#21 Dec 1, 2011
The anti-smokers would have more credibility if they didn't try to blame absolutely everything on smoking. Why don't they pick a few diseases, such as lung cancer, and just stick with that? But when they blame absolutely everything on smoking, it looks like a political agenda to me.
#22 Dec 1, 2011
The tobacco apologists would have more credibility if tobacco didn't cause so MANY health problems. I mean, being bad for the lungs is one thing, but when an industry cranks out products that damage EVERY organ in the human body, it is hard to see that industry's continued existence as anything BUT a question of corrupt politicians.
Add your comments below
|Roger Brown's State of Sports: Wildcat Stadium ...||Jul 3||TheHawk||1|
|Emotions run high for 4 Canadians ahead of wome...||Apr '17||HighPhartsz||2|
|Hurricane taken 19th in OHL draft Belleville Bu... (Nov '08)||Apr '17||Hockey League draft||6|
|Raiders cut down by Blades (Feb '10)||Mar '17||Ontario Junior Ho...||4|
|Halton Hills mayor stands on guard for thee (Jul '09)||Feb '17||he prob at cottage||21|
|Popular fastball, hockey volunteer Jim Ford pas...||Jan '17||TossingPharts||3|
|Pittsfield promoter shines at the Olympics (Mar '10)||Jan '17||The Worlds Bigges...||9|
Find what you want!
Search Ice Hockey Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC