These Sikhs have no shame. hurting the hand that feeds them

Why Khalistan? By: Bijla Singh Note - For more information go to Sikh Freedom website.

[Singh Tyaagi]

I am not sure if you'll clear my comments but the article is simply baseless,atrocious and mischievious.Most of the facts are distorted or totally wrong.Sikhs are a great people living with great respect and dignity in India with Sardar Man Mohan Singh as ruler.
Guru Govind Singh gave the command to Banda Bahadur (a hindu Sadhu) who sacrificed his everything for Khalsa and all the sikh rise was because of him.Bhai Mati Das,Lala Todar Mal(who gave his everything to buy land for the cremation of Sahebzadas)and Guru Nanak were dedicated Hindus for the cause of Sikh faith.Bairagi Akhada of Hindu sadhus is biggest and it's founder were no other than Baba Sri Chand,the great son of Guru Nanak.Hindu and Sikh had suffered together and today progressing together.So please learn not to betray our gurus and our faith.Wahe Guru ji Ka Kalsa,Wahe Guru ji Ki Fateh.

[sukhi]

Singh Tyaagi wrote:

I am not sure if you'll clear my comments but the article is simply baseless,atrocious and mischievious.Most of the facts are distorted or totally wrong.Sikhs are a great people living with great respect and dignity in India with Sardar Man Mohan Singh as ruler.
Guru Govind Singh gave the command to Banda Bahadur (a hindu Sadhu) who sacrificed his everything for Khalsa and all the sikh rise was because of him.Bhai Mati Das,Lala Todar Mal(who gave his everything to buy land for the cremation of Sahebzadas)and Guru Nanak were dedicated Hindus for the cause of Sikh faith.Bairagi Akhada of Hindu sadhus is biggest and it's founder were no other than Baba Sri Chand,the great son of Guru Nanak.Hindu and Sikh had suffered together and today progressing together.So please learn not to betray our gurus and our faith.Wahe Guru ji Ka Kalsa,Wahe Guru ji Ki Fateh.

Banda singh Bahadur was given amrit by Guru Gobind Singh Himself...and with that he became khalsa...as long as he was sadhu he kept on wandering in jungles running after nothing...!

bhai Mati Das was a gursikh who was complete follower of Guru Tegh Bahadur...when he was martyred, he was heard uttering Japji sahib from his mouth rather than cries...a Guru Mantra given by Guru Nanak...!

Lala Todar Mal was devotee of Guru Gogind Singh and facts about him are corect and there were many hindus like him...agaisnt whom sikks are too small to say anything...!

Guru Nanak was never hindu...he was born in hindu family though but rejected hindu karm kaand right from the beggining...For example he rejected wearing of janeo, the sacred hindu thread as he considered it to be useless ritual..!!!

he even stated following verses which are there in Guru Granth Sahib

Hindu Anna, Taraku kaana,
doonhein se Gyani siyana,,

which means hindu is sightless, muslim has got one eye. A person with true knowledge is better than these...

Baba Sri chand was son of Guru Nanak...but cannot be called as sikhs...he started his separate sect called udaasi sect...he was never sikh and his followed could never be...he is not guru of sikhs...though respectfull in sikhism...but never a sikh...!

indeed hindu and sikh suffered together but sikh sufferings are much more in number...!

now regarding that article...i ve compared the contents of it...with many other articles, eye witness accounts of various people...except of few things which show direct hatred towards hindus...almost everything is correct...even those which are not correct has been represented with anger...nothin more...it is the truth...so before commenting here...make ur facts clear...!!!

[mard singh]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

Bhen chod gandu bhanda bahadur was not sadhu he was rajput first make your comments clear.
His contribution was more than guru gobind.
Bhenchod he has those fighting skills.
Tera babe ke amrt chakne se usme nahin aagye they.
Muslamno ki rajputon ne bahut gand marii hai or aagagr tuj me aakal hai to jaa ke dekh lena all the fighter were either kahtri hindus or rajputs jaats. Dekh le panj payara chon keda jaat kahada hoya c te keda kahtri hoya c.
Os time sikh c ge hi nahi warna nanka kehnda hindu anna turk -kana te kahlaistani- fudu.
Guru Nanak (1469-1539), preserved in the Adi Granth.
Mera mani mera man eara Ram piyara Ram
behnchod nanak hindu nahin tha to raam ka naam kaya gand marwane ke liye leta tha

Why don't you fu ck off to to your own shit hole thats where you belong.
Guru Nanak Dev Ji was born in a hindu family, thats all.

