Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 646326 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

socci

El Dorado Springs, MO

#429106 Mar 21, 2013

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#429107 Mar 21, 2013
104 093
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
The first day, verse 5.
And what date in history did this happen????!!!!
socci

El Dorado Springs, MO

#429108 Mar 21, 2013
Clay wrote:
tell me, where did the Bible come from and how do you know the Books that are in it...belong in it?
This is important because you're using those Books to usurp the Church for supposedly not going by it.

We have 36000 letters that cite scripture from pre RC councils. This and more proves the accepted books were in use long before Rome accepted them. What did the pope use before 312 AD?

Clay wrote:
The Church never said 'Peter was in Rome because its in the Bible'.
So whatever verses you slice and dice and zig and zag to prove Peter was never in Rome is stupid. The Bible simply does not say he was in Rome and does not say he wasn't. The fact is, it doesn't matter if he was or was not.
Sorry I called YOU stupid, I should have said your logic is stupid.
I don't think I'm interested in talkin with you, Soc. You need to seriously look in the mirror and lose this silly 911 conspiracy UFO Christianity. Its gotta be incredibly insulting to Jesus Christ to be that way.

The pagan Roman Church is not UFO it is historic fact. UFO does not exist. The pagan obelisk & sun wheel sits out in front of the Vatican.

You are aware it is the Vatican who not only advocates all the evolution big bangism even the Father of the 'big bang' but also has ufologist priest, Corrado Balducci? Do you know why the Vatican is perpetrating this ufo hoax on the world? Buckle your seatbelts.. the Jesuits need ET on other planets to support their big bang theories that claim there are planets with life all over the universe, not just on earth as the Bible says. These Jesuits claim the big bang formed everything, not God, thus according to these mad scientists God did not create or even exist!

There is no life anywhere in space. No ET no UFO. NASA & SETI have been looking since the 1960s and so far -- nothing.

Back on planet earth grounded in the word of God.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#429109 Mar 21, 2013
104 093
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
The first day, verse 5.
And.....

Ge 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Ge 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

How much time elapsed from Ge 1:1 and Ge 1:5?????!!!
James

South Jordan, UT

#429110 Mar 21, 2013
Hey, Im Antiochian Orthodox...and it is an awsome faith I have...God Bless everyone and Happy Lenton season to u!!
James

South Jordan, UT

#429111 Mar 21, 2013
I am a member of the antiochian Orthodox church and it is an awsome faith I belong to!! It is said orthodoxy is Americas best kept secret and it is so true. God Bless all and Happy Lent to u!
4GVN

Jackson, MO

#429112 Mar 21, 2013
Pope Alexander's Banquet of Chestnuts in 1501 was served by 50 whores. Prizes were awarded to those who had the most sex.
Is this your 'Holy Catholic Church' HOJO?
Was this the Vicar of Christ?
Was this the man chosen by God to lead the worlds Catholics, CLAY?
We can only hope that no one followed his lead.
socci

El Dorado Springs, MO

#429113 Mar 21, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
104 093
And.....
Ge 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Ge 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
How much time elapsed from Ge 1:1 and Ge 1:5?????!!!

Oxbow, It reads seven literal 24 hr days. The 7th day God rested creating the Sabbath.

The genealogies are given so we can find the line Jesus would come from, but can also be used to count the aprox date of creation.

Here's an article why..

How long were the days of Genesis?

http://creation.com/how-long-were-the-days-of...

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#429114 Mar 21, 2013
112
4GVN wrote:
Pope Alexander's Banquet of Chestnuts in 1501 was served by 50 whores. Prizes were awarded to those who had the most sex.
Is this your 'Holy Catholic Church' HOJO?
Was this the Vicar of Christ?
Was this the man chosen by God to lead the worlds Catholics, CLAY?
We can only hope that no one followed his lead.
Indeed!!! At least they used honest prostitutes!!!!

History

The banquet was given in Cesare's apartments in the Palazzo Apostolico. Fifty prostitutes or courtesans were in attendance for the entertainment of the banquet guests. Burchard describes the scene in his Diary:

On the evening of the last day of October, 1501, Cesare Borgia arranged a banquet in his chambers in the Vatican with "fifty honest prostitutes", called courtesans, who danced after dinner with the attendants and others who were present, at first in their garments, then naked. After dinner the candelabra with the burning candles were taken from the tables and placed on the floor, and chestnuts were strewn around, which the naked courtesans picked up, creeping on hands and knees between the chandeliers, while the Pope, Cesare, and his sister Lucretia looked on. Finally, prizes were announced for those who could perform the act most often with the courtesans, such as tunics of silk, shoes, barrets, and other things.

