Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 690311 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

truth

Perth, Australia

#517165 Feb 23, 2014
It is true that ordinary people which is in great numbers as billions not care what others nice writhing diploma pretenders going say or convince anyone.
First commandments is been you will be hard worker Adam and you will be mother in birth pain.
Now we have great numbers in billions on this planet.
No any evidence they will tell you as great pretenders of falsyhood.

What a as prophets or similarity.

There they are some not worthy writers yee..why?

It is written
you and your children and oldest will have vision and dreams..o well Lucifer followers as smart diploma liked deference everyone have to have amnesia dementia and so on or to be control with modern technology.
After all we have cemetery too.

Very sad lustful evil mind killers..

seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ee
truth

Perth, Australia

#517166 Feb 23, 2014
Another holy scripture say ..they will tell you where i am ..i am within you.

Then why god created people on own image!

Lust and pride who can and who can't is very sad case.
truth

Perth, Australia

#517167 Feb 23, 2014
Did god created or form first land water tree birds fish animals flora fauna must be even seeds exist before humans too!
truth

Perth, Australia

#517168 Feb 23, 2014
After all who try recreated on other side way as parallels systems they will copy many things with image will be everything similarity.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#517169 Feb 23, 2014
StarC wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't take my word go to Britannica. Com you 'll find the same results. Duh!
Well, lady guess u r a robot too, the orthodoxes do the same thing ever Sunday.
Clueless ex-Protestant .... Brainwashed for sure.
Lord have mercy on the clueless, who bash your Holy and only true Church.
You are clueless as to what was said...which proves my point
Tango Bravo

Wichita, KS

#517170 Feb 23, 2014
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
This interesting thing is that Jesus Christ and over 2000 years of the TRUTH and His Universal Catholic Church has, is, and will always have the "last TRUE WORD despite the bible interpreting "personal opinions" and the "fictitious church history" myths that Ox keeps trying to
push on this forum! Ox is ion an "isolated island" of his own attempting to sell " hot air" to anyone he can dupe into buying it!!! I truly believe that he means well and is sincere in his Christian faith. He is like the bible only Protestant preachers and teachers that we're ministering in the Church I was raised in! Anti-Catholic to the core!!!!
We would all do well to remember that Jesus said that the greatest of all the Commandments is to love God and that the second greatest is to love our neighbors. All else is dross.
Tango Bravo

Wichita, KS

#517171 Feb 23, 2014
Oxbow wrote:
Catlic Bible History Truth
The fifteen Apocryphal books which the Roman Catholics have included in their Bibles, come from a collection of about eighteen or more books written during the Inter-testamental Period. This period of four hundred years began with God giving the last book of the Old Testament which was Malachi. The Inter-testamental period ended with the coming of Christ and the writing of the New Testament. During this four hundred years God sent no prophets to Israel and was silent giving no written revelation.
The word "apocrypha" means "of questionable authenticity." These are called non canonical books because when the canon of Scriptures (the sixty six books of the Old and New Testaments) was accepted by the early Christians they recognized that these books contained spurious material and therefore were not inspired of God. Other names for these books are "hidden" or "deuterocanonical" books. These books are also called "pseudepigraphal", meaning "false writings" to designate them as spurious and unauthentic books of the late centuries B. C. and early centuries A. D. These books contain religious folklore and have never been considered inspired of God by biblical Christians from the earliest times of churches.
Some have referred to these books as the missing books of the Bible and conclude they are new discovers which are part of God's revelation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The sixty six books that comprise the Old and Testament are God's revelation to man and when John completed the Book of Revelation, God's word to man was complete. God has not added to His revelation since. The content of these spurious books shows them to be inspired of man...not God. It is also noteworthy that the Roman Catholic church which is a false church with false doctrines and pagan teachings accepts these books as scripture. Further, some of the cults including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, the Mormons, also accept them as scripture. No biblical Christians or churches have ever accept them as such. The fact is there are no lost books of the Bible.
These books or writings from the Apocrypha that the Roman Catholic Church claims are inspired are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Letter of Jeremiah, additions to Esther, Prayer of Azariah, Susanna (Daniel 13), and Bel and the Dragon (Daniel 14). Three other Apocryphal books in the Septuagint, the Prayer of Manasseh, and 1 & 2 Esdras, are not considered to be inspired or canonical by the Roman Catholic Church.
These books were not accepted by the Roman Catholic church until 1546 in the Council of Trent. Therefore for over 1300 years, since the inception of the Roman Church in the fourth Century, even they did not considered them inspired!!!!!!!!!
If, like the lying snake, you want to know the source of this info...use your search engine...
more later
I don't see any info here, just some more Oxbow imagination that can't be verified by Oxbow or by reputable sources. He even jumps the gun, knowing that someone will surely ask him for a source, and tells us that he won't provide any source for his claims.

Thus I love to debate with the Ox. What better way to support my own beliefs and opinions than to have Oxbow argue against them?
Tango Bravo

Wichita, KS

#517172 Feb 23, 2014
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
I have set you straight on this matter...days ago.....take your crs pills...
Still no answers? Let's try again.

