Mitt Romney prepares for negative attacks

Apr 18, 2012 Full story: Fox News 1,460

This is a RUSH transcript from "The O'Reilly Factor," April 17, 2012. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.

Full Story
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#134 Apr 19, 2012
Did you know Mormon Bishops can baptize your deceased relatives as Mormons, without their knowledge? They can go from heaven to some planet where they get to worship Joseph Smith as a "little" god.

You know in your old Christian Bible being like God is what Satan did, but in the Book of Mormon, being like God is cool, it's the WHOLE POINT.

Mormon Bishop Rmoney is a little God ALREADY.

Your vote for him shows your agreement. We should ALL vote for him.
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#135 Apr 19, 2012
Derek wrote:
<quoted text>
You take stupidity to an impressive level. It has to be tremendously hard becoming so dumb.
Up yours, you commie LIBERAL!
Leo

Tulsa, OK

#136 Apr 19, 2012
How do you defeat a democrat president, run a democrat who has an R behind his name. Where can you find one? Silly Massachusetts is full of them. And just for fun, lets make him a Mormon and let watch the dittoheads and tea party crew bow down and worship.
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#137 Apr 19, 2012
harvey wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama isn't perfect, but remember - he's running against Romney. Elect Romney in November and you'll be abusing your kids - and child abuse is a CRIME.
There's more to life than the economy. I'm voting for Bishop Rmoney because of the social issues. I like the flexibility of his priciples.

You dumb LIBERALS just don't get it.

We don't know if Obama is an islamofacist muslim or a Christian.

We KNOW Bishop Rmoney is a MORMON.

I like that! That's REAL CHANGE we can BELIEVE in.

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#138 Apr 19, 2012
The dog on the grill wasn't his dog, that's just how he was raised.
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#140 Apr 19, 2012
Leo wrote:
How do you defeat a democrat president, run a democrat who has an R behind his name. Where can you find one? Silly Massachusetts is full of them. And just for fun, lets make him a Mormon and let watch the dittoheads and tea party crew bow down and worship.
Are you making fun of us???

Obama doesn't have a chance.

Bishop Rmoney is SEVERELY conservative. Didn't you HEAR him????

This is about the future for our children and Mormonism is the ANSWER, socially and economically.

The Book of Mormon is much clearer than the old Bible and vulture capitalism is the BEST capitalism because it involves NO WORK, just moving decimal points.

What could be more Godly?
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#141 Apr 19, 2012
RayOne wrote:
The dog on the grill wasn't his dog, that's just how he was raised.
Yeah, Bishop Rmoney is more of a man. He killed the dog, but he didn't eat it.

The Book of Mormon teaches us that men must be men. Children are responsible for their own lives.

Look at all those smart young girls married to all those all-knowing polygamous old Mormon men.

They are just doing Mormon God's work as the Book of Mormon commands.
Derek

Rancho Cordova, CA

#142 Apr 19, 2012
Makes sense wrote:
<quoted text>
Up yours, you commie LIBERAL!
Hey Mr. internet warrior I served, did you. I employ over 150 americans, whats your contribution.

BTW; I'm an independent.

Thanks again for proving you ignorance.
Derek

Rancho Cordova, CA

#143 Apr 19, 2012
Makes sense wrote:
<quoted text>
Up yours, you commie LIBERAL!
For what it's worth I'd prefer being a commie liberal vs. a mindless imbecile aka social degenerate.

Strive for a better life sir.
Balmy Palmy

Palm Coast, FL

#144 Apr 19, 2012
Romney can handle the negative attacks. He's an intelligent man. B.O. will go on the attack against Mitt because B.O. can't run on any part of his record. Romney wasn't born w/a silver spoon in his mouth. His parents were hard working people who knew how to handle money and invest. B.O. doesn't have the "slightest" when it comes to finances. B.O. is focused on taking $$ from the rich and giving it to the poor -- so we can become a "help me" society. News Flash: Sooner or later the rich will run out of $$. When is the last time you asked a poor person for a job??