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#429115 Mar 21, 2013
113
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
Oxbow, It reads seven literal 24 hr days. The 7th day God rested creating the Sabbath.
The genealogies are given so we can find the line Jesus would come from, but can also be used to count the aprox date of creation.
Here's an article why..
How long were the days of Genesis?
http://creation.com/how-long-were-the-days-of...
Nay nay!!! Ge 1:1 was not the first day of the seven day Creation.....

Look: Ge 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

The first day was not created until Ge 1:5...

I am asking how long in time from Ge 1:1 and the first day of the seven day creation (Ge 1:5)...My question has nothing to do with the length of day!!!!!!

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#429116 Mar 21, 2013
113
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
Oxbow, It reads seven literal 24 hr days. The 7th day God rested creating the Sabbath.
The genealogies are given so we can find the line Jesus would come from, but can also be used to count the aprox date of creation.
Here's an article why..
How long were the days of Genesis?
http://creation.com/how-long-were-the-days-of...
You said "The genealogies are given so we can find the line Jesus would come from, but can also be used to count the aprox date of creation."

You are far...far...way yonder off base!!! Here is the record of God Creating Heaven and earth: Ge 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

I am asking how long after He Created Heaven and earth did He create "day".....in Ge 1:5.....
guest

United States

#429117 Mar 21, 2013
Clay wrote:
That's an interesting question not discussed a whole lot on here.
I'm guessing they have to believe the Earth is 5,000 or 10,000 yrs old to subscribe to sola scriptura. If they believe its millions of yrs old, then their going against the Bible! wow, what a pickle.
-
-
If you understood E=mc^2 you'd understand that the answer is BOTH. and I'm not pickled literally or figuratively.
-
and it's BILLIONS not millions.
-
God in his infinite wisdom allowed man to discover the calculus and the physics necessary to explain the universe and the *big bang*.
-
Einstein's law of relativity has proven that *time* is 'relative' to where you are as it is occurring. If you are on a space ship traveling through space, time is compressed compared to time here on earth. and since we were not here during the first 5 'days' and we can't measure that time. but more than that we don't know exactly how fast the universe was expanding at that time... the faster it was expanding ... the slower the time for man but we weren't here, until day 5. after man was created then we started counting time with 'man's' reference rather than God's reference.
-
God's reference to time is far different from ours.

I just found this video, I hope it helps:
socci

El Dorado Springs, MO

#429118 Mar 21, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
You said "The genealogies are given so we can find the line Jesus would come from, but can also be used to count the aprox date of creation."
You are far...far...way yonder off base!!! Here is the record of God Creating Heaven and earth: Ge 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
I am asking how long after He Created Heaven and earth did He create "day".....in Ge 1:5.....

Im not way off anything you are. Day one is just what it says, day one. Gen 1:1-5 is day one.

The gap theory between Gen 1:1 and 1:2 was introduced into the seminaries by the Scofield Bible.

To believe it you would also not believe the global flood? Jesus and Peter both said there was a global flood. Noah and seven others were the survivors.

Many scientists continue to find the evidence supports the Biblical account of the age of the entire universe to be circa 6000yo.
socci

El Dorado Springs, MO

#429119 Mar 21, 2013
guest wrote:
If you understood E=mc^2 you'd understand that the answer is BOTH. and I'm not pickled literally or figuratively.
-
and it's BILLIONS not millions.
-
God in his infinite wisdom allowed man to discover the calculus and the physics necessary to explain the universe and the *big bang*.
-
Einstein's law of relativity has proven that *time* is 'relative' to where you are as it is occurring. If you are on a space ship traveling through space, time is compressed compared to time here on earth. and since we were not here during the first 5 'days' and we can't measure that time. but more than that we don't know exactly how fast the universe was expanding at that time... the faster it was expanding ... the slower the time for man but we weren't here, until day 5. after man was created then we started counting time with 'man's' reference rather than God's reference.
-
God's reference to time is far different from ours.
I just found this video, I hope it helps:
30KfPtHec4s

There are a few problems with all that.

Einstein never really invented anything. The theory existed before. Anyway, it is just a theory. However Newton's Laws on Gravity were lab tested and observed. Newton's laws were set aside in favor of Einstien's theory to support the Jesuit's big bang theory and bazzillions of fictional years.

We are told God created Adam and Eve fully grown. Trees and creatures were created all fully mature. The stars and light were made fully visible on the fourth day. But can we date the event with empirical observations?

Supernovas are observed and numbered all with a size that does not allow billions or millions of years.
http://creation.com/exploding-stars-point-to-...


Back here on planet earth the baserock granites claimed to be an igneous rock from when the earth was a molten mass - in accordance with big bangism - is proven in the lab to not be the case at all. Granite cannot be heated to a molten state, recooled, and remain a crystal inter-mix mineral. There are also halos proving granite formed in less than 3 min.
www.halos.com/reports/science-1974-perspectiv...
www.youtube.com/watch...
guest

United States

#429120 Mar 21, 2013
guest wrote:
-
-
Which statement is 100% TRUE:
-
Jesus said, "Call No Man Father."
-
or:
-
Jesus said, "Call Priests, Bishops, Cardinals, and Pope Father."
-
-
hojo wrote:
You have had this explained to you "fundies" over and over again
(many times), by Regina so here is in again!
A.
Catholics call their priests "Father" because in
all matters pertaining to Christ's holy faith they
perform the duties of a father, representing God.

