What you are sure of is irrelevant BS and for sure we are not all dirty morons like you.<quoted text>
Prime ministers are not elected in the UK.
And I have as much say on who will be the next PM as you.
AGAIN, for the hard of thinking - Only after being elected TWICE by popular vote first by constituency and then the party members does a person become leader of their party. Even so, if that entire party does not have the majority public vote the leader cannot become PM. If and only if the party (or coalition of parties) has a popular majority of voters will the position of the leader of that party (or coalition) be approved by the queen.
Why do you have such difficulty understanding the concept of democracy?
Presidents, resign, get assassinated or die naturally, who cares? When they die (for whatever reason) or resign there are replaced, each and very one of them by choice of 2nd best.
Yes, true, Unless my local MP decides to run as party leader and then I may respectfully suggest you are talking out you’re a$$
Nope, lets get this straight you ignorant drippydick cuckold, you make claims but you have not accepted the FACTS as presented to you, there is considerable difference between your pedantic ignorance and proof. Your “proof” of and incident that happened more than 50 years ago is irrelevant to today’s governmental structure.<quoted text>
Actually, I was the one who showed you, bigot, I show you how it works and so far,
Wipe your chin, Skanque.
Still no proof but thanks you puss infested drippy dick cuckold<quoted text>
Most of us men do, Skanque, and we all appreciate everything you do.
Wipe your chin.
You once again appear to have a total blind spot when it comes to Human Rights – Read the convention you ignorant moron. Unlike the US I believe you will find that the UK is a signatory party. It’s no good ignoring it and hoping it will go away, life is not like that<quoted text>
No UK guarantee of freedom of speech.
And do see those examples of recent arrests of persons expressing themselves who were jailed.
And in so expressing themselves were proven in LAW to have acted irresponsibly and to have broken the LAW. That my dear little drippydick butt breath cuckold is the whole idea of the LAW, to protect the public.
GOOD - YOU ARE A DRIPPYDICK CUCKOLD T\/\/AT<quoted text>
I like it when you put things in CAPS.
Before you go to bed tonight look up “mind reading”<quoted text>
When the postman is finished, look up "rhetorical question".
Let me know when you have contradicted what SuperFAG has posted- that the UK is NOT a monarchy.
More trouble, that’s a C you moron, not a G, perhaps you need to get you sight checked out.
Did you see that word LAW?<quoted text>
What about the phrase “necessary in a democratic society”?
How about this real humdinger “in the interests of national security”
Please note that in the interest of national security the US has cart blanch over every US citizen no matter what the constitution says. True you are welcome to argue it in court when (if) you have been released from your government dictated waterborarding sessions but hey, so are we.https://www.rienner.com/upl oads/47e148fd47a65.pdf
You seem to be confused by the concept of responsibly – it is perhaps your schizophrenia or OCD or something like that but more than likely just the basic me, me, me attitude that so many Americans are indoctrinated with at school.