Since: Feb 07

Location hidden

#145 Apr 19, 2012
Makes sense wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, Bishop Rmoney is more of a man. He killed the dog, but he didn't eat it.
The Book of Mormon teaches us that men must be men. Children are responsible for their own lives.
Look at all those smart young girls married to all those all-knowing polygamous old Mormon men.
They are just doing Mormon God's work as the Book of Mormon commands.
Sounds to me like the rules of the m.Brotherhood, but that is on the downlow in DC.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#146 Apr 19, 2012
Eric Gustafson wrote:
you were in a coma or not paying attention
The Unemployment rate when Bush came into the White House was 4.0% and rose from 4.0% to 8.2% Jan 2009, From Dec 2008 to Jan 2009 Americans loss 750,000 Jobs.
So far as printing money, you're forgetting TARP Funding and 200 Billion to AIG, and the 2009 Deficit of $1.4 Trillion.
<quoted text>
==========

You have serious defects in your deformed-cavity mind because you do not comprehend and have conceptual clarity in the understanding what subjects are about and how things are.
By perceiving you, from especially when you came across to me of how you thought of what I said in the post, you seem to be having a very unstable and dumb mind .

The following should give some answers________

^&*+)_)^&)_^&+)_^* &+)^*&+)^+*(&
You were talking about Bill Clinton’s period, which is not applicable and appropriate in the comparison of Obama to Bush---My post with here , is the focal point of discussion ABOUT THE RECORD OF BUSH TO THAT OF Obama ===>>>>All about that Obama has increased Unemployment and debts substantially and worsened foreign policy from Bush‘s and forget pulling Clinton in the picture as it was quite sometime ago
During Clinton era, the middle class was still hanging there, and US strength was still mighty.
However, Clinton failed the Taiwan Strait policy ,when China was not strong , from its military to economics.
But Clinton did not utilize US strength properly in respect to overseeing the tension created by China in Asia,
Instead, Clinton started the chaos by calling China AS PARTNERSHIP, WHICH also STARTED giving and yielding to China to make the uprising China ,against free world stand.
Now, the follows comes back to the focus of illustrating what is that all about Obama, compared to Bush.
Bush was supposed to effect change from Clinton’s policy about China ,yet he made it worse, by increasing trade debts to China, and China subsequently rose to second spot in economy from ninth position.
Since Bush did not do it, Obama did not do it wither, by acting the same way.
Here is to compare the Unemployment rate during Bush era --- staying below 8.05% in general with Highest is not more than 8.2% to what has been with Obama------highest unemployment rate of 9.8% for some time---and the time with more than 9.2 5 has been longer than the time with 8.2 %
Recently.
And about debts and other economic matters, from trade debts to China to stand position to China policy, Obama’s record is being viewed as the worst in the history of USA.
It is a misconception and not true that other people think Obama has turned things around , from Bush economics , Iraq and foreign policy while was negative, Obam had made it them to be the worst at all time.
By looking at Obama record so Far to Bush‘s not only Obama did not undo Bush things policies, he has been doing in the same way, and actualized many damages, destruction ,for all the hampering of biggest destruction in anything, Obama would just do them as facts show them all.

JBH

Richmond, Canada

#147 Apr 19, 2012

1 min ago


Eric Gustafson wrote:
you were in a coma or not paying attention
The Unemployment rate when Bush came into the White House was 4.0% and rose from 4.0% to 8.2% Jan 2009, From Dec 2008 to Jan 2009 Americans loss 750,000 Jobs.
So far as printing money, you're forgetting TARP Funding and 200 Billion to AIG, and the 2009 Deficit of $1.4 Trillion.
<quoted text>

==========

Here is taking about Obama and Bush only to demonstrate that Obama is not turning things around from Bush negativity, but has caused worse destruction---FORGET bringing Clinton in THE PICTURE OF DISCUSSION.

Just focus to compare Obama and Bush only_______

Bush was supposed to effect change from Clinton’s policy about China ,yet he made it worse, by increasing trade debts to China, and China subsequently rose to second spot in economy from ninth position.

