Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 679242 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

marge

Leesburg, GA

#493707 Nov 21, 2013
So the orthodox got the memo on the 'New Israel' also, along with the 'CC',...

I would say this is the beginning of the END or Last Day.

Anyone agree?

I hope they know we won't join them, or approve of them,...

REPENT BEFORE IT'S TO LATE!
marge

Leesburg, GA

#493708 Nov 21, 2013
I see no 'CC' defending their previous day declarations about wanting to rule from Jerusalem.

Maybe they came to their senses:)

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#493709 Nov 21, 2013
marge wrote:
So the orthodox got the memo on the 'New Israel' also, along with the 'CC',...
I would say this is the beginning of the END or Last Day.
Anyone agree?
I hope they know we won't join them, or approve of them,...
REPENT BEFORE IT'S TO LATE!
Margie Im not sure you read what the Orthodox mean by the "New Israel", a term they would rather replace with Ecclesia.

Since: Sep 09

Dawson Creek, Canada

#493710 Nov 21, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
Bug Rome is not he New Israel ...And Jesus is returning to Jerusalem ..not To the new temple ..the Vatican
The believing among e Jews have not been replaced .
And Israel is,NOW, Israel the lAnd of the Jewish people ..And Jesus ....some faithful ..some not ..all will bow to Messiah at His Return..
There may have been doubt in prophecy before the in gathering ...But no excuse now ..
And hats why ..IMO..they want he deed ...
It's,appslling .
The one of the GENTILES will not last forever .
Thanks,Nick ..
You keep on trying to change Judaism to suit your Christian mania.

Jews faithful to Judaism do NOT believe that Jesus was or is a messiah.

A Jewish messiah (within all common sense theology) would be faithful ONLY to Judaism. He would come to earth as a Jew and leave earth as a Jew and live in the afterlife as a Jew for eternity with his Jewish father.

Since: Sep 09

Dawson Creek, Canada

#493711 Nov 21, 2013
marge wrote:
REPENT BEFORE IT'S TO LATE!
YUP! Jehovah is waiting for your repentance with open invisible arms at the ready. All you have to do is convert back to Judaism.

Tongue in cheek

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#493712 Nov 21, 2013
marge wrote:
So the orthodox got the memo on the 'New Israel' also, along with the 'CC',...
I would say this is the beginning of the END or Last Day.
Anyone agree?
I hope they know we won't join them, or approve of them,...
REPENT BEFORE IT'S TO LATE!
yes we know marge your to good to have lunch with us heathens..

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#493713 Nov 21, 2013
marge wrote:
I see no 'CC' defending their previous day declarations about wanting to rule from Jerusalem.
Maybe they came to their senses:)
and you would love that wouldn't you..
truth

Success, Australia

#493714 Nov 21, 2013
its come knock on your door then say he is god from scientology
as jehovich evil killers frindes
did they have drugs and crime over them

yes it is evil serve evil

its easy recognize evil of that corupt killers

jep
they change face as well become on many place as lawyers judges police as everything

killers are killers
how many false documents they will send as criminal mafija organization

n
marge

Leesburg, GA

#493715 Nov 21, 2013
Hermeneutics Smutics wrote:
<quoted text>Margie Im not sure you read what the Orthodox mean by the "New Israel", a term they would rather replace with Ecclesia.
Still we can't be Ecclesia until you are born-again and believe like we do, period.

So did anyone answer yet if 'New Israel' is a new term their exclaiming, or of OLD that we know!

REPENT BEFORE ITS TO LATE!

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#493716 Nov 21, 2013
The Passion of Christ -- Or Why We Never Should Take the Christian Canon too Seriously

There is a term in NT studies.

It is the "synoptic gospels".

It refers to the first three texts in the NT.

"Synoptic" means with a single eye -- with one view.

The synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, are more closely related to each other than they are to the 4th gospel, John. Even many (most?) learned apologists accept the relationship.

It goes like this: Mark was written around '70 AD -- after the fall of Jerusalem and destruction of the 2nd temple.

Matthew came next in the 80's followed not too long after by Luke, some say in the late 80's a few outliers, such as the late Burton Mack, claim it was in the very early 2nd century.

Regardless.

Matthew and Luke rely on Mark and sometimes copy from Mark verbatim. These two gospels also share another common source other than Mark. That source often is referred to as Q.

Q is short for Quelle, a German word that means source.

Q is thought to have been a "sayings gospel" similar to the extant Thomas but not actually Thomas.

Q has never been found; it is a hypothetical manuscript.

A very few critical scholars, such as Mark Goodacre, now at UNC, argue there is no Q. From Goodacre’s viewpoint, Luke merely relies on Mark and Mathew, not Mark and Q.

Fine.

