Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 670661 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551319 Jul 24, 2014
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with you. I think Peter was a devout believer in Christ
Peter was a character in a play, as was and is Santa Claus.

As does your supposed God ... Santa also punishes bad behavior by not bringing gifts to those who offend him.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551320 Jul 24, 2014
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
Incorrect.
Plagiarism is "an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author...."
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagia...
So who's arguing?

You haven't got a clue who wrote biblical scriptures, yet all users of the words plagiarize without so much as giving "credits" to anyone but a supposed mythical god.

Ridiculous blather.
Michael

Hamilton, Canada

#551321 Jul 24, 2014
Holy dr Shrink wrote:
<quoted text>
my spelling and structure is foreign English
but you are stupid and goof to spread rascistic predujicial remarks against foreigners on worldwide open Forum to all nations and languages, not only for idiots like you, you little sucker hateful cockroach?
for sure China Monkey are more smarter from half d...heads like you and all of you low IQ American peasants?
just stop use rascistic remarks,because Topix remove you from posting hateful craps around,
sesh
You poor POS
illiterate low descency alcoholic and drug sniffer, for sure RCC wicked member serving devil and concrete idols?
grosse Schwanz.
if you got brain of dead cockroach in human skull, write to me in my own language,you little goof rascistic psychopath
...Hello Shrink.
.....I am so glad you have a positive outlook on life. Your an inspiration! to all of us.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551322 Jul 24, 2014
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't especially offend me.
I know it's pretend.
Perhaps your projecting.
And yes. He seems to have been a good man in the balance from what I know of him.
How does your life stack up?
If I told you I thought that I am more honest than Billy Graham, would you be convinced???

NAHHHH ... you wouldn't ... and neither should you, as I bullshit a lot ... as does Billy.

The only difference between Billy's behavior and mine is that I don't pretend to preach on behalf of a god as does Billy.

I just cut right to the chase and admit that I'm full of bullshit.
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551323 Jul 24, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think the Catholics were given a canon of Scripture and after careful study, decided that Peter was the first Pope etc etc? You have to get it out of your mind on what Scripture is. Its difficult for me to understand why you all believe as if the apostles simply handed out a few of their writings. Nowhere in the Bible is the protestant approach to the Bible taught. And the funny thing is: even under your verse verse verse microscope, Catholicism still passes with flying colors.
"You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church". From there on, Simon was no longer called Simon, he was called Rock. In the Book of Acts we read "Peter stood up; Peter spoke". It never says "Simon (who's faith is like a rock) stood up".
Hello Clay,

Jesus' church wasn't built on Peter..........

Jesus' church was built on the truth about the divine "Person," "Jesus Christ."
Michael

Hamilton, Canada

#551324 Jul 24, 2014
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
......It is up to them to ( personally) deal with their OWN rebellious and defiant nature in going against the TRUTH of the teachings of the Catholic Church.......
.....What you are saying is that those not catholic, have a rebellious and defiant nature?

OMG!!! OMG!!!

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551325 Jul 24, 2014
pusherman_ wrote:
Robert F wrote:
<quoted text>
June
No one has a special spiritual antenna. Some just spend a little more time tuning in the radio signal, as we did in the old days.....
We all are connected to " it " with spiritual antenna, it's called conscience
( Awareness )
I disagree that your antenna is attuned to anything but your emotional gravity which is earthbound and more often than not as unruly as any other emotion animal.

Threaten a mother mouse and see how she will try to defend her little ones against all odds ... and you will witness sheer bravery.

The supposed god of your worship however (according to whacked out theology) rejects his own to hell for the least little grievance such as his whining stance ... "You refused to worship me ... WAAAAAAAA!!!"

Idiocy!!!
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551326 Jul 24, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think the Catholics were given a canon of Scripture and after careful study, decided that Peter was the first Pope etc etc? You have to get it out of your mind on what Scripture is. Its difficult for me to understand why you all believe as if the apostles simply handed out a few of their writings. Nowhere in the Bible is the protestant approach to the Bible taught. And the funny thing is: even under your verse verse verse microscope, Catholicism still passes with flying colors.
"You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church". From there on, Simon was no longer called Simon, he was called Rock. In the Book of Acts we read "Peter stood up; Peter spoke". It never says "Simon (who's faith is like a rock) stood up".
"For ~~~~~no other foundation can anyone lay~~~~~ than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ."

