Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 603567 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Liam

Saint Paul, MN

#497686 Dec 6, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>clay, you know the same as I do, that many, if not all of his alleged words were proved to be false. so why quote some persons opinion especially since you mocked marge when she quoted just a verse and gave no opine of that verse.
Preston, scholars dispute the authenticity of many of the Books of the Bible. If Paul didn't write Hebrews like they contend, it poses a problem for you. Especially if that author was really Clement of Rome. Obviously we Catholics don't have a problem if Clement wrote it. He was our 3rd Pope.

And the Ignatius writings the Church says are authentic have never been proven otherwise. There were some that are suspect, but the Church doesn't consider those authentic anyway.
I swore you were taught this already, I'm curious as to why you completely ignored it.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#497687 Dec 6, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
On a,New,Earth ..Will there even be a Rome,..!!!
I'm not kidding ..all those treasures may be gone ..destroyed ...along with most man made everything !!!
Crystal Cathedral..Too ...every man made,icon turned to dust ...during the,tribulation or by Christ ..
No wonder they want land,in Jerusalem ..
There will not be a new earth, the earth as we know it will be utterly destroyed and the only place that will be is heaven. Revelation 21:1 “Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea.” New is not the same as the old.(physical)
•Revelation 21:2 “Then I, John, saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.” The holy city, new Jerusalem, cannot be a physical one, because it’s coming from heaven. The new heaven and new earth must be a figurative expression for God’s dwelling place, heaven. Matthew 5:34 “But I say to you, do not swear at all neither by heaven, for it God’s throne, nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King.” Revelation 21:24,27 “And the nations of those who are saved shall walk in its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory and honor into it.”“But there shall by no means enter it anything that defiles, or causes an abomination or a lie, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life.” This describes where the righteous will dwell, including the faithful in the church.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497688 Dec 6, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
NO MORE SILLY THAN YOU...AND YOUR ATHEISTIC FOOLISHNESS...
Your use of scriptures does not do away with the fact that had Jesus lived, he would have been an anti-Semitist ... just the same as are you.

His "truthful" words would have been of the sentiment, "I was born a Jew and practiced Judaism most of my earthly life ... some say ALL of my earthly life. But then either on earth or in spirit form, I decided to start a new religion totally foreign to Judaism, as I now see that Judaism was all based on lies and that I had to correct all the lies previously taught to me as truth by the Jews. Apparently my father ... the God of the Jews, sent me to earth to confuse me, so that I could in turn confuse others."

Religion is BUNK!

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497689 Dec 6, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
Leaving 'religion' certainly hasn't made you to be good. You fume at everyone on here...and compete as much as anyone to 'be the best'.
Maybe it is because of your religion...atheism...
KayMarie
Why are YOU "fuming" at the Catholics?

You are see-through. I'm quite aware that if I sided with you and "fumed" against the Catholics as do you, you would praising me as being WISE.

:)

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497690 Dec 6, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
No it isn't. Please stop making things up about me.
To please your SELF, all people of the world will have to align their beliefs to the beliefs of YOUR SELF.

You go on and on and on about SELF ... meaning YOU.

I simply want people to leave religion so they can stop fighting verbally and physically over who owns truth, when the theological teaching of owning truth is simply based on theological mythology.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497691 Dec 6, 2013
Human Being wrote:
<quoted text>
June
Haven't you noticed most history is written concerning war?
The object of religion is being selfless, not selfish. Religion has been hijacked by the same people that write history....
Most people in the world are in religion, so guess who is starting the wars?

Humans in religion might preach of selflessness, but religion itself is based on the most selfish intentions of "Bliss for me and hell for you."

