Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 688822 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#452869 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
You will never learn!!!!
The background to Luther's Ninety-Five Theses centers on practices within the Catholic Church regarding baptism and absolution.
Significantly, the Theses rejected the validity of indulgences (remissions of temporal punishment due for sins which have already been forgiven).
They also view with great cynicism the practice of indulgences being sold, and thus the penance for sin representing a financial transaction rather than genuine contrition.
Luther's Theses argued that the sale of indulgences was a gross violation of the original intention of confession and penance, and that Christians were being falsely told that they could find absolution through the purchase of indulgences.
Did you get this info from the millionaire John Hagee?
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#452870 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
<quoted text>
When a person bought an indulgence, the church promised them a pardon for their past sins. It was the medieval equivalent of a "Get Out of Jail Free" card. It was commercialized salvation and did not require a change of heart.
Source(s):
Ninety-Five Theses on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences by Dr. Martin Luther
Indulgences do not "pardon past sins" you idiot.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#452871 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Full Question
One of the causes of the Reformation was the selling of indulgences. Does the Catholic Church still sell them?
Answer
That's like asking, "Have you stopped beating your wife?" The Catholic Church does not now nor has it ever approved the sale of indulgences. This is to be distinguished from the undeniable fact that individual Catholics (perhaps the best known of them being the German Dominican Johann Tetzel [1465-1519]) did sell indulgences--but in doing so they acted contrary to explicit Church regulations. This practice is utterly opposed to the Catholic Church's teaching on indulgences, and it cannot be regarded as a teaching or practice of the Church.
http://www.catholic.com/quickquestions/does-t...
My question; do TV evangelicals like Benny Hinn and so many others not participate in even worse behavior as their own private fortunes are from gullible poor fools?
I don't listen to him or send money..I tried a couple of times..for a few minutes.

Those who get rich ..if he does..from preaching. Do not have respect from most Christian s. Imo.

SAMARITANS PURSE.ORG

Is the one charity I know of that uses its contributions,strictly fir each place it goes to aid people.

I know,Catholic charities have done great work.

So u bless I can be sure my money is nit in someone's pocket..It does not leave mine

One thing maybe you can answer is why with all of the Vatican bank and riches..So many local parishes parishioners closed in the past few years..I know it affected 12in my area and out hardship especially on poorer people. I thought it was one CHURCH.

I know they have had to pay out money but dud that come from the diocese that have closed the parishes and sold off the buildings

Or from the Vatican.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/...

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines...

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#452872 Jun 16, 2013
Religion A Delusion wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you, but factually correct. So all you can do is change IDs and call names.
I am honored.
No, you're not correct. What you ARE is tragically mistaken. You are refusing God's gift of salvation and that is heartbreaking.

"Roberta G" is the only nick I've ever used on topix.com .
ReginaM

Bloomfield, NJ

#452873 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say that it is fair to compare their money-raising tactics to those of the RCC selling indulgences 500 years ago. I rarely watch televangelists as I don't like them either. There are some I'm not familiar with, so I won't comment on them, but I despise Hinn.
The Catholic Church did not sell indulgences. Didn't you read the post that explained it?

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#452874 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Indulgences do not "pardon past sins" you idiot.
No, they didn't, but that is what the buyers were PROMISED. Oxbow is right about that.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#452875 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say that it is fair to compare their money-raising tactics to those of the RCC selling indulgences 500 years ago. I rarely watch televangelists as I don't like them either. There are some I'm not familiar with, so I won't comment on them, but I despise Hinn.
St. Peter's was financed with donations. It's the spiritual home to 1.2 billion Catholic Christians 500 years later, open to us all. Today's televangelists finance their personal fortunes with donations. Hardly a fair comparison.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#452876 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
The Apostles' Creed is one of the three great ecumenical Creeds of Christendom, which are believed, confessed, taught and upheld by ALL denominations worthy of being called "Christian" and is the oldest of the three.(The other two are the Nicene Creed and the Athanasian Creed).
For some reason, the word "creed" seems to put people off nowawdays. I don't know why, because a "creed" is simply a brief statement of what one believes.
Only the Lord Himself can see into a person's heart and know who truly belongs to Him and who does not. Having said that, however, and speaking ONLY for myself, I accept as Christian any person or denomination who holds to the core doctrinal truths contained and expressed in the Creeds. I say "holds to" because there are many Christians who believe what the Creeds say, even though they may not be able to recite the Creeds themselves. Baptists, for instance, certainly uphold the doctrinal basics in the Creeds, although they are usually not trained to memorize the Creeds themselves.
Here is the Apostles' Creed, in its entirety:
I believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth.
And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord; who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary; suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried; He descended into hell; the third day He rose again from the dead; He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty; from thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Ghost; the holy catholic* Church, the communion of saints; the forgiveness of sins; the resurrection of the body; and the life everlasting. Amen.
* catholic means "universal" and is not a reference to the Roman Catholic Church.
Very few of your protestant brethren who call themselves Christian confess, believe and teach the creed.
Anthony MN

United States

#452877 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they didn't, but that is what the buyers were PROMISED. Oxbow is right about that.
Wrong. The "pardon" comes in the sacrament of confession. An indulgence is not for the forgiveness or pardon of sin, it is for the remission of the punishment of sin.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452878 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, the Church never taught selling indulgences or torture of the Jews. Those things were done by bad guys contrary to Church teachings.
Bl. John Paul II apologized for those bad guys.
--------

Historical facts per a participant and an eye witness...Luther.....

