Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 701391 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

OldJG

Rockford, IL

#458346 Jul 1, 2013
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>LOL,LOL. Actually back in Christ's day most of the so called religious community didn't acceot Christ as a teacher either. They even called Him a Devil. I am in great company then. The Christian community is just chocked full of SELF RIGHTEOUS HYPOCRITES like yourself. Christ told us that there would come a time they they will not endure SOUND DOCTRINE. There is no new thing under the sun.
Tony17 said, quote, "LOL,LOL. Actually back in Christ's day most of the so called religious community didn't acceot Christ as a teacher either." End quote.

You are declaring yourself as Christ's equal?

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#458347 Jul 1, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
That was auto correct sorry ..happens when you type on a device meant for reading..
GOD said do not EAT.
ADAM said God said do not eat or touch ..the serpent was at or under or near or touching the tree ..not dead ...
So then.....you have nothing to support your false statements...
OldJG

Rockford, IL

#458348 Jul 1, 2013
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Only those that are members of the 144,000 of Gods Elect are privy to comprehending the mystery nof the Serpent's seed. I pity you and the rest that haven't been sealed with the truth of God's word.
If this doctrine of the serpents seed bloodline befuddles you then no doubt about it you are definitely NOT one of Gods elect.
There ore those that God sealed that comprehend this doctrine at this timne but there is coming a time in the millennium that all those of you today that claim to be Christian are then gonna underatand that doctrine because at that time God will remove the veil from your eyes which porevents you guys from being able to understand this doctrine and the reason that Satan did what He did with Eve in the garden in an attempt to corrupt that bloodline through which Christ was to come. That was not the only arttempt by Satan on the seedline through which Christ was to come. In Genesis 6 when the SONS OF GOD took wives of the daughters of Adam that was yet another attempt by Satan on the bloodline through which Christ was to come. And there were many more attempts by Satan trying to corrupt that bloodline and the majority of so called Christians have absolutley NO CLUE what was going on and they still haven't a clue.
144,000? And I take it you are one of the 144,000, correct? LOL LOL You live in a fairy tale world. Quit the drugs and go to rehab.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#458349 Jul 1, 2013
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>Yes Satan was that tree of the knowledge of good and evil. That's just one of his many names and titles. Earlier I posted a link that that showed some the many names of Satan and SERPENT is one of his many name as is DRAGON. Google the names of Satan and you will see that he has many names and titles, AS DOES CHRIST.
Another interestin lesson on names is if you do some research on the comparison of some of the names of Cain's children and some of the names of Adams children.
I wasn't a tree of "good and evil" at all...it was the partaking of "knowledge".
That then scared the shit out of your cluster of deities. What was the next thing said?
DO NOT let them eat of the tree of "LIFE", they will then live forever too!
Who was this deity even talking to?
The "other" Elohim perhaps?
What exactly were they really afraid of?

Maybe that they had abused a subset of their own creation---and did not want to pay the price for it?
Your deity(s) are indeed the evil they contort.

This world has been "MISLED"!!!
OldJG

Rockford, IL

#458350 Jul 1, 2013
Tony17 wrote:
<quoted text>LOL,LOL. Actually back in Christ's day most of the so called religious community didn't acceot Christ as a teacher either. They even called Him a Devil. I am in great company then. The Christian community is just chocked full of SELF RIGHTEOUS HYPOCRITES like yourself. Christ told us that there would come a time they they will not endure SOUND DOCTRINE. There is no new thing under the sun.
You quote the Bible as if you understand it. Sound doctrine? If I chose to believe as you believe is the doctrine you spew salvanic? If so present it. The serpent seed doctrine is bologna and has nothing to do with salvation. You are nothing more than a satan worshiper. Period!!

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#458351 Jul 1, 2013
130
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Joseph- being a devout Jew- would not venture into the Ark that bore forth the word of God. There is no way. Once the Holy Spirit conceived the Christ in her body, it became off limits for sexual intercourse. That's a no brainer to us normal Christians. To the radical fanaticals, I suppose you'd be ok with it.
His calling to the sacrament of Holy Matrimony wasn't about procreation. Joseph had a unique and special calling.
Your feeble mind can't separate sex from marriage.
Look Ox, this is the truth: I don't care what you believe about Mary or why you believe it. I find you very odd. You don't seem concerned with what Catholics really teach. You just wanna antagonize everyone. You help the Catholic Church every time you post.
Hogwash.....