Since Bush did not do it, Obama did not do it either, by acting the same way.

Here is to compare the Unemployment rate during Bush era --- staying below 8.05% in general, with Highest as not more than 8.2%, to what has been with Obama------highest unemployment rate of 9.8% for some long time---and the time with more than 9.2% has been longer than the time with 8.2 %
recently.

And about debts and other economic matters, from trade debts to China to stand position to China policy, Obama’s record is being viewed as the worst in the history of USA.

It is a misconception and not true that other people think Obama has turned things around , from Bush economics , Iraq and foreign policy while Bush was negative, Obama is more negative and had made them all to be the worst at all time.

By looking at Obama record so Far to Bush‘s, not only Obama did not undo Bush things policies, he has been doing in the same way, and actualized many damages, destruction.

For all the hampering of biggest destruction in anything, Obama would just do them as facts show them all.

“@FrankLeePlain”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#148 Apr 19, 2012
JBH wrote:
Among the good, the bad and the ugly, both Obama and Bush are the bad and the ugly.
However, between the two, Obama makes Bush look like a saint.
If Bush has another term of presidency--i.e., he stays on as the third term, in comparison to Obama to what Obama is doing, Bush stays and Would have :>>>__________based on assessment of Bush's past 8 years by doing his pattern of acts of his trend (See Below):________
( The following situations assume Bush is the president now ongoing)
---------- Bush would not have unemployment rate to 9.8% if he were to continue the presidency as Obama has done it , which stayed for quite a while ---the recent 8.2%.has not been long enough to indicate unemployment would drop substantially , and the overall employment picture is still better for Bush’s situation than Obama‘s === very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
----------Bush would add debts about 2.2 trillion (accounting to the way of trend he added debts previously ) while Obama has add debts of 5.8 trillions accounting the same amount of time for both ===very bad of Obama --poorer than Bush
----------Bush would not over-print money as Obama has done=== very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
----------Bush would give about 250 billion less to GM bailout, compared to Obama’s amounts=== very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
---------Bush trade debts with China would stay at same level while Obama keeps on adding=== very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
----------Bin Laden ==even for Bush , he would finally get Laden because of work of Seal team --but would show pictures if it is true, in comparison of Obama showing of nothing , to make people feeling skeptics of unknown , by saying burning Laden body at sea--why not fetched body to show?=== very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush .
----------Iran ---since Bush had not gone to war, then would go on the slogans as usual, while Obama claimed of War option as not buffing and has alarmed international attention, giving further negative image against US , to make public feeling not wanting, and as War-mongering nation all the time , with world putting down US stage=== very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
--------Iraq--For Bush too, he finally would have to pull out of Iraq by talking the same saying Of Obama---“”Mission accomplished””, AND BY hearing they want to charge him as war criminal as well --no different FOR BOTH ==Obama is empty of any claims .
---------Afghanistan-----Bush would stay around same level of troops, with lesser casualties than Obama extending more, with higher casualties=== very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
----------North Korea--after his father king passed away, the son taking over as new king continues with mean stand, but not that harsh to Bush than to Obama, which complicates the problems dealing with North Korea, with the present Obama.
---------Russia---even for Bush, would not gossip with Runsian president about leaks concerning flexibility to missile system === very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
-------China--even for bush, would not invite and let China VP visitor into the Pentagon, which gives US national security break-down by Obama by doing so === very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
--------Scandals--even for Bush, would not come up with hooker-sex-scandal, as Obama did=== very bad of Obama-- poorer than Bush
++++++++++There are miscellaneous items which are very awful, done by Obama, and as the list is long to describe in details, for all are the same, of terrible serious failures, coming out form a self-defeat person Obama ---being the biggest loser anywhere can find.+++++++++
If Bush had a third term, Osama bin Laden would be alive, and we would be at war with Iran.

