You clearly are, but then you could not defend your position from the word go.<quoted text>
Pete and repeat sat on a fence...
are we done yet?
Can you no admit that you cannot indicate ANY legitimate state interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law to marry? If so, then we're done; if not, then you can continue to make a fool of yourself while you offer more rationalizations that fail to establish a legitimate basis for your argument.