The Alleged Perpetual Virginity of Mary
By Wayne Jackson

A few months ago, the world was stunned by the report of a limestone ossuary (bone box), discovered in Jerusalem, bearing the inscription,“James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.” A number of prominent scholars believe this box once contained the bones of James, half-brother of Jesus, who is so prominently mentioned in the New Testament (cf. Mt. 13:55-56; Acts 15:13ff; 21:18-19; Gal. 2:9). For a brief discussion of the evidence, see the article elsewhere on this web site, "The “Jesus” Inscription", October 21, 2002).

Aside from the obvious importance of this discovery as such relates to the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth, the inscription has rekindled the controversy concerning the alleged “perpetual virginity” of Mary. Both the Greek Orthodox Church, and the Roman Catholic Church (along with a few Protestant scholars), contend that Mary and Joseph, even after the birth of the Lord, remained celibate for life.

The Roman Catholic Church alleges that Mary’s parents presented her in the temple when she was but three years old, and that “the child herself mounted the Temple steps, and that she made her vow of virginity on this occasion”(Maas, 464F). This would suggest that at the tender age of three, Mary had considerable knowledge of human anatomy. It further hints that she understood the intricacies of sexual union. Moreover it indicates that she likely foreknew the fact that she would bear the Christ child, and that she perceived somehow that it would be inappropriate for her ever to engage in honorable intimacy with a legitimate husband.

This theory of Mary’s “perpetual virginity” became official dogma at the Council of Chalcedon in A.D. 451, and thus is binding upon both the Greek and Roman segments of the Church (Pelikan, 14.1000).

There is no Scripture that supports this un Christian teaching:

"The Roman Catholic Church alleges that Mary’s parents presented her in the temple when she was but three years old, and that “the child herself mounted the Temple steps, and that she made her vow of virginity on this occasion”(Maas, 464F)."

And....who but a Catholic would believe a three year old has the capacity to:

Mount the Temple steps, and make her vow of virginity !!!!!!! A three year old knows about virginity!!!!?????

And she knew about the intricacies of sexual union!!!!! A three year old knows about intercourse??? Really!!!!

And that she foreknew the fact that she would bear the Christ child, and that she perceived somehow that it would be inappropriate for her ever to engage in honorable intimacy with a legitimate husband. A three year old!!!!!

A safe bet is that if the pope says pigs fly...then Catholics know pigs fly!!!!

Why did it take Catholics over 400 years to come up with the teaching of Mary’s “perpetual virginity”????
4GVN

Jackson, MO

#458352 Jul 1, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
First, you should ask the Catholic Church if they teach that Mary is another mediator. When they answer no, it should be the end of the discussion. There is no reason for you to continue any further with the matter, because now you risk bearing false witness.
You have failed to answer the question with the very criteria you yourself set forth. Would you care to attempt to do so?
4GVN

Jackson, MO

#458353 Jul 1, 2013
Vote for Pedro wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying that "the Word was made flesh" in your womb? Wow, I'm impressed.......NOT!
Let me rephrase...Are we not GREATER if we house God Himself and not just His covenant?
4GVN

Jackson, MO

#458354 Jul 1, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know. Did the Holy Spirit conceive the Word of God with you? Did you carry Baby Jesus in your womb and bring forth Him into this world? Did your breast nurture and feed the Christ?
If you think you're equivalent to that because you sing Christian rock songs with your hands in the air, then I guess you are an ark like Mary. Ugh.
Why must you be incindiary and condescending? These are not Christ like attributes. Are they?

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#458355 Jul 1, 2013
OldJG wrote:
<quoted text>
You quote the Bible as if you understand it. Sound doctrine? If I chose to believe as you believe is the doctrine you spew salvanic? If so present it. The serpent seed doctrine is bologna and has nothing to do with salvation. You are nothing more than a satan worshiper. Period!!
Still waiting on your explanation of why Ezekiel 31:9 stated that the trees in Eden envied this great tree spoken of in Eden. I can imagine God now standing whith His arms folded looking at you and shaking His head with disappointment and disgust because you are not capable of explaining this about the tree. Don't sweat that because I have challenged many so called preachers, some even with Doctorates of Theology and they, just like you were clueless on how to elucidate on many parts of Gods word. It's good to try the spirits and the only way to try a spirit is by the word of God. You have been tried and failed..........MISERABLY.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#458356 Jul 1, 2013
Okay. Qyestion for you Christian folks. When Adam and were formed and placed into the garden which entity at that time was the first entity that knew both good and evil? Even he was good at one time.........TILL INIQUITY ( evil ) was found in him as we are told in scripture. He didn't become evil by eating from some tree that made him aware of evil by eating its fruit. Scripture tells us that iniquity was found in him. Why? He is called the TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL. Are the lessons I give on this forum really too difficult for you guys?
4GVN

