on society for life
mentally retarded creatures should be exterminated at birth. Survival of the fittest means we kill the weakest to ensure we keep becoming stronger.
The average defective human costs us over $110,000/yr. What a waste of money & resources on what is basically a drain.
These things will never live a normal productive life instead are leaches on societies purse. requiring millions over there life time to just join the fringes of society. Face facts we ridicule these creatures and poke fun at them. Waste billion on retard olympics which no able bodied person watches.
99% will never be capable of living by themselves. Killing them as infants saves billions. they have no knowledge of the crappy life ahead.
China has a 1 baby policy to save resources. NWO wants to kill tens of millions to reduce demand on limited resources. So lets start with eliminating these defective animals. Let the strong survive. If you are not going to positively contribute to society then you shall be eliminated.
The Labor socialist economist Keynes even wrote - "I must confess that retarded babies are not beneficial to anyone. They lack utility, even as a commodity. They are a waste of life and of valuable resources. Retarded babies are worthless." So Julia live by one of your socialist ideals & pass laws that defective creatures be eliminated.
Its so obvious you were neglected as a child, you have mental issues, you have abandonment issues, and that your mom wanted an abortion.

poor guy, you are...
Rabies

Castle Hill, Australia

#14 Mar 18, 2013
Chefboy you hit it right on the head, you are dead right , just another subject that all the warm and fuzzy sofcocks won't face up to. Hitler had the right idea in these cases. We as a country could be saving billions.
Elias

Glen Waverley, Australia

#16 Mar 19, 2013
Anglo-Saxon-Celt wrote:
<quoted text>
Well in that case chefboy you should be heading to a euthansia clinic ASAP and do us all a favour because your weak moral base is no use to anyone and is a threat to many.
I think chefboy had his head too close to an oven.
Elias

Glen Waverley, Australia

#17 Mar 19, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
<quoted text>
What's teh matter. Taboo subjects freak you out?
Seems to be enough farckwits here to defend the disposable. So you're one? That's why your here all day. To useless to do anything else other than be a leach on society. What right do you have to live? Societies best interest if you & other retards are disposed of at birth. If you can't take care of yourself you are worthless. That includes all those career welfare bludgers. Most retards/spastics are too stupid to know society mocks them and wishes they were not seen. As adults (well not you farcktard) we make choices such as DNR is we are going to be left mentally deficient. What choice does a baby have. weak parents unable to make the right choice. burdening society with their/gods failures.
Catholics agree with infanticide. So do socialists (keynesians) & communists & many islamic countries. So the majority of the worlds population favours infanticide.
You are an idiot. There are already prenatal tests that allow parents to terminate a fetus with Down Syndrome. There new tests coming up for other forms retardation and developmental conditions that will give parents the option to abort.

“Fair & Balanced”

Since: Jul 12

wherever there's a mine

#18 Mar 19, 2013
alex wrote:
<quoted text>
defective at birth. before birth they can find deformities, if in first month after 2 of conception they peformed abortion i would agree, but to a new born baby, thats too cruel, but there are a cruel percentage I notice who could do this, notibly chinese who kill babies , it seems,some are more cruel and savage than others are you muslim?
I think people who live in countries that have the death penalty like muslim countries and china develop a coldness and savage primitiveness, especially when the death penalty goe s beyond what is justified- which is only for pre mediated murder- the usa only executes willful murderers
both china and muslim nations have the death penalty for crimes other than murder, though its generally agreed the muslims are the worst of a bad bunch
Many countries, including Australia, allow late term abortion up to 36 weeks. So what's the difference to terminating a defective creature say 8 weeks after birth? Several European countries now allow infanticide. Obama supports it. 54% of Catholics support it. Why not destroy defective beings. We have no problems destroying 16,000 babies every day born female. Including hundreds in supposedly civilised countries of Europe, Nth America.

