Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 603130 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

RCC Superiority So BUSTED

Melbourne, FL

#419809 Feb 3, 2013
MICHAEL wrote:
Hispanics in the USA are about to HISPANICIZE the catholic church.
Today and growing quickly 50% of roman catholics in america under the age of 40 are Latinos.
Where have all the british, french, italian, german, dutch catholics gone?
Only 8% of roman catholic priests in america are Latino. This has to change to reflect the fast growing Latino catholic population in america.
http://cliniclegal.org/news/0912/growing-lati...
The skin color of catholics in america is getting darker very quickly.
Not THAT Catholic. They voted for Obama.

OK, typical Catholic freeloaders who only knew RCC totalitarian ideals.

But they'll come around once they become better educated.
RCC Superiority So BUSTED

Melbourne, FL

#419810 Feb 3, 2013
Catholic's Women-Hating Pervert Tradition.......

The great Catholic theologian Thomas Aquinas taught that women were defective men, imperfect in both body and soul. They were conceived either because of defective sperm or because a damp wind was blowing at the time of conception

Following Aquinas, Canon law decreed that women could not witness a will. Neither could they testify in disputes over wills, nor in criminal proceedings. Generally they suffered the same sort of legal disabilities as children and imbeciles.

They could not practice medicine, law or any other profession, nor could they hold any public office.

Here is a piece of reasoning from two famous Catholic scholars: After saying that women are intellectually like children they explain why women are given to the practice of witchcraft:

"But the natural reason is that she is more carnal than a man, as is clear from her many carnal abominations. And it should be noted that there was a defect in the formation of the first woman, since she was formed from a bent rib, that is, rib of the breast, which is bent as it were in a contrary direction to a man. And since through this defect she is an imperfect animal, she always deceives."

No wonder all studies show that the RCC priesthood is a magnet for perverts in denial.
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419811 Feb 3, 2013
A plague of Atheists has Descended, and Catholics are the Target

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-cul...

Attacking Christians is Not Really Clever, Witty or Funny.

FROM time immemorial, this world has been troubled by plagues. From bogong moths in Canberra to frogs in biblical Egypt, unwelcome and unlovely creatures have the awkward habit of turning up in bulk.

Just now, we are facing one of our largest and least appealing infestations. Somewhat in advance of summer's blowflies, we are beset by atheists. Worse, they are not traditional atheists. These tended to be quiet blokes called Algie with ancillary interests in nudist ceramics, who were perfectly happy as long as you pretended to accept a pamphlet in Flinders Lane.

No, the new hobby atheist is as brash, noisy and confident as a cheap electric kettle. They want everyone to know that they have not found God, and that no one else should. Their particular target seems to be Catholics. On the surface, this is odd, as there are plenty of other religious targets just waiting to be saved from a vengeful, non-existent deity. Smaller herds, such as the Christadelphians or the Salvation Army, might seem more manageable. But the Catholic Church has two incomparable advantages as an object of the wrath of proselytising atheists. First, it is the biggie. Taking out the Catholics is the equivalent of nuking the Pentagon. Guerilla bands of Baptists and Pentecostals can be liquidated at leisure.

Second, the Catholics have the undeniable advantage that they do still demonstrably believe in something. Attacking some of the more swinging Christian denominations might mean upsetting people who believe a good deal less than the average atheist.
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-cul...
Clay

United States

#419812 Feb 3, 2013
Seraphima wrote:
Happy Super Bowl and Puppy Bowl Day!! LOL....Hermi is slowly recovering.Still on oxygen but he is very motivated.He is gaining the weight back that he had lost last year.Hopefully soon,he will be able to do his Elvis impersonation or me..lol.God Bless each and everyone of you and try to remember this,life is to short.It is much healthier to Love than to Hate.....
That's awesome. Thanks for the update.
Dust Storm

Minneapolis, MN

#419813 Feb 3, 2013
Mexico is a nation with a very strong Catholic identity, yet for over 70 years during the 20th century the Catholic Church was actually outlawed: not allowed to own property, run schools, convents or monasteries, have more than a certain number of priests (and no foreign priests), nor defend itself publicly or in the courts. It was hardly allowed to exist. According to historian Jim Tuck,“This was not separation of church and state: it was complete subordination of church to state”.

