Charles and Camilla head Down Under

Sep 18, 2012 Full story: AdelaideNow... 21

AS Prince William and wife Catherine wrap up a colourful Pacific islands tour, the next royal touchdown in the southern hemisphere takes shape.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Winnis

Forestville, Australia

#1 Sep 18, 2012

When I think of the reasons why Mrs. Wallace Simpson was the cause of a future King having to abdicate his titled position - why Princess Margaret wasn't allowed to marry the love of her life because he was a commoner, the total estrangement of Fergie from the royal scene for a couple of minor discretions - because of the moral standards the Monarchy has always upheld - I am appalled to think that not only a Divorcee but an Adulteress and Home wrecker on two fronts can now be in a position to have anyone curtsy to her let alone having her, in the wings, as a possible consort to a future King. All I can say is Long live our Queen otherwise it's a sure way for Australia to become a Republic.
jaime

Auckland, New Zealand

#2 Sep 18, 2012
New Zealand needs to be a republic pretty soon before the maori want compensation for breathing. The crown is carrying a lot of excess baggage with it down here. No crown should equate to no more claims, its not as if the maori are empty handed anymore they have more then most and as usual the rats guarding the cheese aren't sharing so whats the point of financial compensation for MOST maori anyway? The British monarchy doesnt even hold an offical position anymore in the day to day running of nz's affairs, more as a courtesy really for when the Queen and her family tours down here. Dont know what happens to the knighthoods from here though maybe a "The" moniker will suffice but apparently John Key wants in on the "Sir" action too for his flop of a tenure thus far so i doubt he'll get behind the idea.
Willy Wonka

Nelson, New Zealand

#3 Sep 19, 2012
When I think of the reasons why Mrs. Wallace Simpson was the cause of a future King having to abdicate his titled position - why Princess Margaret wasn't allowed to marry the love of her life because he was a commoner, the total estrangement of Fergie from the royal scene for a couple of minor discretions - because of the moral standards the Monarchy has always upheld - I am appalled to think that not only a Divorcee but an Adulteress and Home wrecker on two fronts can now be in a position to have anyone curtsy to her let alone having her, in the wings, as a possible consort to a future King. All I can say is Long live our Queen otherwise it's a sure way for Australia to become a Republic. QUOTE] FFS you saying Camilla is at fault of Charles pathetic excuse of an ex husband to Lady Di? geeezz High moral standards of the monarchy? and your appalled? The Royal family are a bunch of Shapeshifting reptillian bloodsucking fiddling peadophiles you fruitcake!! haha wake up!!!!
Must_be_joking_m e

Leichhardt, Australia

#4 Sep 19, 2012
Ahahaha at these idiots who think NZ should just become a republic with no constitution, a very small military and an agricultural economy.

You might want to get a few essential things established BEFORE taking that bold step from being controlled by an aristocratic hereditary monarchy to an expensive election of a select aristocratic elite...
MalbarCACA Royalty Hater

Carrum Downs, Australia

#5 Sep 19, 2012
In other breaking news: I will be heading to my lounge room in about 10 minutes.
MalbarCACA NO A IN PEDO

Carrum Downs, Australia

#6 Sep 19, 2012
Willy Wonka wrote:
peadophiles
THERE is NO "a" in PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!!!!
Willy Wonka

Nelson, New Zealand

#7 Sep 19, 2012
MalbarCACA NO A IN PEDO wrote:
<quoted text>
THERE is NO "a" in PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!!!!
haha you would no eh? haha
MalbarCACA Truth Teller

Carrum Downs, Australia

#9 Sep 19, 2012
Willy Wonka wrote:
<quoted text> haha you would no eh? haha
I would. As I call others/pedos like yourself "pedophiles".. where as you have no reason to say/write it, as you yourself are a pedophile.

OWNED.

Thank you come again.
westerner

Perth, Australia

#10 Sep 19, 2012
I'd lick her ass for 500 pounds :-) and give him a tickle tickle and call them MASTER it would be worth it it's not like i have any shame.
Must_be_joking_m e

Leichhardt, Australia

#11 Sep 19, 2012
westerner wrote:
I'd lick her ass for 500 pounds :-) and give him a tickle tickle and call them MASTER it would be worth it it's not like i have any shame.
Stirrer has come out of the closet...
westerner

Perth, Australia

#12 Sep 19, 2012
who="Must_be_joking_me "]<quoted text>Stirrer has come out of the closet...