31. The man who actually buys indulgences is as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.

35. They who teach that contrition is not necessary on the part of those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional privileges preach unchristian doctrine.

42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend that the buying of indulgences should in any way be compared with works of mercy.

43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better deed than he who buys indulgences.

45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a needy man and passes him by, yet gives his money for indulgences, does not buy papal indulgences but God's wrath.

46. Christians are to be taught that, unless they have more than they need, they must reserve enough for their family needs and by no means squander it on indulgences.

47. Christians are to be taught that they buying of indulgences is a matter of free choice, not commanded.

48 Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting indulgences, needs and thus desires their devout prayer more than their money.

51. Christians are to be taught that the pope would and should wish to give of his own money, even though he had to sell the basilica of St. Peter, to many of those from whom certain hawkers of indulgences cajole money.

57. That indulgences are not temporal treasures is certainly clear, for many indulgence sellers do not distribute them freely but only gather them.

66. The treasures of indulgences are nets with which one now fishes for the wealth of men.

69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of papal indulgences with all reverence.

82. Such as: "Why does not the pope empty purgatory for the sake of holy love and the dire need of the souls that are there if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a church? The former reason would be most just; the latter is most trivial.

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#452879 Jun 16, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't get you. You're taking a sin of a 'bad Pope' and blowing it up to cover all of Catholicism and debunk the Church?
Look, if a bad Pope or Priest affects their flock spiritually in a negative way, then the flock does not understand what Christianity is. Catholicism shouldn't rely on the charismatic nature of the Priest. I notice Protestantism almost exclusively lives or dies on whether or not their pastor is charismatic enough. If he is a good articulate speaker, then his flock follows him. Catholicism doesn't work like that. The sacraments and the Mass are above any individual Priest or Bishop.
Clay, I've been a Protestant all my life, and I've known Protestant clergymen of MANY different denominations through the years, including but not limited to Baptists and Methodists. Frankly, most of them I've either personally disliked or found pretty boring :s

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452880 Jun 16, 2013
Religion A Delusion wrote:
<quoted text>
When a post evokes name-calling only, that tells me it hit the nail on the head and the bozos are unable to refute.
Thank you, again....
The evidence for both sides is made up. There is no provable foundation upon which to build an agreement. Therefore, this debate is 100% predictable. There will be no end, until the god goes out of fashion, or until one side is able to annihilate the other.
When your angry little god gives you some real evidence, get back to us. Until then, it's a fairy tale and a bad one at that -- full of sexism, violence, and absurdities.
Hello!!!! Like what god doesn't know that slavery is wrong and to wash your hands before eating?
Crawl back under your rock....your hissing is not appreciated.

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#452881 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Very few of your protestant brethren who call themselves Christian confess, believe and teach the creed.
Well, Anthony, unless you're able to see into their hearts, souls and minds, I don't think you're qualified to say that.

“ Ah see's lanlubbers Cap'n BT!”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#452882 Jun 16, 2013
RoSesz wrote:
<quoted text>
The early settlers did not make war.
And I can understand why some natives did.
I see you are ignorant about the religious crusade in the Americas also.
Ho point in any further discussion about it until or unless you educate yourself in that regard.

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#452883 Jun 16, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. The "pardon" comes in the sacrament of confession. An indulgence is not for the forgiveness or pardon of sin, it is for the remission of the punishment of sin.
Okay.