Doesn't say anything about Peter......

"I Will Build <<<My>>> Church!"

Jesus indicates present intention to do something in the future!

One church (singular).....one body......
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#551327 Jul 24, 2014
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
It is up to them to ( personally) deal with their OWN rebellious and defiant nature in going against the TRUTH of the teachings of the Catholic Church...It is one thing to be a Catholic ( in name only),,,It is another to be commited and faithful to the teachings of the Catholic Church that Jesus Himself handed down to His Apostles and to the succeeding Bishops that have followed Him during the at past 2000 years.........There is always the inconsistent and self-interpreting (man made) Protestant Church (down the street) that they can join and "do whatever they want......
And there will always be little minions like you to keep people focused on a man and not Christ.

History calls your Pope stuff legend and tradition. No truth to be found, Just hand me down lies. I do believe some of your founders were around in Paul's day; He wrote about them.

Peter taught:

1 Timothy 4 : 1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.

True church, my a$$. Lies and hypocrisy is what you're about li'i minion.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551328 Jul 24, 2014
pusherman_ wrote:
<quoted text> By Tradition the Catholic Church is the Alpha & Omega of Churches..
Without the religion of the Jews, there would BE no Catholic religion.

They came to finish OFF Judaism ... not to "complete it" ... as is their ridiculous story.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#551329 Jul 24, 2014
Mychihuahuawillbite wrote:
<quoted text> Your opinion is wrong. Only the Catholic Church hathe Eucharist. Only through the Eucharist can you enter Christ and Christ enters you.
God did not lay the sins of man upon a ritual nor were they laid upon Peter The Roman Catholic religious system before or after the fact has nothing to do with it...

THE FOUNDATION AND PURPOSE OF JESUS CHRIST

WHO IS THE AUTHOR AND FINISHER OF CHRISTIANITY

IS SIMPLY STATED IN

ISAIAH 53:6

All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and

the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.

THERE IS NOT ANOTHER ENTITY IN THE UNIVERSE THAT TOOK UPON HIMSELF THE SINS OF THE WORLD...

THERE WAS NONE EQUAL...NONE COMPARABLE, NON THAT QUALIFIED ...NON SINLESS ...NO HOLY ....THAT THEY COULD FILL THIS POSITION BUT OR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST THE LIVING SON OF GOD.

CHRISTIANITY IS ALL ABOUT HIM...
ALL OTHER ARE BUT SUPPORTING ACTORS IN THE DRAMA,.
.OR STAGE PROPS....

FOR YOU ROMAN CATHOLIC LIARS OR ANY OTHER FLUNKIES TO ASSUME THEIR VILE RELIGIOUS SYSTEM'S CONJECTURE INTO THIS SACRAD SACRIFICE....IS THE EPITOMEY OF BLASPHEMY...

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551330 Jul 24, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
Good analogy.
How can we tell that Robert is a Catholic and that you are a also a Catholic???

You agree on what is, and what is not a good analogy.

How about this analogy? It's as likely that a Jewish rabbi joined the Catholic religion in the river Jordan, as it is that the pope would join the Protestant religion in today's America.

Did you relate to THAT analogy???

:)

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551331 Jul 24, 2014
USA Born wrote:
<quoted text>
And there will always be little minions like you to keep people focused on a man and not Christ.
How funny. You are focused on the leftover words of Martin Luther who feasted on the Catholic scriptures.

:)
USA Born

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#551332 Jul 24, 2014
Paul Taught

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551333 Jul 24, 2014
Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
"For ~~~~~no other foundation can anyone lay~~~~~ than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ."
......
Catholics that authorized the new testament under the permission of the emperor Constantine wrote those words.

A Jew would not have laid the foundation for a Christian church ... so I suggest you stop DREAMING of your utopia in the sky and come back to earth to live with the rest of us animals in the animal kingdom.
Chess

Columbus, OH

#551334 Jul 24, 2014
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
So who's arguing?
You haven't got a clue who wrote biblical scriptures, yet all users of the words plagiarize without so much as giving "credits" to anyone but a supposed mythical god.
Ridiculous blather.
You are arguing, dummy.

And now you're talking nonsense.

We know who wrote the genuine letters of Paul.

