Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 675527 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

OldJG

Rockford, IL

#455571 Jun 22, 2013
During the normal course of a pregnancy,the mothers and babies blood does not mix or circulate together. The umbilical cord attaches to the placenta. The placenta is the "container" that keeps the baby "isolated" from the mother. The fetal blood flows through the baby, out the umbilical cord to the placenta and no further.

The placental membrane separates maternal blood from fetal blood.

Jesus was made to be a perfect sacrifice for us without blemish or tainted blood, but He had to be made flesh in order to die in our place.

Jesus DID NOT have the blood of Mary. Why? Because Mary was a sinner like the rest of humanity.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#455572 Jun 22, 2013
OldJG wrote:
During the normal course of a pregnancy,the mothers and babies blood does not mix or circulate together. The umbilical cord attaches to the placenta. The placenta is the "container" that keeps the baby "isolated" from the mother. The fetal blood flows through the baby, out the umbilical cord to the placenta and no further.
The placental membrane separates maternal blood from fetal blood.
Jesus was made to be a perfect sacrifice for us without blemish or tainted blood, but He had to be made flesh in order to die in our place.
Jesus DID NOT have the blood of Mary. Why? Because Mary was a sinner like the rest of humanity.
in the 6th chapter of genesis, we read about the sons of god taking wifes, and this made God mad and He determined to destroy this world,

and yet we got these catholics on here saying that God fertilized the seed of Mary.
Clay

Brooklyn, NY

#455573 Jun 22, 2013
OldJG wrote:
During the normal course of a pregnancy,the mothers and babies blood does not mix or circulate together. The umbilical cord attaches to the placenta. The placenta is the "container" that keeps the baby "isolated" from the mother. The fetal blood flows through the baby, out the umbilical cord to the placenta and no further.
The placental membrane separates maternal blood from fetal blood.
Jesus was made to be a perfect sacrifice for us without blemish or tainted blood, but He had to be made flesh in order to die in our place.
Jesus DID NOT have the blood of Mary. Why? Because Mary was a sinner like the rest of humanity.
Well Jesus had Mary's eyes though. lol.

you fools. Mary's DNA combined with God to create Christ. You've a bunch of inept Bible worshipers who'll stop at nothin to trash the Catholic Church because you were brainwashed into believing its the 'Whore of Babylon'.
You do not realize the line you've crossed in demeaning the Mother of God- Our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no way Christ would be tolerant of the treatment towards His Mother from you guys.

Seriously, you sound ridiculous scrambling to debunk her role.
At least agree with the first two hundred yrs of your protesting religion.
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#455574 Jun 22, 2013
OldJG wrote:
During the normal course of a pregnancy,the mothers and babies blood does not mix or circulate together. The umbilical cord attaches to the placenta. The placenta is the "container" that keeps the baby "isolated" from the mother. The fetal blood flows through the baby, out the umbilical cord to the placenta and no further.
The placental membrane separates maternal blood from fetal blood.
Jesus was made to be a perfect sacrifice for us without blemish or tainted blood, but He had to be made flesh in order to die in our place.
Jesus DID NOT have the blood of Mary. Why? Because Mary was a sinner like the rest of humanity.
I.neant blood as in descendant. I know there is a barrier. I know blood does not mingle. except. sometimes at birth process.

But through her He is a descendant of David

A descendant is a,blood relation.

SON OF MAN

MOTHER

SEED
Wholly God. his father
Wholly Man.his mother

Perfect human sacrifice..HE HAD NO SIN.

