What the 2012 election taught us

What the 2012 election taught us

There are 10317 comments on the The Washington Post story from Nov 6, 2012, titled What the 2012 election taught us. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

We've been scouring the data for clues as to what we should learn from what happened tonight as President Obama relatively easily claimed a second term.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#8558 Feb 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
They won't like it for themselves. But, it would be great if everyone buth them were subjected to it.
I agree it would be a real life changing experience and education for them to learn True Liberalism and they would be expected to rely on themselves and themselves only instead on others which they would not want nothing to with True Liberalism and wouldnt be calling themselves liberals anymore which is why I consider modern Liberals bigots which are not Liberal at all for what it really meant to be a Liberal.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8559 Feb 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Perhaps you can help me by correcting anything you see as inaccurate in the below post:

You are very ignorant. I am always willing to help anyone who wants to help themselves. To correct the lies you've been programmed with, I am giving to you the facts.

Here the facts are again. Please feel free to discuss any of them. You may also want to learn why you chose to belong to the political party that founded itself on a system of lies and treason.
... I'm hoping that bothers you somewhat, becoming aware of what you ignorantly joined.

Hitler:
Political genius.
Social radical.
Consumed with racial hatred.
Sought revenge for a lost war.

Democrats:
Political genius.
Social radical.
Consumed with racial hatred.
Seek revenge for losing the Cold War.

And, you just gave me another comparison to use your own standard of acceptance:

Hitler was, as you state it, a credible candidate and political game changer.

Stop with the diatribe and tell us where these comparisons are inaccurate.
... got a problem with that, don't you? That's because it is an accurate comparison.

How about we educate you with the history of the Democratic Party, your idols, in the recent era.
Let's begin with the post World War II reconstruction of our government and the creation of the UN:

Soon after the establishment of what was called the "Iron Curtain" early in the Cold War, the recent history of the Democratic Party began with the most prominent Democrat aside from the sitting president, Alger Hiss, the administrative architect of both the reorganization of the State Department and the UN, being convicted while spying for the Soviet Union.
It took about 20 years for the Democrats to recover from that disaster, which brings us to 1968 when the Democrats openly joined the communists and assisted them in their war against the United States. That was the year the last substitute candidate, Lyndon Johnson, quit, and subsequently shortly afterward the term "Nixon's war" became the most common term used by the Democrats to describe Vietnam.
Now, which way should we go from here?
Should we go back and look at the factual history of how the Vietnam War began and progressed? Or, should we just move forward in history and learn what the Democrats did to sabotage the United States?

Your choice....
This glimpse into the inner workings of your diseased mind has proven interesting but truly disturbing...

My God end your suffering soon.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8560 Feb 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>You can't escape this fact:

We know you'll be coming to see us. You know you'll be coming to see us.
See you then.
When?

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8561 Feb 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Indoctrination isn't education. You are about as educated as Obama.

How about you demonstrate your education for us. Take my post describing the recent history of the Democratic Party and correct the mistakes.

... well?
I will not humor your sickening bullshit for there will be no resolution for you, sheep.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8562 Feb 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Let's see....

birth certificate: Nobody has seen it yet. The (first) pdf file put up on the White House internet site was the original pdg file the White House created with all the layers where they put the fraudulent information. They were so stupid, the put the file they created up instead of making a copy of the file, then scanning it, and putting up the scan of the copy, which would be like an authentic document.
If for no other reason, they should be thrown out of the White House for being that goddam stupid. But, that is consistent with the stupidity of writing programs to steal 100 percent of the vote, instead of a program to steal one in three or one in four votes.

Muslim ties: Tell us about the Wahabist terrorists from the Muslim Brotherhood routinely visiting the White House.

Terrorist friends: Tell us about Obama ordering all combat against the Taliban to cease and ordering US forces to retreat to the population centers in Afghanistan, then actually stating the Taliban will be part of the future government of Afghanistan, then giving the Taliban safe passage throughout Afghanistan.

You forgot to mention that I call Obama a Marxist communist, dupe.
Barack Hussien Obama 44th president elected...Twice.

Which makes your conspiracy theories the rantings of a mad man, nothing more.