What languages did Jesus use when He spoke during His ministry on earth. Hebrew? He was a Rabbi. Aramaic? It was a commonly used language in the area at the time. Latin? The Romans were the secular authority. Other languages? I don't know and neither do you. Whatever languages He used, His words might have been written and translated into a number of languages before they were written in Greek and then in Latin. They were eventually translated into a variety of other languages including English.
It's true that I am thoroughly unfamiliar with Koine Greek. It's also true that I trust the English translations of the Bibles that I use, and have no need to translate the English into Greek, skipping Latin in the process, so that I can translate it back into English with a meaning that is different than the meaning provided by the experts who translated the Bible into English from Latin in the first place. You evidently find it necessary to change the expert English translation you already have before you will accept the Bible. Why is that?
Chess Jurist

Columbus, OH

#517173 Feb 23, 2014
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
I have set you straight on this matter...from the beginning.....you are a lying snake...
Then it should be easy for you to provide a permalink showing where you discredited my four dictionary entries that proved you wrong, eh?

http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TV910R5...
Gods R Delusions x Mine

Orlando, FL

#517174 Feb 23, 2014
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm with you,'ceptin' for the your god bit.
That's OK. My God is a self-assured God that doesn't require groveling or worship.

My God isn't angry, jealous, or vengeful.

And above all, don't worry. My God doesn't demand to be feared.

That is the Bronze Age god of the deluded.

Come to the light of the FSM.

Ramen
hojo

Excelsior, MN

#517175 Feb 23, 2014
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
Where does the Bible say that?? God was silent for 400 yrs until Christ came?? Book chapter and verse please. Or at least a link.
This is protestant propaganda garbage. Its taken straight form a deceitful fanatical website. you care to reveal your source? Didn't think so.
You worship God in YOUR OWN opinionated way"----distorting, twisting and manipulating the TRrUTH of the TRUE WORD of God!!!!------I/We as Catholics will continue (as billion and billions of other a Catholics have done for over 2000 years---worship God in HIS WAY in and through HIS One True Apostolic (Universal Catholic Church--as the Way , the TRUTH and the LIfe!!!!
truth

Perth, Australia

#517176 Feb 23, 2014
Psalm 139
I know you before.
I know everything about you.
Chess Jurist

Columbus, OH

#517177 Feb 23, 2014
Gods R Delusions x Mine wrote:
<quoted text>
That's OK. My God is a self-assured God that doesn't require groveling or worship.
My God isn't angry, jealous, or vengeful.
And above all, don't worry. My God doesn't demand to be feared.
That is the Bronze Age god of the deluded.
Come to the light of the FSM.
Ramen
I'll have to pass.
Gods R Delusions x Mine

Orlando, FL

#517178 Feb 23, 2014
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
I suggest that article, which I copied part of below is a whole lot of claptrap.
Protestants ruled America and did not allow any Pagans on their self-perceived holy turf ... period. Those who came to America in those early years were for the most part Protestant.
And at the time of the Salem witch trials the Puritans ruled over others ... period. That is why Cotton Mather (the Puritan theologian) had such power over the judges in the courts.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
But a clamor of new voices has since reopened the controversy. Members of the growing neopagan revival — 200,000 strong in America today — claim witches burned during the great witch-hunt as their martyred forebears. Last year, a consortium of pagan leaders demanded a special apology from Pope John Paul II on the Jubilee Day of Pardon. They mourned a "pagan Holocaust" of nine million secret nature-worshippers exterminated by Christians 500 years ago under the Inquisition.
M<aye.

But the fact remains.

Both perfect and imperfect church killed innocent people as witches.

Both true and untrue churches killed innocent people as witches.

And never did their immoral god say STOP.

Help these people see the light.

These murdering, amoral people need help and guidance from the one true God.

Join us Judeth.

Ramen
Gods R Delusions x Mine

Orlando, FL

#517179 Feb 23, 2014
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll have to pass.
Then how will you have religious holidays?

Ramen
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Kitwanga, Canada

#517180 Feb 23, 2014
I suggest that a break-away group of Jews from polytheism created the flamboyant story of Abram ... just as the ex-Jew Catholics later created the flamboyant story of Jesus.

Note the words in the following ... "According to Jewish 'tradition.'"
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>

Why Polytheism was Replaced by Monotheism: A Very Brief History of Religion

As early as the Upper Paleolithic era, some 250,000 years ago, various tools and iconography demonstrate that primitive religions were practiced, and possibly existed up to 250,000 years before that (Campbell, 1988; Gimbutas, 1991; and Jelínek, 1975). All of these religions, as far as we can determine from that evidence, were polytheistic. So, after a quarter of a million years of humans investing supernatural powers to a wide diversity of gods and goddesses, why did most people begin to believe in the existence of a single supreme being? When and where did this transformation happen?

