Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 670659 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

truth

Perth, Australia

#456118 Jun 25, 2013
who say boom in rt?
desert=de set r ser t trest=boom see

any desertpustinja=jesus been temted in desert 40 day
tem p ted=rt
any ted on rt

see
now
25/25
25=52
25 temperature + and -
mongolia=ai log=log what?nom ad what?
nomad=is that key
kay

sram te bilo=$ram tebi lo
truth

Perth, Australia

#456119 Jun 25, 2013
a medo=odo ja medo pedo a where are you going..medopede medo persia
really
ajde jadan nebiojadan-dajan he did not know where there ser who..me
not meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
nk
Human Being

Kinder, LA

#456120 Jun 25, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
If you take the context of this ancient text, the eating of the apple was actually a plan to save humanity.
http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn-long.htm...
New Age Spiritual Leader:

Certainly not outside the realm of possibility.

I am reminded that we often think that God and Creation revolves around our own egotistical idealism. Yet we are but a small part in eternity, and our understanding even less.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#456121 Jun 25, 2013
A faithful Jew would not turn away from his faithful Jewish followers.

He would correct their bad behavior ... but he would NOT give up on them. After all, they were his God's chosen few among all other believers.

To insinuate that a faithful Jew would willingly abandon his Jews is NOT a compliment. It IS an INSULT!

I suggest you stop making Jesus into a Christian door-matt, and set that IMAGE free!

You are NOT doing your selves favors by using words in a bible to continually lie to your selves AND in turn to others.
truth

Perth, Australia

#456123 Jun 25, 2013
please
I asked you nicly
who turn everybody against everybody?

now
2=on computerarrow down 2=b
see
where there sereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
sare sere sire sore sure
aeiou
bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxyz
for sure who???????
not me..
nk

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#456124 Jun 25, 2013
Human Being wrote:
<quoted text>
To say that abortion is population control is a euphemism for murder.
Abortion is murder of cells.

Your religious indoctrination is what makes you believe that a god is linked to human-fetuses, and that abortion therefore insults the god.

My guess is, there is no god linked to ANY forms of life, human or non-human.

Abortion is what it is to each woman having one. And your religion does not rule over their ability to believe what fits for their own sense of reality.

I don't believe that women should feel guilt for having abortions.

We are all responsible for ending cellular life each day we survive. And THAT is the truth of the "matter."
Clay

Brooklyn, NY

#456125 Jun 25, 2013
OldJG wrote:
Matthew 6:24 "No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money."
This verse could easily read as follows:
No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and ROME!
Old Jay Gee, come back plz.

Could you provide Book Chapter and Verse where Christ establishes the canon of Books to be used in the Bible?
We have more Books than you, so its important for the sola scripturist to have the right amount.

Why does the KJV have it and ours doesn't?
truth

Perth, Australia

#456126 Jun 25, 2013
we say zid
ziddiz
z=26 i=9
fbi=629
in within=who is in secret in within=who/

NOW
SID=DISCK
WHICH DISK=id sk
DASKDESKDISKDOSKDUSK
aeiou
bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxyz

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#456127 Jun 25, 2013
[QUOTE who="Human BeingAs you might say, the starting point is to know Self/self,[/QUOTE]

By each new happening, self keeps changing.

Four years ago I was under the spell of religion. Now I am not.

I don't relate to that old self anymore. So what good is self to self in the whole "scheme" of past, present and future?

Of IS there even such a thing as past, present and future?
truth

Perth, Australia

#456128 Jun 25, 2013
who is born 62 mounth 9september=metber ps sp or what
pestmember
pest=sklopljena shaka=ulcerston=see hand=if not not clear N on hand if something ad its represent death
any hand direction
N
if ad anything represent death=look shape of hand as diskone line under other down 3 last finger as 3 pillars up geometric circle..
did you find?=where you see that?building cd or what?where?

please read ..you have to understood
if not try find but not judge me
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooo

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#456129 Jun 25, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
It's easy. You just toss the ones you don't need into storage until you need them for a different story.
Which never seemed to have never occurred, except through men admonishing those other Apostle gospels, so other men would not use them at all.

The decisions of men.

Self.
marge

Leesburg, GA

#456130 Jun 25, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Old Jay Gee, come back plz.
Could you provide Book Chapter and Verse where Christ establishes the canon of Books to be used in the Bible?
We have more Books than you, so its important for the sola scripturist to have the right amount.
Why does the KJV have it and ours doesn't?
Compared to the New Testament, there was very little controversy over the canon of the Old Testament. Hebrew believers recognized GodÂ’s messengers and accepted their writings as inspired of God. While there was undeniably some debate in regards to the Old Testament canon, by A.D. 250 there was nearly universal agreement on the canon of Hebrew Scripture. The only issue that remained was the Apocrypha, with some debate and discussion continuing today. The vast majority of Hebrew scholars considered the Apocrypha to be good historical and religious documents, but not on the same level as the Hebrew Scriptures.

Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/canon-Bible.html#...
truth

Perth, Australia

#456131 Jun 25, 2013
find words alphabeth
alpha betha see

now see
b=2=arrow toward down=don't do that please

I am your command!