The priest is the agent of the Christian's
supernatural birth and sustenance in the world.

... <clipped>

... <clipped>

The title of
"Father" is entirely proper for an ordained priest
of Jesus Christ.
-
-
and THIS is EXACTLY why Jesus said DO NOT CALL ANY MAN FATHER!
-
The priest does NOT *represent* GOD. That is blasphemy!
The priest does NOT have the authority to act or speak for God. That, too, is blasphemy! ONLY Jesus is God's representative.
-
-
represent |&#716;repri&#712;zent |
verb [ trans.]
1 be entitled or appointed to act or speak for (someone), esp. in an official capacity : for purposes of

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429121 Mar 22, 2013
Oxbow wrote:
075 023 638
<quoted text>
By now, you should have realized, that this "bet" exercise was to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that your ability to read and understand, displays an IQ somewhere in the low to medium 20s!!!!!
Show me where I ever placed a bet with you on the farm!!!!
Quote: I would be willing to bet the farm that you don't even know what day of the week this is!!!!!!
you state you'd be willing to bet the farm,so i took you up on that bet,and I WON! i'll settle for $50,000. and you can keep the farm.
guest

United States

#429122 Mar 22, 2013
socci wrote:
<quoted text>
There are a few problems with all that.
Einstein never really invented anything. The theory existed before. Anyway, it is just a theory. However Newton's Laws on Gravity were lab tested and observed. Newton's laws were set aside in favor of Einstien's theory to support the Jesuit's big bang theory and bazzillions of fictional years.
We are told God created Adam and Eve fully grown. Trees and creatures were created all fully mature. The stars and light were made fully visible on the fourth day. But can we date the event with empirical observations?
Supernovas are observed and numbered all with a size that does not allow billions or millions of years.
http://creation.com/exploding-stars-point-to-...
Back here on planet earth the baserock granites claimed to be an igneous rock from when the earth was a molten mass - in accordance with big bangism - is proven in the lab to not be the case at all. Granite cannot be heated to a molten state, recooled, and remain a crystal inter-mix mineral. There are also halos proving granite formed in less than 3 min.
www.halos.com/reports/science-1974-perspectiv...
www.youtube.com/watch...
-
we've had this discussion before.
I have debunked you.
for a "lab" experiment, such as this, to be accurate, it would have to have ALL THE ELEMENTS of what occurred in nature. Since we don't have the entire spectrum of atoms present on earth, or the billions of years necessary to *recreate* the actual experiment, we cannot repeat the experiment in any "lab". Indeed, we would need an entire universe to do that.

here's a link to the counter-argument:

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/po-halos/gent...

Summary/Conclusions

Gentry's polonium halo hypothesis for a young Earth fails, or is inconclusive for, all tests. Gentry's entire thesis is built on a compounded set of assumptions. He is unable to demonstrate that concentric haloes in mica are caused uniquely by alpha particles resulting from the decay of polonium isotopes. His samples are not from "primordial" pieces of the Earth's original crust, but from rocks which have been extensively reworked. Finally, his hypothesis cannot accommodate the many alternative lines of evidence that demonstrate a great age for the Earth. Gentry rationalizes any evidence which contradicts his hypothesis by proposing three "singularities" - one time divine interventions - over the past 6000 years. Of course, supernatural events and processes fall outside the realm of scientific investigations to address. As with the idea of variable radioactive decay rates, once Gentry moves beyond the realm of physical laws, his arguments fail to have any scientific usefulness. If divine action is necessary to fit the halo hypothesis into some consistent model of Earth history, why waste all that time trying to argue about the origins of the haloes based on current scientific theory? This is where most Creationist arguments break down when they try to adopt the language and trappings of science. Trying to prove a religious premise is itself an act of faith, not science.

In the end, Gentry's young Earth proposal, based on years of measuring discoloration haloes, is nothing more than a high-tech version of the Creationist "Omphalos" argument. This is the late nineteenth century proposition that while God created the Earth just 6,000 years ago according to the Genesis account, He made everything appear old. Unfortunately, because Gentry has published his original work on haloes in reputable scientific journals, a number of basic geology and mineralogy text books still state that microscopic discoloration haloes in mica are the result of polonium decay.

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429123 Mar 22, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
NONE of us Catholics, EVER claimed "superiority" and the other Churches inferior, just because we have the papacy and a pope (as the successor of St Peter) who speaks (THE TRUTH) for the Catholic Church, for TRUE biblical interpretation and for over 1 billion Catholics Christians throughout the world.... BESIDES---, each of you Protestants have "your own individual" 42,000 bible only Popes, of whom EACH speak in "contradiction, inconsistencies and "conflicting self-interpretations of the bible,(IN DISAGREEMENT WITH EACH OTHER), as the successors to Martin Luther, who started this entire chaos of"hodge-podged" denominations and half-truth, half-heresy Christianity!!! Been there and have done that "distorted confusion" for over 35 years!! IT IS ALL YOURS!!! YOU CAN HAVE IT!!!
CBSNews.com:Pope Benedict XVI has reasserted the universal primacy of the Roman Catholic Church, approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches,they lack something because they do not recognize the primacy of the pope — a defect, or a "wound" that harmed them, it said...JETHRO I suppose your going to call the cbs news anti-catholic to defend your church like you usually do when an news organization prints a story that puts the church in a bad light.
7th Day Catholic Rocks

Poplar Bluff, MO

#429124 Mar 22, 2013
HEADLINES FROM THE YEAR: 2023 !

Ozone created by electric cars now killing millions in the seventh largest country in the world, Mexifornia,formerly known as California .

White minorities still trying to have English recognized as Mexifornia's third language.

Spotted Owl plague threatens northwestern United States crops and livestock.

Baby conceived naturally! Scientists stumped.
Couple petitions court to reinstate heterosexual marriage.

Iran still closed off; physicists estimate it will take at least 10 more years before radioactivity decreases to safe levels.

France begs and pleads for global help after being taken over by Jamaica. No other country comes forward to help the beleaguered nation!

Castro finally dies at age 112; Cuban cigars can now be imported legally, but President Chelsea Clinton has banned all smoking.

George Z. Bush says he will run for President in 2036.

Postal Service raises price of first class stamp to $17.89 and reduces mail delivery to Wednesdays only.

85-year $75.8 billion study: Diet and exercise is the key to weight l oss.

Average weight of Americans drops to 250 lbs.

Global cooling blamed for citrus crop failure for third consecutive year in Mexifornia and Floruba.

Japanese scientists have created a camera with such a fast shutter speed they now can photograph a woman with her mouth shut.

Abortion clinics now available in every
High School in United States .

Senate still blocking drilling in AN WR even though gas is selling for 4532 Pesos per liter and gas stations are only open on Tuesdays and Fridays.

Massachusetts executes last remaining conservative.

Supreme Court rules punishment of criminals violates their civil rights.

Average height of NBA players is now nine feet, seven inches with
only 3 illegitimate children.

New federal law requires that all nail clippers, screwdrivers, fly swatters and rolled-up newspapers must be registered by January 2030.

IRS sets lowest tax rate at 75 percent.

Floruba voters still having trouble with voting machines.

I Love This Country!

It's The Government That Scares Me!

Since: Nov 08

usa

#429125 Mar 22, 2013
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>
No!! I say this because I am "not going to waste my time" discussing bible interpretation, Church History or ANY Catholic Church doctrine with bible only Protestants, atheists or agnostics that have a "pre-determined anti-catholic agenda". You go "look up (THE TRUTH) of TRUE CHURCH HISTORY and TRUE BIBLE INTERPRETATION "yourself"!!! Like I told you before--read the encyclicals, read the Catholic Catechism, read the biographical lives of the Saints, read the Apologist historian authors and writers (both Catholic and Protestant) and read TRUE CHURCH HISTORY of which you can find over 239 volumes that disprove everything you claim is true. HOWEVER--I/we as Catholics "all know that you won't read ANY of what I suggested to you"----because ---you would rather live in your "isolated world" of anti-catholic, vengeance, hostility and heresy, in which your "personal (editorialized) opinion" is--the final authority!!!!
you expect me to believe protestants are going to say the the C/P CHURCH,is the true church when more than one pope has called all churches inferior to the catholic church? i have looked up church history from both sides of the fence,and some popes did actually care about their followers,and their those who did not care sold the papacy,sold favors with-in the church, committed multiple crimes and abused their power,unless you show me a statement that reads, and upon this rock i will build "my church" and it's followers will be called Catholics,it is a false statement,there is nothing in history that supports the churches position,it's their made up history,not the bibles or the scriptures.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 20 hr Crazy 10,159
News John Paul II College of Davao (Dec '07) Jun 20 tine 673
News Milwaukee Rising: Looking for the city's most u... Jun 20 Tom 2
News Pope names new papal nuncio to the United States Jun 1 Michael 7
News Pope's zero tolerance for pedophiles faces test... (Mar '15) May 27 Gods r Delusions ... 4
News Pope Francis eases way for divorced Catholics w... May 27 truth 54
News Pope Francis meets top Sunni cleric May '16 Bullet Proof Pope 1
More from around the web