Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 638058 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Dust Storm

Minneapolis, MN

#429759 Mar 26, 2013
"The rite of circumcision was venerable in the Jews’ account, forasmuch as the law itself gave way thereto, and the Sabbath was less esteemed than circumcision. For that circumcision might be performed, the Sabbath was broken; but that the Sabbath might be kept, circumcision was never broken; and mark, I pray, the dispensation of God. This is found to be even more solemn than the Sabbath, as not being omitted at certain times. When then it is done away, much more is the Sabbath" (Homilies on Philippians 10 [A.D. 402]).

The Apostolic Constitutions

"And on the day of our Lord’s resurrection, which is the Lord’s day, meet more diligently, sending praise to God that made the universe by Jesus, and sent him to us, and condescended to let him suffer, and raised him from the dead. Otherwise what apology will he make to God who does not assemble on that day ... in which is performed the reading of the prophets, the preaching of the gospel, the oblation of the sacrifice, the gift of the holy food" (Apostolic Constitutions 2:7:60 [A.D. 400]).

Augustine

"Well, now, I should like to be told what there is in these ten commandments, except the observance of the Sabbath, which ought not to be kept by a Christian.... Which of these commandments would anyone say that the Christian ought not to keep? It is possible to contend that it is not the law which was written on those two tables that the apostle [Paul] describes as ‘the letter that kills’[2 Cor. 3:6], but the law of circumcision and the other sacred rites which are now abolished" (The Spirit and the Letter 24 [A.D. 412]).
Dust Storm

Minneapolis, MN

#429760 Mar 26, 2013
Pope Gregory I

"It has come to my ears that certain men of perverse spirit have sown among you some things that are wrong and opposed to the holy faith, so as to forbid any work being done on the Sabbath day. What else can I call these [men] but preachers of Antichrist, who when he comes will cause the Sabbath day as well as the Lord’s day to be kept free from all work. For because he [the Antichrist] pretends to die and rise again, he wishes the Lord’s day to be held in reverence; and because he compels the people to Judaize that he may bring back the outward rite of the law, and subject the perfidy of the Jews to himself, he wishes the Sabbath to be observed. For this which is said by the prophet,‘You shall bring in no burden through your gates on the Sabbath day’[Jer. 17:24] could be held to as long as it was lawful for the law to be observed according to the letter. But after that the grace of almighty God, our Lord Jesus Christ, has appeared, the commandments of the law which were spoken figuratively cannot be kept according to the letter. For if anyone says that this about the Sabbath is to be kept, he must needs say that carnal sacrifices are to be offered. He must say too that the commandment about the circumcision of the body is still to be retained. But let him hear the apostle Paul saying in opposition to him:‘If you be circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing’[Gal. 5:2]" (Letters 13:1 [A.D. 597]).

http://www.catholic.com/tracts/sabbath-or-sun...
Clay

Garden City, MI

#429761 Mar 26, 2013
OldJG wrote:
<quoted text>
Where are the words "Roman Catholic Church" in the Bible? Where is the word you so love, "transubstantiation" in the Bible? Where is the word "pope" in the Bible? Where is the word, "nun", in the Bible? Where are the words,"Holy Communion" in the Bible? Where are the words, "infant baptism" in the Bible? This is a short list of what you lay claim to.
Your Roman Catholic church is nothing more than a Babylonian hoax and perversion. Your "faith" as you call it is nothing more than a mix of every pagan religion in the Roman Empire at the time of Constantine.
Also, where is the word, "lent", in the Bible? HA, HA!!!
Ah the ignorant self proclaimed deacon came back to spew more lies. lol.
I'll tell you what Deacon, you show us where Christ instituted the Bible as his sole source of authority on His Ministry, then you can come at us with 'where in the Bible is pope where in the Bible is catholic where in the Bible is infant baptism where in the Bible is holy communion. Bible Bible Bible'

Say, who's Bible you using anyway? Where does it tell you to be reading it like that?