[come on]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

Bhen chod gandu bhanda bahadur was not sadhu he was rajput first make your comments clear.
His contribution was more than guru gobind.
Bhenchod he has those fighting skills.
Tera babe ke amrt chakne se usme nahin aagye they.
Muslamno ki rajputon ne bahut gand marii hai or aagagr tuj me aakal hai to jaa ke dekh lena all the fighter were either kahtri hindus or rajputs jaats. Dekh le panj payara chon keda jaat kahada hoya c te keda kahtri hoya c.
Os time sikh c ge hi nahi warna nanka kehnda hindu anna turk -kana te kahlaistani- fudu.
Guru Nanak (1469-1539), preserved in the Adi Granth.
Mera mani mera man eara Ram piyara Ram
behnchod nanak hindu nahin tha to raam ka naam kaya gand marwane ke liye leta tha

is that what u r taught in your books
or is it ur upbring at fault?

[KnowtheTruth]

Guys dont indulge in useless discussion. See the power of india here:

http://de.youtube.com/watch...

[peace_lover]

KnowtheTruth wrote:

Guys dont indulge in useless discussion. See the power of india here:
http://de.youtube.com/watch...

I believe that one is a muslim and one is a sikh. Good to see that sikhs and muslims can get along.

[Poster]

Singh Tyaagi wrote:

I am not sure if you'll clear my comments but the article is simply baseless,atrocious and mischievious.Most of the facts are distorted or totally wrong.Sikhs are a great people living with great respect and dignity in India with Sardar Man Mohan Singh as ruler.
Guru Govind Singh gave the command to Banda Bahadur (a hindu Sadhu) who sacrificed his everything for Khalsa and all the sikh rise was because of him.Bhai Mati Das,Lala Todar Mal(who gave his everything to buy land for the cremation of Sahebzadas)and Guru Nanak were dedicated Hindus for the cause of Sikh faith.Bairagi Akhada of Hindu sadhus is biggest and it's founder were no other than Baba Sri Chand,the great son of Guru Nanak.Hindu and Sikh had suffered together and today progressing together.So please learn not to betray our gurus and our faith.Wahe Guru ji Ka Kalsa,Wahe Guru ji Ki Fateh.

I saw the article but did not bother responding to it because it was too stupid.

Sikhs work hard and do not take handouts from anyone.

The person who wrote the article is a MORON most probably a brahmin hindu.

[Poster]

The bhramin hindu did not like what Bilja Singh wrote about the Indian atrocities against SIKHS.

[KnowtheTruth]

peace_lover wrote:

<quoted text>
I believe that one is a muslim and one is a sikh. Good to see that sikhs and muslims can get along.

If you are much interested in religion, I would say just notice what happens when Sikh guy starts dancing crowd starts dancing.

[Gaurav Kanwar]

bhen ke lode answer to de, you like coward bindrawla use only those statements from guru granth sahib that suits, you dont have guts to accept the truth. Do not go by articles open your guru granth sahib and then read the truth. Siks they dont have any ideolgy, it is either coped from hindu or muslims. thats it.
But i will not say nor i force any one that sikhs are hindus my aim is to tell you the truth that siks were not born were actually converted hindus.

Bindarawla was a 6ka a terrorist not more than that

Jai hind.

[Fact]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

Mera mani mera man eara Ram piyara Ram
behnchod nanak hindu nahin tha to raam ka naam kaya gand marwane ke liye leta tha

Guru Nanak Devji was not a hindu. He refused to wear sacred hindu thread janaeu and uttered following shabad:

"Though men commit countless thefts, countless adulteries, utter countless falsehoods and countless words of abuse;
Though they commit countless robberies and villianies night and day against their fellow creatures;
Yet the cotton spread is spun, and the brahman come to twist it.
For the ceremony they kill a goat and cook and eat it, and everybody then say 'put on the janaeu'.
When it become old, it is thrown away, and another is put on, Nanak, the string break not if it is strong."
(SGGS p471)

The priest in utter despair asked, "What kind of sacred thread would you wear?" The guru replied,

"Out of cotton of compassion
Spin the thread of contentment
Tie knots of continence,
Give it a twist of truth.
That would make a janaeu for the soul,
If you have it, o brahman, put it on me.
Such a thread once worn will never break
Nor get soiled, burnt or lost,
The man who wear such a thread is blessed."
(SGGS p471)

Also the word 'Raam' has been used for God in Guru Granth Sahib and not for Ram Chand(son of Dasrath) of hindus.

