Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 599782 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#454364 Jun 20, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
Although I'm not Catholic myself, I've known quite a few Catholics. Never yet seen or heard one worshiping a cross or a statue or a painting or anything meant to resemble the illusion they have as to how God looks.
I'm kind of tired of Catholic-bashing too. There are legitimate differences between Protestants and Catholics, but to say they are "deluded" or "of the devil" is misguided at best.
You continue to choose to preach lies.

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#454365 Jun 20, 2013
Had Jesus lived he would have been faithful to Judaism ... period.

Observe the lies ... let them sink in to your brains and you will see. Jesus would not have supported any form of Christianity OR Islam.

Christianity is based on nothing but lies, and that means that when you put words into an image of a dead Jew and pretend he is Christian or supports Christianity ... you are ALL LIARS.

You are "framing" a Jew to be a traitor to his own Judaism. And THAT is not honest. Not ONE BIT HONEST!!!
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >

Signs & Symbols in Christian Art

The Saints

St. Peter the Apostle

Peter carried the word of the Savior throughout Asia Minor, centering his activities around Antioch. Subsequently, he came to Rome, where, it is believed, he formed the first Christian community there.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#454366 Jun 20, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>now if you wish to split hairs which you try to do all of the time.
lets go at.
I've been splittinghairs since I arrived, and now you want to.

Let's make sure we get the split correctly.

Why don't you believe in all of what Jesus taught?

Why do you follow men?

Why do you think less than six of the original 13 Apostles were more enlightened that the others?

Why do you accept those writings only?

How is it that "Paul" receives more credit for his teachings than Jesus does?

Let's split the hairs on these....okay?

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#454367 Jun 20, 2013
What you should be discussing is not whether Jesus baptized Christians with fire or with water or other stupid nonsense ... but whether Jesus (had he lived) would have supported a new religion other than Judaism.

And you KNOW the answer to that question. He would have died on the supposed cross SHOUTING "I've been faithful to my one and only Jewish god, and let no man say otherwise as he will be LYING!!!"

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#454368 Jun 20, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Just thank the Lord, Old G and Preston didn't introduce us to Christianity. These guys are modern day Scribes and Pharisees. They are too filled with pride to see outside of their man-made religion.
I also believe they undid too many teachings from Jesus Christ to be considered Christian anymore.
Baptism, Confession, Holy Eucharist, Faith + works, Adding scripture alone... its never ending with each passing generation.
both Oxbore and myself have showed that DAN lied about mary in which she was never said to be "full of grace" as those words are only used twic and never in context with mary.

so it is better that you learn from MODERN DAY SCRIBES and never learn the truth at all from your irreligious system.

please dopnt think that you are right b ecause you beleive the lies that you are told. some day, God is going to hold your chruch accountable and then death and destruction will follow and people like you will b e destroyed in your tracks.

You have been WARNED!!!!!!!!!!

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#454369 Jun 20, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
We believe..as in Catholics
Do you still believe in limbo
How can they NOT be with Our Lord??
I read a website on Catholic belief..
It blames the devil for the proliferation of abortion..I get that part..But it says it's because the babies won't be baptized.
Do you honestly think that Our Lord would let the devil prevail with regard to innocent souls.
That they coukd be anywhere but in His loving arms.
Since they were never BORN coukd He have them in stasis to be born somewhere else??
Or in a limbo where He is not.
Instead of waiting for the answers, I would suggest for you to go out and find them for yourself, because the responses you get from others who are bias in their belief, will NOT give you an honest answer.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#454370 Jun 20, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
You continue to preach lies.
No, but I can see how you are shielding your eyes from reading my posts.

Maybe you should just pass on over my posts, so you don'thave to worry so much.

“What are you looking at?”

Since: Jan 08

Albuquerque, NM

#454371 Jun 20, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
You continue to preach lies.
Maybe you should begin posting facts that refute my posts, instead of just an opinion.

In truth, for a supposed "Atheist" - none of my posts should matter at all to you, huh?