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#497692 Dec 6, 2013
StarC wrote:
"The Church Is One (Rom. 12:5, 1 Cor. 10:17, 12:13, CCC 813–822)
Jesus established only one Church, not a collection of differing churches (Lutheran, Baptist, Anglican, and so on). The Bible says the Church is the bride of Christ (Eph. 5:23–32). Jesus can have but one spouse, and his spouse is the Catholic Church.
His Church also teaches just one set of doctrines, which must be the same as those taught by the apostles (Jude 3). This is the unity of belief to which Scripture calls us (Phil. 1:27, 2:2).
Although some Catholics dissent from officially-taught doctrines, the Church’s official
teachers—the pope and the bishops united with him—have never changed any
doctrine. Over the centuries, as doctrines are examined more fully, the Church comes
to understand them more deeply (John 16:12–13), but it never understands them to
mean the opposite of what they once meant.
The Church Is Holy (Eph. 5:25–27, Rev. 19:7–8, CCC 823–829)
By his grace Jesus makes the Church holy, just as he is holy. This doesn’t mean that each member is always holy. Jesus said there would be both good and bad members in the Church (John 6:70), and not all the members would go to heaven (Matt. 7:21–23).
But the Church itself is holy because it is the source of holiness and is the guardian of the special means of grace Jesus established, the sacraments (cf. Eph. 5:26).
The Church Is Catholic (Matt. 28:19–20, Rev. 5:9–10, CCC 830–856)
Jesus’ Church is called catholic ("universal" in Greek) because it is his gift to all people.
He told his apostles to go throughout the world and make disciples of "all nations"
(Matt. 28:19–20).
For 2,000 years the Catholic Church has carried out this mission, preaching the good news that Christ died for all men and that he wants all of us to be members of his universal family (Gal. 3:28).
Nowadays the Catholic Church is found in every country of the world and is still sending out missionaries to "make disciples of all nations" (Matt. 28:19).
The Church Jesus established was known by its most common title, "the Catholic Church," at least as early as the year 107, when Ignatius of Antioch used that title to describe the one Church Jesus founded. The title apparently was old in Ignatius’s time, which means it probably went all the way back to the time of the apostles."
WRONG, The Catholic church is a man made church which came about from some of the members of the true church which is the Church of Christ. These few members enjoyed the attention and praise they were getting from the Roman dignitaries and for this these members decided to please them back by doing things that these Roman officials desired and that's when you have the development of the Catholic church . The Church of Christ which Jesus built Matthew 16;18 and the Church that Jesus said he would build was eventually built in the year 33 AD when the first souls that were saved were added to the church on the day of Pentecost. There is only one true church of the bible and that's the CoC and I urge all to go to the nearest Church of Christ and study, then get baptized and then you would know that your home will be.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497693 Dec 6, 2013
Chess wrote:
<quoted text>
Humans don't need religion to be inhuman.
Humans in religion ARE human. Believing self to be better than other humans was and is the building blocks OF religion.

Even the silly old man Gerald Gardner (father of Wicca) taught that the goddess loves everyone ... "but" ... she curses homosexuals.

Theologians in all religions simply taught who the gods loved and who the gods would reject. That is how theologians earned, and still earn their "keep."

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#497694 Dec 6, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
Most people in the world are in religion, so guess who is starting the wars?
Humans in religion might preach of selflessness, but religion itself is based on the most selfish intentions of "Bliss for me and hell for you."
People start wars in the name of God but God never authorized any of these wars, so you simply got bad people who are not Christians to start with saying to the world that God authorized this, and he didn't. Evil people are the cause for wars, not God.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497695 Dec 6, 2013
Catholic Girl wrote:
<quoted text>
Than what will we believe? The evening news channel?
Trust in your self worth. Since I left religion, I am of the same nature as when I was in religion. I try to be fair to others as I feel better about my self when I am kind than I do if I am overly self-centered.

It's common sense that when you treat others in a fair and decent manner that your reputation follows you. Humans, for the most part have long memories. If you are a shyster, they will not forget that you scammed them. But if you are forthright and try to never deceive, they will see you for what they believe is YOUR worth TO them.

Religion in itself doesn't build a good character ... but it has lead far too people to be killing brutes in the guises of serving gods.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497696 Dec 6, 2013
Working for the Lord wrote:
<quoted text> People start wars in the name of God but God never authorized any of these wars,
Well, I don't believe that a creator exists, much less instructs human thought one way or the other.