Following 1940, enforcement of these restrictions gradually lessened, but it was not until 1992 that the Church was restored as a legal entity in Mexico. During the period of the strictest enforcement of these draconian laws beginning with the rule of President Calles in the late 1920s, Mexicans were often imprisoned for wearing religious items, saying “Adios” in public (which literally means “with God”), or even questioning the laws. Public worship was a crime punishable by hanging or firing squad.(In fact, this week – May 21 – was the feast day of 25 Mexican saints and martyrs who remained true to their faith during these turbulent years and were canonized by Pope John Paul II in 2000. Another 13 martyrs were canonized by Pope Benedict XVI in 2005, including young José Luis Sánchez del Río. Perhaps the most well-known modern Mexican martyr, however, is Blessed Fr. Miguel Pro, beatified by Pope John Paul II in 1988.)

http://catholicgene.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/...
Clay

United States

#419814 Feb 3, 2013
RCC Superiority So BUSTED wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the link your provided...
http://cara.georgetown.edu/CARAServices/reque...
17% of world population is Catholic.
24% of these are reported as practicing Catholics.
.17 x .24 = about 4.1% of humanity is a practicing Catholic.
Therefore, either this RCC "one-true" claim is 100% baloney, or ...
Jesus died a horrific death in order to "save" 4.1% of humanity.
Ummmm? Let history and reality guide us to the truth.
Another interesting statistic:
99% of the people on this forum think you're an idiot.

And Catholicism will never be wholly accepted just as the majority of the world denied the Son of God and killed Him 2,000 yrs ago. The " free mind, RCC Superiority So busted, light of catholicism Michaels" of the world denied the Christ back then, they deny him now.

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#419815 Feb 3, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Robert, did you know among pagan nations, nothing was more common than for persons to profess to have contact with spirits, and to be under the influence of their inspiration?
And yes it frightens most Christians.
marge

I haven't made a study of it. But I have some opinions. I think in pre-industrial societies people were more in-tune with the environment in which they lived. And this made them more sensitive to knowing good and evil going on about them, and in them. In today's society we have been desensitised and consciences cauterized to such a degree that demons can easily remain undisturbed from the light.

In the Bible note how people with demons and possessed came forward or were brought to Jesus.

In this age demons find refuge in the abundance of darkness, and operate in it.

But not to fear Jesus already has won the victory.
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419816 Feb 3, 2013
Catholics hate women? Really??

:)

http://www.catholicmemes.com/captions/queen-o...
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419817 Feb 3, 2013
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419818 Feb 3, 2013
Perfectly fulfilling the will of God since the Immaculate Conception:

http://www.catholicmemes.com/captions/catholi...

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#419819 Feb 3, 2013
Pad wrote:
<quoted text>"Sin is a reproach to any people."You have known since your own start on this planet that people do terrible things in all facets of life.Political or religious fervor all stems from the same trigger points in the brain.People are prone to fanaticism in all venues of life,why is being religious and a zealot any different than a rabid politician who is consumed by political ambition or the need to serve to prove loyalties?
All sin is rebellion against God,no matter who commits it,or partakes of it.It is our way of doing our own thing,standing erect as it were in our own pride,that is the roots of sin all sin, a pride to be independent of anything or person who would restrict our movements,who would inhibit our inner most desires.
Pad good friend

I Cor 14:12 Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church.

We must not be temperate in seeking truth. Rather be zealous.

There is a sort of fear of looking like a fanatic, by the world, and even within our own selves, when it comes to religion..., truth. But any slacking of zealousness means that the soul grows sluggish(slothful), to finally becoming lukewarm.