But somehow, they do......hmmmmmm......
Dan

Omaha, NE

#454372 Jun 20, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text>both Oxbore and myself have showed that DAN lied about mary in which she was never said to be "full of grace" as those words are only used twic and never in context with mary.
so it is better that you learn from MODERN DAY SCRIBES and never learn the truth at all from your irreligious system.
please dopnt think that you are right b ecause you beleive the lies that you are told. some day, God is going to hold your chruch accountable and then death and destruction will follow and people like you will b e destroyed in your tracks.
You have been WARNED!!!!!!!!!!
I showed both you and Oxtail where "full of grace" was RE: Mary.

I hope your "MODERN DAY SCRIBES" have better reading skills than you and maybe some integrity.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#454373 Jun 20, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Instead of waiting for the answers, I would suggest for you to go out and find them for yourself, because the responses you get from others who are bias in their belief, will NOT give you an honest answer.
You're sending her on a snipe hunt.

How is she to know for sure the disposition of these souls?

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#454374 Jun 20, 2013
Catholics praised those who died as martyrs for the Catholic church. Century after century they canonized them as saints.

They never canonized Jesus the Jew as a Catholic saint and my guess is, they were scared to go THAT far with their flamboyant words, as being superstition they probably believed that if he was real at all, he would put a curse on them for telling such a whopper of a lie.

Yet they were cunning enough to USE the image of that JEW to start a new religion.

Isn't it odd that they called all the others saints, but they never used the term Saint-Jesus, and yet he was supposedly the most important player in the whole GAME concerning the new "Christian" religion.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#454375 Jun 20, 2013
who="Clay "
We've definitely proved you in error these last three yrs. Just because you're to stubborn to admit your error doesn't change the fact. Most onlookers would have converted to Catholicism a long time ago after reading the debates between you, Preston, Old Gee and the Catholics. In fact, I believe you three do more to HELP the Catholic Church than anything.
You can't believe you are right based on this following typical exchange:
Catholics:'Prove that Christ taught sola scripture as the authority on His Ministry'
Confrint:'all scripture is God breathed, and is useful for teaching'
You lost, Confrint. 2tim 3:16 does not say what well claim it says. Therefore your ENTIRE opinion on sacred scripture falls apart because you based it off a lie to start with.

**********

Catholics have proved nothing of the sort. Scripture IS God-breathed.
You haven't converted anyone on here.

You can insist that some early 'fathers' may have written some stuff, but accepting that as gospel would be something like accepting everything written on this forum as gospel.

It must agree with what IS written...and all of it does not.

KayMarie

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON to Save us

#454376 Jun 20, 2013
Selene100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Baptism, confirmation, and the Eucharist are celebrated as one sacrament by the Early Christians, and today the Eastern Catholics still follow this.
The Catholics in the West, however, separated the sacraments of baptism and confirmation because there were not enough bishops to give out all the sacraments. In the West, the priest baptizes and the bishop confers the sacrament of confirmation. In all three - Baptism, Confirmation, and the Eucharist, the Holy Spirit is present.
Ok well Western Confirmation is more similar to what non Catholics do at BAPTISM

The recipient is able to say words of belief. As opposed to being baptized as an infant.

Does the Church still teach as they definitely used to that baby baptism washes away original sin..as in what we have from Adam And Eve.

Or does it wash away all sin..

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#454377 Jun 20, 2013
who="Dan"
A mom looks after her kid and you're finding fault.
Outstanding.
As if Mary could look into the mind of the "town gossip".
Please, KM.

**********

Jesus was a grown man...not a 'kid'.

Mary should NOT have worried about the 'town gossip'. That is not finding fault...simply saying that if she was perfect, she would have known that THEY were wrong.

KayMarie

Since: Sep 09

Prince George, Canada

#454378 Jun 20, 2013
New Age Spiritual Leader wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you should just pass on over my posts, so you don'thave to worry so much.
Not likely. Having been a Catholic, you get right into the discussions about what Jesus said and did, and your lies are as noted as the lies of others, who still continue to try in VAIN to make a faithful Jew into a traitor of his own religion.

Had he and his Jewish father been real, you people would all be cursed, and my guess is you would have nothing for a reward in any hereafter, even if a hereafter just happens to be the case.

For such lies, none of you deserve rewards.

That is my opinion.

And when you know better and you don't do better ... the onus is on you.

Had Jesus lived, he would NOT have supported the starting up of Christianity OR Islam. He would NOT have baptized any human on earth as a Christian. He would not have counseled Peter to become a Catholic pope, or to start a new Christian community.