Jackson, MO

#458357 Jul 1, 2013
4GVN wrote:
<quoted text>So Catholicism is the only way to God? So you are trying to tell us that one can not go directly to God, but must go through a religious system? What are you smoking. Good thing the thief on the cross didn't know that. Nor the Ethiopian eunich. Fortunatly God is available to all sincere seekers who would call on His name for salvation. You are really clueless and are teaching a false gospel, which is really no gospel at all.
Funny how they try to ignor the things they can't answer.

“YESHUA IS LORD”

Since: Apr 07

GAWGIA (GEORGIA)

#458358 Jul 1, 2013
Do you guys understand Ezekiel 28:15. This is when the knowledge of evil was introduced into the world. Satan was PERFECT, had only the knowledge of good till he because of his pride, wanted to be like God and sit on Gods throne himself WHICH CAUSED HIM TO BECOME EVIL. This is when the knowledge of evil was introduce by him and he became known as the TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#458359 Jul 1, 2013
OldJG wrote:
<quoted text>
Tony17, said, quote, "You foolishly stated that there are no metaphors in the Bible yet you can't apply a literal intrepretation to verse 9 of Ezekiel 37." End quote.
Tony17, you are lost. At no time did I ever say there are NO METAPHORS in the Bible.
I'll keep my ESV and you can have your KJV. Actually I have an NASB as well.
Also, Tony17, aren't you the "Serpent Seed" doctrine guru? LOL LOL
He is trying to get you to believe what the Kenites teach...they are mentioned in the OT....and they are alive and well today...and he claims to be a Christian....

KENITES

A people who dwelt west of the Dead sea, and extended themselves far into Arabia Petraea. Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, was a Kenite, and his family accompanied the Israelites, and settled with other Kenites in various parts of the Holy Land, Jg 1:16; 4:11; 1Sa 30:29; 1Ch 2:55 Heber and the Rechabites were their descendants.

The Kenites of whom we read appear to have known and served Jehovah, and the whole tribe were friendly to the Hebrews. Saul spared them, when sent to destroy the Amalekites among whom they dwelt, Nu 24:20-21; 1Sa 15:6
truth

Duncraig, Australia

#458360 Jul 1, 2013
truth

Duncraig, Australia

#458361 Jul 1, 2013
Now you are against me..why?
truth

Duncraig, Australia

#458362 Jul 1, 2013
I told you beware from Israel or else.
truth

Duncraig, Australia

#458363 Jul 1, 2013
http://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/1-16.htm

your law is not my law..
ones when you put hand over me and judge finish..
https://www.google.com.au/search...
truth

Duncraig, Australia

#458364 Jul 1, 2013
your judges is not my judges..no.
jesus know i speak truth..

Since: Jul 08

Columbus, OH

#458365 Jul 2, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>since we do not have a mode to express our words for emphasis, we use CAPS.
IF YOU DONT LIKE IT, PLEASE REFRAIN FROM READING THE POSTS WHEN YOU SEE CAPS BEOING USED.
If your writing has any force, child, you won't need caps.

If your writing has no force, caps won't change that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 20 hr Married in 10,772
News What Pope Francis and Obama may talk about (Sep '15) May 8 Serial deserters 54
News Alfie Evans' dad meets POPE to plead for asylum... Apr 24 C Kersey 1
News Pope writes Chile's bishops after receiving sex... Apr '18 Wisdom of Ages 1
News Vatican nixes former Irish president from Women... Apr '18 dubiecatholicarch... 3
News Vatican backs Obama as Nobel Peace Prize Winner (Oct '09) Apr '18 helpful links 40
News 'Hell does not exist,' says Pope Francis Apr '18 thepopeonthetwit 3