Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

Full story: CBC News 550,554
The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ. Full Story
preston

Waverly, OH

#412433 Dec 30, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
Clay:
Wait second...are you saying you have shown the CC is not the true Church through Apostolic succession?
How on Earth did you do that?
I'm going to guess you did it by slander, propaganda and ignorance. The three virtues of Protestantism.
**********
Who was it said the other day that the CC respected all faiths? Was that you?
But slander, propaganda and ignorance...???
Shame...
KayMarie
WHY DONT YOU TWO STOP THIS FOOLISHNESS? IF YOU WANT TO POST, THEN GET YOUR OWN NICK.

and grow up!

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 55:11--"MATT 10:27"

#412434 Dec 30, 2012
preston wrote:
<quoted text>Jesus was speaking literal which is why I said that Clay is not his earthly brother(literal) so this verse is moot, and any minister should know that. look at the part of this verse, WE DONT HAVE TO ANSWER TO THE SANHEDRIN(COUNCIL).
{and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council:}
If you are so smart... suppose you take the Bible and either refute the claim of the Roman Catholics dynasty in Rome...Or prove that it is Biblical ...

You chimed in out debate so suppode you give the answer either for or against the dynasty.
preston

Waverly, OH

#412435 Dec 30, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are so smart... suppose you take the Bible and either refute the claim of the Roman Catholics dynasty in Rome...Or prove that it is Biblical ...
You chimed in out debate so suppode you give the answer either for or against the dynasty.
any FOOL can post Bible verses.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 55:11--"MATT 10:27"

#412436 Dec 30, 2012
preston wrote:
<quoted text>any FOOL can post Bible verses.
~~~
SO YOU DON'T HAVE ANY ANSWER EITHER..RIGHT?
IF YOU CAN'T PROVE ME WRONG WHY DON'T YOU MIND YOU OWN BUSINESS.
preston

Waverly, OH

#412437 Dec 30, 2012
GIF, for over four years you have been an embarressment to Christianity with your ignorance of what the Bible teaches, and because of that, the catholics on here have nothing but contempt for every person on here, who does try and reason with them about our differences in theology.

if you did attend a Bible college, you should ask for your money back, they taught you NOTHING.

if all you did was clean the blackboards and the seats, then we understand why you are ignorant of the Word.

you wouldnt be capable of a better understanding than what you now possess
preston

Waverly, OH

#412438 Dec 30, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
SO YOU DON'T HAVE ANY ANSWER EITHER..RIGHT?
IF YOU CAN'T PROVE ME WRONG WHY DON'T YOU MIND YOU OWN BUSINESS.
no one has to prove you wrong, your ignorance does that for you.

and since this is a privately owned business open to the public.

I can answer any post that I wish to reply to. and it is possible that your cyber bullying is the reason why you have been kicked off of this forum twice(acording to u)

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 55:11--"MATT 10:27"

#412439 Dec 30, 2012
preston wrote:
<quoted text>no one has to prove you wrong, your ignorance does that for you.
and since this is a privately owned business open to the public.
I can answer any post that I wish to reply to. and it is possible that your cyber bullying is the reason why you have been kicked off of this forum twice(acording to u)
~~~
WHY CANT YOU JUST STAY ON THE SUBJECT AT HAND..
EVIDENTLY THE SUBJECT IS BEYOND YOUR EXPERTISE.
preston

Waverly, OH

#412440 Dec 30, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
WHY CANT YOU JUST STAY ON THE SUBJECT AT HAND..
EVIDENTLY THE SUBJECT IS BEYOND YOUR EXPERTISE.
ask your wife, she just posted a couple of days ago about HOW SMART THAT SHE SAW THAT I WAS.LOL

and when I use a Bible verse, it is appropriate, not like what you have done for over 4 years.

again, when jesus said those words, they were literal, and no one has the Authority to change them to suit his purpose, like you try constantly

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 55:11--"MATT 10:27"

#412441 Dec 30, 2012
who="preston" WHY DONT YOU TWO STOP THIS FOOLISHNESS? IF YOU WANT TO POST, THEN GET YOUR OWN NICK.
and grow up!
**********

:):)

KM
preston

Waverly, OH

#412442 Dec 30, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="preston" WHY DONT YOU TWO STOP THIS FOOLISHNESS? IF YOU WANT TO POST, THEN GET YOUR OWN NICK.
and grow up!
**********
:):)
KM
well? why dont you?

when your husband says something and he is rebuked for it, then he leaves and you come on.

it only takes a couple of minutes for a person to get their own account.

so why dont you two grow up? just because you both have entered into your second childhood is no excuse.
Evan Politico