“for sure__maybe”

Since: Mar 11

Dubtown Ohio

#150 Apr 19, 2012
JBH wrote:
1 min ago
Eric Gustafson wrote:
you were in a coma or not paying attention
The Unemployment rate when Bush came into the White House was 4.0% and rose from 4.0% to 8.2% Jan 2009, From Dec 2008 to Jan 2009 Americans loss 750,000 Jobs.
So far as printing money, you're forgetting TARP Funding and 200 Billion to AIG, and the 2009 Deficit of $1.4 Trillion.
<quoted text>
==========
Here is taking about Obama and Bush only to demonstrate that Obama is not turning things around from Bush negativity, but has caused worse destruction---FORGET bringing Clinton in THE PICTURE OF DISCUSSION.
Just focus to compare Obama and Bush only_______
Bush was supposed to effect change from Clinton’s policy about China ,yet he made it worse, by increasing trade debts to China, and China subsequently rose to second spot in economy from ninth position.
Since Bush did not do it, Obama did not do it either, by acting the same way.
Here is to compare the Unemployment rate during Bush era --- staying below 8.05% in general, with Highest as not more than 8.2%, to what has been with Obama------highest unemployment rate of 9.8% for some long time---and the time with more than 9.2% has been longer than the time with 8.2 %
recently.
And about debts and other economic matters, from trade debts to China to stand position to China policy, Obama’s record is being viewed as the worst in the history of USA.
It is a misconception and not true that other people think Obama has turned things around , from Bush economics , Iraq and foreign policy while Bush was negative, Obama is more negative and had made them all to be the worst at all time.
By looking at Obama record so Far to Bush‘s, not only Obama did not undo Bush things policies, he has been doing in the same way, and actualized many damages, destruction.
For all the hampering of biggest destruction in anything, Obama would just do them as facts show them all.
The fixability of the mass problem escapes all known solutions fact: The global economy is in turmoil-fact:due to globalization
unemployment will remain high and globalization or businesses going overseas where people will work for 4 dollars and hour.The horse has already been let out it's to late to close the barn door.
ABN Ortiz

Chicago, IL

#151 Apr 19, 2012
There is no negative attacks. They will all be true, at least those that come from the Democrats.
bottlecap

Tampa, FL

#152 Apr 19, 2012
The MSM is in a real JAM here. EVERYBODY who has a working brain knows that they, the MSM SKEWED the Democratic Primary in 2008 in favor of Obama GIVING him the nomination.

Of course, with the Bush albatross around McCain's neck, Obama was sucessful in the General.

Now, with economy in shambles AND intelligent people blaming the MSM for giving Obama the Presidency, the MSM is staring at MULTIPLE Obama scandals and not knowing what to do, as their rapidly shrinking credibility is costing them millions.
Saul

Newport News, VA

#153 Apr 19, 2012
Negative ads like Romney used to destroy Santorum and Gingrich?

Romney never talked about his achievements as Governor.
Balmy Palmy wrote:
Romney can handle the negative attacks. He's an intelligent man. B.O. will go on the attack against Mitt because B.O. can't run on any part of his record. Romney wasn't born w/a silver spoon in his mouth. His parents were hard working people who knew how to handle money and invest. B.O. doesn't have the "slightest" when it comes to finances. B.O. is focused on taking $$ from the rich and giving it to the poor -- so we can become a "help me" society. News Flash: Sooner or later the rich will run out of $$. When is the last time you asked a poor person for a job??
Eric Gustafson