"Raam Chand passed away, as did Raawan, even though he had lots of relatives.
Says Nanak, nothing lasts forever; the world is like a dream."
(SGGS p1429)

"Kabeer, it does make a difference, how you chant the lord's name,'Raam'.
This is something to consider.
Everyone uses the same word for the son of dasrath and the wondrous lord.
Kabeer, use the word 'Raam', only to speak of the all-pervading lord.
You must make that distinction."
(SGGS p1374)

[sukhi]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

Bhen chod gandu bhanda bahadur was not sadhu he was rajput first make your comments clear.
His contribution was more than guru gobind.
Bhenchod he has those fighting skills.
Tera babe ke amrt chakne se usme nahin aagye they.
Muslamno ki rajputon ne bahut gand marii hai or aagagr tuj me aakal hai to jaa ke dekh lena all the fighter were either kahtri hindus or rajputs jaats. Dekh le panj payara chon keda jaat kahada hoya c te keda kahtri hoya c.
Os time sikh c ge hi nahi warna nanka kehnda hindu anna turk -kana te kahlaistani- fudu.
Guru Nanak (1469-1539), preserved in the Adi Granth.
Mera mani mera man eara Ram piyara Ram
behnchod nanak hindu nahin tha to raam ka naam kaya gand marwane ke liye leta tha

now its nasty...kutti deya...tera maa de phudde ch kuttey dee lees paayi c...jo tere jeha katura ugeya...!

banda bahadur joined bairagi sadhus called janki das and became his disciple and was living like a sadhu till he met Guru Gobind Singh...he was baptised and was given five arrows by the Guru and sent to fight agaisnt suba sirhind...he was born as rajput...but till he was rajput he was called lachman dev and nothing else...nobody knows him from that name...he was khalsa and devotee of Guru...!

his contribution was more than Guru Gobind Singh...read following lines by Baba Bulle Shah

na kahoon ab ki na kahoon tab ki,,
Gar na hotey Guru Gobind Singh, toh sunnat hoti sabki...

if Guru Gobind Singh would not have been there...everybody would have been circumcised in India...and ur ancestors would have proudly called khans or pathans...rajput race would have been wiped out completely...!

panj pyare and shaheed sikhs...wat the fuck...now i completely agree u belong to the family of illtrates..is ur dad a sweeper somwhere...?

out of all panj piaras, bhai dharam singh was a farmer and certainly not rajput or khatri, bhai himmat singh was low caste sikh, bhai mohkam singh was again a cloth printer not rajput again, bahi sahib singh was not rajput either but was a barber...how come u claim all were rajputs...kabhi khud ya apne baap ko school toh bheja hota...shayad pad likh jaate thoda...!

ram is synonym of the name of the God...this name was there even before Ram was born...it doesnt mean king of ayodhya...raja ram chander...he was not God...he was under the command of true lord...the one God...Guru Nanak never praised Ram chander, he praised the true Lord, the God...his waheguru or the wonderful Guru...!

from ur comments i could find that ur not at all learned person...post here only when u got indepth knowledge...else lick ur mother's bund...!

[sukhi]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

That's exactly what i am saying nanak was produced due to friction of hindu dic and hindu pussy so u khalsitani should be thankfull to hindus. All your guruus were khatri hindus. If an owl can see in the day it is not the fault of the sun. Bhanda bahadur blood sucker was Rajput accepot that converted not born sikh. We are not scared of land latus and khalistani's lund pe betahte hai inko.
I have seen you curse brahins because there was one brahims who helped muslims behnchod pehele apne aap ko dekho , tume guru gobind singh ko marne ke liye chod ke baag aaye the bloody cowards. so was bindrawala 6ka.
You always talk about bhagt singh to show your braveness have you ever talked about rajguru and sukhdev. maa ke lodo.

i will say only one thing about hindu rajputs...they used to sell their daughters and sisters to mughals, used to beg before mughals, were main cause why punjab was captured by britishers...if this is called bravery in rajputana or hindu terminology..m gratefull to God I am neither hindu nor Rajput...God save the ill educated or illetrate people still living in my country..!