HE had yo be a Son of Adam ..a Son of David.
Son of Man

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#455575 Jun 22, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
YOU WROTE
Go use your fire and brimstone crap on someone who'll buy it. You do not speak for the Word of God. You don't even know what the word of God is! If its only the written documentation, then you are short 7 Books dude!
SO NOW YOU CALL THE WORD OF GOD CRAP...
FOR ONE THAT IS A PART OF A RELIGIOUS SOCIETY THAT
Rom 1:25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
YOUR Infidelity
(INFIDEL'ITY, n.[L. infidelitas.]
1. In general, want of faith or belief; a withholding of credit.
2. Disbelief of the inspiration of the Scriptures, or the divine original of christianity; unbelief.)
IS SHOWING THROUGH YOUR FACADE....
~~~
An infidel; one who discredits revelation, or the mission, character and doctrines of Christ. 2 Cor 6.

2Co 6:15 And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?

2Co 6:16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.

2Co 6:17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,

2Co 6:18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#455576 Jun 22, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>in the 6th chapter of genesis, we read about the sons of god taking wifes, and this made God mad and He determined to destroy this world,
and yet we got these catholics on here saying that God fertilized the seed of Mary.
They were angelic beings not God and they took them CARNALLY.

THERE was no carnal knowledge ..with Mary

Hey you believe as you like.

Bible says she was His MOTHER.

I believe it's Word ..No idea why you don't..

We can ask them in heaven

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#455577 Jun 22, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
God impregnated Mary, but He didn't have sex with her you moron.
NO sperm went in her and yet she was pregnant?

These fables are very silly.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#455578 Jun 22, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Jesus had Mary's eyes though. lol.
you fools. Mary's DNA combined with God to create Christ. You've a bunch of inept Bible worshipers who'll stop at nothin to trash the Catholic Church because you were brainwashed into believing its the 'Whore of Babylon'.
You do not realize the line you've crossed in demeaning the Mother of God- Our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no way Christ would be tolerant of the treatment towards His Mother from you guys.
Seriously, you sound ridiculous scrambling to debunk her role.
At least agree with the first two hundred yrs of your protesting religion.
~~~

INFIDELS SUCH AS YOURSELF HAVE TAKEN MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS AND

BROUGHT HERE DOWN TO THE BE THE OBJECTIVE OF SEXUAL EXPLOITATION..

YOUR DIRTY MINDED OLD MEN ( YOUR UNHOLY FATHERS )HAVE Turned her married life he relationship with here HUSBAND INTO A Tabloid sexual novel.

EVIDENTLY YOU GET YOU OWN JOLLIES FROM DISCUSSING THIS UNGODLY SENSUALITY.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#455579 Jun 22, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
They were angelic beings not God and they took them CARNALLY.
THERE was no carnal knowledge ..with Mary
Hey you believe as you like.
Bible says she was His MOTHER.
I believe it's Word ..No idea why you don't..
We can ask them in heaven
went over your head , didn't it?

if God was angry at these fallen angels having sex with humans and making babies, why do you think He would make a baby with mary?

now shut your mouth and then try and think it thru, if you are capable?

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#455580 Jun 22, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Jesus had Mary's eyes though. lol.
you fools. Mary's DNA combined with God to create Christ. You've a bunch of inept Bible worshipers who'll stop at nothin to trash the Catholic Church because you were brainwashed into believing its the 'Whore of Babylon'.
You do not realize the line you've crossed in demeaning the Mother of God- Our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no way Christ would be tolerant of the treatment towards His Mother from you guys.
Seriously, you sound ridiculous scrambling to debunk her role.
At least agree with the first two hundred yrs of your protesting religion.
Total indoctrination!!!

If you were raised a Muslim, you would now be praising Allah and preaching that Christians will burn in Islam's hell.

What a tragedy religion placed on humanity.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#455582 Jun 22, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Jesus had Mary's eyes though. lol.
you fools. Mary's DNA combined with God to create Christ. You've a bunch of inept Bible worshipers who'll stop at nothin to trash the Catholic Church because you were brainwashed into believing its the 'Whore of Babylon'.
You do not realize the line you've crossed in demeaning the Mother of God- Our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no way Christ would be tolerant of the treatment towards His Mother from you guys.
Seriously, you sound ridiculous scrambling to debunk her role.
At least agree with the first two hundred yrs of your protesting religion.
So tell us...exactly what part of the DNA was altered so that "supernatural" could mix with human?
It would have been rejected by the host, and spontaneously aborted.
Do you people realize how ridiculous your assertion is?
We are not living in the ignorance of the past any longer.

Since: Sep 09

Quesnel, Canada

#455583 Jun 22, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
They were angelic beings not God and they took them CARNALLY.
THERE was no carnal knowledge ..with Mary
Hey you believe as you like.
Bible says she was His MOTHER.
I believe it's Word ..No idea why you don't..
We can ask them in heaven
What makes you certain that you are going to be in a heaven???