Fanaticism is being unreasonable with faith. Being zealous for the faith requires reason.
Clay

United States

#419820 Feb 3, 2013
ReginaM wrote:
http://www.catholicmemes.com/c aptions/super-bowl-sunday/
Great links Regina
truth

Perth, Australia

#419821 Feb 3, 2013
truth

Perth, Australia

#419822 Feb 3, 2013
http://www.acts17-11.com/light.html

Pape Benedict 16 declare 2005 years as year of ''light''
LTM

Sudbury, Canada

#419823 Feb 3, 2013
ReginaM wrote:
Perfectly fulfilling the will of God since the Immaculate Conception:
http://www.catholicmemes.com/captions/catholi...
If You Tell me again you don't worship Mary , It would be a fib.
LTM

Sudbury, Canada

#419824 Feb 3, 2013
Robert F wrote:
<quoted text>
LTM
I know your doubts. Don't be afraid. The relationship I have with God, by His Grace is working, His Good Work....I have perfect peace.
What is truth?"

Answer: Almost two thousand years ago, Truth was put on trial and judged by people who were devoted to lies. In fact, Truth faced six trials in less than one full day, three of which were religious, and three that were legal. In the end, few people involved in those events could answer the question,“What is truth?”

After being arrested, the Truth was first led to a man named Annas, a corrupt former high priest of the Jews. Annas broke numerous Jewish laws during the trial, including holding the trial in his house, trying to induce self-accusations against the defendant, and striking the defendant, who had been convicted of nothing at the time. After Annas, the Truth was led to the reigning high priest, Caiaphas, who happened to be Annas’s son-in-law. Before Caiaphas and the Jewish Sanhedrin, many false witnesses came forward to speak against the Truth, yet nothing could be proved and no evidence of wrongdoing could be found. Caiaphas broke no fewer than seven laws while trying to convict the Truth:(1) the trial was held in secret; (2) it was carried out at night; (3) it involved bribery; (4) the defendant had no one present to make a defense for Him; (5) the requirement of 2-3 witnesses could not be met; (6) they used self-incriminating testimony against the defendant; (7) they carried out the death penalty against the defendant the same day. All these actions were prohibited by Jewish law. Regardless, Caiaphas declared the Truth guilty because the Truth claimed to be God in the flesh, something Caiaphas called blasphemy.

When morning came, the third trial of the Truth took place, with the result that the Jewish Sanhedrin pronounced the Truth should die. However, the Jewish council had no legal right to carry out the death penalty, so they were forced to bring the Truth to the Roman governor at the time, a man named Pontius Pilate. Pilate was appointed by Tiberius as the fifth prefect of Judea and served in that capacity A.D. 26 to 36. The procurator had power of life and death and could reverse capital sentences passed by the Sanhedrin. As the Truth stood before Pilate, more lies were brought against Him. His enemies said,“We found this man misleading our nation and forbidding to pay taxes to Caesar, and saying that He Himself is Christ, a King”(Luke 23:2). This was a lie, as the Truth had told everyone to pay their taxes (Matthew 22:21) and never spoke of Himself as a challenge to Caesar.

After this, a very interesting conversation between the Truth and Pilate took place.“Therefore Pilate entered again into the Praetorium, and summoned Jesus and said to Him,‘Are You the King of the Jews?’ Jesus answered,‘Are you saying this on your own initiative, or did others tell you about Me?’ Pilate answered,‘I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests delivered You to me; what have You done?’ Jesus answered,‘My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm.’ Therefore Pilate said to Him,‘So You are a king?’ Jesus answered,‘You say correctly that I am a king. For this I have been born, and for this I have come into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth hears My voice.’ Pilate said to Him,‘What is truth?’”(John 18:33–38).

Pilate’s question,“What is truth?” has reverberated down through history. Was it a melancholy desire to know what no one else could tell him, a cynical insult, or perhaps an irritated, indifferent reply to Jesus’ words?