[come on]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

That's exactly what i am saying nanak was produced due to friction of hindu dic and hindu pussy so u khalsitani should be thankfull to hindus. All your guruus were khatri hindus. If an owl can see in the day it is not the fault of the sun. Bhanda bahadur blood sucker was Rajput accepot that converted not born sikh. We are not scared of land latus and khalistani's lund pe betahte hai inko.
I have seen you curse brahins because there was one brahims who helped muslims behnchod pehele apne aap ko dekho , tume guru gobind singh ko marne ke liye chod ke baag aaye the bloody cowards. so was bindrawala 6ka.
You always talk about bhagt singh to show your braveness have you ever talked about rajguru and sukhdev. maa ke lodo.

a person who has no knowledge or who does not have anything proper to say resorts to abusing
Sikhs are not hindus no matter what your desperation
i ll tell you a story that happened in UP recently there was a marriage arranged of a jadav, rpt jadav (not yadav)Now jadavs are considered Shudras in hindu varnas
he left 4 bride's house on a horse as is custom in many indian baraat
on the way high caste hindus stopped this baraat "HOW DARE A LOW CASTE MAN RIDE A HORSE AND PROCEED THROUGH THEIR AREA" they did not allow the bridegroom to proceed further
but the bridegroom was bent upon going to his bride' s house on the horse only
later all the family members of the bridegroom converted to sikhism and the th bridegroom mounted the horse,carried a sword (kirpan)_and royally went to marriage
those high caste dared not stop his marriage procession
KHALSA SOI JO CHADE TURANG (GURU GOBIND SINGH)
HE IS KHALSA WHO MOUNTS A HORSE
TURAND= HORSE
I invite all readers who are nit sikhs who feel humiliated or embarrassed bcos of the caste system or insults spewed by so called KANWAR GAURAW to become sikhs
GURU GOBIND SINGH made warriors out of depressed classes

[Gaurav Kanwar]

Lachmen dev was more than guru gobind singh, had more fighting skills than guru gobind singh ji, he single handly fought mullas for more than 40 days,and ate flesh of his hourse, muslims killed his own son in front of him and put that in his mouth gobind.
Though guru gobind singh family was killed but it wasn't as dreadfull as of banda bhadur.

You dont answer all my questions. Sikhs left guru gobind singh to get his ass busted by muslims dont u think u r more culprits than brahmin which helped muslims.

Kutee ki gand pe ugne wale pisu: RAM is hindu word
GOD is english tune kede khote de lun ne keha hai ki bhagwan was called ram before the birth of RAM
It was only RAM chander was born the word came in hindu religion.

U r not singhs of gobind singh u r sings of bindrawala(6ka) who can accept the truth.

Pehle tu apani cast das phere rajputs naal comapre kari.

Bhai Daya Singh (1661-1708), one of the Panj Pyare or the Five Beloved celebrated in the Sikh tradition, was the son of Bhai Suddha, a Sobti Khatri of Lahore, and Mai Diali. His original name was Daya Ram. Teri mass da bosda aatenhu hindu nazar nahi aan da ke

Bhai Dharam Singh: orignal name Dharam DAS Bhai Sant Ram aaye hindu nahin hai from birth.

MUHKAM SINGH, BHAI (1663-1705).(Also written as "Mokham") born Muhkam Chand, Pthe Sikh tradition, was the son of TIrath Chand(HINDU), a calico printer/tailor of Dvaraka in Gujarat.He was gurati.

a barber of Bidar in Karnataka, and his wife Ankamma. suggets he was hindu bhenchod kisi sikh nu mayi da kaam karde dekhya hai ke bhen de lode aaye hindu nahi c te hor ki c. as

[sukhi]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

That's exactly what i am saying nanak was produced due to friction of hindu dic and hindu pussy so u khalsitani should be thankfull to hindus. All your guruus were khatri hindus. If an owl can see in the day it is not the fault of the sun. Bhanda bahadur blood sucker was Rajput accepot that converted not born sikh. We are not scared of land latus and khalistani's lund pe betahte hai inko.
I have seen you curse brahins because there was one brahims who helped muslims behnchod pehele apne aap ko dekho , tume guru gobind singh ko marne ke liye chod ke baag aaye the bloody cowards. so was bindrawala 6ka.
You always talk about bhagt singh to show your braveness have you ever talked about rajguru and sukhdev. maa ke lodo.

while people talk bout bhagat singh...rajguru and sukhdev always comes along...they are not different...but bhagat singh was the leader of HSRA not rajguru or sukhdev...they were his team mates i would say...and for the "crime" these three great men were hanged was bhagat singh's plan, not anybody else's plan...neverthless...if u go to Ludhiana today...u will find staues of all three great men at one place...!!

it was bhagat singh's idea to go for poorna swaraj or complete independence which congress cashed...they didnt even know about poorna swaraj...!