I believe humans invoked images of gods into their psyches and are foolish enough to believe that the gods LOVE them and will reject others.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497697 Dec 6, 2013
I came to conclude that in order for me to stay under the spell of religion, I was going to have to also believe that the creator was vile for creating human animals AND non-human animals to suffer needless pain ... when the creator could have omitted suffering altogether.

I knew that if I could not respect what I was worshipping, I had to stop worshipping what I could NOT respect. Otherwise I would lose respect for my self.

And so I left all theological gibberish behind and freed my self entirely from all religion.
OldJG

Rockford, IL

#497698 Dec 6, 2013
Liam wrote:
<quoted text>
Preston, scholars dispute the authenticity of many of the Books of the Bible. If Paul didn't write Hebrews like they contend, it poses a problem for you. Especially if that author was really Clement of Rome. Obviously we Catholics don't have a problem if Clement wrote it. He was our 3rd Pope.
And the Ignatius writings the Church says are authentic have never been proven otherwise. There were some that are suspect, but the Church doesn't consider those authentic anyway.
I swore you were taught this already, I'm curious as to why you completely ignored it.
O my goodness Dust Storm, Cly(also know as Liam?), Regina, StarC, Catholic Girl, Husker Du and AnthonyMN. What is going on here? The scholars you so eloquently quote have thrown you and your Roman theology under the bus.

The following information is taken from...

http://onefold.wordpress.com/early-church-evi...

The words of the Lord from the bread of life discourse “Eat My flesh and drink My blood,” is, according to Clement, figurative speech. Given Clement’s credentials and with regard to how much he was admired in the church, it is not at all likely he was out on a limb here. Clement was teaching orthodox Christian doctrine, widely understood in the universal church at that time.

The Roman Catholic Church is in quite a predicament when it comes to Clement. They cannot accept his metaphorical teachings, and they cannot deny the evidence showing that he was orthodox. As previously mentioned, Clement was highly admired and praised as a great Christian teacher by prominent figures in the early church. If Clement’s teaching that the bread of life discourse was to be understood metaphorically was erroneous, why do we not find any protest against him by the ecclesiastical writers of the third and fourth centuries? What we do find is praise for his skill of teaching and his knowledge of Scripture.

From Schaff’s introductory note to Clement of Alexandria – After Clement’s death, Alexander, bishop of Jerusalem, said of him,“For we acknowledge as fathers those blessed saints who are gone before us, and to whom we shall go after a little time; the truly blest Pantaenus, I mean, and the holy Clemens, my teacher, who was to me so greatly useful and helpful.” Cyril of Alexandria referred to him as “a man admirably learned and skillful, and one that searched to the depths all the learning of the Greeks, with an exactness rarely attained before.” Jerome said he was the most learned of all the ancients. And Eusebius described him as an “incomparable master of Christian philosophy.”

Such admiration and praise could not been uttered for a man that was anything but orthodox.

It is interesting how easily Roman Catholic apologists will discount any church father’s testimony if it does not agree with Catholic doctrine. What is worse is that the Catholic Encyclopedia, which is supposed to be a respected source for this type of information, completely dodges Clement and Origen on the topic “The Sacrifice of the Mass.”

“Passing over the teaching of the Alexandrine Clement and Origen, whose love of allegory, together with the restrictions of the Disciplina Arcani [Latin term meaning discipline of the secret], involved their writings in mystic obscurity…”(Catholic Encyclopedia, Sacrifice of the Mass)

In plain English, the reason the Roman Catholic Encyclopedia passed over Clement and Origen is because they both clearly taught that Jesus was speaking metaphorically when He said,“Eat My body and drink My blood.”

Origen specifically referred to the eucharistic bread and wine as symbolical.
OldJG

Rockford, IL

#497699 Dec 6, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I don't believe that a creator exists, much less instructs human thought one way or the other.
I believe humans invoked images of gods into their psyches and are foolish enough to believe that the gods LOVE them and will reject others.
Here we go again. Thank you June VanDerMark. Your words are very helpful in conveying God's message. I especially enjoyed this from you, quote, "Well, I don't believe that a creator exists, much less instructs human thought one way or the other." End quote.

