Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 685540 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452912 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
St. Peter's was financed with donations. It's the spiritual home to 1.2 billion Catholic Christians 500 years later, open to us all. Today's televangelists finance their personal fortunes with donations. Hardly a fair comparison.
It is all the same con. If you can prove your deity exists, then we might consider it different.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#452913 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
However and but....the people selling indulgences were Catholic clergy...and if Luther could see the gross wrongness, so could every other Catholic clergy...including the pope...Luther was the only one to speak up....
The sale of indulgences was a byproduct of the Crusades in the 12th and 13th centuries. Because they risked dying without the benefit of a priest to perform the appropriate ceremonies, Crusaders were promised immediate salvation if they died while fighting to "liberate" the Christian holy city at Jerusalem. Church leaders justified this by arguing that good works earned salvation, and making Jerusalem accessible to Christians was an example of a good work. Over time, Church leaders decided that paying money to support good works was just as good as performing good works, and it evened things up for people who were physically incapable of fighting a Crusade. Over several centuries, the practice expanded, and Church leaders justified it by arguing that they had inherited an unlimited amount of good works from Jesus, and the credit for these good works could be sold to believers in the form of indulgences. In other words, indulgences functioned like "confession insurance" against eternal damnation because, if you purchased an indulgence, then you wouldn't go to hell if you died suddenly or forgot to confess something.
A. The 12th and 13th centuries equal 200 years....that is much more than "a little while"...
B. NOTE: Church leaders justified this by arguing that good works earned salvation, and making Jerusalem accessible to Christians was an example of a good work. "Church leaders" include da pope....
C. HEY ANTHONY!!!!! Look!!!!"In other words, indulgences functioned like "confession insurance" against eternal damnation because, if you purchased an indulgence, then you wouldn't go to hell if you died suddenly or forgot to confess something."
The selling of indulgences was only a problem in Germany, which is why you only see Martin Luther speaking up about it. Martin Luther was from Germany. Everywhere else, everyone followed the teachings of the Catholic Church. So, why would you expect everyone else to speak up about it when the problem was only in Germany??

Furthermore, the selling of indulgences had nothing to do with the Crusades. Martin Luther saw that indulgences were being sold to the rich. Luther protested the selling of the indulgences because he knew that it went against Catholic teaching.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452914 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
St. Peter's was financed with donations. It's the spiritual home to 1.2 billion Catholic Christians 500 years later, open to us all. Today's televangelists finance their personal fortunes with donations. Hardly a fair comparison.
If you show the actual manifests and paperwork in that concern, someone might even believe your rhetoric, but of course you can not.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#452915 Jun 16, 2013
LTM wrote:
<quoted text>
You care but June doesn't Sere.
Yes I care...

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452916 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Very few of your protestant brethren who call themselves Christian confess, believe and teach the creed.
I would expect that most cathaholics don't believe it eithert, or they would follow the teachings and attend the church---and they do not.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452917 Jun 16, 2013
Selene100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, every Catholic knows that if they want their sins to be forgiven, they go through the Sacrament of Reconciliation (Confession). They do not seek an indulgence to have sins forgiven. That is not what an indulgence is for. That is basic Catholic knowledge.
Maybe now...they have been known to ignore the Word of God...and change their teaching as it suits them..

The point here is, Anthony said, the Catholic church never sold indulgences...that has been proven a lie....over and over...
LTM

Marathon, Canada

#452918 Jun 16, 2013
June VanDerMark wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree. Neither high I.Q. or low I.Q. can capture the essence of the mysteries.
They are what they are, not what humans try to proclaim they are.
"THEY ARE WHAT THEY ARE;" Are you not human June??? SOUNDS LIKE YOUR TALKING ABOUT A DIFFERENT SPECIES.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452919 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
Crawl back under your rock....your hissing is not appreciated.
In other words, you have no logical or reasonable refutation to the poster's posit.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452920 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
There is a perfect example of people who claim to be Christians, which the Bible identifies as followers of Christ, by their very beliefs, say they are frauds...
the Athanasian Creed: No one knows who wrote the thing!!!!!!
Here Oxbow. Educate yourself on this...no thanks needed-it's my pleasure.

http://www.wlsessays.net/files/KruegerOrigin....

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#452921 Jun 16, 2013
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you show the actual manifests and paperwork in that concern, someone might even believe your rhetoric, but of course you can not.
A vast majority of it came from donations. Some of it came from the indulgences that were being illegally sold in Germany. Some of the corrupted priests in Germany were selling the indulgences to the rich people. They were the ones who had the money, which in turn went to the building of the Basicilia. A major promoter of this method of fund-raising was Albrecht, Archbishop of Mainz and Magdeburg, who had to clear debts owed to the Roman Curia by contributing to the rebuilding program. To facilitate this, he appointed the German Dominican preacher Johann Tetzel, whose salesmanship provoked a scandal.

