Why do you ignore the psots in which I refuted your nonsense? Respond. Tell us on what grounds you think yourself smarter than a million PHD's, after repeatedly confessing to knowing squat about science.<quoted text>I want something: a compelling experiment for climate change mitigation. Fo nothing, my opinion that selling untested snake oil is fraud and hoax.
I explained exactly how we know, by multiple means, that man is producing orders of magnitude greater CO2 than the normal production rate. I POSTED SCIENCE, JACKBAG! On what grounds do you reject it?
I explained in detail four different ways that the data clearly shows that the warming can only be caused by the GH effect. Do you reject that science? On what grounds, jackbag?!
You made, by clear implication, the following recent excuses for denying the science:
1) Just maybe 99+% of purchased fossil fuels are horded instead of burned.
2) Just maybe several cubic miles of undetected oil seeps out of the sea floor each year.
3) Just maybe humans produce CO2 that is magically 99+% weaker than other CO2 in its GH properties.
4) I've forgotten the 4th one - probably because my brain recoiled in horror from the ooze that your brain produces. I'm sure you can refresh our memory. What was it, Lyin' Brian?
And why do you run from your asinine excuses for denial? You started out a proud science denier; now you hide in shame from your insane arguments.