Don't do that!
Don't press arrow down!

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#456132 Jun 25, 2013
Human Being wrote:
<quoted text>
New Age Spiritual Leader:
I can see your point. And it is not easily dismissed.
Yet somehow, I sense that if one is doing good, they aren't going to go about, or let others go about randomly killing people. In short there is accountability for one's actions.
To say that abortion is population control is a euphemism for murder.
It is hard to describe but I think in Judeo-Christianity, there is an inverse, or reciprocal action going on.... Through time, the more one understands oneself and God, the less God apparently intervenes in human affairs. I say apparently, because in truth, the rules of the game(Creation) were set up and in play all the time.
Examples, like the Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, the Canaanites, Philistines, are merely recorded, and canonized. But the fall of empires, kingdoms and nations have and will continue, I think as a result of not living within the "rules of the game(Creation), set by God.
As you might say, the starting point is to know Self/self, when you start losing that knowledge your bound for destruction.
Interesting take on it.....thanks for posting.

In essence, our perception is what drives our being to do what we think "is good and right".

Again, one does not need organized religion to do this.

Unless you can demonstrate the exclusive requirements that religion gives its followers, that which will secure their salvation.

Do you?

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#456133 Jun 25, 2013
Women of the Catholic faith, who for legitimate reasons according to their selves had many abortions, felt better by referring to abortion as the "making of angels."

They had a good point, in that they were simply sparing what would be human sinners from suffering by sending the little "souls" back to "god" from whence they supposedly came.

How thoughtful of those women to do "god" AND the "souls" a big favor.

After all, a decent god would not WANT the little ones to suffer on earth as sinners "needlessly" ... would HE???

Silly dogmas!
marge

Leesburg, GA

#456134 Jun 25, 2013
Clay,

The criteria the church used for recognizing and collecting the Word of God are as follows:

1) Was the book written by a prophet of God?
2) Was the writer authenticated by miracles to confirm his message?
3) Does the book tell the truth about God, with no falsehood or contradiction?
4) Does the book evince a divine capacity to transform lives?
5) Was the book accepted as God's Word by the people to whom it was first delivered?

Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/canonicity-script...

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#456135 Jun 25, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like Matthew 6:24 fits the fundies and their Bible worship to a T.
Is the Word of God you say? How do you know your Books are the word of God? My Bible has 7 more Books than yours.
Could you provide Book, chapter and verse where Christ establishes the canon?
Most of the OT comes from the Jewish scripture. Are or were those extra books part of that ??
Human Being

Ville Platte, LA

#456136 Jun 25, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? What would make you a liar?
<quoted text>
Let's try again:
Let's say X and Y are both mutually exclusive actions (like going left or going right). You can't do both X and Y.
If God knows you will do X, then can you do Y instead?
wilderide:

What I think you are setting is a course in logic here with the X/Y argument, with some classical laws of thought, and that may be a means of linguistically approaching your point, but I have been describing the behavior as means of approaching the issue of free-will/choice.(If behavior is "always" logical, we would be robots. And your logic would apply. But I beg to differ.)

So in a sequence here, you have not established that my free-will is affected, because my behavior is affected, because God knows what my choices are. More or less you just set out a posit that free-will excludes omniscience.

I will show you why this posit is incorrect.

God has set some pre-conditions that may affect my behavior, which I concede. For instance, the ability to learn, affects behavior(for most people). I put my hand in the fire, and get burned, I learn not to do so again. But my free-will may override my learning, and I may put my hand in the fire by choice.

(This is similar in the case of free-will related to choice, regarding sin and righteousness. Although with sin, one's choice begins to obscure(blinds) If one continues to destroy the nerves in one's hand as a result of putting it in the fire, soon the pain will vanish, and the ability to learn.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#456137 Jun 25, 2013
It all boils down to "survival."

If I recognized a person coming to my door with the intentions of causing bloodshed to my family members and my self, I would end that person's life without any guilt whatsoever.

If one of my own family members wanted to kill me and I could end his/her life first, I would not feel guilt for defending my own life.

You can preach your holy nonsense, but real life calls for action and honesty ... not blather about sin or salvation in some future mythical "dynasty."
truth

Perth, Australia

#456138 Jun 25, 2013
irudice prokletnice
cairo kairo qairo=3x
iraraiair
ai ai ai=see envy lust

elijairudica
noprejure
proverb 10;21=right or foolish

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 9 hr Married in 10,420
News Pope discusses climate, immigrants in historic ... (Sep '15) Feb 22 WelbyMD 47
News Where Is the Place for Devout Gay Families in t... (Oct '15) Feb 17 True Christian wi... 49
News Vatican will finance adult stem cell research (Apr '10) Feb 12 Pessimistic1 29
News Prayers To Mother Mary 'Cured Lung Cancer' (Jan '10) Feb 11 Phart Girlishly 323
News Pope sings on CD for charity (Dec '09) Feb 11 Phart Musically 31
News Woman Knocks Over Pope Benedict XVI At Christma... (Dec '09) Feb 11 Phart Athletically 165
More from around the web