However, the selling of indulgences have always been illegal. That has never changed. The fact that you have a few corrupted people doesn't change the teaching. After all, in every Church there are sinners.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452922 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't be silly. Yes, it's accepted today that Athanasius himself probably didn't write the Creed that bears his name. It's named after him because he staunchly upheld what the Creed says.
----------
"A medieval account credited Athanasius of Alexandria, the famous defender of Nicene theology, as the author of the Creed. According to this account, Athanasius composed it during his exile in Rome...This traditional attribution of the Creed to Athanasius was first called into question in 1642...and it has since been widely accepted by modern scholars that the creed was not authored by Athanasius...Athanasius' name seems to have become attached to the creed as a sign of its strong declaration of Trinitarian faith."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasian_Creed
__________
Why would that be a problem? We don't call the Apostles' Creed "the Apostles' Creed" because we think somebody named "Apostle" wrote it. We don't call the Nicene Creed "the Nicene Creed" because we think somebody called "Nicene" wrote it (it was developed by the Council of Nicaea under Constantine), and we don't call the Pledge of Allegiance the "Pledge of Allegiance" because we think somebody named Allegiance wrote it.
No one knows who wrote the thing...therefore, it cannot be said it is a teaching of Christ.

No matter who put the words together for the apostle's creed, to my knowledge, every word is found in the Bible...it is the teaching of Christ..

We know who put together the Nicene creed...we know who wrote the Pledge of Allegiance...

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452923 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
What a sucker.
Is that the best you have to offer as rebuttal?
Shows you are inept.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#452924 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe now...they have been known to ignore the Word of God...and change their teaching as it suits them..
The point here is, Anthony said, the Catholic church never sold indulgences...that has been proven a lie....over and over...
The Roman Catholic Church never sold indulgences because it was always illegal according to her teaching. It was only a few priests in Germany that sold indulgences. Just because you have a few priests in Germany who went against Catholic teaching does not indicate that they represent the entire Roman Catholic Church.

Every Catholic even during that time knows that if they want their sins forgiven, they go through the Sacrament of Reconciliation. The indulgence cannot forgive sins.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#452925 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
It was financed PARTLY by donations, yes. Fortunately for the peace of mind of millions of Christians then and now, financing it THROUGH EMOTIONAL BLACKMAIL failed.
Anthony, I happen to be glad that St. Peter's was built. Among other things, it's a very beautiful building, and is appropriately important to and symbolic of Christians worldwide. But you seem to be trying to whitewash a dark chapter in the history of the Roman Catholic Church. Denying that the RCC of the 16th century used unethical--unCHRISTIAN practices--to raise money, not just for building programs but for other things is just plain inaccurate. It is also defeatist, because when you attempt to rationalize the wrongs of the past, you call into question the trustworthiness of the Church today.
No question some in the hierarchy were corrupt, I freely admit that. Fundamentalists wrongly assert that corruption translates into false doctrine. I'm simply pointing out that while there were corrupt men, the Church never taught or condoned it.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452926 Jun 16, 2013
Selene100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, every Catholic knows that if they want their sins to be forgiven, they go through the Sacrament of Reconciliation (Confession). They do not seek an indulgence to have sins forgiven. That is not what an indulgence is for. That is basic Catholic knowledge.
Ritual.
That is purely a Pagan practice. I thought your deity was directly responsive to prayer? What happened to the words of your Jesus? do you just ignore them also?
If so, what was the point of having a savior and his utterance of "truth"?
That being the case, your church has usurped the teachings of the central figure of your edifice. IOW -gone astray.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452927 Jun 16, 2013
Selene100 wrote:
<quoted text>
The selling of indulgences was only a problem in Germany, which is why you only see Martin Luther speaking up about it. Martin Luther was from Germany. Everywhere else, everyone followed the teachings of the Catholic Church. So, why would you expect everyone else to speak up about it when the problem was only in Germany??
Furthermore, the selling of indulgences had nothing to do with the Crusades. Martin Luther saw that indulgences were being sold to the rich. Luther protested the selling of the indulgences because he knew that it went against Catholic teaching.
I will not reiterate the info in my post...only an excerpt...which shows you did not read the info I posted..