I would be honoured to lick any rich bitchs ass for 500 pounds :)
s-licker

New Zealand

#14 Sep 19, 2012
westerner wrote:
who="Must_be_joking_me "]<quoted text>Stirrer has come out of the closet...
I would be honoured to lick any rich bitchs ass for 500 pounds :)
I'm slightly confused...do you mean rich bitches asses weigh 500 pounds?
Willy Wonka

Nelson, New Zealand

#15 Sep 19, 2012
MalbarCACA Truth Teller wrote:
<quoted text>
I would. As I call others/pedos like yourself "pedophiles".. where as you have no reason to say/write it, as you yourself are a pedophile.
OWNED.
Thank you come again.
yawn...
TEEstrong

United States

#16 Sep 19, 2012
westerner wrote:
who="Must_be_joking_me "]<quoted text>Stirrer has come out of the closet...
I would be honoured to lick any rich bitchs ass for 500 pounds :)
and wipe the dinglberry with ur tongue
Willy Wonka

Nelson, New Zealand

#17 Sep 20, 2012
PUT THEM BOTH ON THE bLOCK!! HAHA
thor

Perth, Australia

#18 Sep 20, 2012
Winnis wrote:
When I think of the reasons why Mrs. Wallace Simpson was the cause of a future King having to abdicate his titled position - why Princess Margaret wasn't allowed to marry the love of her life because he was a commoner, the total estrangement of Fergie from the royal scene for a couple of minor discretions - because of the moral standards the Monarchy has always upheld - I am appalled to think that not only a Divorcee but an Adulteress and Home wrecker on two fronts can now be in a position to have anyone curtsy to her let alone having her, in the wings, as a possible consort to a future King. All I can say is Long live our Queen otherwise it's a sure way for Australia to become a Republic.
england is strapped for cash and these tosses are jet setting about ! and whats this going to cost us ? why dont the just stay home ?

“Sawadee Ka”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#19 Sep 20, 2012
Yuck old people sex.

“Sawadee Ka”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#20 Sep 20, 2012
jaime wrote:
New Zealand needs to be a republic pretty soon before the maori want compensation for breathing. The crown is carrying a lot of excess baggage with it down here. No crown should equate to no more claims, its not as if the maori are empty handed anymore they have more then most and as usual the rats guarding the cheese aren't sharing so whats the point of financial compensation for MOST maori anyway? The British monarchy doesnt even hold an offical position anymore in the day to day running of nz's affairs, more as a courtesy really for when the Queen and her family tours down here. Dont know what happens to the knighthoods from here though maybe a "The" moniker will suffice but apparently John Key wants in on the "Sir" action too for his flop of a tenure thus far so i doubt he'll get behind the idea.


So desperate love so desperate. Another stupid idea people think probably work. Lack sight. Your scope is narrow far narrow for bold statement like that.

“Sawadee Ka”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#21 Sep 20, 2012
Must_be_joking_me wrote:
Ahahaha at these idiots who think NZ should just become a republic with no constitution, a very small military and an agricultural economy.
You might want to get a few essential things established BEFORE taking that bold step from being controlled by an aristocratic hereditary monarchy to an expensive election of a select aristocratic elite...
Yes yes honey we know you are smart. You don't need to run in other faces. I'm so smart I'm full of myself narcissist
over it

Camperdown, Australia

#22 Sep 20, 2012
MalbarCACA NO A IN PEDO wrote:
<quoted text>
THERE is NO "a" in PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!!!!
yes there is. the british spelling is 'paedophile'.

'pedophile' is US spelling.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Prince William Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Oh baby! Will and Kate expecting second child Sep 11 Prince Harry the ... 2
British royal couple expecting second child Sep 10 Common Sense from... 5
Prince William And Kate Middleton Are Havi... Sep 8 familyof four 1
Prince Harry Moves on From Cressida Bonas to Ca... Aug '14 Tuzwoman 1
Queen Elizabeth Delighted: Kate Middleton Confi... Jul '14 -Lea- 2
Teacher Meets World: The Collected Wisdom of Mr... Jul '14 biggest fan 1
Harper poised for possible state visit to China... Jul '14 RayH 1
•••
•••

Prince William People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••