James Safechuck Claims Michael Jackso...

James Safechuck Claims Michael Jackson Kept Him Out Of School To Molest Him

There are 766 comments on the 411mania.com story from May 14, 2014, titled James Safechuck Claims Michael Jackson Kept Him Out Of School To Molest Him. In it, 411mania.com reports that:

James Safechuck Claims Michael Jackson Kept Him Out Of School To Molest Him Posted by Joseph Lee on 05.14.2014 Some more details on the accusation... TMZ reports that James Safechuck has provided more details on his claim that Michael Jackson molested him as a child.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at 411mania.com.

Octopus

Clifton Park, NY

#681 Jan 28, 2015
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
MJ never sexualized children in songs because he loved and respected all children. That's something pedophiles never do.
Of course the one can claim Wacko sexualized children in various songs:

Little Susie
Hollywood Tonight
Bille Jean
Dirty Diana
Do You Know Where Your Children Are?
persephone

Mountain View, CA

#684 Jan 28, 2015
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet another post, proving you have not read Kenneth Lanning's profile of a pedophile. What you have described is typical of acquaintance molesters.
Excuse me, but just because you have chosen to give power to make decisions over to Kenneth Lanning doesn't mean that everyone else has.
Octopus

Clifton Park, NY

#685 Jan 28, 2015
persephone wrote:
<quoted text>
Nowhere except in the warped mind of the deluded hater would anyone ever see anything even remotely like the sexualization of children in any of those songs.
Oh really?

The lyrics to every one of those Wacko tunes are on the internet.

Little Susie:

A neglected little girl beaten, raped and then murdered by a pedophile.

Hollywood Tonight:

A young runaway does tricks for men on the sunset strip in hopes to be a movie star.

Bille Jean:

A young groupie claims an old pop star is the father of her baby.

Dirty Diana:

Another young groupie that will do anything to sleep with the band.

Do You Know Where Your Children Are:

Parents have no clue their twelve year old daughter is doing tricks on the street. She gets arrested.

Apparently, all "Little Sister" did was date her older sister's boyfriend when she grew up. You floons are laughably delusional.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#686 Jan 28, 2015
Len is Disgusted wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet another post, proving you have not read Kenneth Lanning's profile of a pedophile. What you have described is typical of acquaintance molesters.
Since when has sexual molestation of children become respectful Len?

You are so f*cked up. Even Kenneth Lanning will tell you that.

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#687 Jan 28, 2015
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Since when has sexual molestation of children become respectful Len?
What sense does that make? You wouldn't happen to be mentally impaired would you?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#688 Jan 28, 2015
Octopus wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course the one can claim Wacko sexualized children in various songs:
Little Susie
Hollywood Tonight
Bille Jean
Dirty Diana
Do You Know Where Your Children Are?
None of those songs are about sexual lust for a child.

It does not change the fact Elvis crooned away lustily in some songs over female children.
Octopus

Clifton Park, NY

#691 Jan 28, 2015
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
None of those songs are about sexual lust for a child.
It does not change the fact Elvis crooned away lustily in some songs over female children.
I have everything Elvis ever recorded, including unreleased stuff like the song, "Wings Of An Angel" which is as dirty as Elvis got. I can assure you that the song is not about little girls. As far as "Little Sister" goes, I find nothing sexual about the lyrics. Even "Baby, Lets Play House" is pretty innocent with the famous line, "I rather see ya dead little girl" I've listed five songs from the clown that are of sexual nature involving pedophilia. Elvis did not sing one of them. I've read the lyrics and in fact, they are about young girls being sexually abused and/or murdered. "Little Susie" could actually be "Little Steve" and "Dirty Diana" could actually be "Dirty Danny" Wacko was definitely a boy lover, but love songs about boys by male pop stars usually would not sell, except for maybe "Ben" Wacko was probably thinking of a rat boy when he recorded it as a child. Your arguments concerning Elvis are laughable because the recording industry back in the fifties through the seventies had to live up to certain standards. For Elvis, it was all rated G material. You are beating a dead horse if you actually think the lyrics to "Little Sister" is about lust. You are a floon and extremely delusional if you think your ridiculous claims over a fifty-four year old rock n roll song is going to have merit. However, lyrics on every song Wacko did are on the internet as well. You are hilarious.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#695 Jan 29, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh come on, pediatricians, teachers.pediatric nurses, foster parents who adopt children from different countries, children's charities....... all these people in some manner can fit Kenneth Lannings profile....are they pedophiles,, please
Oh, puh-lease. Trying to deflect the fact Michael fit the profile of a pedophile, in every possible way, has been noted. Have you even read that document?