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429762 Mar 26, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
"once they learn the truth about the Church, they will leave"
What truth? How Pagan Rome established Sunday as the Lords day to coincide with sun god worship??
God help anyone who pulls souls away from the Church using that 'truth'.
Sol Invictus and Jesus Christ in comparative mythology
Christ is associated with the Sun through Christmas, which occurs at the time of the Winter solstice. Many astrologers point out a connection between a many of the supposed events in the New Testament to the phenomena of the sun which makes the biblical Jesus more of a solar riddle.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429763 Mar 26, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Matthew 16:19 shows the kind of authority Jesus gave Peter. Whatever decisions he makes within the Church, Heaven will recognize as valid.
Acts 20:7 Shows the Apostles 'gathering on Sunday to break bread. This is also called the Holy Mass.
As I showed yesterday, the Apostolic fathers clearly show Sunday the day being the Lords day.
Your assertion that Pagan Rome changed it to be the Sun god worship day is a lie. Sunday is from the authority of the Apostles.
Do you acknowledge your error?
During the Roman Empire, a festival of the birth of the Unconquered Sun (or Dies Natalis Solis Invicti) was celebrated on the winter solstice—the "rebirth" of the sun—which occurred on December 25 of the Julian calendar. In late antiquity, the theological centrality of the sun in some Imperial religious systems suggest a form of a “solar monotheism.” The religious commemorations on December 25 were replaced under Christian domination of the Empire with the birthday of Christ.
Clay

Garden City, MI

#429764 Mar 26, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text> Sol Invictus and Jesus Christ in comparative mythology
Christ is associated with the Sun through Christmas, which occurs at the time of the Winter solstice. Many astrologers point out a connection between a many of the supposed events in the New Testament to the phenomena of the sun which makes the biblical Jesus more of a solar riddle.
I get the impression you're going to believe what you want to believe no matter what.
But for the record: Christ died on a Friday and rose on Sunday. This has nothing to do with Pagan Sun gods or the Roman Empire.
Dust Storm

Minneapolis, MN

#429765 Mar 26, 2013
jethro8 wrote:
<quoted text>During the Roman Empire, a festival of the birth of the Unconquered Sun (or Dies Natalis Solis Invicti) was celebrated on the winter solstice—the "rebirth" of the sun—which occurred on December 25 of the Julian calendar. In late antiquity, the theological centrality of the sun in some Imperial religious systems suggest a form of a “solar monotheism.” The religious commemorations on December 25 were replaced under Christian domination of the Empire with the birthday of Christ.
But let us leave the realm of conjecture and return to historical records. There is ample evidence to demonstrate that, even though the Christmas date was not made official until 354, clearly it was established long before Aurelian instituted his pagan feastday.

The conception of St. John the Baptist is the historical anchor to know the date of Christmas, based on the detailed and careful calculations on dates made by first Fathers of the Church.



The date of St. Elizabeth's conception sets the base for knowing Christ's birth
The early tractatus De solstitiia records the tradition of the Archangel Gabriel appearing to Zachariah in the High Temple when he was serving as high priest on the Day of Atonement (Lk 1:8). This placed the conception of St. John the Baptist during the feast of Tabernacles in late September, as the Archangel Gabriel said (Lk 1:28) and his birth nine months later at the time of the summer solstice.(4)

Since the Gospel of Luke states that the Archangel Gabriel appeared to the Virgin Mary in the sixth month after John's conception (Lk 1:26), this placed the conception of Christ at about the time of the spring equinox, that is, at the time of the Jewish Passover, in late March. His birth would thus be in late December at the time of the winter solstice.

That these dates, based on Tradition and Scripture, are trustworthy is confirmed by recent evidence taken from the Dead Sea Scrolls, whose authors were very concerned about calendar dates, essential for establishing when the Torah feasts should be celebrated. The data found in the Scrolls make it possible to know the Temple’s rotating assignment of priests during Old Testament times and show definitely that Zachariah served as a Temple priest in September, thus confirming the tradition of the Early Church.(5)

The Catholic Church determined March 25 as the date of Our Lord’s Conception long before Aurelian decided to make his solar feast. For example, around 221 AD, Sexto Julio Africano wrote the Chronographiai in which he affirmed that the Annunciation was March 25.(6) Once the date of the Incarnation was established, it was a simple matter of adding nine months to arrive at the date of Our Lord’s birth - December 25. This date would not be made official until the late fourth century, but it was established long before Aurelian and Constantine. It had nothing to do with pagan festivals.