Obvious to most.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#8563 Feb 18, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Barack Hussien Obama 44th president elected...Twice.
Which makes your conspiracy theories the rantings of a mad man, nothing more.
Obvious to most.
Well, you know what liberals say. America, home of the freebe, and land of the slave.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8564 Feb 18, 2013
Truman wrote:
<quoted text>Conspiracy theories and slander are all they have left.
All you have to do is read two threads in this forum to know the notion of the GOP and its halt and lame base(apparently driven to genuine Mental Illness due to a man of mixed heritage becoming President)'Re_Branding' itself is nonsense.
On some level they know they will never win another National Election in our lifetime.
And that this Nation is moving forward and leaving them and their Ayn Randian notion of 'Thier America' on the crapheap of History where it belongs.
Reduced to incoherant resentment and paranoia, incontinance and impotance they have nothing left but to snivel to each other and us about thier 'White Mans Burdern' beset by Parasites.
And mutter about the dark machinations of Benghazi and Guvment 'Czars' and Birth Conspiracies set in motion 50 years ago and the Grandious Conciet that they and they alone are qualified to interpret Constitutional Intent by its 18th Century authors.
They are Liars and Fools and frankly there must be something wrong with any one who would find the thin bitter gruel of their 'idealogy' so platable.
Agreed and Agreed.

I find it hilarious that this president has that kind of power over the weak minded sheep...

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#8565 Feb 18, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>You can run, but you can't hide.
This color doesn't run.
Responsibility

Redwood City, CA

#8566 Feb 18, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think the Democrats were that afraid of losing the election?
Of course - our whole country should have been afraid of the democrats losing the election.

But it all turned out for the best, n'est-ce pas?
Responsibility

Redwood City, CA

#8567 Feb 18, 2013
au contraire wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget to add, jumbles, the Land of the Guns.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#8569 Feb 18, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
This color doesn't run.
Ok, ok, ok, waddle. You are such a stickler for precision.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#8570 Feb 18, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget to add, jumbles, the Land of the Guns.
Which is why we are still the land of the free.

au contraire

“Forever Is Promised To No One”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#8571 Feb 18, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course - our whole country should have been afraid of the democrats losing the election.
But it all turned out for the best, n'est-ce pas?
Obama so loved the poor......he created 12 million more.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#8572 Feb 18, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Barack Hussien Obama 44th president elected...Twice.
Which makes your conspiracy theories the rantings of a mad man, nothing more.
Obvious to most.
Barack Hussein Obama will also be askerisk in history, as Richard Milhouse Nixon is. The powers that be, don't want the massive Black riots.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#8573 Feb 18, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
This glimpse into the inner workings of your diseased mind has proven interesting but truly disturbing...
My God end your suffering soon.
Sooner or later you'll have to face these facts.
You're running away from these facts like a dog escaping from Michael Vick's house.
Stop running away from the real world.
Here's the real world again for you:

Perhaps you can help me by correcting anything you see as inaccurate in the below post:

You are very ignorant. I am always willing to help anyone who wants to help themselves. To correct the lies you've been programmed with, I am giving to you the facts.

Here the facts are again. Please feel free to discuss any of them. You may also want to learn why you chose to belong to the political party that founded itself on a system of lies and treason.
... I'm hoping that bothers you somewhat, becoming aware of what you ignorantly joined.

Hitler:
Political genius.
Social radical.
Consumed with racial hatred.
Sought revenge for a lost war.

Democrats:
Political genius.
Social radical.
Consumed with racial hatred.
Seek revenge for losing the Cold War.

And, you just gave me another comparison to use your own standard of acceptance:

Hitler was, as you state it, a credible candidate and political game changer.

Stop with the diatribe and tell us where these comparisons are inaccurate.
... got a problem with that, don't you? That's because it is an accurate comparison.

