Ron Paul seeks breakthrough in Kansas...

Ron Paul seeks breakthrough in Kansas caucuses

There are 11 comments on the Los Angeles Times story from Mar 9, 2012, titled Ron Paul seeks breakthrough in Kansas caucuses. In it, Los Angeles Times reports that:

Hoping to improve on his third-place finish in the Kansas caucuses in 2008, Ron Paul was scheduled to make three campaign stops on Friday and planned to visit four caucuses on Saturday to deliver five-minute synopses of his libertarian agenda.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Los Angeles Times.

Mark

Lenexa, KS

#1 Mar 10, 2012
If Ron Paul was 30 years younger, he'd win. A lot of people agree with him, but if he died in office who would take his place?
Theo

Germany

#2 Mar 10, 2012
Mark wrote:
If Ron Paul was 30 years younger, he'd win. A lot of people agree with him, but if he died in office who would take his place?
Donīt worry, he will not die, he looks really the most healthy among all these candidate. And there are people, who are biologically strong and they have clear, sane minds till 90 or 100.
If he would die, he will have normal VP and normal government and they will take it. Thatīs why normal government is very importnat.
By the way Obama can die too, he smokes ciggarettes. Romney has already dementia, Gingrich can have stroke and Santorum is mentally disabled. And these three smoke cigarettes, I bet.
Theo

Germany

#3 Mar 10, 2012
Mark wrote:
If Ron Paul was 30 years younger, he'd win. A lot of people agree with him, but if he died in office who would take his place?
And the second thing, if Ron Paul would be 30 younger, he would be too young to start as presidential candidate from republican party.
These speculations are very strange. You have one normal candidate and he should get chance and win. You had no objections by voting for Clintons of Bushes or Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, who are responsible for ruining of your country and many other countries, but Paul is good candidate and there are objections immedietely.
He will have good government, good VP and even if he would die ( he is healthy, he will not die )then everything will be o.k. And his son could be the next president in 4 years.
door king

Corpus Christi, TX

#4 Mar 10, 2012
Cockasses, what is this world coming too?
door king

Corpus Christi, TX

#5 Mar 10, 2012
You'd think they'd either be one or the other.
Theo

Germany

#6 Mar 10, 2012
It is very important to have good president and the most important is president, who can think and who is able to create normal government, because majority of job makes just government. President must control it. VP and government is very important. And certainly Ron Paul would be optimal president and he would have normal, good government and normal VP.
Gary

Bellingham, WA

#7 Mar 10, 2012
Paul seeks a breakthrough? You mean he wants to get above 10%? Not likely. Get real. The man is is way too radical for at least 75% of Americans. All
that libertarian nonsense. Crackpot politics. In
normal times Paul would be laughed off the stage.
Chicago Guy

Evanston, IL

#8 Mar 10, 2012
Theo wrote:
<quoted text>
And the second thing, if Ron Paul would be 30 younger, he would be too young to start as presidential candidate from republican party.
These speculations are very strange. You have one normal candidate and he should get chance and win. You had no objections by voting for Clintons of Bushes or Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, who are responsible for ruining of your country and many other countries, but Paul is good candidate and there are objections immedietely.
He will have good government, good VP and even if he would die ( he is healthy, he will not die )then everything will be o.k. And his son could be the next president in 4 years.
1) Paul's 77. He was eligible 30 years ago. Hell, he was eligible 40 years ago.
2) Paul does not have an ice cube's chance in hell of winning the nod.
3) You are not even American, so why the hell are you the biggest Ron Paul troll on Topix?
Theo

Germany

#9 Mar 10, 2012
Chicago Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
1) Paul's 77. He was eligible 30 years ago. Hell, he was eligible 40 years ago.
2) Paul does not have an ice cube's chance in hell of winning the nod.
3) You are not even American, so why the hell are you the biggest Ron Paul troll on Topix?
1.He has no chance, because you are morons, age does not play big role. You have elected 2 alcoholics for your presidents and one junkie till. first make oral sex with a bitch and dropped bombs of people heads, the second was pure alcoholic, who has thought that he is a girl from Texas, third is pure junkie. 2.Certainly that this guy has chances in general elections.
3. because your brainless crowd so called mainstream elects complete morons, who do not destroy only your fu..d country ( it would be no problem, if they would make only this thing, motherfu..s from your country ruin the whole world, you stupid, fu.. ussmen and thatīs why I try to give you good direction, maybe your brains have a defect thatīs why you donīt know, how to vote, because you donīt understand what these people say or you have no imagination and you donīt know what these people do or will do, you are really completely simple-minded and primitive and backward society)If you want to ruin your fu.. country, make it, why donīt you drug another countries with you? Do you think that the next war will be good for ussa, more debts will be best?
Theo

Germany

#10 Mar 10, 2012
Gary wrote:
Paul seeks a breakthrough? You mean he wants to get above 10%? Not likely. Get real. The man is is way too radical for at least 75% of Americans. All
that libertarian nonsense. Crackpot politics. In
normal times Paul would be laughed off the stage.
if you write that somebody is radical, you must check the meaning of this word in vocabulary or in google: www.google.com and write radical.
Radical means person, who supports wars, who is homophobic, who is racist, who is intolerant. Radical is such person, who says: oh, yes we will make now war, we will bomb another countries immedietely, we will make global world war, we will execute all Muslims and another minorities like for instance gays. Radical was Bush, radical is Romney, radical is Santorum, radical is Gingrich. These guys are radicals.Radicalism is conneceted with insenity.
Ron Paul is not radical. It can be said that he is opposite to radicalism. He is liberal or libertarian. He is peaceful, tolerant, sane, intelligent.
But it is just that way, you donīt even know what all these candidates say, because you donīt understand even meaning of basic terms.
Theo

Germany

#11 Mar 10, 2012
Gary wrote:
Paul seeks a breakthrough? You mean he wants to get above 10%? Not likely. Get real. The man is is way too radical for at least 75% of Americans. All
that libertarian nonsense. Crackpot politics. In
normal times Paul would be laughed off the stage.
and additionally radicals are such guys, who say that we will will make wars, we will kill these people, who are according to us terrorist, we will drop bombs on heads of another people and it will solve the problem - just like your all presidents and majority of these GOP candidates say except just R. Paul. R. Paul is completely sane. Donīt you think that maybe it is the last chance for your country to have normal president, who is just not radical, but normal.
Wars and bad foreign politics is just reason of all truobles in your country. And it is not radical, if this man wants to change it, it is the highest time to do it. Now or never.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mike Huckabee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 18 min RiccardoFire 8,360
News CNBC raises the bar for upcoming GOP debate (Oct '15) Aug 10 Cordwainer Trout 13
News Jim Bakker interviews Mike Huckabee on faith, p... (Sep '16) Jul '17 Randy Mc Cay 3
News Perry Can Win If Leadership Trumps Debates (Nov '11) Jun '17 JamieYung 4
News To boycott, or not to boycott over Trumpian 'Ju... Jun '17 Anita Bryant s Jihad 2
News Shock poll: 46% of Mississippi GOP would vote t... (Apr '11) Jun '17 Not 291
News Mike Huckabee to revive his talk show on TBN Jun '17 The real Dan Rather 21
More from around the web