Roman Catholic church only true churc...

Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican

There are 667847 comments on the CBC News story from Jul 10, 2007, titled Roman Catholic church only true church, says Vatican. In it, CBC News reports that:

The VaticanA issued a document Tuesday restatingA its belief that the Roman Catholic Church is the only true church of Jesus Christ.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBC News.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#407408 Dec 6, 2012
Dust Storm wrote:
Dust Storm,I find you one of the more intelligent and informed posters. Nevertheless I would like to respond to the article/link you provided.

First a correct definition of pedophilia is a psychological definition with certain characteristics. ne characteristic is the attraction/compulsion to children.

A person who sexually acts against an adolescent post pubescent is not a pedophiac by definition. He is however a sexual abuser and a sexual offender if there is a relationship of trust/ authority. Therefore a prioest or preacher that sexually acts out against an adolescent post pubescent would be a sex offender.

Secondly,false memory is an accurate but dangerous and misued phenomenon that has caused great harm to victims. Those suffering from false memory would be minute. This should not have been a point of argument for the authoprs of the article.

Thirdly I dispute the conclusions drawn by the authors re
there is evidence that priests have a higher rate of false and unfounded allegations than adults in the general population. Less than half of the allegations were found to be substantiated and even with those that were criminally prosecuted a large number—nearly a third—were found not guilty.

The reason I would dispute this is that there are a number of factors that could affect the retraction, unsubstantiation of charges against priests. I would rely more heavily on not guilty verdicts.

I am vehemently against agenda-driven attacks against the Church re sexual abuse, against the characterization of priests, and exagerration of the extent of the problem. I will defend against such rubbish.

At the same time,my vehement defense and advocacy of victims prompted me to respond to the article.

Thanks

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#407409 Dec 6, 2012
truth wrote:
Jesus Christ make clear why others is better..and set free..because He know what many not visible Masters can do!!!
Why is that secret..someone who watching real Creator creation know everything about your body as well mind as well soul inaf accuse as well ruin.
We as believers are so simple!
But God is not simple he watching with ''eye'' who is wicket and not who is good as well who is very bad.
If you call upon his name above all name
maybe your door can be open 0003 per second.
Why is like that?
Where two heart is united?
One is yours other is who?
you have 0003 per second speed..
Why is like that Confe?
Never
truth

Maylands, Australia

#407410 Dec 6, 2012
tray drove per art per pro-cent..
if you drove that procent in art as two heart unite
then you will have
zillion/zillion on map place

hm
Are you for sure your e is not wisible in deference way..
Only who have love within can recognize that!
Did you stolen something from that heart?
How you will call that adulatory?

no..that impact over me i don't recognize..more samantija more know..
''more subconsciousness left within''

''duso duse moje''=Holy Spirit
''srce srca moga''
Is that when you pray adulatory?

no
If you sin against Holy Spirit is not good!

''Love your God with your heart as well mind''

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#407411 Dec 6, 2012
Makesure100 wrote:
<quoted text>
Never
Where are my freakshows??? I need to discuss......
truth

Maylands, Australia

#407412 Dec 6, 2012
Speed of light is 300 000!!!

Speed of love is ultimatum=instant!

eye up to eye.. eye up to eye.. eye up to eye..
no petrol
no gas
no electricity
no any ticket for payment
no gold
no silver
no any money

Why is like that confe so cheep and free flight?
Who can do that?
truth

Maylands, Australia

#407413 Dec 6, 2012
I am sure many Master know which flight is free.

Did they asked someone?
no
I don't think so!
4GVN

Saint Louis, MO

#407414 Dec 6, 2012
Robert F wrote:
<quoted text>
4GVN good friend
I will be brief:
You ask:
'How many of your sins did Jesus die for?"
Answer: All of them.
"How many did He take upon Himself and carry to the cross?"
Answer: None of them. Isaiah 53:5 "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was on him; and with his stripes we are healed.") It is his sacrifice to death that is the payment for my wages of sin, which is death. So that in his resurrection, I might live.
"Was Jesus' payment enough?"
Answer: Enough for what? My salvation? Yes.
"Is there more to be paid?"
Answer: For what? Salvation? No.
"Can we in any way add to the sacrificial payment that Jesus made?"
Answer: I cannot add to God. It doesn't make sense. I can only return His Love.
"And what did Jesus mean when He stated that "IT IS FINISHED?"
In short he made peace between God and humanity.
After looking at your questions, it seems you are trying to get straight what God as Judge requires. It means you are seeking from me repentence, as John the Baptist, cried in the wilderness. This is a good thing. I applaud your questions.
(Yes God is The Judge, but His Love is even greater. For God is Love.)
And there is little about a personal relationship with Jesus. His amazing sacrifice, has a startling, and bright hope for each and every person. It is blinding to the natural man's mind. So we think in terms of what we consider justice.
In light of your affirmation that Jesus paid for all of your sins at Calvery, and with the hope that you understand that that payment is accredited to ones account the moment they accept by faith the Saviour, how can you possibly believe in purgatory? And why would you want to? There is no such place,nor is it needed. Jesus paid it all in full.
truth

