Didn't break Beatles: Yoko Ono

Jan 14, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Newkerala.com

New Delhi, Jan 14 : Musician and artist Yoko Ono has said she was not responsible for the break up of iconic English rock band The Beatles.

Comments
21 - 40 of 51 Comments Last updated Nov 7, 2012
Jane

Bronx, NY

#21 Jan 25, 2012
Now Obama wants tourism. He wants to open 4 airports. Wow what is he expecting. Oh Yeah when John Love Child comes out it will start an economic beatle boom. He knows it that is why he is talking tourism. I mean if we are in a recession what will motivate people to come here? John Lennon!
Biff Gonad

Everett, WA

#22 Jan 25, 2012
Jane wrote:
Now Obama wants tourism. He wants to open 4 airports. Wow what is he expecting. Oh Yeah when John Love Child comes out it will start an economic beatle boom. He knows it that is why he is talking tourism. I mean if we are in a recession what will motivate people to come here? John Lennon!
Now Oklahoma wants tourism.They want to open 4 airvents.Wow what are they expecting?Oh yeah when Juan Glove Child comes out it will start an egomaniac beast boom.they know it that is why they are talking tourism.I mean if we are in a repression what will motivate people to come there? Jaun Lemmon!
Your name must contain

Dallas, TX

#23 Jan 25, 2012
Jane wrote:
Now Obama wants tourism. He wants to open 4 airports. Wow what is he expecting. Oh Yeah when John Love Child comes out it will start an economic beatle boom. He knows it that is why he is talking tourism. I mean if we are in a recession what will motivate people to come here? John Lennon!
Jane, you can post whatever you want, but don't fart in the wind, it ain't polite.
Towas

Amsterdam, Netherlands

#24 Oct 30, 2012
Jane wrote:
John was also a drug addicted and she fed him plenty of heroine as she systematically controlled his finances. Maybe she even sent Chapman to kill him because I heard John wanted to divorce her so what better way to ensure the money is all yours is by killing your husband!
The irony is that while Paul claims that Yoko didn't break up the Beatles, at the same time he says that she showed him another way of living (heroine?), and so Jhon wanted to quit. So Paul is in fact admitting that had there been no Yoko, then the Beatles would not have broken up.
Towas

Amsterdam, Netherlands

#25 Oct 30, 2012
The irony is that while Paul claims that Yoko didn't break up the Beatles, at the same time he says that she showed him another way of living (heroine?), and so Jhon wanted to quit. So Paul is in fact admitting that had there been no Yoko, then the Beatles would not have broken up.
Towas

Amsterdam, Netherlands

#26 Oct 30, 2012
On the other hand, no matter what woman had walked into the studio, it would have ruined the atmosphere and proved fatal for the Beatles.

Women had no room in their studio.
Jane

Bronx, NY

#27 Nov 4, 2012
Austrailla wants her exibit in November 2013. Then they don't want it at all. At her age why would they make her wait another whole year? She could croak soon.
Myrtle Menard

Camano Island, WA

#28 Nov 4, 2012
Jane wrote:
Austrailla wants her exibit in November 2013. Then they don't want it at all. At her age why would they make her wait another whole year? She could croak soon.
Austrailla wants her tortilla in November 2013. Then they don't want it at Fall. At her rage why would they make her late another whole year?She could toke soon.
Pat my Kat

Houston, TX

#29 Nov 4, 2012
Jane wrote:
Austrailla wants her exibit in November 2013. Then they don't want it at all. At her age why would they make her wait another whole year? She could croak soon.
Jane, the way you abuse drugs and alcohol, you could CROAK very soon too.
Trash dump.
chris

United States

#30 Nov 4, 2012
Paul said Yoko didn't break up The Beatles, & that they would've broken up anyway. Still, I can't see how her constant presence in the studio, helped matters either. She should've known that her place was not in the studio, while they were trying to work. All the rest of them left their wives at home, John should've as well.
Poppa

Camano Island, WA

#31 Nov 4, 2012
chris wrote:
Paul said Yoko didn't break up The Beatles, & that they would've broken up anyway. Still, I can't see how her constant presence in the studio, helped matters either. She should've known that her place was not in the studio, while they were trying to work. All the rest of them left their wives at home, John should've as well.
I hate to say it but John was a wimp when it came to Yoko having her way.I think he was submissive and the other 3 Beatles tolerated her to try not to make John get all defensive and mad about it.She may not of been souly resposible for their break up but I'm sure she added to the already tension between them all.She should of stayed at her art gallery and not in the recording studio.
chris

United States

#32 Nov 4, 2012
Poppa wrote:
<quoted text>I hate to say it but John was a wimp when it came to Yoko having her way.I think he was submissive and the other 3 Beatles tolerated her to try not to make John get all defensive and mad about it.She may not of been souly resposible for their break up but I'm sure she added to the already tension between them all.She should of stayed at her art gallery and not in the recording studio.
Yeah, John was falling hard for Yoko, so he couldn't tell her no.

