Why? You are never satisfied with your demands and when completely cornered - politics degree springs to mind - you simply up sticks and move on to something else.<quoted text>
Not remotely. You have simply linked me to other sites that copy-paste Wikipedia's own work.<quoted text>
Putting aside I have already
a) Proved that the Wiki entry is a compilation of posts
Was an internet link, most likely Wikipedia.<quoted text> including my source
When copy-pasted into Google Wikipedia was the only source that came up.<quoted text>
b) did you already forget to told us there were no other sources that I could have possible gotten my quote from?
Even so, you are -still- to declare which link you got it from, so until you do, there is nothing for me to acknowledge. You are still running away from saying where you got it from - and it was certainly not the source Wiki cited.
Because you serve as an excellent time-killing whackamole.<quoted text>
Why are you still posting?
How about answering the question which was where you got the quote from?<quoted text>
QUOTE: Wikipedia is the -only- source where the quote shows up ad verbatim
PS: I GAVE YOU THE LINKSA, Welsher!
Here's a thought, dumbpqhuq: I didn't go looking for the quote, I already had the quote.
I didn't know or care that it was ALSO in Wikipedia, ya dumbphuq.
Why are you still posting, Welsher?
Was it from Wiki?
Your non-EB Facebook page?
An internet debate forum?
How could I be lying when I was unaware of those links, all of which copied from Wikipedia anyway?<quoted text>
You mean by taking EXACTLY what YOU said and proving you to be a liar?
And semantics it is. Notice how you are -still- to tell me where you got the quote from which was what I was asking in the first place.<quoted text>
You notice that?
Even when you prove the NotBot to be wrong - or to be a liar... again... here's their excuse: you are using 'semantics'...
Pounces on words, avoids the argument.