After all, many Muslims claim that you will burn in Islam's hell?

You don't like THAT story??? I wonder WHY?

:)
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#455584 Jun 22, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>went over your head , didn't it?
if God was angry at these fallen angels having sex with humans and making babies, why do you think He would make a baby with mary?
now shut your mouth and then try and think it thru, if you are capable?
No one had sex with Mary ..befallen angels had sex.

GOD destroyed the polluted DNA of those people by finding non polluted DNA in Noah..the rest died.

Jesus in order to be a sacrifice for us He was a Son of Adam ..a Son of David (despite efforts to kill.all if his descendants)

MARY.IS A DIRECT DESCENDANT OF DAVID.

the imoregnation was not sexual. sexualIzed with the sons of God.

How do you think a descendant of David became Messiah as prophesied.

SHE
WAS
HIS
MOTHER

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#455585 Jun 22, 2013
[who="Clay "
That's all find and dandy that the Jews acknowledged Joseph as the legal father of Jesus. To God, the status the Jews gave Joseph is irrelevant. And so is the moment they decide to recognize Josephs status. God recognized Joseph's title before he was born.

**********
When did God 'recognize' Joseph's title?

KM

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#455586 Jun 22, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
INFIDELS SUCH AS YOURSELF HAVE TAKEN MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS AND
BROUGHT HERE DOWN TO THE BE THE OBJECTIVE OF SEXUAL EXPLOITATION..
YOUR DIRTY MINDED OLD MEN ( YOUR UNHOLY FATHERS )HAVE Turned her married life he relationship with here HUSBAND INTO A Tabloid sexual novel.
EVIDENTLY YOU GET YOU OWN JOLLIES FROM DISCUSSING THIS UNGODLY SENSUALITY.
THE Bible says ...

Eph_4:29 Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying, that it may minister grace unto the hearers.

IT DOES NOT EDIFY JESUS CHRIST... NOR HIS MOTHER ....

TO DISCUSS HER PRIVATE LIFE WITH HER HUSBAND.

THERE IS NOT ONE OF YOU HERE THAT COULD APPRECIATE SUCH A DISCUSSION

ABOUT YOU OWN .

there is no difference between a peeping tom and a vain imagination....

1Ti 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.


1Ti 1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:

1Ti 1:6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
OldJG

Rockford, IL

#455587 Jun 22, 2013
OldJG wrote:
During the normal course of a pregnancy,the mothers and babies blood does not mix or circulate together. The umbilical cord attaches to the placenta. The placenta is the "container" that keeps the baby "isolated" from the mother. The fetal blood flows through the baby, out the umbilical cord to the placenta and no further.
The placental membrane separates maternal blood from fetal blood.
Jesus was made to be a perfect sacrifice for us without blemish or tainted blood, but He had to be made flesh in order to die in our place.
Jesus DID NOT have the blood of Mary. Why? Because Mary was a sinner like the rest of humanity.
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Jesus had Mary's eyes though. lol.
you fools. Mary's DNA combined with God to create Christ. You've a bunch of inept Bible worshipers who'll stop at nothin to trash the Catholic Church because you were brainwashed into believing its the 'Whore of Babylon'.
You do not realize the line you've crossed in demeaning the Mother of God- Our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no way Christ would be tolerant of the treatment towards His Mother from you guys.
Seriously, you sound ridiculous scrambling to debunk her role.
At least agree with the first two hundred yrs of your protesting religion.
Cly said, quote, "Mary's DNA combined with God to create Christ. You've a bunch of inept Bible worshipers who'll stop at nothin to trash the Catholic Church because you were brainwashed into believing its the 'Whore of Babylon'." End quote.

Mary's DNA is not contained in the body of the perfect sacrifice for our sins, Jesus Christ. Mary is nothing more than you and me. She is a human being and a sinner saved by grace. The Roman Catholic church deserves to be trashed but Mary does not. The Roman Catholic church deserves to be trashed because you have elevated Mary to sinless, ever virgin and assumed into heaven. All of which is a lie from the pits of hell and from your father, Satan. The only perfect sinless person who ever lived was Jesus Christ. Not Mary and not anyone other than Jesus Christ.