Maylands, Australia

#407415 Dec 6, 2012
Your diploma is so horrible..why corupt diploma pardon diploma with interest which usual say we can if we want when we see what is good for us.
Its that reality what others need except?
nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooo

Many many many who is smart and know recognize as well how used..as well who used and how.

Whats mean thousand thousand thousand..lottery numbers???

or myriad numbers..
4GVN

Saint Louis, MO

#407416 Dec 6, 2012
Anthony MN wrote:
cont. to Kay
1 Tim. 4:3 - in this verse, Paul refers to deceitful doctrines that forbid marriage. Many non-Catholics also use this verse to impugn the Church's practice of celibacy. This is entirely misguided because the Catholic Church (unlike many Protestant churches) exalts marriage to a sacrament. In fact, marriage is elevated to a sacrament, but consecrated virginity is not. The Church declares marriage sacred, covenantal and lifegiving. Paul is referring to doctrines that forbid marriage and other goods when done outside the teaching of Christ and for a lessor good. Celibacy is an act of giving up one good (marriage and children) for a greater good (complete spiritual union with God).
1 Tim. 5:9-12 - Paul recommends that older widows take a pledge of celibacy. This was the beginning of women religious orders.
2 Tim. 2:3-4 - Paul instructs his bishop Timothy that no soldier on service gets entangled in civilian pursuits, since his aim his to satisfy the One who enlisted him. Paul is using an analogy to describe the role of the celibate priesthood in the Church.
Rev. 14:4 - unlike our sinful world of the flesh, in heaven, those consecrated to virginity are honored.
Isaiah 56:3-7 - the eunuchs who keep God's covenant will have a special place in the kingdom of heaven.
Jer. 16:1-4 - Jeremiah is told by God not to take a wife or have children.
http://www.scripturecatholic.com/the_priestho...
So did the RCC teach error for the first 1000 yrs? Which is biblical? It can not be both ways? Did the RCC screw up then or now?

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#407417 Dec 6, 2012
who="ReginaM"
Different in that you started out claiming that priestly celibacy is responsible for pedophilia. Anthony correctly pointed out that the majority of abuse cases involved homosexuals and post-pubescent males. We both reminded you that Christ said that those who can bear celibacy should and the called deliberately embrace celibacy for the Kingdom of God. So....you changed your tune and are now claiming that those called to the priesthood and religious life are ignorant and don't have any idea as to what they're sacrificing. I can assure you that these men and women don't live in a vacuum prior to entering the seminary, convent, or monastery. They're fully aware of what they're doing and freely choose to devote their lives to serving God. Sex is not the be all and end all, marriage is not the only vocation in life.

**********

I did not change anything. What are homosexuals and post-pubescent males doing in the priestly ranks? Marriage is not only God's 'invention'; it is the means for building God's church.

You can't tell me that a teenage boy OR girl (not sexually 'savvy') knows what they are giving up. They go into ministry because they desire that high calling. They cannot understand what they are giving up, because they've never 'had' what they are supposedly giving.

KayMarie
truth

Maylands, Australia

#407418 Dec 6, 2012
Why myriads is infinite numbers?

For us small and not worthy people in eyes of big diploma are small number!

small number=myriads
thousand thousand thousand thousand thousand thousand

Why is like that Confe?

I hope Jesus Christ read this too.
truth

Maylands, Australia

#407419 Dec 6, 2012
Why you scare that somebody from purgatory or hell going to be save?

Our lovely God have everything possible!
4GVN

Saint Louis, MO

#407420 Dec 6, 2012
Anthony MN wrote:
<quoted text>
It certainly is a choice. A man or woman, individually, makes a conscious choice to forego marriage and devote their lives entirely to God. In the case of protestant converts, the Church recognizes that we cannot break the marriage bond that already exists. If they take their vows while BEFORE marriage, they cannot later get married.
If they are accepable for the priesthood as married (converts) why would they not be equally acceptable as married(non-converts)?
ReginaM