You do not believe in a Creator, correct? If so, how did you get here? Will you please explain and thanks again. OldJG.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497700 Dec 6, 2013
Many people believe that humans, because of scientific advancements have become more WISE than we were when men lived in caves.

An example of how we are simply bits and pieces of other people's thought is made plain in the supposed "brilliance" of Einstein. Had math not been discovered by earlier humans and developed to such a complicated extent, Einstein would have had no more on which to base his theories than would a man fresh from the cave.

Medical science is that same. Back a very short while ago, humans either lived or died, as the physicians were limited in their abilities to help patients TO survive.

But now their are specialists that specialize in most every part of the human body and they pool their knowledge together to save human lives.

I don't believe that humans are any wiser than we were when we lived in caves. We are simply bits and pieces of the thoughts of others.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497701 Dec 6, 2013
OldJG wrote:
<quoted text>
Here we go again. Thank you June VanDerMark. Your words are very helpful in conveying God's message. I especially enjoyed this from you, quote, "Well, I don't believe that a creator exists, much less instructs human thought one way or the other." End quote.
You do not believe in a Creator, correct? If so, how did you get here? Will you please explain and thanks again. OldJG.
As I've stated many times ... I don't know the answers to what remains mysteries. That is WHY I don't pretend I'm a fortune-teller of future events.

If I can't figure out the past, I certainly have no right to believe I'm wise enough to map out a future.

When one man was asked what he was going to do with the rest of his life, he responded that he didn't know even what he was going to do in the next 15 minutes.

I related and still relate to his response.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#497702 Dec 6, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>I have been saying that for over 5 years. His body was NEVER broken(regardless of what kay says) therefore it is not his broken body that catholics eat.
that is just plain common sense.
and another thing, an opening in the body(wounds) are not indicative of a break in the body, tho it is a break in the SKIN
further PROOF from the Bible that His Body was not broken.

But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was [bruised] for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.

bruised means exactly that, and it doesn't mean that His body was broken. as Christians, we need not to accept the false teachings of Catholicism, NOR go along with them

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497703 Dec 6, 2013
Century after century any Catholic that tried to break away from Catholicism to start a new religion was put to death or ordered to recant his beliefs to suit the beliefs of the popes that were in power.

But finally, so many Catholics became disillusioned with the teachings of Catholicism, that when the disgruntled ex-monk Martin Luther came to power, he finally had the support of other ex-Catholics to start his new religion.

He was just as power-hungry and as ignorant of thought as were the popes, but at least he managed to break the power of the Catholic religion, and for that, I, for one, am very thankful.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497704 Dec 6, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>further PROOF from the Bible that His Body was not broken.
But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was [bruised] for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
What a lot of theological slop!

Your heart is supposedly broken over the supposed suffering of one solitary Jew ... but the Jews that were tortured century after century as "Christ-killers" by the Catholic hierarchy mean absolutely NOTHING to you.

Despicable hypocrisy!

Had Jesus lived, he also would have been an anti-Semitist, as are you.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#497705 Dec 6, 2013
I suggest that the pope is LYING!

Christianity was CREATED by anti-Semites, preaching that the horrible Jews had crucified Jesus.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>

Anti-Semites are not true Christians, pope says

http://www.timesofisrael.com/anti-semites-are...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Pope eases church rule on abortion forgiveness 3 hr Redeemed 30
News What Divides Catholics and Protestants? (Apr '08) 8 hr Jaimie 84,426
News Pope: Priests in Holy Year can absolve - sin of... 9 hr Catholic24 8
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) Aug 31 3Way4me 9,681
News Pope Francis Affirms Evolution and Big Bang Theory Aug 30 Paul Porter1 421
News Ahead of pope's visit to US, some friction over... Aug 26 Belle Sexton 3
News Ahead of pope's visit to US, some friction over... Aug 25 Abrahamanic Relig... 1
More from around the web