In a postmodern world that denies that truth can be known, the question is more important than ever to answer. What is truth?
cont
LTM

Sudbury, Canada

#419825 Feb 3, 2013
Rob:

Cont
A Proposed Definition of Truth

In defining truth, it is first helpful to note what truth is not:

• Truth is not simply whatever works. This is the philosophy of pragmatism – an ends-vs.-means-type approach. In reality, lies can appear to “work,” but they are still lies and not the truth.
• Truth is not simply what is coherent or understandable. A group of people can get together and form a conspiracy based on a set of falsehoods where they all agree to tell the same false story, but it does not make their presentation true.
• Truth is not what makes people feel good. Unfortunately, bad news can be true.
• Truth is not what the majority says is true. Fifty-one percent of a group can reach a wrong conclusion.
• Truth is not what is comprehensive. A lengthy, detailed presentation can still result in a false conclusion.
• Truth is not defined by what is intended. Good intentions can still be wrong.
• Truth is not how we know; truth is what we know.
• Truth is not simply what is believed. A lie believed is still a lie.
• Truth is not what is publicly proved. A truth can be privately known (for example, the location of buried treasure).

The Greek word for “truth” is aletheia, which literally means to “un-hide” or “hiding nothing.” It conveys the thought that truth is always there, always open and available for all to see, with nothing being hidden or obscured. The Hebrew word for “truth” is emeth, which means “firmness,”“constancy” and “duration.” Such a definition implies an everlasting substance and something that can be relied upon.

From a philosophical perspective, there are three simple ways to define truth:

1. Truth is that which corresponds to reality.
2. Truth is that which matches its object.
3. Truth is simply telling it like it is.

First, truth corresponds to reality or “what is.” It is real. Truth is also correspondent in nature. In other words, it matches its object and is known by its referent. For example, a teacher facing a class may say,“Now the only exit to this room is on the right.” For the class that may be facing the teacher, the exit door may be on their left, but it’s absolutely true that the door, for the professor, is on the right.

Truth also matches its object. It may be absolutely true that a certain person may need so many milligrams of a certain medication, but another person may need more or less of the same medication to produce the desired effect. This is not relative truth, but just an example of how truth must match its object. It would be wrong (and potentially dangerous) for a patient to request that their doctor give them an inappropriate amount of a particular medication, or to say that any medicine for their specific ailment will do.

In short, truth is simply telling it like it is; it is the way things really are, and any other viewpoint is wrong. A foundational principle of philosophy is being able to discern between truth and error, or as Thomas Aquinas observed, "It is the task of the philosopher to make distinctions."

cont
MICHAEL

Hamilton, Canada

#419826 Feb 3, 2013
Dust Storm wrote:
Bolivar Baptist Church (Denton County, TX): Retains as its pastor a man whose "best" defense against a clergy molestation allegation was to say, "I didn't have sex with her when she was 16 or younger." The woman says he abused her starting when she was 14. But even if people believe the pastor as to the girl's age, is that the sort of man who should stand in a Baptist pulpit in a position of spiritual trust? The woman also has a paternity judgment against the pastor for the child she gave birth to at age 18. She had to get a paternity judgment in order to even get the pastor to financially support the kid that he fathered.
Branchville Baptist Church (Summerville, South Carolina): Hired a pastor who had a prior conviction for criminal sexual conduct with a minor.
Why don't you tell us about the catholic abuses in almost every diocese in america? Thousands of catholic priests who stood up in the pulpit at every mass telling catholics to never commit the sins that they have committed themselves.

Arch Diocese of Las Angeles in 2007 paid out $660 MILLION in lawsuits,$660 MILLION!! and today over 190 priests from the one diocese have their stories told right on the arch-diocese website.

Cardinal Gomez spanked Cardinal Mahony and relieved him of any catholic administrative duties just last week.

There is much infighting within the ranks of the catholic clergy.

Catholics need to pay attention.