How about we educate you with the history of the Democratic Party, your idols, in the recent era.
Let's begin with the post World War II reconstruction of our government and the creation of the UN:

Soon after the establishment of what was called the "Iron Curtain" early in the Cold War, the recent history of the Democratic Party began with the most prominent Democrat aside from the sitting president, Alger Hiss, the administrative architect of both the reorganization of the State Department and the UN, being convicted while spying for the Soviet Union.
It took about 20 years for the Democrats to recover from that disaster, which brings us to 1968 when the Democrats openly joined the communists and assisted them in their war against the United States. That was the year the last substitute candidate, Lyndon Johnson, quit, and subsequently shortly afterward the term "Nixon's war" became the most common term used by the Democrats to describe Vietnam.
Now, which way should we go from here?
Should we go back and look at the factual history of how the Vietnam War began and progressed? Or, should we just move forward in history and learn what the Democrats did to sabotage the United States?

Your choice....

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#8574 Feb 18, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
When?
When the reality that there's nothing left for you to steal in your own neighborhood is impossible to avoid, you you realize that you are incapable of doing anything for yourself. You'll have to steal what you need.

We know you'll be coming to see us. You know you'll be coming to see us.
See you then.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#8575 Feb 18, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Barack Hussien Obama 44th president elected...Twice.
Which makes your conspiracy theories the rantings of a mad man, nothing more.
Obvious to most.
You forgot to put content into your post. All I see is the programmed party line mantra.
Here's the post again for your convenient reference when you discuss the content:

birth certificate: Nobody has seen it yet. The (first) pdf file put up on the White House internet site was the original pdg file the White House created with all the layers where they put the fraudulent information. They were so stupid, the put the file they created up instead of making a copy of the file, then scanning it, and putting up the scan of the copy, which would be like an authentic document.
If for no other reason, they should be thrown out of the White House for being that goddam stupid. But, that is consistent with the stupidity of writing programs to steal 100 percent of the vote, instead of a program to steal one in three or one in four votes.

Muslim ties: Tell us about the Wahabist terrorists from the Muslim Brotherhood routinely visiting the White House.

Terrorist friends: Tell us about Obama ordering all combat against the Taliban to cease and ordering US forces to retreat to the population centers in Afghanistan, then actually stating the Taliban will be part of the future government of Afghanistan, then giving the Taliban safe passage throughout Afghanistan.

You forgot to mention that I call Obama a Marxist communist, dupe.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#8576 Feb 18, 2013
Black Rhino wrote:
<quoted text>
Agreed and Agreed.
I find it hilarious that this president has that kind of power over the weak minded sheep...
... oh, yeah.

Tell us where the money will come from to pay for Obama's government.

Got a problem with that, don't you? You clowns don't even have a plan.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#8577 Feb 18, 2013
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course - our whole country should have been afraid of the democrats losing the election.
But it all turned out for the best, n'est-ce pas?
Well, if this question isn't answered, the government collapses and the existence of the United States will come to an end:

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

I suppose you think collapsing the government is "for the best", n'est-ce pas?

How about you do something patriotic and save the country from destruction. Answer that question. If that question isn't answered, to government collapses.
I suppose you've never been in a country when something like the government collapsing happens, have you?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#8578 Feb 18, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Barack Hussein Obama will also be askerisk in history, as Richard Milhouse Nixon is. The powers that be, don't want the massive Black riots.
... unless it gives them the convenient opportunity to declare an emergency, and put their intended fascist dictatorship into effect.

Riots would very much help the Democrats achieve their agenda. You can bet all that hate speech and diversive propaganda is intended to assist the mentality transition toward social upheaval.

Just read "Das Kapital" and "Rules for Radicals". Everything the Democrats do is in there.
... well, except their idiotic Machievellian idea to mint coins and unconstitutionally exchange them with the Federal Reserve for real money to fund a government outside the authority of the Cosntitution. You can bet those ignorant clowns didn't even know they were taking someting directly from Machievelli's "The Prince".
That's how ignorant the Democrats are.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mitt Romney Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Presidential endorsements: now therea s a touch... 1 hr Will Dockery 5
News GOP at war with itself (Mar '16) 1 hr Tm Cln 2,482
News Who says Mormons aren't Christians? (Oct '11) 15 hr Joanne 32,065
News Conway resumes Romney opposition, says Trump lo... Fri Philosophic 24
News Trump charges, without evidence, millions voted... Thu Trumps 2nd Homewr... 71
News Who cares if Mitt Romney is a sellout? Thu USA Today 1
News Former House speaker Newt Gingrich on Usa Today... Nov 30 AmericanWoman 2
More from around the web