“Fair & Balanced”

Since: Jul 12

wherever there's a mine

#19 Mar 19, 2013
Elias wrote:
<quoted text>
You are an idiot. There are already prenatal tests that allow parents to terminate a fetus with Down Syndrome. There new tests coming up for other forms retardation and developmental conditions that will give parents the option to abort.
Less than 30% of women over 30 have the amnio to determine downs. So for the 70% of negligent women if they have a DS child why shouldn't infanticide be allowed?

And if a woman gives birth to a deaf, blind, mentally deficient creature why shouldn't infanticide be allowed up to 16 weeks. After all society not the parents pay for the useless thing so why shouldn't society decide if we let it live.

Why are you happy to abort a perfectly healthy normal foetus at up to 36 weeks yet won't destroy a defective leach after birth?
sarah

United States

#20 Mar 19, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
<quoted text>
Many countries, including Australia, allow late term abortion up to 36 weeks. So what's the difference to terminating a defective creature say 8 weeks after birth? Several European countries now allow infanticide. Obama supports it. 54% of Catholics support it. Why not destroy defective beings. We have no problems destroying 16,000 babies every day born female. Including hundreds in supposedly civilised countries of Europe, Nth America.
Bc other countries do it you seem to think its right. Do you usually agree with what europe or north america do? By judgeing your past post on topics I'd say no. So you're out just to destroy the helpless, what next, the poor, sick, old?
We're HUMANS, we have something other animals dont have, its called intelligence, we are the only animals that seem to understand our mortality.

As a race, the human race, the majority of us also have something called compassion. You should give it a try, but to have compassion you must first be able to put those less fortunate then you ahead of yourself, something you surely cant seem to do, for that you have to have a heart.
I guess you're like the Tinman on the wizard of OZ, you have no heart. And liveing in OZ, you're still heartless. I guess all your family and loved ones are in perfect health, otherwise you'd be singing a different song.
Its people like you who need to be put away, then yes, the world would truely be a better place.
No need to reply, Im gone from here, you make me sick. BASTARD!

“Fair & Balanced”

Since: Jul 12

wherever there's a mine

#21 Mar 19, 2013
The Professor wrote:
<quoted text>
Its so obvious you were neglected as a child, you have mental issues, you have abandonment issues, and that your mom wanted an abortion.
poor guy, you are...
LMAO
morals from a turdskin whose country murders over 500,000 babies every year born with the deformity of a vag1na.
Elias

Glen Waverley, Australia

#22 Mar 19, 2013
chefboy812 wrote:
<quoted text>
Less than 30% of women over 30 have the amnio to determine downs. So for the 70% of negligent women if they have a DS child why shouldn't infanticide be allowed?
And if a woman gives birth to a deaf, blind, mentally deficient creature why shouldn't infanticide be allowed up to 16 weeks. After all society not the parents pay for the useless thing so why shouldn't society decide if we let it live.
Why are you happy to abort a perfectly healthy normal foetus at up to 36 weeks yet won't destroy a defective leach after birth?
It's uneccessary to debate this. Non-invasive techniques for testing retardation (such as Downs Sydnrome) will be in place over the next 10-20 yrs reducing the number of 'defective' births to almost zero. Your attempt at armchair eugenics is out of step with developments in science.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Australia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Filthy indian bashed by police. Hilarious! 7 hr Indians are worth... 1
mujhe ladko se gand marwana or unka lund chusna... (Jun '13) 8 hr suraj 40
An Indian man posted on topic Germany he had...... 10 hr Vikram The Indian 7
Reasons to reinstate the White Australia Policy 10 hr Social cohesion 16
going to swingers clubs ruined my marriage - alfie (Mar '13) 10 hr Guage Hanssen 11
badi behan ko nangi nahate hue dekha. Aur usne ... (May '12) 10 hr Helen 8809 1,401
India will beat Australia in Worldcup Semifinal 11 hr Indians are worth... 4
More from around the web