Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 603568 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#419218 Jan 31, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
Tony...we have a thing going here. Remember it's your turn. Please interpret for me if the Woman is Mary. thanks
Rev 12:6 and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, in which she is to be nourished for 1,260 days.
I've never claimed to be an authority on interpreting scripture, especially Revelation. That's a protestant thing. What I can tell you is that protestants, even the ones who claim to infallibly interpret scripture, don't agree that the woman in Revelation always references Israel. Again, you seem to be the exception. lol.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#419219 Jan 31, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
The woman from the crowd said something about His mother and Jesus replied without saying a word about His mother and actually uses the word RATHER.
It's not there Regina...stop fishing for it.
All christians are blessed and I never said she didn't do God's will.
Luke 11:28 - also, the Greek word for "rather" is "menounge." Menounge really means "Yes, but in addition," or "Further." Thus, Jesus is saying, yes my mother is blessed indeed, but further blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it. Jesus is encouraging others to follow Mary's example in order to build up His kingdom.
LTM

Sudbury, Canada

#419220 Jan 31, 2013
ReginaM wrote:
*[11:27Ė28] The beatitude in Lk 11:28 should not be interpreted as a rebuke of the mother of Jesus; see note on Lk 8:21. Rather, it emphasizes (like Lk 2:35) that attentiveness to Godís word is more important than biological relationship to Jesus.
http://www.usccb.org/bible/luke/11/
Amen! Now THAT is biblical exegesis! Not the silly nonsense that protestant put forth because they haven't got anything else.
The Beatitudes; Jesus' Sermon on the Mountian is in Matthew 5 Regina not Luke
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#419221 Jan 31, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never claimed to be an authority on interpreting scripture, especially Revelation. That's a protestant thing. What I can tell you is that protestants, even the ones who claim to infallibly interpret scripture, don't agree that the woman in Revelation always references Israel. Again, you seem to be the exception. lol.
I never said it did either.

I said the Woman in Revelation 12 is Israel.
truth

Perth, Australia

#419222 Jan 31, 2013
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419223 Jan 31, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
The woman from the crowd said something about His mother and Jesus replied without saying a word about His mother and actually uses the word RATHER.
It's not there Regina...stop fishing for it.
All christians are blessed and I never said she didn't do God's will.
The Greek word for "rather" is "menounge." Menounge really means "Yes, but in addition," or "Further." Thus, Jesus is saying, yes my mother is blessed indeed, but further blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it. Jesus is encouraging others to follow Mary's example in order to build up His kingdom.

Silly wabbit! Take your pole out of the water, you're catching nothing but weeds!

All Christians are not blessed unless they DO the will of God. Not doing very well for someone who claims to follow scripture alone, Charles. It might help if you actually knew what Scripture was saying.
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419224 Jan 31, 2013
LTM wrote:
<quoted text>
The Beatitudes; Jesus' Sermon on the Mountian is in Matthew 5 Regina not Luke
LOL, please stop, you're killing me. I've got a stitch in my side from laughing so hard!

If you insist on calling yourself a Christian, get an education in the faith....please!!
Chuck

Dublin, OH

#419225 Jan 31, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never claimed to be an authority on interpreting scripture, especially Revelation. That's a protestant thing. What I can tell you is that protestants, even the ones who claim to infallibly interpret scripture, don't agree that the woman in Revelation always references Israel. Again, you seem to be the exception. lol.
This was your verse to prove the assumption of Mary:

Revelation 12:1 And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.

and then 4 verses down you believe it's still Mary and your arguement now is you are no an authority on interpreting scripture.

**huh**
marge

Ames, IA

#419226 Jan 31, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
I get it Tony. If catholics don't believe the bible is the only/final authority, their popes can make up doctrines so catholics can be under their authority.
-assumption of Mary and my new favorite...all who follow her Son are her offspring.
hee hee
LTM

Sudbury, Canada

#419227 Jan 31, 2013
ReginaM wrote:
<quoted text>
The Greek word for "rather" is "menounge." Menounge really means "Yes, but in addition," or "Further." Thus, Jesus is saying, yes my mother is blessed indeed, but further blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it. Jesus is encouraging others to follow Mary's example in order to build up His kingdom.
Silly wabbit! Take your pole out of the water, you're catching nothing but weeds!
All Christians are not blessed unless they DO the will of God. Not doing very well for someone who claims to follow scripture alone, Charles. It might help if you actually knew what Scripture was saying.
This is too funny to comment on.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#419228 Jan 31, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it did either.
I said the Woman in Revelation 12 is Israel.
You said? Other sola scriptura protestants say you're wrong.
Clay

Chicago, IL

#419229 Jan 31, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
I get it Tony. If catholics don't believe the bible is the only/final authority, their popes can make up doctrines so catholics can be under their authority.
-assumption of Mary and my new favorite...all who follow her Son are her offspring.
Mary is our spiritual Mother. We approach her the way Jesus did. We try and imitate Christ by honoring His Mother. This isn't new.

"Woman, behold your son. Then He said to the disciple, son, behold your Mother. And from that hour he took Mary into his home"
John 19: 26-27

BTW, on a side note: if Mary had all these other children .. Why would Jesus entrust someone other than His siblings to take their Mom in?
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419230 Jan 31, 2013
LTM wrote:
<quoted text>
The Beatitudes; Jesus' Sermon on the Mountian is in Matthew 5 Regina not Luke
Alright, I've stopped laughing (for the time being).

