Debbie Rowe -- HaHaHaHa ... I'm Not E...

Debbie Rowe -- HaHaHaHa ... I'm Not Engaged

There are 89 comments on the TMZ.com story from Mar 28, 2014, titled Debbie Rowe -- HaHaHaHa ... I'm Not Engaged. In it, TMZ.com reports that:

We just got off the phone with Debbie Rowe ... who stopped laughing long enough to tell us the story out that she's engaged is "ridiculous and not true."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at TMZ.com.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#27 Apr 1, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
<quoted text> Very plausible theory as well, the woman is dumber than a box of rocks.
She is not dumb..she is a good woman...she still loves him...mean comment...

“Dark Lord of All.”

Since: Jun 13

The Untempered Schism.

#28 Apr 1, 2014
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>She is not dumb..she is a good woman...she still loves him...mean comment...
Loves him? Man that cow was bought and paid for.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#29 Apr 1, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
<quoted text> Loves him? Man that cow was bought and paid for.
Yes she really loves him. That is a mean comment..do you treat all women like that?

“Dark Lord of All.”

Since: Jun 13

The Untempered Schism.

#30 Apr 1, 2014
Jermaine 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Yes she really loves him. That is a mean comment..do you treat all women like that?
She is not capable of even loving her own children. She signed off all her rights as you may recall. Her latest co-guardianship of Paris is for nothing more than publicity. Also note "co" guardianship as she can't be trusted with the real thing. Treat women like what, am I mean? Hell no. Dumb question.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#31 Apr 1, 2014
Stormageddon wrote:
<quoted text> She is not capable of even loving her own children. She signed off all her rights as you may recall. Her latest co-guardianship of Paris is for nothing more than publicity. Also note "co" guardianship as she can't be trusted with the real thing. Treat women like what, am I mean? Hell no. Dumb question.
Yes...she is capable...she let Michael have them...she is not bein phony...she loves her children...I don't think it was a dumb question...you describe Debbie as a cow...unloving.....just made me wonder...forget about it...

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#35 Apr 2, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
MJ hired Marc Schaffel to be executive producer of What More Can I Give, 2001. There was nothing sinister in that.
Now that I finished laughing over your ridiculous post about Marc Schaffel, let's hear your explanation why Michael had Dieter Weisner on his payroll, who owned a brothel.

“Evolution is fab!”

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#36 Apr 2, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
Mind you, thinking about it, she must have really loved him because it takes a special kind of adulation to let your groom share his bed with a young boy on your wedding night. Oooh, maybe that was part of the deal too?
Wacko Jacko spent his first night of marriage in bed with a little boy, instead of Debbie? Crikey's, I thought he only did that to his first wife.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#38 Apr 2, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Now that I finished laughing over your ridiculous post about Marc Schaffel, let's hear your explanation why Michael had Dieter Weisner on his payroll, who owned a brothel.
Brothels are legal in Germany. Weisner wouldn't be the only person to ever owned a brothel and has nothing to do with managing MJ.
persephone

Mountain View, CA

#39 Apr 2, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a blog somewhere on the internet where f'loons discuss Schaffel's films - the ones he made in Hungary, a country that's renowned for its sexual exploitation. Anyway, these particular bloodhounds must have sat through his handiwork because you can almost sense their relief that there doesn't seem to be an underaged male in any of them.
So desperate to exonerate Wacko, they sit through gay porn? Something tells me that you'd really have to be schitting yourself to do something so obsessive. And still they pretend to be confident of his innocence. Yeah, right.
It doesn't prove guilt.

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#40 Apr 2, 2014
persephony wrote:
<quoted text> It doesn't prove guilt.
In other words,'That, in and of itself...'

Thanks for resorting to your hackneyed platitude, Jugsy.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#41 Apr 2, 2014
An NFL Fan wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words,'That, in and of itself...'
Thanks for resorting to your hackneyed platitude, Jugsy.
It doesn't prove guilt..you wish it did.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#42 Apr 3, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Brothels are legal in Germany. Weisner wouldn't be the only person to ever owned a brothel and has nothing to do with managing MJ.
My god. You think there is nothing wrong with a man pimping people, for money? The bigger question you ought be asking is why would Michael want to surround himself with such an unsavory person?

Do not, under any circumstances, ever have children.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#43 Apr 3, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a blog somewhere on the internet where f'loons discuss Schaffel's films - the ones he made in Hungary, a country that's renowned for its sexual exploitation. Anyway, these particular bloodhounds must have sat through his handiwork because you can almost sense their relief that there doesn't seem to be an underaged male in any of them.
So desperate to exonerate Wacko, they sit through gay porn? Something tells me that you'd really have to be schitting yourself to do something so obsessive. And still they pretend to be confident of his innocence. Yeah, right.
So, they sit through gay porn, checking their junk to make sure they have pubes?

Let's see, now. Michael surrounded himself with a gay-porn filmmaker, a brothel owner, and a gangster suspected of child kidnapping and child sexual exploitation. F'loons certainly like to ignore the elephant in the room.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#44 Apr 3, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
My god. You think there is nothing wrong with a man pimping people, for money? The bigger question you ought be asking is why would Michael want to surround himself with such an unsavory person?
Do not, under any circumstances, ever have children.
Where there is a demand there is a need. MJ didn't own brothels, so it's not necessary of you to run him down for something that was none of his business.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#45 Apr 3, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Where there is a demand there is a need. MJ didn't own brothels, so it's not necessary of you to run him down for something that was none of his business.
Dieter Weisner was named as a co-defendant. Obviously, his "entrepreneurial activities" were of great interest. So great, Mesereau didn't want them discussed in the courtroom.