We can be certain that the first Catholic apologists and Fathers of the Church, who lived very close to the time of the Apostles, were fully aware of the dates associated with the birth of Our Lord Jesus Christ. They had all the calendar sources at hand and they would not allow any untruth to be introduced in the Catholic liturgy. The date of Christ’s birth was transmitted by them as being December 25, a Sunday.

Addressing the verse of Luke 2:7, Fr Cornelius a Lapide comments on the architecture of this choice:“Christ was born Sunday, because this was the first day of the world.… Christ was born on Sunday night, in keeping with the order of His marvels, so that the day on which He said Let there be light, and there was light, was the same day on which, at night, the light shone in darkness for the upright of heart, that is, the sun of justice, Christ the Lord.”(7)

http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/e0...

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429766 Mar 26, 2013
Some mythologists, such as Brian Branston, Patricia Monaghan and Janet McCrickard, contend that sun goddesses are as common as, or even more common, worldwide than their male counterparts. They also claim that the belief that solar deities are primarily male is linked to the fact that a few better known mythologies (such as those of late classical Greece and late Roman mythology) rarely break from this rule, although closer examination of the earlier myths of those cultures reveal a very different distribution than the contemporary popular belief. The dualism of sun/male/light and moon/female/darkness is found in many (but not all) late southern traditions in Europe that derive from Orphic and Gnostic philosophies....JETHRO:from what i am finding just about every culture at one time or another worshiped the sun as a god....SEE HOJO,this what happens when you open a history book you LEARN,try it some time
Free Mind

Saint Petersburg, FL

#429767 Mar 26, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
I get the impression you're going to believe what you want to believe no matter what.
But for the record: Christ died on a Friday and rose on Sunday. This has nothing to do with Pagan Sun gods or the Roman Empire.
1... we are not sure.

http://amazingdiscoveries.org/S-deception_Jes...

2... According the writings by your own church fathers (patristic fathers), the day was not set by all Christian sects until it was decreed by Constantine.

3... Ask your Parrish Priest if you care about the truth. Otherwise,-- read your own words -- "I get the impression you're going to believe what you want to believe no matter what."

Why post buffoonery? Don't you see enough of that being posted in error? Why add to it?

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429768 Mar 26, 2013
LTM wrote:
<quoted text>
That explains why I believed there was a God since I was 3.
Jethro, It's a choice we must make to accept, or reject Him .
tell me how you knew at 3 yrs. old??
Free Mind

Saint Petersburg, FL

#429769 Mar 26, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
716
<quoted text>
The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and Abe Lincoln doeth no good?

I disagree.

What a petty, small-minded god you have created. You should get out more, travel the world, read about other cultures. Other peoples are just as worthy as yourself.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429770 Mar 26, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Matthew 16:19 shows the kind of authority Jesus gave Peter. Whatever decisions he makes within the Church, Heaven will recognize as valid.
Acts 20:7 Shows the Apostles 'gathering on Sunday to break bread. This is also called the Holy Mass.
As I showed yesterday, the Apostolic fathers clearly show Sunday the day being the Lords day.
Your assertion that Pagan Rome changed it to be the Sun god worship day is a lie. Sunday is from the authority of the Apostles.
Do you acknowledge your error?
KEY TO GETTING PEOPLE AWAY FROM WORSHIPING THE CREATOR

We see all through Biblical history that one of the key elements in weaning a loyal people away from their loyalties to the true
God is by infiltration. Sun worship first infiltrated Israel, it became mixed with their true worship, until finally they were carried
away into midst of Babylon itself.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429771 Mar 26, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
"once they learn the truth about the Church, they will leave"
What truth? How Pagan Rome established Sunday as the Lords day to coincide with sun god worship??
God help anyone who pulls souls away from the Church using that 'truth'.
THE FALSE PROPHETS WOULD LEAD US STRAIGHT INTO SUN WORSHIP--

The third angel's message cries with a loud voice to return to the worship of the Creator God, who made the heaven's and the
earth and the sea. Why would the last warning message focus on this aspect of God? Why the emphasis on His Creative
power? Could it be because sun worship, has invaded Christianity in a clever disguise and usurped the true worship of God
the Creator.