Cly said, quote, "You do not realize the line you've crossed in demeaning the Mother of God- Our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no way Christ would be tolerant of the treatment towards His Mother from you guys." End quote.

You and the Roman Catholic church crossed the line when you declared Mary as sinless, Mary as forever being a virgin and Mary's assumption into heaven. You have lied about Jesus mother and will be held accountable by Jesus Himself. As for tolerance, I am surprised Jesus has allowed your bologna Christianity to survive for such a very long time in human terms.

Cly, go back to the hole you crawled out of and worship your statues, relics, saints and everything else the Roman Catholic church tells you to worship.
rosesz

Pompano Beach, FL

#455588 Jun 22, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
INFIDELS SUCH AS YOURSELF HAVE TAKEN MARY THE MOTHER OF JESUS AND
BROUGHT HERE DOWN TO THE BE THE OBJECTIVE OF SEXUAL EXPLOITATION..
YOUR DIRTY MINDED OLD MEN ( YOUR UNHOLY FATHERS )HAVE Turned her married life he relationship with here HUSBAND INTO A Tabloid sexual novel.
EVIDENTLY YOU GET YOU OWN JOLLIES FROM DISCUSSING THIS UNGODLY SENSUALITY.
Sorry Kay but it's cowboy saying the sex thing.

As if Holy God woukd need that to make sure His Son was David's descendant as prophesied..

She. Was His mother..a descendant of David.

He was as he said. The Son of MAN.THIS HAS gotten crazy imo.

And I don't like being told to shut up.

The bible clearly says she was,His mother ..Not a surrogate .
Nit receptacle

Mother..Gods word not mine..

And I personally think she later was wife to Joseph and had other children .

And I don't care about her sex life.

But she was the Mother of our Dear Lord.

NOT a Petri dish

And no sex involved..No similarity to the sinful so called sons if God as cowboy says.

God in heaven through His Spirit impregnated her.

She was if David's line through Nathan ..

OldJG

Rockford, IL

#455589 Jun 22, 2013
Numbers 13:33, "And there we saw the Nephilim (the sons of Anak, who come from the Nephilim), and we seemed to ourselves like grasshoppers, and so we seemed to them."

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#455590 Jun 22, 2013
rosesz wrote:
<quoted text>
No one had sex with Mary ..befallen angels had sex.
GOD destroyed the polluted DNA of those people by finding non polluted DNA in Noah..the rest died.
Jesus in order to be a sacrifice for us He was a Son of Adam ..a Son of David (despite efforts to kill.all if his descendants)
MARY.IS A DIRECT DESCENDANT OF DAVID.
the imoregnation was not sexual. sexualIzed with the sons of God.
How do you think a descendant of David became Messiah as prophesied.
SHE
WAS
HIS
MOTHER
No he didn't.
There were others still here after the "flood"(according to your book).
Take "Goliath" for example.
Your deity doesn't seem to be very competent in his works.
1/3 of heaven revolting, Adam and Eve not being perfect(let's not forget about Lillith here) the failure of the flood, etc. etc. etc.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#455591 Jun 22, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
[who="Clay "
That's all find and dandy that the Jews acknowledged Joseph as the legal father of Jesus. To God, the status the Jews gave Joseph is irrelevant. And so is the moment they decide to recognize Josephs status. God recognized Joseph's title before he was born.
**********
When did God 'recognize' Joseph's title?
KM
Probably when Joseph returned home, and found that some scoundrel had knocked up his young fiance.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Pope Francis meets 4 Imams to open a Christian-... Fri Joe 30
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) Apr 20 Rdclaw2000 10,517
News Pope opens free laundromat for the poor Pope Fr... Apr 12 True Christian wi... 1
News Role of women in the modern Catholic Church 'un... Apr 9 South Knox Hombre 1
News What Pope Francis and Obama may talk about (Sep '15) Apr 7 Teana Trump 53
News Pope Francis to stop off in Cuba on way to Unit... (Apr '15) Mar 31 whirlingmerc 9
News Pope Francis will do 'everything he can' to vis... Mar 31 Gods r Delusions ... 1
More from around the web