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#452884 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, the Church never taught selling indulgences or torture of the Jews. Those things were done by bad guys contrary to Church teachings.
Bl. John Paul II apologized for those bad guys.
--------
Historical facts per a participant and an eye witness...Luther.....
31. The man who actually buys indulgences is as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.
35. They who teach that contrition is not necessary on the part of those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional privileges preach unchristian doctrine.
42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend that the buying of indulgences should in any way be compared with works of mercy.
43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better deed than he who buys indulgences.
45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a needy man and passes him by, yet gives his money for indulgences, does not buy papal indulgences but God's wrath.
46. Christians are to be taught that, unless they have more than they need, they must reserve enough for their family needs and by no means squander it on indulgences.
47. Christians are to be taught that they buying of indulgences is a matter of free choice, not commanded.
48 Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting indulgences, needs and thus desires their devout prayer more than their money.
51. Christians are to be taught that the pope would and should wish to give of his own money, even though he had to sell the basilica of St. Peter, to many of those from whom certain hawkers of indulgences cajole money.
57. That indulgences are not temporal treasures is certainly clear, for many indulgence sellers do not distribute them freely but only gather them.
66. The treasures of indulgences are nets with which one now fishes for the wealth of men.
69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of papal indulgences with all reverence.
82. Such as: "Why does not the pope empty purgatory for the sake of holy love and the dire need of the souls that are there if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a church? The former reason would be most just; the latter is most trivial.
Historical facts do show that the Roman Catholic Church have always taught that the selling of indulgences was illegal. Martin Luther was referring only to some of the priests in Germany. There were a few Catholic priests in Germany who did not follow Catholic teachings and sold indulgences. The selling of indulgences was not widespread and some people think. It was only limited to a few errant priests in Germany.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452885 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
The Apostles' Creed is one of the three great ecumenical Creeds of Christendom, which are believed, confessed, taught and upheld by ALL denominations worthy of being called "Christian" and is the oldest of the three.(The other two are the Nicene Creed and the Athanasian Creed).
For some reason, the word "creed" seems to put people off nowawdays. I don't know why, because a "creed" is simply a brief statement of what one believes.
Only the Lord Himself can see into a person's heart and know who truly belongs to Him and who does not. Having said that, however, and speaking ONLY for myself, I accept as Christian any person or denomination who holds to the core doctrinal truths contained and expressed in the Creeds. I say "holds to" because there are many Christians who believe what the Creeds say, even though they may not be able to recite the Creeds themselves. Baptists, for instance, certainly uphold the doctrinal basics in the Creeds, although they are usually not trained to memorize the Creeds themselves.
Here is the Apostles' Creed, in its entirety:
I believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth.
And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord; who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary; suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried; He descended into hell; the third day He rose again from the dead; He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty; from thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Ghost; the holy catholic* Church, the communion of saints; the forgiveness of sins; the resurrection of the body; and the life everlasting. Amen.
* catholic means "universal" and is not a reference to the Roman Catholic Church.
There is a perfect example of people who claim to be Christians, which the Bible identifies as followers of Christ, by their very beliefs, say they are frauds...

the Athanasian Creed: No one knows who wrote the thing!!!!!!
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#452886 Jun 16, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, the Church never taught selling indulgences or torture of the Jews. Those things were done by bad guys contrary to Church teachings.
Bl. John Paul II apologized for those bad guys.
--------
Historical facts per a participant and an eye witness...Luther.....
31. The man who actually buys indulgences is as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.
35. They who teach that contrition is not necessary on the part of those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory or to buy confessional privileges preach unchristian doctrine.
42. Christians are to be taught that the pope does not intend that the buying of indulgences should in any way be compared with works of mercy.
43. Christians are to be taught that he who gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better deed than he who buys indulgences.
45. Christians are to be taught that he who sees a needy man and passes him by, yet gives his money for indulgences, does not buy papal indulgences but God's wrath.
46. Christians are to be taught that, unless they have more than they need, they must reserve enough for their family needs and by no means squander it on indulgences.
47. Christians are to be taught that they buying of indulgences is a matter of free choice, not commanded.
48 Christians are to be taught that the pope, in granting indulgences, needs and thus desires their devout prayer more than their money.
51. Christians are to be taught that the pope would and should wish to give of his own money, even though he had to sell the basilica of St. Peter, to many of those from whom certain hawkers of indulgences cajole money.
57. That indulgences are not temporal treasures is certainly clear, for many indulgence sellers do not distribute them freely but only gather them.
66. The treasures of indulgences are nets with which one now fishes for the wealth of men.
69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit the commissaries of papal indulgences with all reverence.
82. Such as: "Why does not the pope empty purgatory for the sake of holy love and the dire need of the souls that are there if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of miserable money with which to build a church? The former reason would be most just; the latter is most trivial.
You're not a follower of Luther are you?

Your best bet in this discussion would be to locate any official Church teaching wherein the selling of indulgences is permitted.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#452887 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
No, they didn't, but that is what the buyers were PROMISED. Oxbow is right about that.
Thanks for speaking up for the truth!!!!!
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#452888 Jun 16, 2013
Roberta G wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, Anthony, unless you're able to see into their hearts, souls and minds, I don't think you're qualified to say that.
Hey, I agree with you about the creeds, the problem is the fundamentalist evangelicals don't, and they'll tell you that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) Oct 11 Married in 10,646
News Pope Francis Denounces Gender Confirmation Surg... Oct 9 TerriB1 1
News Paul Is No Inventor of Christianity, Says Pope (Sep '08) Oct 2 The Bible Student 81
News Boston cardinal, Jewish leaders have Holocaust ... (Feb '09) Sep '17 Tom Fontaine 42
News Catholic clergy fires back after Bannon criticism Sep '17 South Knox Hombre 1
News Evangelical Trump supporters want meeting with ... Aug '17 Ms Sassy 1
News What Divides Catholics and Protestants? (Apr '08) Aug '17 -Prince Of Darkness- 84,837
More from around the web