UNBELIEVABLE!
LTM

Sudbury, Canada

#419827 Feb 3, 2013
Rob
Cont

God and Truth

During the six trials of Jesus, the contrast between the truth (righteousness) and lies (unrighteousness) was unmistakable. There stood Jesus, the Truth, being judged by those whose every action was bathed in lies. The Jewish leaders broke nearly every law designed to protect a defendant from wrongful conviction. They fervently worked to find any testimony that would incriminate Jesus, and in their frustration, they turned to false evidence brought forward by liars. But even that could not help them reach their goal. So they broke another law and forced Jesus to implicate Himself.

Once in front of Pilate, the Jewish leaders lied again. They convicted Jesus of blasphemy, but since they knew that wouldn’t be enough to coax Pilate to kill Jesus, they claimed Jesus was challenging Caesar and was breaking Roman law by encouraging the crowds to not pay taxes. Pilate quickly detected their superficial deception, and he never even addressed the charge.

Jesus the Righteous was being judged by the unrighteous. The sad fact is that the latter always persecutes the former. It’s why Cain killed Abel. The link between truth and righteousness and between falsehood and unrighteousness is demonstrated by a number of examples in the New Testament:

• For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false, in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness”(2 Thessalonians 2:9–12, emphasis added).

•“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness”(Romans 1:18, emphasis added).

•“who will render to each person according to his deeds; to those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, eternal life; but to those who are selfishly ambitious and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, wrath and indignation”(Romans 2:6–8, emphasis added).•“[love] does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth”(1 Corinthians 13:5–6, emphasis added).

What is truth?- Conclusion

The question Pontius Pilate asked centuries ago needs to be rephrased in order to be completely accurate. The Roman governor’s remark “What is truth?” overlooks the fact that many things can have the truth, but only one thing can actually be the Truth. Truth must originate from somewhere.

The stark reality is that Pilate was looking directly at the Origin of all Truth on that early morning over two thousand years ago. Not long before being arrested and brought to the governor, Jesus had made the simple statement “I am the truth”(John 14:6), which was a rather incredible statement. How could a mere man be the truth? He couldn’t be, unless He was more than a man, which is actually what He claimed to be. The fact is, Jesus’ claim was validated when He rose from the dead (Romans 1:4).

There’s a story about a man who lived in Paris who had a stranger from the country come see him. Wanting to show the stranger the magnificence of Paris, he took him to the Louvre to see the great art and then to a concert at a majestic symphony hall to hear a great symphony orchestra play. At the end of the day, the stranger from the country commented that he didn’t particularly like either the art or the music. To which his host replied,“They aren’t on trial, you are.” Pilate and the Jewish leaders thought they were judging Christ, when, in reality, they were the ones being judged. Moreover, the One they convicted will actually serve as their Judge one day, as He will for all who suppress the truth in unrighteousness.

cont
MICHAEL

Hamilton, Canada

#419828 Feb 3, 2013
RCC Superiority So BUSTED wrote:
<quoted text>
According to the link your provided...
http://cara.georgetown.edu/CARAServices/reque...
17% of world population is Catholic.
24% of these are reported as practicing Catholics.
.17 x .24 = about 4.1% of humanity is a practicing Catholic.
Therefore, either this RCC "one-true" claim is 100% baloney, or ...
Jesus died a horrific death in order to "save" 4.1% of humanity.
Ummmm? Let history and reality guide us to the truth.
The truth must be told.

The information I posted is right from roman catholic news sources.

How many of the 4.1% are really devout catholics? Maybe cut that in half.

BUSTED....again!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 1 hr Scales Off 9,671
News Pope Francis Affirms Evolution and Big Bang Theory 23 hr Chimney1 420
News What Divides Catholics and Protestants? (Apr '08) Thu satanlovesyou 84,393
News Ahead of pope's visit to US, some friction over... Wed Belle Sexton 3
News Ahead of pope's visit to US, some friction over... Aug 25 Abrahamanic Relig... 1
News Pope Benedict is living out old age calmly (Aug '08) Aug 24 The Oracle 73
News LGBT equality groups getting shut out of Pope F... Aug 23 Fundiementally ill 8
More from around the web