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#696 Jan 29, 2015
goodvibrations wrote:
<quoted text>
Since when has sexual molestation of children become respectful Len?
You are so f*cked up. Even Kenneth Lanning will tell you that.
I reread my post. There is nothing in it that says sexual molestation of children is respectful. I don't know how the three brain cells, between your skull, drew that conclusion, but all you have done is prove you are even more daft than I originally thought.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#697 Jan 29, 2015
persephone wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me, but just because you have chosen to give power to make decisions over to Kenneth Lanning doesn't mean that everyone else has.
Kenneth Lanning worked for the FBI, for decades. He specialized in these types of crimes. I'd believe his profile a LOT more than I would believe any f'loon.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#702 Jan 29, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
Evidently Kenneth has more influence over your deluded little mind, than he did the FBI. The FBI closed their investigation after finding nothing that showed Michael touched a child . Stop reading books and stick your head out the window once in awhile. Leinster. the. hamster.
Your belief in yet another ridiculous piece of f'loonspin has been noted. The FBI was brought in for another reason. The report also raised a lot of questions; it did not exonerate your favorite pedophile. Care to tell us what was on the video, about Michael's favorite boys of Neverland Ranch? Care to explain what noises the social worker, in Canada, heard coming from the compartment Michael shared, with a little boy?

I dare you to continue this "debate" with Kenneth Lanning.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#703 Jan 29, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again Jessie. Brett, Frank,Eddie, Mac, even Wade remained friends with Michael up until he died. Unfortunately wade chooses to exploit and embellish the friendship to look like something it was not.
What sweet sentiments you have posted, about Wade. Please insert heavy sarcasm, in that comment.

I don't know what Brett's life is like. But Michael doesn't seem to have helped Frank's, Eddie's, and Mac's lives turn out, very well.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#704 Jan 30, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>Evidently Kenneth has more influence over your deluded little mind, than he did the FBI. The FBI closed their investigation after finding nothing that showed Michael touched a child . Stop reading books and stick your head out the window once in awhile. Leinster. the. hamster.
LOL

“Love and Hugs!”

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#708 Feb 1, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
Debate: mj friend vs Kenneth Lanning
mj friend Good evening sir, May I call you Kenneth?
Kenneth: Sure.
mj friend: Sir, I'd like to start tonight's discussion with child pornography. You state in your profile of a pedophile, that all pedophiles own a massive amount of child pornography. You state that explicit photos of child pornography is found on a pedophiles computer, and in massive quantities of magazines. One of the purposes of owning explicit child pornography is to loosen a child's inhibitions by showing that child pictures of other children in a sexual manner, so that the child.thinks it is okay to behave in such a way. Now my question to you sir is this. Did Michael Jackson own such.child pornography?
Kenneth:,No he did not.
'friend : So it is your expert opinion that Michael Jackson did not fit this criteria, and other criteria of your pedophile of a pedophile.
Kenneth: That is correct.
mj friend : Sir, I have one final question. Do you know a person named Len is disgusted?
Kenneth: Who?
mj friend : Exactly.
Debate concludes: Feb 1 2015
Sure, have another beer. Have several more, in fact. Won't you feel hungover for your commute in the morning?

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#709 Feb 1, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
You can not say anything about Frank and Eddie. What do you know about their lives today?
Frank and Eddie helped produce a posthumous album, for Pedo Pan. The Wacksons and f'loons didn't seem very pleased about it. Frank wrote an apologist's book, about his relationship, with Wackson. It didn't seem to go over very well. I wonder how he reacted when Wackson was acquitted. It meant he didn't have to face a trial, as a co-defendent. Lucky Frank.

I also wonder how he felt about his brother Aldo sleeping with Wackson, during the 2005 trial.