Point Pleasant Beach, NJ

#407421 Dec 6, 2012
Dust Storm wrote:
I'd not read this article before, thanks. Not all sexual abuse is pedophilia, yet you wouldn't know it from the protestants, atheists, and whatevers on this board. They come here foaming at the mouth in absolute delight to announce that all priests are pedophiles and rape "infants". And, of course, celibacy is the reason! From the sound of it, most of them are getting vicarious thrills and spend an inordinate amount of time fantasizing about it. No one is excusing sexual abuse of any kind, but to sensationalize it as they do makes one wonder. I agree that there's a higher incidence of false allegations involving priests since, as the authors pointed out, bigotry against the Church and the likelihood of $$$ are prime motivators for these alleged victims. It's a dishonor and disgrace to those who really were abused.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#407422 Dec 6, 2012
who="Hermeneutics Smutics" Kay Marie,
I used to think the same way as you described, but in time, working with abusers I learned that whether they get satisfied at home with their wives or not has nothing to do with their sexual abuse of others.Thuis is a preference and a problem. This is a compulsion that will drive them no matter what the wife presents. do agree that some husbands cheat because of the coldness and lack of affection from their wives.I know this is no excuse and the husbands are part of the problem.Love your posts and love you and your husband.

**********

I agree with you...just didn't think of that 'side' of the problem. In other words, some offenders are lacking affection at home, BUT there are others who are mean for various reasons. I talked with one such man who had molested someone I knew. He said that his father molested him when he (the father) returned from the Korean war.

I believe that in such a case (maybe in all of them) an evil spirit is involved. Joyce Meyer says that "hurting people HURT people".

Thank you for your kindness. We are both very happy that you are back. We pray that your health continues to improve.

Blessings,
KayMarie

“The Black Mermaid”

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#407423 Dec 6, 2012
ReginaM wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd not read this article before, thanks. Not all sexual abuse is pedophilia, yet you wouldn't know it from the protestants, atheists, and whatevers on this board. They come here foaming at the mouth in absolute delight to announce that all priests are pedophiles and rape "infants". And, of course, celibacy is the reason! From the sound of it, most of them are getting vicarious thrills and spend an inordinate amount of time fantasizing about it. No one is excusing sexual abuse of any kind, but to sensationalize it as they do makes one wonder. I agree that there's a higher incidence of false allegations involving priests since, as the authors pointed out, bigotry against the Church and the likelihood of $$$ are prime motivators for these alleged victims. It's a dishonor and disgrace to those who really were abused.
Regina, I know there have been guilty Catholic clergy, and from other denominations also. I'm sure though that some "victims" are indeed looking to cause trouble and make some cash. What really has shocked me is that in my "teensy" village, there were a number of homosexual and pedophile priests (I realize they are not one and the same). I'm in no way a homophobe, but we had several priests preaching against it while doing it. I guess some people can rationalize anything.

If I don't get to talk to you again, I wish you a happy and healthy holiday season.
4GVN

Saint Louis, MO

#407424 Dec 6, 2012
confrinting with the word wrote:
who="4GVN" KayMarie, please take the time to sincerely and PRAYERFULLY consider your response. DID Jesus pay for ALL of your (future) sins on the cross? Was it a (FULL) payment? Therefore are they not all(covered)?
I do understand the donfusion, but consider for a moment what your reply would entail. If (any) unconfessed sin was not (covered) we would be in danger of hell at any moment in our lives. In fact we could never be confident of our salvation because it would all hinge on the last moments before death. And what of the sins we commit(falling short of the Glory of God) that we are not even aware of. The scripture tells us that "to him that knows to to good and does it not, to him it is sin." How many times do we as christians fail to to that 'good' thing that we have thought(I should do this, or I should do that), but we just never get around to it. Scripture telles us that that is sin. If that is true and as you say since we did not repent of it we are lost, because that sin was not covered. If that were true we would have NO POSSIBILITY of ever reaching heaven. JESUS PAID IT ALL. They are ALL covered! And we were given the GIFT of eternal life the moment we trusted in that finished work(completed and paid in full) by Jesus. I believe taht what you are misunderstanding is chastisement."whom the Lord loves(His children) He chastises" to bring us back to where He wants us to be. God does not chastise anothers children. Only His own.
*********
I understand your point. But surely you also understand that one knows whether they are in rebellion against God.
If the heart is where it should be with God, there need be no fear that He will destroy us for some unknown/unintended offense. The just shall LIVE by his faith; if your faith is founded in HIM, you do not need to be afraid.
Yes, He does chasten/correct those He loves. If that happens and the heart is right, the individual will be led to repentance by His correction.
The rebel will turn against God, the church, and other people.
KayMarie
But you are changing the subject. YOU SAID that any unrepentant sin of a believer was "not covered by the blod of Jesus". Which would be enough to condemn one to hell. The fact is, the MOMENT we recieve Christ, we are given a 'FREE GIFT'. All of our sins are at that moment placed under the blood of Jesus. If they are not, we are not saved; we have no assurence of heaven, we are not sealed by the Holy Spirit unto the day of redemption, We do not have ETERNAL LIFE. We are only 'pardoned' untill the next time we 'fall short of the Glory of God. THEN we would have to be saved all over again.....and on and on we would go.