[sukhi]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

That's exactly what i am saying nanak was produced due to friction of hindu dic and hindu pussy so u khalsitani should be thankfull to hindus. All your guruus were khatri hindus. If an owl can see in the day it is not the fault of the sun. Bhanda bahadur blood sucker was Rajput accepot that converted not born sikh. We are not scared of land latus and khalistani's lund pe betahte hai inko.
I have seen you curse brahins because there was one brahims who helped muslims behnchod pehele apne aap ko dekho , tume guru gobind singh ko marne ke liye chod ke baag aaye the bloody cowards. so was bindrawala 6ka.
You always talk about bhagt singh to show your braveness have you ever talked about rajguru and sukhdev. maa ke lodo.

kanjri de puttar (kanjri means gashti)...u should go to school once in ur life time...!

[sukhi]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

Lachmen dev was more than guru gobind singh, had more fighting skills than guru gobind singh ji, he single handly fought mullas for more than 40 days,and ate flesh of his hourse, muslims killed his own son in front of him and put that in his mouth gobind.
Though guru gobind singh family was killed but it wasn't as dreadfull as of banda bhadur.
You dont answer all my questions. Sikhs left guru gobind singh to get his ass busted by muslims dont u think u r more culprits than brahmin which helped muslims.
Kutee ki gand pe ugne wale pisu: RAM is hindu word
GOD is english tune kede khote de lun ne keha hai ki bhagwan was called ram before the birth of RAM
It was only RAM chander was born the word came in hindu religion.
U r not singhs of gobind singh u r sings of bindrawala(6ka) who can accept the truth.
Pehle tu apani cast das phere rajputs naal comapre kari.
Bhai Daya Singh (1661-1708), one of the Panj Pyare or the Five Beloved celebrated in the Sikh tradition, was the son of Bhai Suddha, a Sobti Khatri of Lahore, and Mai Diali. His original name was Daya Ram. Teri mass da bosda aatenhu hindu nazar nahi aan da ke
Bhai Dharam Singh: orignal name Dharam DAS Bhai Sant Ram aaye hindu nahin hai from birth.
MUHKAM SINGH, BHAI (1663-1705).(Also written as "Mokham") born Muhkam Chand, Pthe Sikh tradition, was the son of TIrath Chand(HINDU), a calico printer/tailor of Dvaraka in Gujarat.He was gurati.
a barber of Bidar in Karnataka, and his wife Ankamma. suggets he was hindu bhenchod kisi sikh nu mayi da kaam karde dekhya hai ke bhen de lode aaye hindu nahi c te hor ki c. as

as long as lachman dev was not singh he was dissolved in blind meditation...it was after he became gurbax singh or banda singh bahadur he was infused into warrior saint analogy...it was Guru who made him warrior else he was a sadhu with no spirituality...!
the thinking of dying for ur faith and fighting the oppressors was given by Guru Gobind Singh...else hindus wouldnt have learnt the essense of living with freedom...ghulam the ghulam hi reh jaate...ya shayad pehle mughal chod dete fir angrez...!!!
which sikhs ur talking about who left Guru...if ur talking about 40 mukte...then I would again say either u or ur dad must go to school and atend history lecture for couple of weeks...!!
these 40 sikghs left guruji...but returned back after realising there mistake and were martyred in the battle of muktsar...any other reference if u can give from history where singhs left Guruji...well ur most welkum...!
well Rama reffered to one God, the True One...in sikhism God is called by the name WahegGuru...if we call our child by the name of Waheguru singh...will he become God...same is the case with Rama Chandra...u tell me what spiritual message Did Rama Gave to the world...nothing...really...he wasnt a God...but incarnation of Vishnu...as Mythology say...look at the following link...if u can read english...read the following article with patience...!
http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Gurbani_:_...
Bhindranwale was true singh of the Guru, he was and a true singh is one step below the true Guru...there is no harm in respecting him...!!!
CAST SYSTEM is the part of hinduism...not sikhism...m singh...as Guru Himself stated
jiski jaat paat kul mahi, sardari na bhahi kadahi,,
tin hi ko sardar banaun, tabhe Gobind Singh Naam kahaon...!!!
so it the trend of backward people like u to follow casteism not me...!

