U.S. envoy: Gaddafi troops raping, is...

U.S. envoy: Gaddafi troops raping, issued Viagra

There are 40 comments on the WNFL-AM Green Bay story from Apr 29, 2011, titled U.S. envoy: Gaddafi troops raping, issued Viagra. In it, WNFL-AM Green Bay reports that:

The U.S. envoy to the United Nations told the Security Council on Thursday that troops loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi were increasingly engaging in sexual violence and some had been issued the impotency drug Viagra, diplomats said.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WNFL-AM Green Bay.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
chootista harper

Thailand

#3 May 16, 2011
rubbish.normally what nato does they put o others.check nato unachsand sexualy dysfunctioonal gents.chootista
Faith

New Baltimore, MI

#4 May 16, 2011
Forcible rape is one of the pillars of islam.
Confederate

San Jose, CA

#5 May 16, 2011
Why would a bunch of pricks need viagra? Bunch of dickless uneducated camel humpers. Do they make their camels wear a hijab? Or make each other, maybe they are all queer!
Confederate

San Jose, CA

#6 May 16, 2011
Now wonder their dogs walk bow legged.
lol

Santa Clara, CA

#7 May 16, 2011
What's up with these jihadists and viagra? Osama Bin Laden was using natural viagra too.
NEUTRAL

Singapore, Singapore

#8 May 16, 2011
Hey Nato and the West please go to so low as to made such accusations just because you control most of the Western Media.

Why did not you bring up the use of Agent Orange in Vietnam by American Troop - why no International Criminal Court Investigations ???

You just hush it up.

Your reasons of the past was to stop the Communists'
Domino Theory and that was enough to start a war to kill.

Now you use the excuse to enter to war by saying that you protect Libyan civilians and Mr Foxy guaranteed there would be no innocent casualties in the bombing and missile attacks - you know yourself you are lying but no one can stop up

I hope the Russians would be willing to stand up to the West and send their forces to assist Gaddafi

Since: Apr 11

Steyl, Netherlands

#9 May 17, 2011
Gaddafi and his family have nothing to do with islam. I'm a muslim myself and i hate people who use religion to commit terror and crimes.

Terrorist like Qaddafi should be burned

let's share knowledge and info together.

on http://www.who-is-gaddafi.com/gaddafis-ideolo...

you can see what crazy thoughts this idiot madman has. He must be stopped
yared

Chicago, IL

#10 May 17, 2011
some of this could be propaganda from the u.n. i really don't believe words u.n. says sometimes simply cuz they only pick put the bad guys who they think are bad guys. viagra, how would they know, if anything, those could be made up from defectors who want public opinion on gadaffi. like those defectors back in february, they could be lying about gadaffi telling them he ordered them to fire at the protestors.
StormRider

Almada, Portugal

#11 May 17, 2011
Terrorists like Obomba, Neo_Napoleon and the kid that is uk prime-minister should be send to Papua New Guinea....i heard that there's still canibals there , they will make a decend dinner...as 1st dish >:>
AGRAB

Larvik, Norway

#12 May 18, 2011
RRRUUUUBBBIIISSSHHH--this is nonsens

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#13 May 18, 2011
Faith wrote:
Forcible rape is one of the pillars of islam.
.

You talk absolute garbbage, crap, you moron.
You filthy dogs will never be as civilised as muslims are.

Romanov.
Joe

Phoenix, AZ

#14 May 18, 2011
Dimitri100 wrote:
<quoted text>.
You talk absolute garbbage, crap, you moron.
You filthy dogs will never be as civilised as muslims are.
Romanov.
Right, you must be talking about the same civilized Muslims and peace loving religion that blowing women and children every day by the dozens!

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#15 May 18, 2011
Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, you must be talking about the same civilized Muslims and peace loving religion that blowing women and children every day by the dozens!
America has done a lot worse for the past 200 years.
Romanov.
truth lover

London, UK

#16 May 21, 2011
This was a story invented by susan rice and it was refuted by the cia operatives on the ground, who said there was no proof of this. The rebels took two dead soldiers to a hospital and a doctor there said he discovered tablets in their pockets - how do we know the rebels didn't plant them there? They do love making false claims, I'm sure they'll make great politicians. The only issue I can see with the idea is that no one voted for them either, so it won't be a democracy, oh and the small conideration that their tribe is apparently one of the smallest, so ethnic cleansing might ensue when nato leave. As for those putting down Islam or religion, you clearly believe everything that is told to keep your mind in slavery. People are people.

Since: Jul 11

Berlin, Germany

#23 Apr 24, 2012
NEUTRAL wrote:
Hey Nato and the West please go to so low as to made such accusations just because you control most of the Western Media.
You really expect to find any truth in any media in times of war? Loool!
Why did not you bring up the use of Agent Orange in Vietnam by American Troop - why no International Criminal Court Investigations ???
A whole lot of reasons: Itís ancient history and not relevant any more. There was no ICC at that time. The US has not signed to the ICC and is therefore not liable. Agent orange was not classed as a chemical weapon - it was a defoliating agent (weed killing)- and therefore its effects on the enemy (and also on US GIs) can be argued to have been an accident.
Accidents are called collateral and are exempt unless you have hard proof of otherwise. And lastly the ICCís jurisdiction only covers purposely committed war crimes not collateral.
You just hush it up.
I doubt that very much. The application of agent orange was at the time even shown on the TV news. The facts are widely known otherwise how do you know about it?
Your reasons of the past was to stop the Communists'
Domino Theory and that was enough to start a war to kill.
I lived through the times and can assure you that the spread of communism was looking threatening enough for war. Be glad it only went that far. It could have become nuclear and we wouldnít now be posting comments on the internet.
Now you use the excuse to enter to war by saying that you protect Libyan civilians and Mr Foxy guaranteed there would be no innocent casualties in the bombing and missile attacks - you know yourself you are lying but no one can stop up
The international community (the UN) sanctioned the intervention. Go blame them if you donít like it. It was either the world watches Gaddhafi massacre all of Benghazi - 500 000 people - or help the rebels stop him. What do you say the UN should have done?

