Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#2524 Nov 18, 2012
Face the Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
If Obama created heaven and earth would you then also conclude that calling the grass green and the sky blue is a broad, sweeping accusations without any basis?
Stop acting like one of the blinded obama voters and open your eyes to reality.
Reality..
Obama 332..

Romney 206...

Open your eyes to the reality that you lost. Four more years of teabag tears.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#2525 Nov 18, 2012
OH NO You Did not wrote:
<quoted text>
Obamatons always deny the truth. The only thing you can do is repeatedly prove they are wrong until finally the see the truth.
Truth. He won. Choke on it...
Four more years of teabag tears.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#2526 Nov 19, 2012
OH NO You Did not wrote:
<quoted text>
I have not seen a link by you yet. I read the timelines and seen a failure for this administration to care about the ambassador in a dangerous place.
Check any of the threads on this topic...i've been on them since day one showing you fools what is true and what you've been lied to about.

the pentagon timelines talked about state department procedures previous to the attack? Really? do you even have te slightest clue as to what you are talking about? It's no surprise you are so easily lied to...

Look! Bigfoot!
spud

United States

#2527 Nov 19, 2012
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>She saved Romney from making a bigger fool of himself than he did. i'm surprised someone in te audience didn't google it and tell Mitt he was a fool before Crowley politely took him off the subject...
Crowlet didn't save anything. She knew she helped create what the MSM would characterize as the defining moment of the debate. She knew her liberal collegues would pound Romney with what she helped to create. She was far from an objective moderator. But having said that, Romney was getting alot of bad advise from the neocons that control his party. Stupidity, like their new idiotic idea for supporting amnesty, flows from their mouths far too often. Romney got whupped and If they don't take control of that party from neocon idiots like Bush, Boehner, Graham, Toomey, McConnel etc. etc, they're going to continue to get whupped, in spite of the ridiculous positions of the Ds. Both parties suck. If you don't believe that, just wait and see the bogus fix they come up with for our finances. The great majority of them are gutless weasels.
spud

United States

#2528 Nov 19, 2012
OH NO You Did not wrote:
<quoted text>
I have not seen a link by you yet. I read the timelines and seen a failure for this administration to care about the ambassador in a dangerous place.
But the attack happened at night. You wouldn't expect a good union man like Obama to get out of bed and go back to work when his shift for the day was over.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#2529 Nov 19, 2012
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Crowlet didn't save anything. She knew she helped create what the MSM would characterize as the defining moment of the debate. She knew her liberal collegues would pound Romney with what she helped to create. She was far from an objective moderator. But having said that, Romney was getting alot of bad advise from the neocons that control his party. Stupidity, like their new idiotic idea for supporting amnesty, flows from their mouths far too often. Romney got whupped and If they don't take control of that party from neocon idiots like Bush, Boehner, Graham, Toomey, McConnel etc. etc, they're going to continue to get whupped, in spite of the ridiculous positions of the Ds. Both parties suck. If you don't believe that, just wait and see the bogus fix they come up with for our finances. The great majority of them are gutless weasels.
Crowley could have let Romney ramble on about something he obviously had wrong. he would have looked even more foolish if he had pressed the issue further.

in fact, she gave the media parrots something to focus on other than Romney's blunder.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#2530 Nov 19, 2012
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>she didn't have it. that has been proven. Where have you been?
tired of having your benghazi conspiracy theory shot down and going back to an oldie but goodie?
Proved, horse chit, what's been proven, is that the audio is available and it does not say what Obama and his paid hag tried to claim. It is of no matter now. The children have spoken. Mo candy, mo candy, mo phone mo phone.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#2531 Nov 19, 2012
Le Jimbo wrote:
<quoted text>Proved, horse chit, what's been proven, is that the audio is available and it does not say what Obama and his paid hag tried to claim. It is of no matter now. The children have spoken. Mo candy, mo candy, mo phone mo phone.
Your denial of facts is well documented...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2532 Nov 19, 2012
OH NO You Did not wrote:
I read the timelines and seen a failure for this administration to care about the ambassador in a dangerous place.
Did you read about Stevens being handcuffed and dropped behind enemy lines?

Working for the state department is a dangerous job, dipstick, not unlike being in the military; every administration suffers these kind of losses.

When you get your time machine working- coupled with your 20/20 hindsight, we can eliminate them entirely.