“OH MY LOVE”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#33 Nov 5, 2012
Jane wrote:
This Ono needs to shut her ugly mouth once and for all. She is a thief and dirty ugly rat. The devil in disguise. She didn't break up the Beatles. She helped break up the Beatles. She was very jealous of the Beatles and wanted her husband John to be a puppet for her. This Ono is a manipulative domineering woman who messed with John Lennon's Will and stocks he had put away for Julian and a love child daughter from the Bronx. She is evil and that is never gonna change. When fate finally meets her head on and the world sees what she has done in the last 25 years she is in for it!
That is why she is always defensive in the last 2 years. She keeps on repeating over and over again. I didn't break up the Beatles. None of John's family was allowed over at the Dakota. He has half sisters, half brothers and a whole bunch of neices and nephews that Ono prevented from visiting him.
This is my first time posting on this Topix site, I feel very compelled to reply to this load of poppycock.
I first must introduce myself, my name is Julia Baird half sister to John Lennon through our mother,Julia.
Let me start of by saying that John only fathered two children, Julian and Sean.
Kyoko is Yoko's daughter by Tony Cox,but John loved here as a daughter.
After reading through many of these threads posted here on this forum, I must disagree with the poster named Jane,she is full of delusions.
I would not say that Yoko and I are best friends, but we have a respectful understanding.
Joh never had a lovechild,and all these posts by Jane are slanderous libel,they will be forwarded to someone in legal handlings.
There are law to protect the innocent and they will be done.
Beware Jane from the Bronx, you have crossed the line.




chris

United States

#34 Nov 5, 2012
Julia Baird wrote:
<quoted text>This is my first time posting on this Topix site, I feel very compelled to reply to this load of poppycock.
I first must introduce myself, my name is Julia Baird half sister to John Lennon through our mother,Julia.
Let me start of by saying that John only fathered two children, Julian and Sean.
Kyoko is Yoko's daughter by Tony Cox,but John loved here as a daughter.
After reading through many of these threads posted here on this forum, I must disagree with the poster named Jane,she is full of delusions.
I would not say that Yoko and I are best friends, but we have a respectful understanding.
Joh never had a lovechild,and all these posts by Jane are slanderous libel,they will be forwarded to someone in legal handlings.
There are law to protect the innocent and they will be done.
Beware Jane from the Bronx, you have crossed the line.
Hi Julia, welcome to topix. Thanks for setting the record straight, as far as all of this misinformation about your brother is concerned. Please continue to post here, I'm sure their is a lot we could learn from you.
Emer Jackson

Camano Island, WA

#35 Nov 5, 2012
Julia Baird wrote:
<quoted text>This is my first time posting on this Topix site, I feel very compelled to reply to this load of poppycock.
I first must introduce myself, my name is Julia Baird half sister to John Lennon through our mother,Julia.
Let me start of by saying that John only fathered two children, Julian and Sean.
Kyoko is Yoko's daughter by Tony Cox,but John loved here as a daughter.
After reading through many of these threads posted here on this forum, I must disagree with the poster named Jane,she is full of delusions.
I would not say that Yoko and I are best friends, but we have a respectful understanding.
Joh never had a lovechild,and all these posts by Jane are slanderous libel,they will be forwarded to someone in legal handlings.
There are law to protect the innocent and they will be done.
Beware Jane from the Bronx, you have crossed the line.
Yep this lame Jane has been posting fabricated Rubbish on topix for over two years. No one believes it but her. Still the dimwit keeps rambling on and claiming to know this secret love child who doesn't exist.I think she is confused and craves attention and got the secret love child mixed up with the secret Glove child.

“OH MY LOVE”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#36 Nov 5, 2012
Thank you both, Chris and Elmer, I appreciate the very kind replies.
Forgive me of my poor grammer, it has been too long since I have used my keyboard.
I do have limited time on the computer these days and I am so busy being the director of Cavern City Tours here in Liverpool.
Me and John share the same mother, Julia, but our fathers are not the same.

I was on Google yesterday and found a link to Topix about a secret lovechild daughter, I thought it was a joke of sorts.