You're an appalling person, Goofvibrations. You defend Pedo Pan at every opportunity, and now you're defending somebody who sold people for sex, in order to make money.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#46 Apr 3, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Dieter Weisner was named as a co-defendant. Obviously, his "entrepreneurial activities" were of great interest. So great, Mesereau didn't want them discussed in the courtroom.
You're an appalling person, Goofvibrations. You defend Pedo Pan at every opportunity, and now you're defending somebody who sold people for sex, in order to make money.
MJ did not own one single brothel and he was no pimp.

Brothels have been legalised in certain places of the globe because a large population of males want the freedom and choice to using them without problems.

Mesereau didn't want the books discussed in court because they weren't relevant to the case. Simples.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#48 Apr 4, 2014
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
MJ did not own one single brothel and he was no pimp.
Brothels have been legalised in certain places of the globe because a large population of males want the freedom and choice to using them without problems.
Mesereau didn't want the books discussed in court because they weren't relevant to the case. Simples.
You think there is nothing wrong with the exploitation of other people's bodies? That is disgusting, on your part. Why would Michael want to associate with a man who ran a place where people's bodies were exploited for the perverse pleasures of others? In Thailand, some of those brothel owners exploit the bodies of children, by renting them to pedophiles.

Shame on you.

Insofar as the books are concerned, they were relevant under Section 1108, Prior Bad Acts, and they were not on the list of 14 items Mesereau wanted kept out of court. But if you know how to read, check this link to find out why Mesereau wanted no mention of Dieter's brothel. It's number 6, and it's on page 8.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Here's Sneddon's response. It's on page 13.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Here's the link to the documents in which the items the D.A. brought to court were listed. The two NAMBLA-recommended books are listed, on page 2.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#49 Apr 4, 2014
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>You think there is nothing wrong with the exploitation of other people's bodies? That is disgusting, on your part. Why would Michael want to associate with a man who ran a place where people's bodies were exploited for the perverse pleasures of others? In Thailand, some of those brothel owners exploit the bodies of children, by renting them to pedophiles.

Shame on you.

Insofar as the books are concerned, they were relevant under Section 1108, Prior Bad Acts, and they were not on the list of 14 items Mesereau wanted kept out of court. But if you know how to read, check this link to find out why Mesereau wanted no mention of Dieter's brothel. It's number 6, and it's on page 8.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Here's Sneddon's response. It's on page 13.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...

Here's the link to the documents in which the items the D.A. brought to court were listed. The two NAMBLA-recommended books are listed, on page 2.

http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/docs/ctdocs/0...
There are some legitimate brothels that provide a service to disabled people of the community. Cripples have sexual needs too. The workers are highly educated sex therapists that don't feel exploited. They help all sorts of people with sex hang ups. They enjoy working under safe and clean conditions and the brothel owners are respected in the communities for providing a much needed service.
Sounds like you need some sex therapy to loosen up Len.

No one under the age of 20 should be sold for sex. Illegal brothels should be shut down because they are havens for all crimes.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#51 Apr 4, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>Len just gave you a plethora of educational links and you ignored them in favour of promoting sex with prostitutes.
MJ's ex manager didn't own those brothels his was legal.
I don't promote crime so cut the crap. Len turns everything into sordid filth. She is aware of all the child exploitation that occurs around the globe but does nothing to stop it. That's because she is a shit stirring fake

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#54 Apr 4, 2014
Jina Wild_ wrote:
<quoted text>What absolute bollocks you write, nasty person that you are. This is an Wacko Jacko forum and despite your racist and cluless trolling, most people post here because of an interest in why he did what he did and how he got away with it.
Within that context, Len's posts are spot on. Away from this forum you have no idea what she does but I'll bet my bottom dollar that she's engaged in more positive activities than sticking selfies on facebook like you do.
MJ got away with nothing because he did nothing.
He led an extraordinary life but that did not make him a villain.
Research as much as you like into MJ but the only thing you will find on him is only within Len's and yours sordid imaginations. Len's stupid court documents proved the great lengths people go to, to lie. None of those documents were accepted in court because of their fictional content.
Have a good look at who you associate with because they may have something hidden in their closet. MJ was a very trusting man that's why crooks took advantage of him

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Wade robson paid by illuminati 6 hr Space ace 29
Jackson family ‘hires detectives to find MJ’s s... (Nov '09) 11 hr The Power Of Mast... 54
Thousands will arrive at Forrest Lawn for Pedop... 11 hr The Power Of Mast... 13
3 people showed up at MJs child hood home! ha ... Mon The Power Of Mast... 4
No family nor fanatics arrived at Forrest Lawn ... Mon Pliez 2
Breaking news! David Anderson aka @sanemjfan w... Mon Spotted Wee 1
The Crickets Chirp On The Dead Michael Jackson ... (Jun '15) Mon The Power Of Mast... 71
More from around the web