Hicksville, NY

#412443 Dec 30, 2012
Pope B enjoys the casional young alter boy Yo!
4GVN

Wentzville, MO

#412444 Dec 30, 2012
Scripture shows that Peter’s authority was shared by the other apostles (Ephesians 2:19-20), and the “loosing and binding” authority attributed to him was likewise shared by the local churches, not just their church leaders (see Matthew 18:15-19; 1 Corinthians 5:1-13; 2 Corinthians 13:10; Titus 2:15; 3:10-11).
4GVN

Wentzville, MO

#412445 Dec 30, 2012
Nowhere does Scripture state that, in order to keep the church from error, the authority of the apostles was passed on to those they ordained (the idea behind apostolic succession). Apostolic succession is “read into” those verses that the Roman Catholic Church uses to support this doctrine (2 Timothy 2:2; 4:2-5; Titus 1:5; 2:1; 2:15; 1 Timothy 5:19-22). Paul does NOT call on believers in various churches to receive Titus, Timothy, and other church leaders based on their authority as bishops or their having apostolic authority, but rather based upon their being fellow laborers with him (1 Corinthians 16:10; 16:16; 2 Corinthians 8:23).

What Scripture DOES teach is that false teachings would arise even from among church leaders, and that Christians were to compare the teachings of these later church leaders with Scripture, which alone is infallible (Matthew 5:18; Psalm 19:7-8; 119:160; Proverbs 30:5; John 17:17; 2 Peter 1:19-21). The Bible does not teach that the apostles were infallible, apart from what was written by them and incorporated into Scripture. Paul, in talking to the church leaders in the large city of Ephesus, makes note of coming false teachers. To fight against their error does NOT commend them to “the apostles and those who would carry on their authority”; rather, Paul commends them to “God and to the word of His grace”(Acts 20:28-32). It is Scripture that was to be the infallible measuring stick for teaching and practice (2 Timothy 3:16-17), not apostolic successors. It is by examining the Scriptures that teachings are shown to be true or false (Acts 17:10-12).
4GVN

Wentzville, MO

#412446 Dec 30, 2012
Was Peter the first pope? The answer, according to Scripture, is a clear and emphatic “no.” Peter nowhere claims supremacy over the other apostles. Nowhere in his writings (1 and 2 Peter) did the Apostle Peter claim any special role, authority, or power over the church. Nowhere in Scripture does Peter, or any other apostle, state that their apostolic authority would be passed on to successors. Yes, the Apostle Peter had a leadership role among the disciples. Yes, Peter played a crucial role in the early spread of the gospel (Acts chapters 1-10). Yes, Peter was the “rock” that Christ predicted he would be (Matthew 16:18). However, these truths about Peter in no way give support to the concept that Peter was the first pope, or that he was the “supreme leader” over the apostles, or that his authority would be passed on to the bishops of Rome. Peter himself points us all to the true Shepherd and Overseer of the church, the Lord Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2:25).
4GVN

Wentzville, MO

#412447 Dec 30, 2012
the New Testament makes it abundantly clear that Christ is both the foundation (Acts 4:11, 12; 1 Corinthians 3:11) and the head (Ephesians 5:23) of the church. It is a mistake to think that here He is giving either of those roles to Peter. There is a sense in which the apostles played a foundational role in the building of the church (Ephesians 2:20), but the role of primacy is reserved for Christ alone, not assigned to Peter. So, Jesus’ words here are best interpreted as a simple play on words in that a boulder-like truth came from the mouth of one who was called a small stone. And Christ Himself is called the “chief cornerstone”(1 Peter 2:6, 7). The chief cornerstone of any building was that upon which the building was anchored. If Christ declared Himself to be the cornerstone, how could Peter be the rock upon which the church was built? It is more likely that the believers, of which Peter is one, are the stones which make up the church, anchored upon the Cornerstone,“and he who believes on Him will by no means be put to shame”(1 Peter 2:6).
marge

Ames, IA

#412448 Dec 30, 2012
Think about what 'The Bible' says when we have a arguement between eachother, take it to the 'church', well you both have to agree on 'who' that is before it can happen.