Americans understand Al Qaeda is responsible for these killings.
OH NO You Did not

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#2533 Nov 19, 2012
Mykro wrote:
<quoted text>Truth. He won. Choke on it...
Four more years of teabag tears.
Obamatons always deny the truth. The only thing you can do is repeatedly prove they are wrong until finally the see the truth.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2534 Nov 19, 2012
OH NO You Did not wrote:
<quoted text>
Obamatons always deny the truth.
Obama 332.
Draft dodger Romney = 206
OH NO You Did not

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#2535 Nov 19, 2012
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Check any of the threads on this topic...i've been on them since day one showing you fools what is true and what you've been lied to about.
the pentagon timelines talked about state department procedures previous to the attack? Really? do you even have te slightest clue as to what you are talking about? It's no surprise you are so easily lied to...
Look! Bigfoot!
Obamatons always deny the truth. The only thing you can do is repeatedly prove they are wrong until finally the see the truth.

I proved over and over that you lie and I post the truth with links. You deny the truth from the unbiased sources over and over again. Obama let those people die and then used them as a photo op. Talk about someone with their blinders up.
OH NO You Did not

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#2536 Nov 19, 2012
spud wrote:
<quoted text>Crowlet didn't save anything. She knew she helped create what the MSM would characterize as the defining moment of the debate. She knew her liberal collegues would pound Romney with what she helped to create. She was far from an objective moderator. But having said that, Romney was getting alot of bad advise from the neocons that control his party. Stupidity, like their new idiotic idea for supporting amnesty, flows from their mouths far too often. Romney got whupped and If they don't take control of that party from neocon idiots like Bush, Boehner, Graham, Toomey, McConnel etc. etc, they're going to continue to get whupped, in spite of the ridiculous positions of the Ds. Both parties suck. If you don't believe that, just wait and see the bogus fix they come up with for our finances. The great majority of them are gutless weasels.
IT does not matter as our "Obamatons will always deny the truth. The only thing you can do is repeatedly prove they are wrong until finally the see the truth."
OH NO You Did not

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#2537 Nov 19, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you read about Stevens being handcuffed and dropped behind enemy lines?
Working for the state department is a dangerous job, dipstick, not unlike being in the military; every administration suffers these kind of losses.
When you get your time machine working- coupled with your 20/20 hindsight, we can eliminate them entirely.
Americans understand Al Qaeda is responsible for these killings.
Yep, and Obama let the 4 of them die, then went to take a photo op with them to prove what a great "soldier" he was. Remember, Osama is gone . lol

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2538 Nov 19, 2012
OH NO You Did not wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, and Obama let the 4 of them die,
Ronald Reagan let 241 Americans die in Beirut.

Of course, the difference was: Reagan put them right there in the middle of the bullseye.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#2541 Nov 19, 2012
Yeah the Retarded Troll wrote:
<quoted text>
lol! son...
BoyToy: I understand why you you can't keep an alias, you can say anything that you can be proud of, and as we know you spend all your free time when not on a lap top servicing bathroom clients with the Lassen head bob.
OH NO You Did not

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

#2542 Nov 20, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ronald Reagan let 241 Americans die in Beirut.
Of course, the difference was: Reagan put them right there in the middle of the bullseye.
Sweetie Pie, have you lost your mind? Soldier were targeted by terrorists. You know like the terrorists that attacked the ambassador. You know every time you post you hurt your side with your ramblings. By living your life with such hate it appears that your brain has melted. ROTFLMAO

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#2543 Nov 20, 2012
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Your denial of facts is well documented...
Your lips keep moving but nothing comes out. Come on pookie, prove you got something.

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#2544 Nov 20, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ronald Reagan let 241 Americans die in Beirut.
Of course, the difference was: Reagan put them right there in the middle of the bullseye.
You keep running from the 58 thousand that Johnson got killed.

Since: Feb 08

Hypoluxo Fl

#2545 Nov 20, 2012
OH NO You Did not wrote:
<quoted text>
Obamatons always deny the truth. The only thing you can do is repeatedly prove they are wrong until finally the see the truth.
Truth. He won. Choke on it...
Four more years of teabag tears.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mitt Romney Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush lead GOP 2016 field 9 min Kid_Tomorrow 34
Who is the worst president since WWII ? 2 hr mjjcpa 1,097
Tea Partiers Are Right: Jeb Is a RINO Fri Foster 6
A Jeb Bush 2016 Run Would Have Huge Implication... Thu Le Duped 7
Buffett, Gates, and Adelson: Billionaires prod ... Dec 16 swedenforever 3
Ex-Virginia Gov. McDonnell guilty on 11 corrupt... Dec 15 serfs up 28
Wahlberg's plea points up risk of issuing pardons Dec 14 Deo Vindice 2
More from around the web