For in six days God created the heavens and the earth and rested upon the seventh day and blessed and sanctified it.
Remember the Sabbath day!

Sun day - is the venerable day of the sun.

The edict of Constantine, in A.D. 321, was NOT the first time the week of seven day week with it's recurring day of the Sun
recognized. Two hundred years earlier we already see a Christian teacher trying to impress a Roman emperor by telling him
Christians worship on the "day of the sun".

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429772 Mar 26, 2013
nap time be back later.
Free Mind

Saint Petersburg, FL

#429773 Mar 26, 2013
Dust Storm wrote:
<quoted text>
But let us leave the realm of conjecture and return to historical records. There is ample evidence to demonstrate that, even though the Christmas date was not made official until 354, clearly it was established long before Aurelian instituted his pagan feastday.
The conception of St. John the Baptist is the historical anchor to know the date of Christmas, based on the detailed and careful calculations on dates made by first Fathers of the Church.
The date of St. Elizabeth's conception sets the base for knowing Christ's birth
The early tractatus De solstitiia records the tradition of the Archangel Gabriel appearing to Zachariah in the High Temple when he was serving as high priest on the Day of Atonement (Lk 1:8). This placed the conception of St. John the Baptist during the feast of Tabernacles in late September, as the Archangel Gabriel said (Lk 1:28) and his birth nine months later at the time of the summer solstice.(4)
Since the Gospel of Luke states that the Archangel Gabriel appeared to the Virgin Mary in the sixth month after John's conception (Lk 1:26), this placed the conception of Christ at about the time of the spring equinox, that is, at the time of the Jewish Passover, in late March. His birth would thus be in late December at the time of the winter solstice.
That these dates, based on Tradition and Scripture, are trustworthy is confirmed by recent evidence taken from the Dead Sea Scrolls, whose authors were very concerned about calendar dates, essential for establishing when the Torah feasts should be celebrated. The data found in the Scrolls make it possible to know the Temple’s rotating assignment of priests during Old Testament times and show definitely that Zachariah served as a Temple priest in September, thus confirming the tradition of the Early Church.(5)
The Catholic Church determined March 25 as the date of Our Lord’s Conception long before Aurelian decided to make his solar feast. For example, around 221 AD, Sexto Julio Africano wrote the Chronographiai in which he affirmed that the Annunciation was March 25.(6) Once the date of the Incarnation was established, it was a simple matter of adding nine months to arrive at the date of Our Lord’s birth - December 25. This date would not be made official until the late fourth century, but it was established long before Aurelian and Constantine. It had nothing to do with pagan festivals.
We can be certain that the first Catholic apologists and Fathers of the Church, who lived very close to the time of the Apostles, were fully aware of the dates associated with the birth of Our Lord Jesus Christ. They had all the calendar sources at hand and they would not allow any untruth to be introduced in the Catholic liturgy. The date of Christ’s birth was transmitted by them as being December 25, a Sunday.
Addressing the verse of Luke 2:7, Fr Cornelius a Lapide comments on the architecture of this choice:“Christ was born Sunday, because this was the first day of the world.… Christ was born on Sunday night, in keeping with the order of His marvels, so that the day on which He said Let there be light, and there was light, was the same day on which, at night, the light shone in darkness for the upright of heart, that is, the sun of justice, Christ the Lord.”(7)
http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/e0...
More RCC cut & paste -- full of mysticism, opinion, and factual errors -- from the same people who tell us that the decades-long, worldwide abuse cover-up never happened.