Paul did.

For most of the other texts we do not know who the author was.

But for some we know who it wasn't.

Second Peter is a forgery.

It wasn't written by Peter though it claims to be.

And since it copies wholesale from Jude without credit, it represents plagiarism, too -- plagiarism from yet another forgery.

And yes, even in antiquity, despite frequent Christian claims to the contrary, plagiarism was considered inappropriate. It even was sometime punished beyond social stigma if it offended someone in power.

But not everything in the New Testament is forgery and plagiarism. Luke and Matthew plagiarize from Mark -- they might as well be considered later editions of Mark. But all three were written anonymously and so don't qualify as forgeries, just falsely attributed texts.

But not everything therein represents plagiarism. If the author of Matthew says scripture tells us something, that is not plagiarism. That is a reference to the Hebrew Bible, or more precisely, the Septuagint, the Greek version in antiquity of the Hebrew Bible. And everyone understood that. That would not be plagiarism in an otherwise largely plagiarized work.
Chess

Columbus, OH

#551335 Jul 24, 2014
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
If I told you I thought that I am more honest than Billy Graham, would you be convinced???
NAHHHH ... you wouldn't ... and neither should you, as I bullshit a lot ... as does Billy.
The only difference between Billy's behavior and mine is that I don't pretend to preach on behalf of a god as does Billy.
I just cut right to the chase and admit that I'm full of bullshit.
I know you are.

I've seen plenty evidence of that.

But I'm betting Billy believed his nonsense.

That makes him wrong.

Since you know better, that makes you a bullsh!ter.

On the whole, I'd rather hang with the guy's who's simply wrong.

His nonsense usually isn't as smelly.
Truth

Leesburg, VA

#551336 Jul 24, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
Peter must have misunderstood Jesus. Because he went to Antioch and Rome and ordained Bishops and Priests. He set up a hierarchy. Glad you could examine the Scriptures 2,000 yrs later and clarify this embarrassing mistake of Peter. Lol. Seriously....hope all is well, Truth.
Clay,

The first temple was built by Solomon in about 1000 B.C., what was it made of???

Stone..........

The second temple was built in about 535 B.C., by who???

It was beautified by King Herod, when???

In the first century B.C., and, was made out of what???

Stone..........

The third temple was built in 33 A.D., in what age???

Christian age.......was it made out of stone???

NO.......

It was made of LIVING stones, LIVING human beings..........

These LIVING stones were redeemed to God by the Blood of Christ.

So, what was God's third temple???

It was a spiritual temple.

It was the church which Jesus said he would build in the Word of God.
Just Sayin

United States

#551337 Jul 24, 2014
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
"Some" would be WRONG.
I'm trying to encourage people to leave all religion ... including yours.
All you ever do is brag that Catholicism is aligned to the mindset of Jesus and God ... and the Protestants and Gnostic Christians contradict your thesis with the same story on their preferential sides of the religious COINs.
Heads versus TALES ... with no winners.
Jooney, honey, the only thing you are managing to accomplish is to help Protestants and Catholics understand how much they have in common.
....oh, and also to help atheists see just how far around the bend that atheism can take them.

Thanks for all your posts.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#551338 Jul 24, 2014
Chess wrote:
<quoted text>
We know who wrote the genuine letters of Paul.
No we don't!

Much was written about the supposed Jesus, yet not one word was found on earth that we know of in his own hand-writing. For such a learned man to not write anything is suspect to men writing nothing but mythology.

"Jesus said this and Jesus did that" ... means nothing to me, albeit that it means eternal bliss in a hereafter to millions of IDOL worshippers.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 14 hr Married in 10,420
News Pope discusses climate, immigrants in historic ... (Sep '15) Feb 22 WelbyMD 47
News Where Is the Place for Devout Gay Families in t... (Oct '15) Feb 17 True Christian wi... 49
News Vatican will finance adult stem cell research (Apr '10) Feb 12 Pessimistic1 29
News Prayers To Mother Mary 'Cured Lung Cancer' (Jan '10) Feb 11 Phart Girlishly 323
News Pope sings on CD for charity (Dec '09) Feb 11 Phart Musically 31
News Woman Knocks Over Pope Benedict XVI At Christma... (Dec '09) Feb 11 Phart Athletically 165
More from around the web