You KNOW that is true!!!

You know it and I know it.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#454379 Jun 20, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="Dan"
Luke 1:28.
She is called "full of grace".
She's given the name "full of grace" and in the Greek perfect tense, indicating that this permanent state of Mary was completed.
Remember Greek? You were very insistent on it RE: 2 Tim 3:16.
'St. Luke uses the perfect passive participle, kekaritomene, as his "name" for Mary. This word literally means "she who has been graced" in a completed sense. This verbal adjective, "graced," is not just describing a simple past action. Greek has another tense for that. The perfect tense is used to indicate that an action has been completed in the past resulting in a present state of being. "Full of grace" is Mary’s name. So what does it tell us about Mary? Well, the average Christian is not completed in grace and in a permanent sense (see Phil. 3:8-12). But according to the angel, Mary is.'
http://www.catholic.com/magazine/articles/hai...
**********
Neither verse calls Mary 'full of grace'.
KM
kekaritomene in its fullest and best translation means "highly favored", nothing else can be added to that.

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#454380 Jun 20, 2013
Selene100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, the people of Antioch were the first to be called Christians. That is in the Bible. And the Bishop of Antioch (Ignatius) was the first person to use the word "Catholic". That is found in a first century historical document. So, history and archaeology is on our side.
perhaps your words are factual, however that doesnt mean they go together. many of us on here certainly dont beleive that roman catholics are Christians.

and your actions and the lies told on here are not indictive of a Christlike lifestyle
Dan

Omaha, NE

#454381 Jun 20, 2013
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="Dan"
A mom looks after her kid and you're finding fault.
Outstanding.
As if Mary could look into the mind of the "town gossip".
Please, KM.
**********
Jesus was a grown man...not a 'kid'.
Mary should NOT have worried about the 'town gossip'. That is not finding fault...simply saying that if she was perfect, she would have known that THEY were wrong.
KayMarie
You're requiring her to be omniscient, and that's God's province.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#454382 Jun 20, 2013
atemcowboy wrote:
<quoted text> kekaritomene in its fullest and best translation means "highly favored", nothing else can be added to that.
Cite your "fullest and best translation", as all I've viewed translate it as "full of grace".
hojo

Chanhassen, MN

#454383 Jun 20, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
Although I'm not Catholic myself, I've known quite a few Catholics. Never yet seen or heard one worshiping a cross or a statue or a painting or anything meant to resemble the illusion they have as to how God looks.
I'm kind of tired of Catholic-bashing too. There are legitimate differences between Protestants and Catholics, but to say they are "deluded" or "of the devil" is misguided at best.
As a former "bible only' Protestant for over 35 years (now Catholic)---You must understand that Protestantism "cannot exist" on its own doctrine, beliefs and teaching (without) attacking, bashing, condemning and judging the TRUTH of over 2000 years of Jesus Christs One True Apostolic Catholic Church...... It has absolutely nothing historically or biblically to stand on its own, because sola scriptura (bible only) was never believed by anyone until the 17th century...... It is a "man-made" (half-truth, half-heresy) religion of editorializing the interpretation of the bible, to make it mean--ONLY what each Protestant wants it mean! Since the reformation, it now consists of over 42,000 contradiction, inconsistent and conflicting denominations of "relative truth" bible interpretations, in conflict with each other!!.. God never has been, nor ever will be the author of bible only Protestant confusion and chaos. The TRUTH of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, has, is and will always be in Our Lords One True Apsotolic Catholic Church (Matthew 16:13-21 and in the Eucharist (John 6:47-59) Jesus TRUE body and TRUE blood!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What Divides Catholics and Protestants? (Apr '08) 1 min par five 84,327
News Pope Francis Affirms Evolution and Big Bang Theory 22 hr Paul Porter1 266
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) Jul 28 Gee Tee 9,601
News Hispanics energized by Argentinian pope's first... Jul 27 tomin cali 1
News Philippines and Vatican release Pope Francis po... (Mar '14) Jul 26 pazuzu 91
News Pope previews long-awaited climate letter Jul 25 pazuzu 14
News Poll: US views of Francis dim; a plunge in appr... Jul 24 Bug Spray 20
More from around the web