There's an entire industry that is paid to provide various denominations with "proof."

But that "proof" is outdated, because even Pope Benedict wrote that the 12/25 date is surely incorrect.

Remember Pope Benedict?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Free Mind

Saint Petersburg, FL

#429774 Mar 26, 2013
Catholics here need to be reprogrammed.

"Pope Benedict Disputes Jesus’ Date of Birth"

http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/11/22/pope-bene...

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429776 Mar 26, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Matthew 16:19 shows the kind of authority Jesus gave Peter. Whatever decisions he makes within the Church, Heaven will recognize as valid.
Acts 20:7 Shows the Apostles 'gathering on Sunday to break bread. This is also called the Holy Mass.
As I showed yesterday, the Apostolic fathers clearly show Sunday the day being the Lords day.
Your assertion that Pagan Rome changed it to be the Sun god worship day is a lie. Sunday is from the authority of the Apostles.
Do you acknowledge your error?
quick note,peter has nothing to do with the catholic church.he was not the first pope as the church likes people to think.show me in scripture where he is called pope? the papacy is a myth created by the church.
Dust Storm

Minneapolis, MN

#429777 Mar 26, 2013
Clay,

I was listening to Scott Hahn recently and before he was a Catholic he said he hadn't read Catholic perspectives. In all his schooling he had never felt the need. He always went to libraries to gather every book he could to fight against Catholics. He found this raggedy old book one day. He started to read it. He said it was the most profound book he had ever read. It was so clear and pristine.

He started to share it with his Protestant friends. They were all blown away at the wisdom of this man immersed in scripture and knowledge. They all asked, Who is this guy? We need to read more from him. Scott Hahn said I dont know probably a reformed anything but a Catholic. It never even occured to him that a Catholic could be the author.

Then one day a guy came in with a guy in time Magazine. The author of that book. They said well that cant be this guy he is a Catholic. So they dismissed it as the same guy. Meanwhile he found some other books. They continued to be amamazed at the wisdom and knowledge of this man who was bringing scripture and Christ to life like they had never known before.

That man was Joseph Ratzinger. His colleagues who were all militant anti-catholics were stunned. He had to meet this man the media was calling the Grand Inqusitor, the panther, the feared master and all kinds of other negative connotations assigned to him. What he found was the most humble man he had ever met and with knowledge of scripture that surpassed anyone he had known. He found him in the bookshelves. He devoted an entire day speaking to a Protestant and answering all of his questions and leaving him more and a burning desire to learn more about God.

He was not long ago invited by the largest Baptist bible in the country to speak on the writings of Joseph Ratzinger. He said he knows what they are expecting, but its not what they will get.
Free Mind

Saint Petersburg, FL

#429778 Mar 26, 2013
The "one true" church has a problem.

2000 years of history -- that no one ever imagined could one day be so well cataloged, accessed, and studied.

Suddenly, long-time claims are easily refuted, not only by independent sources, but also by finding and comparing the exact words and writings of Popes and Councils.

No one true church would ever have a reason to fear the truth -- or to blame others for their own ills.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#429779 Mar 26, 2013
who="Free Mind"
Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, and Abe Lincoln doeth no good?
I disagree.
What a petty, small-minded god you have created. You should get out more, travel the world, read about other cultures. Other peoples are just as worthy as yourself.

__________
Read a little better. The scripture was talking about FOOLS, not Jefferson, Franklin or Lincoln.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News How much hatred does God have? (Dec '08) 57 min Time again 20
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 15 hr Married in 10,085
News Was Obama right about the Crusades and Islamic ... (Feb '15) May 2 nanoanomaly 1,965
News Biden to see Pope Francis, discuss cancer cures... Apr 29 serfs up 6
News Archbishop of Cologne Blasts Germany's Anti-Isl... Apr 29 Marie-Luise_J 6
News Pope names new papal nuncio to the United States Apr 19 Tough Guy 6
News Pope Rescues 12 Muslims To Demonstrate How Euro... Apr 18 The_Prophet_Had_LICE 5
More from around the web