Who is Mr. Foxy?
I hope the Russians would be willing to stand up to the West and send their forces to assist Gaddafi
You do know that Gaddhafi is past being assisted, donít you?

Also, you seem to get the Russians wrong. They and the Chinese were secretly actually glad that someone else was doing the dirty work while they could sit back and pretend to whine over it all. Now they are just as much in Libya trying to get oil contracts like everybody else.
Chris

Toronto, Canada

#24 Apr 24, 2012
NEUTRAL
Singapore, Singapore

Why did not you bring up the use of Agent Orange in Vietnam by American Troop - why no International Criminal Court Investigations ???
Ditto Dog wrote:
<quoted text>

A whole lot of reasons: Itís ancient history and not relevant any more. There was no ICC at that time. The US has not signed to the ICC and is therefore not liable. Agent orange was not classed as a chemical weapon - it was a defoliating agent (weed killing)- and therefore its effects on the enemy (and also on US GIs) can be argued to have been an accident.
Accidents are called collateral and are exempt unless you have hard proof of otherwise. And lastly the ICCís jurisdiction only covers purposely committed war crimes not collateral.
<quoted text>
American use of Agent Orange in Vietnam is still very relevant today, because children with birth defects are still being born in Vietnam as a consequence of its introduction in Vietnamís environment.

U.S. bombing of Iraq and Fallujah with depleted uranium and phosphorus bombs is also relevant. The records show a 10% increase in cancer rate overall in Iraq, and 18% increase in Fallujah. Also, in Fallujah 12% increase in birth defects is recorded. Increase in cancer rate was noticed in all countries bombed by NATO. Nobody is held responsible, because this in NATOís time. But, the history shows that the power relations change, and with them the accountability. And despite all kinds of linguistic gimmicks the West uses, the damage which their actions keep inflicting upon people and the environment, is relevant; no matter passage of time.
Carlos

Volta Redonda, Brazil

#25 Apr 24, 2012
Childish and pathetic lie... not better than "ommunist eat babies", those guys are almost retard.

Since: Jul 11

Berlin, Germany

#26 Apr 24, 2012
Chris wrote:
American use of Agent Orange in Vietnam is still very relevant today, because children with birth defects are still being born in Vietnam as a consequence of its introduction in Vietnamís environment.
Nobody is denying that. The point though was the judicial relevance which is not an issue anymore because of the distance in time. Also most of the persons responsible, Pres. Nixon, Pres Johnson and most of the Generals are not alive anymore.
U.S. bombing of Iraq and Fallujah with depleted uranium and phosphorus bombs is also relevant. The records show a 10% increase in cancer rate overall in Iraq, and 18% increase in Fallujah. Also, in Fallujah 12% increase in birth defects is recorded. Increase in cancer rate was noticed in all countries bombed by NATO.
Iíd be very surprised if depleted uranium was ever used in Fallujah. Itís very effective in armour piercing projectiles but is forbiddingly expensive and is therefore only used when heavy armour such as tanks is to be taken out. In Fallujah the enemy had no heavy armour so it does not sound plausible that this kind of weapon was used there.

Phosphorus bombs do not cause cancer. But they can burn you badly if you pick just a piece of one up.
Nobody is held responsible, because this in NATOís time. But, the history shows that the power relations change, and with them the accountability. And despite all kinds of linguistic gimmicks the West uses, the damage which their actions keep inflicting upon people and the environment, is relevant; no matter passage of time.
Well then weíre alright seeing as weíre always going to be the good guys who take out the bad guys. If we stick to that we just canít lose can we.

Since: Jul 11

Berlin, Germany

#27 Apr 24, 2012
Carlos wrote:
Childish and pathetic lie... not better than "ommunist eat babies", those guys are almost retard.
Who's comment are you addressing?

Since: Jul 11

Berlin, Germany

#28 Apr 24, 2012
Faith wrote:
Forcible rape is one of the pillars of islam.
Errr... Isn't rape already being forced enough onto the victim without being forcible on top of it all?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Muammar Gaddafi Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Obama admits worst mistake of his presidency Apr 17 Le Jimbo 265
News Hillary's Libya Debacle Overlooked Mar '16 Three Days 1
News Russia Joins Call For Gadhafi To Step Down (May '11) Mar '16 Israeli Virgins 46
News Candidly speaking: The fallout of the Obama doc... Mar '16 Three Days 1
News Libyan rebels in battles outside Gadhafi hometown (Mar '11) Mar '16 Tripoli Dating 7
News NATO nations: Gadhafi must go (Apr '11) Mar '16 Reblundercants 111
News Obama warns UK must 'pay fair share' for defenc... Mar '16 Speaking Freely 7
More from around the web