The sale of indulgences was a byproduct of the Crusades in the 12th and 13th centuries. Because they risked dying without the benefit of a priest to perform the appropriate ceremonies, Crusaders were promised immediate salvation if they died while fighting to "liberate" the Christian holy city at Jerusalem. Church leaders justified this by arguing that good works earned salvation, and making Jerusalem accessible to Christians was an example of a good work. Over time, Church leaders decided that paying money to support good works was just as good as performing good works, and it evened things up for people who were physically incapable of fighting a Crusade. Over several centuries, the practice expanded, and Church leaders justified it by arguing that they had inherited an unlimited amount of good works from Jesus, and the credit for these good works could be sold to believers in the form of indulgences. In other words, indulgences functioned like "confession insurance" against eternal damnation because, if you purchased an indulgence, then you wouldn't go to hell if you died suddenly or forgot to confess something.

BTW.. Jerusalem is not in Germany!!!!!
OldJG

Rockford, IL

#452928 Jun 16, 2013
According to the Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church, an indulgence "is the remission before God of the temporal punishment due to sin whose guilt has already been forgiven. A properly disposed member of the Christian faithful can obtain an indulgence under prescribed conditions through the help of the Church which, as the minister of redemption, dispenses and applies with authority the treasury of the satisfactions of Christ and the saints. An indulgence is partial if it removes part of the temporal punishment due to sin, or plenary if it removes all punishment."

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452929 Jun 16, 2013
Selene100 wrote:
<quoted text>
The Roman Catholic Church never sold indulgences because it was always illegal according to her teaching. It was only a few priests in Germany that sold indulgences. Just because you have a few priests in Germany who went against Catholic teaching does not indicate that they represent the entire Roman Catholic Church.
Every Catholic even during that time knows that if they want their sins forgiven, they go through the Sacrament of Reconciliation. The indulgence cannot forgive sins.
The people selling indulgences were Catholic clergy...and if Luther could see the gross wrongness, so could every other Catholic clergy...including the pope...Luther was the only one to speak up....

The sale of indulgences was a byproduct of the Crusades in the 12th and 13th centuries. Because they risked dying without the benefit of a priest to perform the appropriate ceremonies, Crusaders were promised immediate salvation if they died while fighting to "liberate" the Christian holy city at Jerusalem. Church leaders justified this by arguing that good works earned salvation, and making Jerusalem accessible to Christians was an example of a good work. Over time, Church leaders decided that paying money to support good works was just as good as performing good works, and it evened things up for people who were physically incapable of fighting a Crusade. Over several centuries, the practice expanded, and Church leaders justified it by arguing that they had inherited an unlimited amount of good works from Jesus, and the credit for these good works could be sold to believers in the form of indulgences. In other words, indulgences functioned like "confession insurance" against eternal damnation because, if you purchased an indulgence, then you wouldn't go to hell if you died suddenly or forgot to confess something.

A. The 12th and 13th centuries equal 200 years....that is much more than "a little while"...

B. NOTE: Church leaders justified this by arguing that good works earned salvation, and making Jerusalem accessible to Christians was an example of a good work. "Church leaders" include da pope....

C. Look!!!!"In other words, indulgences functioned like "confession insurance" against eternal damnation because, if you purchased an indulgence, then you wouldn't go to hell if you died suddenly or forgot to confess something."

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452930 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why are you working so hard to look stupid?
Can't rebut my posit huh?
Don't feel bad-most others can't either.
Anthony MN

United States

#452931 Jun 16, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
How on earth would you know really?
If I confess to my Lord Jesus,you are nit there
If our Church pray e the creed are you there
Are you even allowed to participate in our services??
I am asking respectfully Anthony
Both sides who have had no experience in the other have some really crazy idea of what the other side does in worship.
That US why your Blessed Pope called for Unity..to bring us together.
We can talk about our differences..But why nit learn a bit too.
I went to a Catholic Church fir stations..this us nit forbidden by my faith.
Have you attended a Baptist worship I doubt it.
I had some odd ideas about them too as a,Catholic.
I found these people among the most loving and believing people U had ever met.
The ritual of Mass US beautiful. But I feel closer in a less ritualistic service..But at least I know about both BEFore I speak..
Some of the mainline protestant denominations still recite a creed. Very few, if any, non-denominational communities do. I haven't been to a baptist service in a long time, so if they started doing it, I'm in error.

Bl. John Paul did call for unity, so did Benedict and now Francis. I doubt many fundamentalist evangelicals will heed the call unfortunately.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) Wed Married in 10,583
News Boston cardinal, Jewish leaders have Holocaust ... (Feb '09) Aug 12 Jeremy 24
News Evangelical Trump supporters want meeting with ... Aug 9 Ms Sassy 1
News What Divides Catholics and Protestants? (Apr '08) Aug 8 -Prince Of Darkness- 84,840
News Pope 'loves China', Vatican official says on tr... Aug 8 Harold 2
News Pope Francis accepts resignation of Boston Auxi... Jul 29 Anti- 2
News 'That's all he wanted': Spicer, a devout Cathol... Jul 25 misleading troller 2
More from around the web