But Luke's author, whether he was a physician and follower of Paul or not, was not an eyewitness to the events in his narrative. Just the opposite. In his opening sentences in that text, he admits he relies on other sources to tell his tale. Modern scholars know -- for a fact -- that one of those sources was the Gospel of Mark.

Odd that Luke's author would rely on Mark -- sometimes verbatim -- but change that text at will whenever it suited him, eh?

Yet that is exactly what he did.

So in Luke, the passion narrative is not just different in detail but also in tenor in comparison to Mark’s passion narrative – even though Luke relied on Mark for the story.

In Mark, Jesus runs the passion gauntlet in silence until, at the end, after those who were crucified with him reviled him, he cries, "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?"

(Didn't Eloi have a helpful household hints column in syndication a few years ago?)

But in Luke, though relying on Mark, things are different. Rather than suffering in silence until the end and then asking BibleGod why he has been forsaken, Jesus is rather vocal throughout the whole process.

And the two crucified with Jesus -- "malefactors" according to the KJV -- are not in accord in reviling Jesus. One mocks him but the other proclaims Jesus innocent.

And Jesus, rather than feeling "forsaken" at the end tells one of the malefactors, "To day shalt thou be with me in paradise," and then Jesus commends himself to his father: "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit."

So much for feeling forsaken as portrayed in Mark even though Mark is Luke’s source for the story.

Lying for Jesus has a long history; Luke’s author is merely one of the earliest practitioners. But then he had a good example to follow – Mark’s author.

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#493717 Nov 21, 2013
Oooo.

That post's definitely going into the Topix Book of Chess.

Yes it is.
truth

Success, Australia

#493718 Nov 21, 2013
satanic evil people which they practising they are something
in reality they simply criminals evil organizators in all aspect..they liked used passiges trough bible
but they are nobody and nothing..

if you need false documentation go there you will find drug dillers killers liars police detective judges priests anything as evil satanic accusers

nobody and nothing

law of them is not law of rightenatiosness accusers and killers

byyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

someone know where they lived yeeee

how many adress face and so on..
did they are authority

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o
killers

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#493719 Nov 21, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Still we can't be Ecclesia until you are born-again and believe like we do, period.
So did anyone answer yet if 'New Israel' is a new term their exclaiming, or of OLD that we know!
REPENT BEFORE ITS TO LATE!
who are you to judge and make demands??

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#493720 Nov 21, 2013
marge wrote:
...
REPENT BEFORE IT'S TO LATE!
I'm sorry I ate the last blueberry bagel in the break room.
truth

Success, Australia

#493721 Nov 21, 2013
to my accusers
which unlowfully missuded position and set on owfull evil satanic way
many things

o yee

see
power to recognize who they are

by
n
marge

Leesburg, GA

#493722 Nov 21, 2013
Seraphima wrote:
<quoted text>who are you to judge and make demands??
This life is either for a short time, or forever, and I don't feel it's forever with you and nick but I want it to be.

Sounds like your siding with the Enemy here Seri, thee enemy of God. Please prove me wrong. Blessings
marge

Leesburg, GA

#493723 Nov 21, 2013
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry I ate the last blueberry bagel in the break room.
Are you sorry you refused GOD?

This is not a game you've been warned.
marge

Leesburg, GA

#493724 Nov 21, 2013
Judgment Proclaimed
…20"Declare this in the house of Jacob And proclaim it in Judah, saying, 21'Now hear this, O foolish and senseless people, Who have eyes but do not see; Who have ears but do not hear. 22'Do you not fear Me?' declares the LORD.'Do you not tremble in My presence? For I have placed the sand as a boundary for the sea, An eternal decree, so it cannot cross over it. Though the waves toss, yet they cannot prevail; Though they roar, yet they cannot cross over it.
marge

Leesburg, GA

#493725 Nov 21, 2013
Matthew 13:13
This is why I speak to them in parables: "Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.

Matthew 13:14
In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: "'You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.

Mark 4:12
so that, "'they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding; otherwise they might turn and be forgiven!'"

Mark 8:18
Do you have eyes but fail to see, and ears but fail to hear? And don't you remember?

John 12:40
"He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn--and I would heal them."

Acts 28:26
"'Go to this people and say, "You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving."

Romans 1:20
For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#493726 Nov 21, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you sorry you refused GOD?
This is not a game you've been warned.
So you could tell I really wasn't sorry, huh?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Melania Trump covers her head one day and n... 5 hr Eric 4
News Why did Melania Trump wear a head covering at t... 6 hr nanoanomaly 1
News What Divides Catholics and Protestants? (Apr '08) 9 hr Jasonville 84,711
News What is up with that strange photo of President... 12 hr Chilli J 14
News Pope's Egypt visit offers chance to improve Cat... Fri BB Board 1
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) May 24 Apostolic of anot... 10,545
News How the war-of-words between Trump and Pope Fra... May 23 WhollyConcrete 8
More from around the web