They are not of us 4gvn to reason with don't ya think, different master.
marge

Ames, IA

#412449 Dec 30, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
<quoted text>
~~~
WHY CANT YOU JUST STAY ON THE SUBJECT AT HAND..
EVIDENTLY THE SUBJECT IS BEYOND YOUR EXPERTISE.
and even in this case who can reason... So lets stay with the subject at hand, the reason for every season! Jesus!

either one has been forgiven of their sins by God, or not.
Pad

Rockford, IL

#412450 Dec 30, 2012
ReginaM wrote:
If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex-monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517.
If you belong to the Church of England, your religion was founded by King Henry VIII in the year 1534 because the Pope would not grant him a divorce with the right to remarry.
If you are a Presbyterian, your religion was founded by John Knox in Scotland in the year 1560.
If you are a Protestant Episcopalian, your religion was an offshoot of the Church of England founded by Samuel Seabury in the American colonies in the 17th century.
If you are a Congregationalist, your religion was originated by Robert Brown in Holland in 1582.
If you are a Methodist, your religion was launched by John and Charles Wesley in England in 1744.
If you are a Unitarian, Theophilus Lindley founded your church in London in 1774.
If you are a Mormon (Latter Day Saints), Joseph Smith started your religion in Palmyra, N.Y., in 1829.
If you are a Baptist, you owe the tenets of your religion to John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1605.
If you are of the Dutch Reformed church, you recognize Michaelis Jones as founder, because he originated your religion in New York in 1628.
If you are a member of the Churches of Christ your church began near the beginning of the 19th century in New England. Abner Jones, Barton Stone and Alexander Campbell were some of the most well known originators of your religion.
If you worship with the Salvation Army, your sect began with William Booth in London in 1865.
If you are a Christian Scientist, you look to 1879 as the year in which your religion was born and to Mrs. Mary Baker Eddy as its founder.
If you belong to one of the religious organizations known as "Church of the Nazarene," "Pentecostal Gospel," "Holiness Church," "Pilgrim Holiness Church," "Jehovah's Witnesses," your religion is one of the hundreds of new sects founded by men within the past century.
If you are a Seventh Day Adventist, Mrs. Ellen Gould White inaugurated your group in 1860.
If you are a believer at the Vineyard Chrstian Fellowship, your denomination was started by Ken Guillickson and Keith Green in Santa Monica, California in 1974.
If you are a member of Calvary Chapel, Chuck Smith began your congregation in Costa Mesa, California in 1975.
If you are Catholic, you know that your church was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ the Son of God, and it is still the same Church.
http://www.fatherpeffley.org/docs/HowOld.pdf
Religions have a completely different belief system that does not originate from God to begin with,but man's search for God.Christianity is God's Hand reaching out to human kind,along with Judaism.The world sees Christianity as religion,and labels it as such,but God reaching down to Man is the faith In Christ and trusting in His Salvation,and Believing on His Name. Each prot denomination is not a seaparate religion,but all part of Chriatianity,along with Catholicism.I am a Christian because I follow Christ,you the same,your church affiliation and mine can easily stear us away from Christ,and we could very well become religious,rather than born of His Spirit. If you want religion that is your choice,I'll choose Christ as my Savior,thank you!
Pad

Rockford, IL

#412451 Dec 30, 2012
StarC wrote:
Q.
Did Our Lord write any part of the New Testament or command His Apostles to do so?
A.
Our Lord Himself never wrote a line, nor is there any record that He ordered his Apostles to write; He did command them to teach and to preach. Also He to Whom all power was given in Heaven and on earth (Matt. 28-18) promised to give them the Holy Spirit (John 14-26) and to be with them Himself till the end of the world (Mat. 28-20).
He did comand them to built His Church. Mt 16:18
However we must be thankful that the Bible was compiled and distributed even though with much resistance.The Bible is not a book of affiliation,but God's inspiredW o r d,and it is spiritually discerned.No group has claim to it,but we all can benefit with humility from its great history and its Divine Roots.When I read the Word,I do not consider the Book to be Protestant or Catholic or Orthodox,but a WORD from the Living God,Inspired into Jewish Men,including one Gentile(Luke).
There is nothing denominational or that of an organization religious system.We are all subject to its Content not vice versa!
Pad

Rockford, IL

#412452 Dec 30, 2012
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
The "Roman" Catholic Church was written to by St. Paul. Your KJV would call it "Romans".
Thanks.
Than why is the RCC so different from the Believers who were in Rome at the time of Paul?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) 49 min Scales Off 8,533
Filipino Catholics hails new saints (Apr '14) 6 hr ELIAS IBARRA 47
Pope condemns gay equality laws (Feb '10) 20 hr kent 70
German Bishop: Gays a Condemned to Hella (Jun '10) 21 hr tonyintoronto 65
Vatican exorcism conference warns the Devil is ... Mon Atheist Silurist 23
Pope to visit Blue Mosque, Hagia Sophia in Turkey Oct 21 Serkan Turkbayram 6
Pope Francis leaves the beatification ceremony ... Oct 20 Belle Sexton 11

Pope Benedict XVI People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE