NASL writes -- "Man doesn't have the capacity to understand "God". The RCC and Christianity, and every religion created does the same thing - they think they can define "God""Still afraid to answer the questions honestly, huh?
Can stand up to your Self?
So you continue to divert......
Man doesn't have the capacity to understand "God". The RCC and Christianity, and every religion created does the same thing - they think they can define "God".
Arrogance is more adored in many ways - putting honesty aside.
I don't limit "God" - religions do.
I guess I just don't understand how you can believe certain texts, and only because of men, whereas, you refute still others.
Why does "God" need men to deliver a message int he first place?
And what meter is that?
Are you judging me?
....and they all have teachings by Jesus that you don't use.
Instead of just looking at the list, and actually reading them, they may give you the answers to why you believe "Paul" is more enlightened than Jesus......or maybe not.
Most, but not every.
Otherwise, good point. Thomas Jefferson wrote similarly.
On board topic....
Oh how the Vatican hated him. I wonder if they freed him from "eternal despair" yet, since they changed their Catechism to allow for such?
Will the waffling RCC finally tell us the fate of 99% of America's founders?