It's come to me clear that Jane is either a person of mental illness or one of the many robbers who want a claim of my brother's inheritance.

I myself have not received any part of the will, but I am not bitter of it, Julian,Sean and his wife are entitled to that claim, though I admit that Mrs. Ono has been very generous to the Lennon family still living in Liverpool.

The National Trust runs John's old home in Liverpool, we get many visitors on a daily basis.

Our mother Julia was killed by PC Eric Clague in the year of 1958,it was a very shattering experience for both John and I, that is why I take these claims of a lovechild to heart, we have gone through enough pain.

Thanks again for your kindness.
Elmer

Renton, WA

#37 Nov 5, 2012
Julia Baird wrote:
Thank you both, Chris and Elmer, I appreciate the very kind replies.
Forgive me of my poor grammer, it has been too long since I have used my keyboard.
I do have limited time on the computer these days and I am so busy being the director of Cavern City Tours here in Liverpool.
Me and John share the same mother, Julia, but our fathers are not the same.
I was on Google yesterday and found a link to Topix about a secret lovechild daughter, I thought it was a joke of sorts.
It's come to me clear that Jane is either a person of mental illness or one of the many robbers who want a claim of my brother's inheritance.
I myself have not received any part of the will, but I am not bitter of it, Julian,Sean and his wife are entitled to that claim, though I admit that Mrs. Ono has been very generous to the Lennon family still living in Liverpool.
The National Trust runs John's old home in Liverpool, we get many visitors on a daily basis.
Our mother Julia was killed by PC Eric Clague in the year of 1958,it was a very shattering experience for both John and I, that is why I take these claims of a lovechild to heart, we have gone through enough pain.
Thanks again for your kindness.
You are most certainly welcome. Good luck to you and don't be a stranger.It's good to hear from someone who is related to the legendary John Lennon.
Greg

ChalkÝda, Greece

#38 Nov 6, 2012
I think that Jane should respect Mrs. Baird and above all Lennon's memory, and stop posting about this love child who doesn't exist. Please, the family has been through a lot of pain, have you got no heart? Despite this, Mrs. Baird's presence honours this Forum. It was a big surprise for all the fans who used to post regularly over the Beatles' glory and stopped because of the haters.
chris

United States

#39 Nov 6, 2012
Julia Baird wrote:
Thank you both, Chris and Elmer, I appreciate the very kind replies.
Forgive me of my poor grammer, it has been too long since I have used my keyboard.
I do have limited time on the computer these days and I am so busy being the director of Cavern City Tours here in Liverpool.
Me and John share the same mother, Julia, but our fathers are not the same.
I was on Google yesterday and found a link to Topix about a secret lovechild daughter, I thought it was a joke of sorts.
It's come to me clear that Jane is either a person of mental illness or one of the many robbers who want a claim of my brother's inheritance.
I myself have not received any part of the will, but I am not bitter of it, Julian,Sean and his wife are entitled to that claim, though I admit that Mrs. Ono has been very generous to the Lennon family still living in Liverpool.
The National Trust runs John's old home in Liverpool, we get many visitors on a daily basis.
Our mother Julia was killed by PC Eric Clague in the year of 1958,it was a very shattering experience for both John and I, that is why I take these claims of a lovechild to heart, we have gone through enough pain.
Thanks again for your kindness.
You're very welcome Julia. It was very cool to talk to someone from Liverpool. And an honor to talk to Johns little sister. Please comeback anytime you get some free time.
chris

United States

#40 Nov 6, 2012
Greg wrote:
I think that Jane should respect Mrs. Baird and above all Lennon's memory, and stop posting about this love child who doesn't exist. Please, the family has been through a lot of pain, have you got no heart? Despite this, Mrs. Baird's presence honours this Forum. It was a big surprise for all the fans who used to post regularly over the Beatles' glory and stopped because of the haters.
Very well said, Greg

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

The Beatles Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Thanks to Taylor Swift's "Shake It Off," Super-... 7 hr I HATE New Days 1
10 Facts You Probably Didn't Know About Michael... 23 hr goodvibrations 1
Why do people hate Asparagus ? (Jan '10) Fri Nave Spelled Back... 20
The Walrus Was Wrong; Paul is Alive and Well Aug 26 Kid_Tomorrow 2
150 Best Selling Artists in the World! (Dec '08) Aug 25 Octopus 12,754
The year after the Beatles met E Aug 22 ElvisGirl1970 173
Beatles Las Vegas Aug 20, 1964 (Jan '06) Aug 20 Greg 32
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

The Beatles People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••