Do you know what the word 'beatitude' means? Do you know that it is a proper noun, as in the Beatitudes from the Sermon on the Mount, but is also just a 'plain old noun' and is used in Christian theology as such, and has been for 2,000 years?

III. CHRISTIAN BEATITUDE

1720 The New Testament uses several expressions to characterize the beatitude to which God calls man:

- the coming of the Kingdom of God;16 - the vision of God: "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God"17

- entering into the joy of the Lord;18

- entering into God's rest:19

There we shall rest and see, we shall see and love, we shall love and praise. Behold what will be at the end without end. For what other end do we have, if not to reach the kingdom which has no end?20

1721 God put us in the world to know, to love, and to serve him, and so to come to paradise. Beatitude makes us "partakers of the divine nature" and of eternal life.21 With beatitude, man enters into the glory of Christ22 and into the joy of the Trinitarian life.

1722 Such beatitude surpasses the understanding and powers of man. It comes from an entirely free gift of God: whence it is called supernatural, as is the grace that disposes man to enter into the divine joy.

"Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God." It is true, because of the greatness and inexpressible glory of God, that "man shall not see me and live," for the Father cannot be grasped. But because of God's love and goodness toward us, and because he can do all things, he goes so far as to grant those who love him the privilege of seeing him.... For "what is impossible for men is possible for God."23

1723 The beatitude we are promised confronts us with decisive moral choices. It invites us to purify our hearts of bad instincts and to seek the love of God above all else. It teaches us that true happiness is not found in riches or well-being, in human fame or power, or in any human achievement - however beneficial it may be - such as science, technology, and art, or indeed in any creature, but in God alone, the source of every good and of all love:
http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive...

One example of the use of the word 'beatitude'.
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419231 Jan 31, 2013
LTM wrote:
<quoted text>
This is too funny to comment on.
To non-Christians, yes it is funny.

Give it up, LTM. You're biblically illiterate.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#419232 Jan 31, 2013
Chuck wrote:
<quoted text>
This was your verse to prove the assumption of Mary:
Revelation 12:1 And a great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.
and then 4 verses down you believe it's still Mary and your arguement now is you are no an authority on interpreting scripture.
**huh**
I'm giving you an interpretation of the Church.

"Revelation is apocalyptic literature unique to the 1st century. It contains varied symbolism and multiple meanings of the woman (Mary, the Church and Israel)." The Catholic Church does not base her teachings on Mary strictly from Revelation as it is a difficult book to interpret.

Here's why your so comical. You, a bible alone protestant, is deciding you can infallibly interpret something in direct contradiction to ther sola scriptura protestants. If you guys can't agree on who the woman is, why do you feel you can tell us who the woman is?
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419233 Jan 31, 2013
Clay wrote:
<quoted text>
Mary is our spiritual Mother. We approach her the way Jesus did. We try and imitate Christ by honoring His Mother. This isn't new.
"Woman, behold your son. Then He said to the disciple, son, behold your Mother. And from that hour he took Mary into his home"
John 19: 26-27
BTW, on a side note: if Mary had all these other children .. Why would Jesus entrust someone other than His siblings to take their Mom in?
It's like something out of the DuhVinci Code. Can you imagine other children walking around with the same DNA as Jesus? These folks actually have no problem with this. Absurd! No wonder protestantism is a heresy!
marge

Ames, IA

#419234 Jan 31, 2013
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
Most protestants adhere to sola scriptura. I guess you're an exception.
Why 'use' anything else? Because the gospel was preached orally for a decade or more before a single passage of the NT was written. The oral preaching of the Word of God by the same men who wrote the NT is no less valuable than the written Word of God. That's why.
Oh but it is less valuable as we see here;

3Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.

To be 'Certain' we go with what is Written.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#419235 Jan 31, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
hee hee
I would suggest laying off the weed for awhile since it's giving you the giggles.
Anthony MN

Minneapolis, MN

#419236 Jan 31, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh but it is less valuable as we see here;
3Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.
To be 'Certain' we go with what is Written.
So you wouldn't have been certain of the oral preaching of Sts. Peter and Paul or the other apostles unless they wrote it down.

Actually, I think think the only preaching you're certain of is your own. Quit drinking the bong water marge.
ReginaM

Middletown, NJ

#419237 Jan 31, 2013
marge wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh but it is less valuable as we see here;
3Therefore, since I myself have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.
To be 'Certain' we go with what is Written.
What is written came from what was orally taught.
The bible is the written portion of Tradition.
Sorry, Marge.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Archbishop assails Trump over birthright citize... 11 min Asian Guy 1
News Pope eases church rule on abortion forgiveness 6 hr Redeemed 30
News What Divides Catholics and Protestants? (Apr '08) 11 hr Jaimie 84,426
News Pope: Priests in Holy Year can absolve - sin of... 12 hr Catholic24 8
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) Aug 31 3Way4me 9,681
News Pope Francis Affirms Evolution and Big Bang Theory Aug 30 Paul Porter1 421
News Ahead of pope's visit to US, some friction over... Aug 26 Belle Sexton 3
More from around the web