How have their lives turned out well, since involving themselves in bungled projects? Since you claim to know the inside scoop, on the Wackson family and all associated with them, do tell me.

I'm glad you acknowledge Macaulay's life hasn't turned out very well.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#710 Feb 1, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
mj friend: Sir, I'd like to start tonight's discussion with child pornography. You state in your profile of a pedophile, that all pedophiles own a massive amount of child pornography. You state that explicit photos of child pornography is found on a pedophiles computer, and in massive quantities of magazines. One of the purposes of owning explicit child pornography is to loosen a child's inhibitions by showing that child pictures of other children in a sexual manner, so that the child.thinks it is okay to behave in such a way. Now my question to you sir is this. Did Michael Jackson own such.child pornography?
Thank you for revealing the fact you haven't read Kenneth Lanning's profile of a pedophile. Either that, or you're intentionally being untruthful because it's what f'loons want to hear.

http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications...

Thank you for giving me another excuse to post the link!

An NFL Fan

“Brevity is the soule of wit”

Since: May 09

USA

#713 Feb 2, 2015
persephone wrote:
<quoted text>
Clueless, biased, ignorant haters cne big dent in the 'grooming' theory.
'MJ ever specifically showed them any of those books' You've upchucked that weak excuse before.

Do curious pre-teen boys need to be SHOWN such crap, Jugsy? Do you leave porn on your coffee table? No wonder you're registered.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#714 Feb 3, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
I have read it, and he clearly states that all pedophiles own child pornography. He also states that it is found on all pedophiles computers, and is also shown to groom a child to behave in a sexual way.Stop lying, Leinster the hamster. Michael owned no. child pornography.
Had you really read Kenneth Lanning's profile of a pedophile, you would have learned they usually prefer to own books and photos of nude and seminude children because they are legal to own, as opposed to flat-out porn. Didn't Michael own NAMBLA-recommended books of nude and seminude boys? Yes, he did. Didn't Michael have his own personal collection of nude and seminude children? Yes, he did.

As usual, you lose.

“at yet more f'loonspin”

Since: Aug 11

I live far away from f'loons

#715 Feb 3, 2015
persephone wrote:
<quoted text>
Clueless, biased, ignorant haters continue to equate the perfectly legal books he had as something to be used for 'grooming' purposes.
This is especially ridiculous, since no one has ever claimed that MJ ever specifically showed them any of those books, which makes one big dent in the 'grooming' theory.
Do you own books of nude and seminude children? Do you leave porn around, in easy-to-discover places that gawky teenagers could stumble upon? If you don't, does somebody in your family have such material?
A Fan

Elgin, UK

#716 Feb 3, 2015
mjfriend wrote:
<quoted text>
I have read it, and he clearly states that all pedophiles own child pornography. He also states that it is found on all pedophiles computers, and is also shown to groom a child to behave in a sexual way.Stop lying, Leinster the hamster. Michael owned no. child pornography.
It's not true that all paedophiles own or possess child porn at all. Some do and some don't. To say ALL do is incorrect which is to suggest also that paedophiles have absolutely NO control over their behaviour when they do. They can be absolutely patient over long periods of time, for example.

Think about it like this - not all heterosexuals or homosexuals possess or even like porn, legalities aside. This principle holds true for paedophiles - some possess it, some don't while other paedophiles possess either heterosexual/homosexual porn OR a combination of child and heterosexual/homosexual porn. Some possess nothing at all and may get their jollies watching kids from their bedroom window playing in the park across the road.

There is no one size fits all for any one human behaviour as behaviour itself operates along a wide spectrum.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Michael Jackson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Paris Jackson cuts touches down in London follo... 22 hr Jake 2
News Paris Jackson Posts Rare Home Video From Childh... 23 hr Jake 24
News Michael Jackson's secret sister was 'rejected b... Fri Just Me 1
News Profile of a Pedophile: Does Michael Jackson fit? (Dec '08) Feb 15 Philip 64,803
MJloser4life still repeating lies & hate Feb 15 Roger Williams Ra... 11
The Crickets Chirp On The Dead Michael Jackson ... (Jun '15) Feb 14 Jake 109
News Quincy Jones Wasn't Lying About Michael Jackson... Feb 14 Agent Mildew 15
More from around the web