'Where the Wild Things Are'

'Where the Wild Things Are'

There are 4 comments on the Zap2it.com story from Oct 15, 2009, titled 'Where the Wild Things Are'. In it, Zap2it.com reports that:

Truly, I am madly, deeply in love with the film version of "Where the Wild Things Are." Not since Robert Altman took on "Popeye" a generation ago, and lost, has a major director addressed such a well-loved, all-ages title.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Zap2it.com.

Leo C

Salisbury, MD

#1 Oct 17, 2009
I saw it last night, and fell in love with it. Max is a little hellion in the first part of the film, but shows a vunerability early on, and the introduction and early discussions of the Wild Things were hilarious. I especially liked Carol and, surprisingly, Alexander. A very good movie to take children to, or just to enjoy.
teen moviegoers stink

Luzerne, PA

#2 Oct 17, 2009
another stupid special effects movie for stupid teenagers.

"major director"....what a sick joke that is; john ford was a major director.

if all teenagers would drop dead, be a lot better movies for adults.

and, of course, when movies cost 100 million dollars to make, some lowly cmovie critic making a measly 50 thousand a year isn't gonna risk losing his job by badmouthing a movie that needs 200 million to break even.
Jen

Panama City, FL

#3 Oct 17, 2009
I saw this movie with my husband and daughters, ages 13 and 18. After the movie we all agreed it was one of THE best movies we have seen in a very long time. If anyone thinks this movie is stupid, then they clearly missed the entire point of the movie. Pity.
Aaron R

Decatur, IL

#4 Oct 18, 2009
What I find hilarious is that when this book was first published, it was meant for children ages 6-8. Nowadays, most parents of kids those ages would be horrified to have such a bratty little kid be the protagonist of a children's book. Then again, when they were first published, a lot of classic children's books were meant for younger readers (such as A Wrinkle In Time, which used to be for children ages 9-12, but is now considered a young adult book). Either kids in the 60s and 70s were better-read than they are now, or publishers really didn't understand their audiences.

Anyway, this adaptation could have been much worse (and I was expecting it to be so, given how PC things are nowadays), but it was decent, if not spectacular.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Spike Jonze Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Spike Jonze nude (Nov '11) Nov '11 Tonda 1
News Hewitt: Through beautiful filmmaking a little b... (Oct '09) Nov '09 jab 3
News Kanye Commits Himself (Oct '09) Nov '09 Donald Os 5
News Review: Gorgeous `Wild Things' roars to the screen (Oct '09) Oct '09 CAPE 4
News Ledger's former partner reportedly to marry Spi... (Apr '09) Apr '09 MJR 3
News As the celebrity love world turns ... (Nov '08) Nov '08 XXX 1
News Being John Malkovich (Aug '08) Aug '08 craigs still the ... 1
More from around the web