Newport News, VA

#154 Apr 19, 2012
I was correct in my initial assumption. You've been in a coma and, recently have become aware of politics in America.
JBH wrote:
<quoted text>
==========
You have serious defects in your deformed-cavity mind because you do not comprehend and have conceptual clarity in the understanding what subjects are about and how things are.
By perceiving you, from especially when you came across to me of how you thought of what I said in the post, you seem to be having a very unstable and dumb mind .
The following should give some answers________
^&*+)_)^&)_^&+)_^* &+)^*&+)^+*(&
You were talking about Bill Clinton’s period, which is not applicable and appropriate in the comparison of Obama to Bush---My post with here , is the focal point of discussion ABOUT THE RECORD OF BUSH TO THAT OF Obama ===>>>>All about that Obama has increased Unemployment and debts substantially and worsened foreign policy from Bush‘s and forget pulling Clinton in the picture as it was quite sometime ago
During Clinton era, the middle class was still hanging there, and US strength was still mighty.
However, Clinton failed the Taiwan Strait policy ,when China was not strong , from its military to economics.
But Clinton did not utilize US strength properly in respect to overseeing the tension created by China in Asia,
Instead, Clinton started the chaos by calling China AS PARTNERSHIP, WHICH also STARTED giving and yielding to China to make the uprising China ,against free world stand.
Now, the follows comes back to the focus of illustrating what is that all about Obama, compared to Bush.
Bush was supposed to effect change from Clinton’s policy about China ,yet he made it worse, by increasing trade debts to China, and China subsequently rose to second spot in economy from ninth position.
Since Bush did not do it, Obama did not do it wither, by acting the same way.
Here is to compare the Unemployment rate during Bush era --- staying below 8.05% in general with Highest is not more than 8.2% to what has been with Obama------highest unemployment rate of 9.8% for some time---and the time with more than 9.2 5 has been longer than the time with 8.2 %
Recently.
And about debts and other economic matters, from trade debts to China to stand position to China policy, Obama’s record is being viewed as the worst in the history of USA.
It is a misconception and not true that other people think Obama has turned things around , from Bush economics , Iraq and foreign policy while was negative, Obam had made it them to be the worst at all time.
By looking at Obama record so Far to Bush‘s not only Obama did not undo Bush things policies, he has been doing in the same way, and actualized many damages, destruction ,for all the hampering of biggest destruction in anything, Obama would just do them as facts show them all.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#155 Apr 19, 2012
Frank Lee Plain wrote:
<quoted text>
If Bush had a third term, Osama bin Laden would be alive, and we would be at war with Iran.
^&*)_+*(&)_^*&*()_ ^*&+)_*(&+)_^*
Frank Lee Plain wrote:
<quoted text>
If Bush had a third term, Osama bin Laden would be alive, and we would be at war with Iran.
()_)(*)_+)

Why was that?
This is merely reviewed objectively in the context according to the tendency and patterns of How Bush conducted himself during his era, compared to the facts ABOUT Obama showing himself _______(See Below)::____

If it was the Seal team that got Bin Laden, then it was not Obama who got Laden.
But why Seal team burnt Bin Laden body at sea by Obama saying it , that was not the answer by showing no pictures . Laden could have died of illness already long ago.

So if Bush is now the third term president, it is all the same thing , for Seal did it ---but he could present better truth of answers if Seal really did it, than Obama.

If Bush had not gone for war with Iran for 8 years by using slogans only to Iran.

Why would it change as at Bush’s latent (later) period, the war of Iraq already got to him, from people and the world sentiments against him.

As being called a war criminal, under extreme pressure, it was unlikely Bush would go to another war in the region, as another war to Iran, when USA suffered large casualties in Iraq already.

Bush never during his presidency, talked of any situation, or using war option of war to Iran.

There are based on apparent facts and data in economics and foreign policy conducting by Obama, so shown explicitly_____
But Obama has been doing , just like that, by saying not bluffing, for possible war option to Iran recently ..

Among 2 evils of messing up economy , Bush also did better, in employment and debts than Obama, even both were doing the same bad things in the wrong direction .

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mitt Romney Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who is the worst president since WWII ? 17 min mjjcpa 1,103
Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush lead GOP 2016 field 4 hr barefoot2626 35
Tea Partiers Are Right: Jeb Is a RINO Fri Foster 6
A Jeb Bush 2016 Run Would Have Huge Implication... Thu Le Duped 7
Buffett, Gates, and Adelson: Billionaires prod ... Dec 16 swedenforever 3
Ex-Virginia Gov. McDonnell guilty on 11 corrupt... Dec 15 serfs up 28
Wahlberg's plea points up risk of issuing pardons Dec 14 Deo Vindice 2
More from around the web