Mick Jagger admitted Rolling Stones were outshone by the Beatles
During the 1960s on both sides of the Atlantic, teens defined themselves by whether they were fans of the Beatles or the Rolling Stones.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Mail.
#1 Nov 7, 2013
Great band man, the Rolling Stones. But, the Beatles were, are, and always will be different let's say, not better. Something special. Congrats to Mick. It is needed great honesty and modesty to admit it. Although the Stones were bitter sometimes in the sixties over the Beatles' stardom and acknowledge from people as "great Rock band". It's logical, I don't blame them. It was only Brian Jones who saw and admitted in the newspapers or magazines something else in the Beatles.
Add your comments below
|150 Best Selling Artists in the World! (Dec '08)||May 15||RICK||12,899|
|Is Ringo's Nose bigger than Mick Jagger's Lips? (Oct '07)||May 10||Atsa Lotsa Teefs||28|
|The Beatles vs Led Zeppelin (Sep '11)||May 7||Rocker 75||101|
|Satellite radio's SiriusXM is debuting Beatles ...||May 2||Pasquali||1|
|Imagine if John Lennon was not "neutralized" by...||Apr 27||justicewell||1|
|Beatles Album Revolver||Apr 23||Anonymous||1|
|Beatlemania heads to JET Saturday night||Apr '17||UK eh||1|
Find what you want!
Search The Beatles Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC