Giuliani Breaking Wedding Promise to Gay Pals?

Jul 1, 2011 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: EDGE

Howard Koeppel and then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani in the 1996 New York City Pride Parade When Rudy Giuliani was embroiled in divorce proceedings ten years ago, he was taken in by a gay couple who provided the then-mayor of New York City respite and a home.

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 35 of35
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Created Equal”

Since: Feb 08

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Jul 1, 2011
 
carey529 wrote:
<quoted text>
at the moment, the only thing i can "blame" on breeders, is you.
if the human race bothers you THAT much, why don't YOU check out.
you'd being doing us a huge favor...
besides, the chances of humanity accepting "your rules to live by" are just a tad more remote than the ny times doing a positive article on sarah palin.
zero to none.
You can't dispute my observations--they are accurate.

You can't understand my use of satire because... well I don't know whether it's a problem of depth or density.

And you, like everyone else, has no useful ideas to address the problem.

Fact: if we don't dramatically slash the escalating birth rate, the human race will soon exceed the planet's capacity to produce food and resources to support them all.

So, what would you rather do? Build more bombs?

“Created Equal”

Since: Feb 08

USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Jul 1, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
Sanctimonious at best.
On sterilization, how very Margaret Sanger-ish of you.
Clearly, you have no useful or workable ideas on dealing with the problem, so you must make fun of those who do so that you can feel superior.

Sanctimonious? Damn right. Because I'm f'ing brilliant, and I know it, and I offer no apology for that.

And no, not Margaret Sanger. My radical suggestion was more in the vein of Ayn Rand.
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Jul 1, 2011
 
ScottyMatic wrote:
<quoted text>
Clearly, you have no useful or workable ideas on dealing with the problem, so you must make fun of those who do so that you can feel superior.
Sanctimonious? Damn right. Because I'm f'ing brilliant, and I know it, and I offer no apology for that.
And no, not Margaret Sanger. My radical suggestion was more in the vein of Ayn Rand.
Nope, no ideas... really not even sure what the problem is, but certainly wasn't making fun. There wasn't a damn thing to make fun about, since it was completely ridiculous.

The rest is a load of happy horse-sh!t, and you apparently haven't read either Sanger, or Rand.

“The Buybull is innerrrent.”

Since: Jun 08

South Hill, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jul 1, 2011
 
ScottyMatic wrote:
<quoted text>
If everyone were a celibate Roman Catholic priest, the species would die out!
That is not true, since women cannot be RCC priests, and they can bear children without men.

The reverse might be possible some day, but it isn't really now.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jul 1, 2011
 
writewingproxycontin wrote:
<quoted text>
That is not true, since women cannot be RCC priests, and they can bear children without men.
The reverse might be possible some day, but it isn't really now.
What if everyone were a priest or a nun? Did you ever thing of that? Obviously, we should have laws agains the priesthood AND the nunneries.

“The Buybull is innerrrent.”

Since: Jun 08

South Hill, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jul 1, 2011
 
Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
Aside from your apparent anger-management issues, I never said "everyone is going to go gay" (homosexual, by the way, since 'gay' is hijacked). I just said heterosexual couples perpetuate the species, so get over yourself, victim.
There ought to be no need for you talibangelical reprobates to lie all the time.

You were trying to make some "point" about heterosexuals.

Your point was numbingly obvious while irrelevant while errant in its intended implication about homosexuals. That's a kind of trifecta.

“The Buybull is innerrrent.”

Since: Jun 08

South Hill, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jul 1, 2011
 
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
What if everyone were a priest or a nun? Did you ever thing of that? Obviously, we should have laws agains the priesthood AND the nunneries.
I WILL NEVER YIELD TO YOU, SIR!

You incredibly have forgotten the ol' immaculate conception end run.
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jul 1, 2011
 
writewingproxycontin wrote:
<quoted text>
There ought to be no need for you talibangelical reprobates to lie all the time.
You were trying to make some "point" about heterosexuals.
Your point was numbingly obvious while irrelevant while errant in its intended implication about homosexuals. That's a kind of trifecta.
I'm agnostic, dip-sh!t, so your assertion of fact fails. You're zero for three for your trifecta of ignorance.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jul 1, 2011
 
writewingproxycontin wrote:
<quoted text>
Homophobes, he meant.
Normal heterosexuals don't foam at the mouth over glbt people any longer.
well, i personally don't believe that the homophobes were ever really foaming at the mouth... i think they were actually doing was drooling.

“The Buybull is innerrrent.”

Since: Jun 08

South Hill, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Jul 1, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm agnostic, dip-sh!t, so your assertion of fact fails. You're zero for three for your trifecta of ignorance.
Well then, make it simple for me, you tundra talibangelical:

What was your "point" exactly when you (falsely) claimed that if there were no heterosexuals that the species would become extinct?

Gays and lesbians are perfectly capable of biological reproduction, in case you weren't aware.

The difference is that glbt people aren't trying to prevent str8 people from marrying of from adopting or from serving openly as heterosexuals.

Now, again, what stooopit point were you trying to make?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Jul 1, 2011
 
ScottyMatic wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't dispute my observations--they are accurate.
You can't understand my use of satire because... well I don't know whether it's a problem of depth or density.
And you, like everyone else, has no useful ideas to address the problem.
Fact: if we don't dramatically slash the escalating birth rate, the human race will soon exceed the planet's capacity to produce food and resources to support them all.
So, what would you rather do? Build more bombs?
hmmm... from shat i understand all reliable statistics already put the world's population at about 500% of what the planet's natural resources can sustain. the u.s. alone is at about 300%.

i personally believe that it's time for about a 30 year moratorium on breeding.
Far Away

Anchorage, AK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Jul 1, 2011
 
writewingproxycontin wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then, make it simple for me, you tundra talibangelical:
What was your "point" exactly when you (falsely) claimed that if there were no heterosexuals that the species would become extinct?
Gays and lesbians are perfectly capable of biological reproduction, in case you weren't aware.
The difference is that glbt people aren't trying to prevent str8 people from marrying of from adopting or from serving openly as heterosexuals.
Now, again, what stooopit point were you trying to make?
Well, I guess since you want to continue being a victim, my point was that heterosexual couples wouldn't have to hold their noses and close their eyes for natural--as opposed to your choice of the word biological--procreation. That will do nicely for my point.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Jul 1, 2011
 
Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I guess since you want to continue being a victim, my point was that heterosexual couples wouldn't have to hold their noses and close their eyes for natural--as opposed to your choice of the word biological--procreation. That will do nicely for my point.
On the other hand, gays don't accidentally end up with a brood that they can't or won't take care of. Nor do they bear children whose father's identity is uncertain. But gays may take good care of many of the children created and abandoned by careless heterosexual.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Jul 1, 2011
 

Judged:

1

1

Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I guess since you want to continue being a victim, my point was that heterosexual couples wouldn't have to hold their noses and close their eyes for natural--as opposed to your choice of the word biological--procreation. That will do nicely for my point.
funny, from my experience you anal retentive, conservative types hold your noses and close your eyes at the mention of any sort of sex at all... and then run right out and rent porn videos to wank along with.

“The Buybull is innerrrent.”

Since: Jun 08

Falls Church, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Jul 2, 2011
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I guess since you want to continue being a victim, my point was that heterosexual couples wouldn't have to hold their noses and close their eyes for natural--as opposed to your choice of the word biological--procreation. That will do nicely for my point.
Right, your (ignorant, erroneaous) point ws that str8 people are superior. You're a defaming, homophobic cretin who claims not to be a talibangelical.

But your grasp of science is on par with talibangelicals, who think the earth is under 10000 years old.

Stooopit: It is possible to procreate without having intercourse. Your "point" was idiocy from the get go, both literally and socially.

And virtually kicking homophobic morons in the nuts doesn't make me a victim. Homophobic pogroms make me a victim.

Do you know what "pogrom" means? I would hate to confuse you further, Cletus.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 35 of35
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
•••
•••