“" THE WORD WAS MADE FLESH!"”

Since: Jun 10

"ISA 53:1.--6 "MATT 10:27"

#407425 Dec 6, 2012
Anthony said:
Jer. 16:1-4 - Jeremiah is told by God not to take a wife or have children.

**********

Read it all. He didn't tell him not to have a family so that he could minister. He told him not to BECAUSE they would all die horrible deaths in 'this place'.

KM

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#407426 Dec 6, 2012
Sherlayne wrote:
<quoted text>
Regina, I know there have been guilty Catholic clergy, and from other denominations also. I'm sure though that some "victims" are indeed looking to cause trouble and make some cash. What really has shocked me is that in my "teensy" village, there were a number of homosexual and pedophile priests (I realize they are not one and the same). I'm in no way a homophobe, but we had several priests preaching against it while doing it. I guess some people can rationalize anything.
If I don't get to talk to you again, I wish you a happy and healthy holiday season.
Are you sensible? The CC has a history of abuse from 31ce. The 12 Inquisitions for example. Constantine was the first Pope, a Pagan from Rome. All of the teachings of the CC are from Babylon, 2000 years before Christ. Leave the CC church, find the right way to serve God. If you search, He will find you. I do promise.
Dust Storm

Minneapolis, MN

#407427 Dec 6, 2012
Hermeneutics Smutics wrote:
<quoted text>Dust Storm,I find you one of the more intelligent and informed posters. Nevertheless I would like to respond to the article/link you provided.
First a correct definition of pedophilia is a psychological definition with certain characteristics. ne characteristic is the attraction/compulsion to children.
A person who sexually acts against an adolescent post pubescent is not a pedophiac by definition. He is however a sexual abuser and a sexual offender if there is a relationship of trust/ authority. Therefore a prioest or preacher that sexually acts out against an adolescent post pubescent would be a sex offender.
Secondly,false memory is an accurate but dangerous and misued phenomenon that has caused great harm to victims. Those suffering from false memory would be minute. This should not have been a point of argument for the authoprs of the article.
Thirdly I dispute the conclusions drawn by the authors re
there is evidence that priests have a higher rate of false and unfounded allegations than adults in the general population. Less than half of the allegations were found to be substantiated and even with those that were criminally prosecuted a large number—nearly a third—were found not guilty.
The reason I would dispute this is that there are a number of factors that could affect the retraction, unsubstantiation of charges against priests. I would rely more heavily on not guilty verdicts.
I am vehemently against agenda-driven attacks against the Church re sexual abuse, against the characterization of priests, and exagerration of the extent of the problem. I will defend against such rubbish.
At the same time,my vehement defense and advocacy of victims prompted me to respond to the article.
Thanks
The article does not contend the definition of pedophilia you have given.

Second, The conclusion is based on the John Jay Independent study and they say, "Another key difference found in the study is that a little less that half of the priests (1881) were found to be subject to unsubstantiated allegations.

An unsubstantiated allegation was defined as “an allegation that was proven to be untruthful and fabricated” as a result of a criminal investigation. This rate of false accusations is much higher than found in the general population.

So I suppose you could challenge the methodology of how they arrived at the rate, nevertheless it was the finding and that information is not provided. One can also easily argue that just as many factors are involved regardless of the institution and some of those possible motives are given. Regardless it is not anywhere near the focus of the study nor does it seek to discredit legitimate claims, but rather look at the whole for the fullest extent of the picture. The numbers are the numbers.

Third, I think the article was more than fair in pointing out that no definite statisitics can be applied in terms of false memory.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Pope Benedict XVI Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News DeGeneres says her show is no place for anti-ga... 10 hr Sceptical-Mal 284
News Dr Zakir Naik invites Pope Benedict XVI for ope... (Oct '06) Jan 14 Serah 14,364
News 7 reasons why Friday the 13th is considered an ... Jan 14 True Christian wi... 3
News Women should breastfeed in church, Pope Francis... Jan 11 Jeremy 3
News Pope Francis Affirms Evolution and Big Bang Theory (Jul '15) Dec 30 Dogen 508
News United House of Prayer for All People: Bishop's... (Apr '08) Dec 20 Married in 10,385
News Preview: The Pope's Choir Dec '16 KenJr26 1
More from around the web