[sukhi]

Gaurav Kanwar wrote:

Lachmen dev was more than guru gobind singh, had more fighting skills than guru gobind singh ji, he single handly fought mullas for more than 40 days,and ate flesh of his hourse, muslims killed his own son in front of him and put that in his mouth gobind.
Though guru gobind singh family was killed but it wasn't as dreadfull as of banda bhadur.
You dont answer all my questions. Sikhs left guru gobind singh to get his ass busted by muslims dont u think u r more culprits than brahmin which helped muslims.
Kutee ki gand pe ugne wale pisu: RAM is hindu word
GOD is english tune kede khote de lun ne keha hai ki bhagwan was called ram before the birth of RAM
It was only RAM chander was born the word came in hindu religion.
U r not singhs of gobind singh u r sings of bindrawala(6ka) who can accept the truth.
Pehle tu apani cast das phere rajputs naal comapre kari.
Bhai Daya Singh (1661-1708), one of the Panj Pyare or the Five Beloved celebrated in the Sikh tradition, was the son of Bhai Suddha, a Sobti Khatri of Lahore, and Mai Diali. His original name was Daya Ram. Teri mass da bosda aatenhu hindu nazar nahi aan da ke
Bhai Dharam Singh: orignal name Dharam DAS Bhai Sant Ram aaye hindu nahin hai from birth.
MUHKAM SINGH, BHAI (1663-1705).(Also written as "Mokham") born Muhkam Chand, Pthe Sikh tradition, was the son of TIrath Chand(HINDU), a calico printer/tailor of Dvaraka in Gujarat.He was gurati.
a barber of Bidar in Karnataka, and his wife Ankamma. suggets he was hindu bhenchod kisi sikh nu mayi da kaam karde dekhya hai ke bhen de lode aaye hindu nahi c te hor ki c. as

kisi kanjri ya gashti deya...i said only Dya singh was khatri..rest all of them were from different castes...not Rajput...they were sikh with unshorn hair...when guruji asked for a head...he bever said he needs a head of a muslim or hindu or a rajput...he asked for a head of sikh...!!!
and hindus were those who answered
kaam humara tolan takri, nangi kard (sword) kabhu na pakri,,
kaag udey toh main dar jaaon,, mughlon se kaise lad paoon...!!!
these cowards were those people who were scared to become sikh and fight against mughals...and now they are freed from all atrocity, what they do is simply bark like an infected dog...!!!!

if u go by name, then there are many people in sikhism who got hindu names...and many in hinduism who sikh names..but does it really mean that he is hindu...or latter are sikhs...the five piaras were gursikhs following gurus baani to the core, living life as Gurus taught them...they were sikhs and after baptising to the khalsa panth they became singhs...it is not the name or the birth placeor ur family that decides which faith u belong to...it is upto u...Guru Nanak was born in hindu family but denounced every single hindu practice...!

keeping kesh and being singh was given by Guru Gobind singh on vaisakhi of 1699...though bhai sahib singh was attached to Guru Ghar from very beggining due to the the respecft baba Nanak gained in BIdar...he was working in his chosen proffesion...but was staunch believer of guru's philosophy...not vedas...he became a revered warrior of khalsa panth later on...!!!
the sikhism is a philosophy...those who follow it is a sikh...panj piare followed it and were baptised to become khalsa to give final form to sikh panth...but again if u were educated enough to understand all that...!!!

[sukhi]

come on wrote:

<quoted text>
a person who has no knowledge or who does not have anything proper to say resorts to abusing
Sikhs are not hindus no matter what your desperation
i ll tell you a story that happened in UP recently there was a marriage arranged of a jadav, rpt jadav (not yadav)Now jadavs are considered Shudras in hindu varnas
he left 4 bride's house on a horse as is custom in many indian baraat
on the way high caste hindus stopped this baraat "HOW DARE A LOW CASTE MAN RIDE A HORSE AND PROCEED THROUGH THEIR AREA" they did not allow the bridegroom to proceed further
but the bridegroom was bent upon going to his bride' s house on the horse only
later all the family members of the bridegroom converted to sikhism and the th bridegroom mounted the horse,carried a sword (kirpan)_and royally went to marriage
those high caste dared not stop his marriage procession
KHALSA SOI JO CHADE TURANG (GURU GOBIND SINGH)
HE IS KHALSA WHO MOUNTS A HORSE
TURAND= HORSE
I invite all readers who are nit sikhs who feel humiliated or embarrassed bcos of the caste system or insults spewed by so called KANWAR GAURAW to become sikhs
GURU GOBIND SINGH made warriors out of depressed classes

well buddy if that's true, its really a very nice thing...!!