According to Jewish tradition (Rich, 1998 - 2011), Abram (or Abraham) was born in the city of Ur in Babylonia (Southeastern Mesopotamia) in the year 1948 from Creation (circa 1800 BCE, although this does not necessarily mean that Judaism believes the universe has existed for only 5,700 years as we measure years). At that time, the Mesopotamians were still highly polytheistic, worshiping idols. Abram was the son of Terach, an idol merchant, but from his early childhood, Abram questioned the faith of his father and sought "the truth". Abram came to believe that the entire universe was the work of a single creator, and he began to teach this belief to others. Abram tried to convince his father, Terach, of the folly of idol worship.

http://voices.yahoo.com/why-polytheism-was-re...
truth

Perth, Australia

#517181 Feb 23, 2014
When person pray its coming from single mind or single heart.
You forget that God can hear prayers your error your sin your problems your happiness your going and coming far away from God.
Another thing person never pray o god you are catholic orthodox methodist anglican protestant this or that..there not place in prayers for personal prayers.
Then you are not believer.

Your authority liked control you don't you, every document have to go trough them if you going control authority they going say stop i am sorry you can't..there door become close.

See I say to you even authority will go on knee.
Door of your heart and mind is not close toward God even when you want close you can't God know your going from him and coming to him.
June VanDerMark

Since: Sep 09

Kitwanga, Canada

#517182 Feb 23, 2014
Gods R Delusions x Mine wrote:
<quoted text>
M<aye.
But the fact remains.
Both perfect and imperfect church killed innocent people as witches.
Both true and untrue churches killed innocent people as witches.
And never did their immoral god say STOP.
Help these people see the light.
These murdering, amoral people need help and guidance from the one true God.
Join us Judeth.
Ramen
I suggest that the Christians learned all about burning humans and other animals in the flames from the ancient Pagans.

Sorcerer was another word for witch, and those considered as either/or, were not looked upon as fit to live.

Anyone that was suspected of offending the gods was in deep trouble.

The crazy theology was that devils offended the gods, yet the gods did nothing to do away "with" the devils.

Nuts!
Tango Bravo

Wichita, KS

#517183 Feb 23, 2014
Oxbow wrote:
Catlic Bible History Truth ...continued
Why do non-Catholic authorities reject the Apocrypha as being a part of the sixty six books of the canon?
There are mainly five reasons:
1. They abound in historical and geographical inaccuracies and anachronisms.
2. They teach doctrines which are false and foster practices which are at variance with inspired Scripture.
3. They resort to literary types and display an artificiality of subject matter and styling out of keeping with inspired Scripture.
4. They lack the distinctive elements which give genuine Scripture their divine character, such as prophetic power and poetic and religious feeling.
5. They show contradictions in the Bible.
Of course if you exclude the books Luther discarded after 1600 years or more of continuous use as not "Scriptural", then it's easy to exclude them from Scripture per your items 2 through 5 above. Somehow assuming they aren't part of Scripture and using that assumption to prove they aren't part of Scripture seems like a suspect method for even the least capable.

Your items 1 and 5 refer to contradictions and inaccuracies in the books that have been included in the Catholic version of the Bible ever since the Bible Canon was first established. You are saying that contradiction and inaccuracy is justification for deleting books from the Bible. Which of the two contradictory versions of Creation in Genesis do you think is inaccurate and justification for discarding Genesis? Which of the two versions of the fall from the garden of Eden in Genesis do you think is inaccurate and justification for discarding Genesis? Which two of the first three contradictory versions of the Gospel in the New Testament do you think is inaccurate and justification for discarding two more books from the New Testament? If you don't think Luther's version of the Old and New Testaments contains contradictions and inaccuracies it quickly becomes evident that you've never read Luther's version of the Old and New Testaments. No surprise there.
Michael

Canada

#517184 Feb 23, 2014
Liam wrote:
Man I tell you.....I appreciate the zeal of some of our Protestant brothers. They really do have a deep conviction for the Lord, but they are terribly misguided in Biblical Christianity. The Pentecostal sects that embrace snakes is evidence of the reckless approach to sacred scripture by these guys. They isolated a verse (mark 16:18); completely took it out of context, and ended up getting bit by the snake and dying!
This poor pastor of "Full Gospel Tabernacle in Jesus name Church" in Kentucky was bitten in front of his congregation. And now the his family is going to pick up the snake again next week. All because they don't know how to read the Bible.
www.charismanews.com/us/42852-snake-that-kill...
..... Can your snake talk? The one in bible did.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 10 hr Married in 10,654
News John Paul I Closer to Sainthood as Book Debunks... Nov 12 South Knox Hombre 1
News Vatican backs Obama as Nobel Peace Prize Winner (Oct '09) Nov 8 Feeling Abandoned 37
News Pope Francis to stop off in Cuba on way to Unit... (Apr '15) Nov 2 whirlignmerc 11
News War, religion and tolerance Oct 30 The Bible Student 1
News Pope Francis Denounces Gender Confirmation Surg... Oct '17 TerriB1 1
News Paul Is No Inventor of Christianity, Says Pope (Sep '08) Oct '17 The Bible Student 81
More from around the web